[jeffreyjerpp]

(12-10-2018 10:10 AM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(12-09-2018 11:46 PM)TIOT12 Wrote:  

(12-09-2018 02:54 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

If you bring this up to a woman she will usually respond with "you can't raise children on one income anymore". Kinda true, I guess.

The answer is that we did it the past and can do it again. If a lot of women decided to have kids and opt out of the workforce, you would see governments and other institutions adjust to that new reality with programs to support it. There is no way government leaders would ignore that new voting bloc.

Well, not only that, if the whole country decides that one parent stays home to take care of the kids, be it the man or the woman, you take away half of the labor force. So the remaining labor would be worth more, as there would be less supply of labor. Every person remaining in the labor force would get a raise.

In a sane world, tax structures would be wildly skewed to favor married couples with children, and a populist/nationalist government would demand that production of goods sold inside a country takes place inside a country.

This would:

-Instantly transfer wealth/power from pozzed oligarchs like Jeff Bezos to his employees
-Incentivize women to stop slutting it up, since marriage would reemerge as a social norm
-Make the American dream achievable for the middle class
-Fix declining population and other destructive demographic trends
-Massively benefit children, who would have high levels of parental attention and stability growing up

It seems Eastern Europe is the only part of the world that really "gets it", so it might be time to relocate there in a few years.