Late in the discussion, but continuing on what DoBA and Paracelsus wrote and which might again seem conspiratorial, controversial and there is no way that we can actually prove it. But here it goes:
As we know the western society in which we live in has foregone its traditional values to become a hypersexualised society. As with everything else in life, this so called progressive and liberalised society has advantages and disadvantages. For example, access to sex without commitment (good for all of us here in the forum), but as we also know the riding of the carousel creates women with a lot of baggage; this tends to mess up a womans' capability to pair bond with their future husband and partner (beta bucks). This is show in the statistics of divorce rates of non-virginal women.
Another aspect which we need to consider is that this liberal society, the Bonobo masturbatory society as Jack Donovan (The Way of Men) puts it, creates boys and not men - For those who do not know, the Bonobo is a primate similar to the chimpanzee which is very matriarchal. Due to the lack of struggle - they do not need to hunt because they are mostly vegetarians, they have no natural predators, because their habitat is pretty secluded - they live a very hedonistic lifestyle, where women are in charge. Homosexuality, male and female, is common practice and sex is seen as a way to diffuse conflicts within the groups. The lack of real struggle in western civilization, where most of us have all our needs met, food, shelter, clothing, etc. is allowing us to live a hedonistic lifestyle similar to that of the Bonobos. Women have more and more freedom, while men are being shamed for having natural male urges and behaviors. As Heartiste puts it:
The feminist goal is removing all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.
In this Bonobo society, boys are growing up without masculine male role models, because their fathers might be pussy wiped, emasculated, betas, whatever you want to call it; women wear the pants and are in charge. In addition to this, the encouragement by the media and general population to be in touch with their feminine side, and that it's okay to be gay (which it is as long as it's not rubbed in my face, and there are without a doubt, as Paracelsus puts it, a tiny proportion of the population who are genetically wired to fuck butt or lick carpet. However, not as much as we tend to see in society) has had, as we've seen, a significant impact and creates a lot of confusion in some more impressionable young men.
We therefore end up with passive boys who are in touch with their feminine/nurturing side, who still want/need sex, love and intimacy. However, these boys cannot get girls, because they've been sold a reality of women that is incorrect, and what they have been taught throughout their lives doesn't really work, AKA blue pill. The fact that the price of pussy is so high and that women no longer want good/kind men until they are ready to settle down doesn't help the situation.
In addition to this, normal male friendship and affection has been sexualised to the point where we have to use terms such as NoHomo to describe the non-romantic love for another man. See this link from the Art of Manliness of a not too distant past
(Link).
So when these men find good companionship with other guys, they sexualise it, because that's the time we live in, they think they are gay/bi, or whatever other letters they want to use, and make it their identity.
The consequences of this have yet to be studied...