[Handsome Creepy Eel]

You gotta admit, the idea that inventing agriculture, fire, stone tool or anything basic to civilization is somehow dependent on having either a vagina or a penis is ludicrous. Why does that matter? It's a simple 50-50 chance. If you still don't think that the idea isn't blatant sexism that was filmed only to suck up to feminists, try rewriting your paragraph about the program:

Quote:

I was watching a program on the History Channel last night about the history of man. In this program, it talked about the domestication of plants, and subsequently animals. In hunter-gatherer societies, men do the hunting, and women gather. They brought up the idea of the "Fire Father" (found nothing on it when Googled). The theory is that a man saw lightning strike ignite a dry fallen tree. He then rubbed a rock against another dead tree's bark, sparking a fire and leading to what we call fire.

The availability of light and heat led to a rise in population, as well as better defense against predators. Because humans were now on the top of the food chain, this gave rise to improved hunting (smoking out beasts from their hideouts), and civilization as we know it.

Question: would there be an OUTRAGE at someone suggesting that only men are responsible for civilization?