Quote: (06-04-2013 10:45 PM)Menace Wrote:
I still don't understand why the chose such a low annual price point...it makes me think they're not that confident in their brand and what they could potentially offer...or do they feel the women members can't afford it? I mean it really should be around $500/year.
Yeah. $105 isn't restrictive but it's a price point that I think is high enough that those who choose to pay it will actually be active. I think that was what they're getting at by introducing a paying membership system. ASW was having an issue where many members were not active at all (dead weight). I think the annual fee at $105 is an experiment to discourage bullshitters from joining and wasting space.