Since the case does not make sense from a psyop, false flag or useful propaganda platform, then the most likely scenario is that one of the guys in the camp was supposedly an FBI undercover agent. Or they thought that he was with massive ties to FBI, Homeland security and maybe even some good connections like the Clintons or the Bushes.
If it there was a public trial, then all of that would get uncovered and it would be embarrassing to explain to the public: "Yeah - he got cash from us, we thought we had an agent in the field, but turns out that he was being an Islamic Jihadi after all and was batshit insane. Our bad...."
Who is more stupid in this instance, the Jihadi or the FBI who gets played by the Jihadi?
I would respect the Jihadi more than those morons from the Deep State.
So it's the lesser evil to raze the compound, release the suspects, put them on a watch-list silently and forget about the entire thing as if it never existed.
If it there was a public trial, then all of that would get uncovered and it would be embarrassing to explain to the public: "Yeah - he got cash from us, we thought we had an agent in the field, but turns out that he was being an Islamic Jihadi after all and was batshit insane. Our bad...."
Who is more stupid in this instance, the Jihadi or the FBI who gets played by the Jihadi?
I would respect the Jihadi more than those morons from the Deep State.
So it's the lesser evil to raze the compound, release the suspects, put them on a watch-list silently and forget about the entire thing as if it never existed.