I think what this incident teaches is, the feminists have not given up or lost their ability to attack us just because Trump won. Trump is not explicitly a part of the manosphere, so it's unlikely that he would be defending people just for being antifeminist. He didn't leap to the defense of Milo Yiannopoulous either, even though Milo said that feminism is cancer.
This incident is both good and bad, because on the one hand, it could make other antifeminist candidates reluctant to run, but on the other hand, it did draw some attention to the red pill. In a way, we're a victim of our own success in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton did the alt-right a favor by publicly denouncing the alt-right and drawing attention to its existence in a way that acknowledged its relevance. When people attack you, it gives you a public platform, which is perhaps part of the reason why Corey Stewart is focusing his campaign on defending Confederate monuments. (Remember also how Ben Carson pleaded, "Can somebody attack me, please?")
The main advantage of electing Trump is that at least he's not attacking us. So we have some rest that allows us to formulate and share our ideas amongst ourselves in peace. It's like trench warfare, though, where the lull in hostilities is conditioned on our keeping ourselves hidden out of the line of fire, rather than leaping above the parapet to try to take any more ground. If someone like Fisher puts himself in an exposed position, he will be attacked. Meanwhile, the enemy is also always looking for some way to break the stalemate in their favor.
It seemed like Trump's election was a successful rebellion against political correctness, and maybe it was. But the leftists will continue trying to tear him down so they can get the last word in the matter. For example, in 2017, they're going to try to win state and local elections to send a message that the tide is turning. They've already won a moral victory by
flooding the races with openly feminist candidates, while we have put forth comparatively few openly antifeminist candidates.
Notice how the left now is propagating a narrative that Hillary Clinton ran an exceptionally bad campaign, and that was why she lost. In other words, it wasn't that Trump's ideas were good, or that Hillary's were bad, but rather, her campaign just didn't express her ideas effectively. They're analyzing it and listing all the mistakes in detail so that they can say, "We now have a full understanding of what went wrong, so next time will be different."
They're going to try to win the 2020 Presidential election to send a message that, although the wheels of progress turn slowly sometimes, and there are occasional temporary setbacks, ultimately they were able to prevail against the deplorables, because right is stronger than wrong.
Meanwhile, on the Wikipedia front, they were
describing TheRedPill as misogynistic, saying that it's not opinion but rather fact backed up by reliable sources. If they can make it seem like it's an established consensus reality that TheRedPill has been objectively proven to be misogynistic, then it makes it easier to do stuff like shut down the subreddit as a hate site.