Quote: (07-21-2012 09:12 AM)ccurtis189 Wrote:
Quote: (07-21-2012 05:48 AM)Architekt Wrote:
blockedurl made a post about something like this yesterday
That was a pretty shitty anti-choice argument made by an overcompensating dick.
They have the ultimate say because they're the one carrying the fetus. It's in order to prevent less deadbeat dads from running away from responsibility. After all, a woman has three holes, not one!
"It's in order to prevent less deadbeat dads from running away from responsibility." What is the "it's" referring to in that sentence?
I think what naughty nomad was getting at, really, was that if women have the right to keep or kill a fetus while the man has no say, a man should have the right to not pay anything more than a one time fee equal to the cost of an abortion.
I agree with that. This isn't 1850 after all.