The Anatolian hypothesis is interesting because all the sources I read, like Razib Khan, Dienekes, Greg Cochran, seem to think the Anatolian hypothesis is not supported by the bulk of evidence. As such I have never really heard the affirmative case for the Anatolian hypothesis in detail, only heard the affirmative case for the Steppe hypothesis and heard the Anatolian hypothesis discredited.
I wonder if my impression, that the Steppe hypothesis is generally more widely accepted, is accurate.
I wonder if my impression, that the Steppe hypothesis is generally more widely accepted, is accurate.