Quote: (05-12-2019 01:55 PM)911 Wrote:
Quote: (05-12-2019 11:23 AM)debeguiled Wrote:
Quote: (05-12-2019 01:46 AM)911 Wrote:
Quote: (05-11-2019 08:48 PM)bbgun Wrote:
Strange guy. Obsessed with Peterson, Shapiro and Joooooos in general, while throwing roses at the feet of Putin. And for a man who complains about deplatforming, he bans and moderates posts with the best of them.
This is the kind of putdown that really validates the quality of Vox' work.
How?
Putin global supervillain boogeyman, Corbyn-Omar raging antisemites, as is everyone who dares touch Our Greatest Ally with a 10' pole or just notice what's going on... Haters coming from that cucked RINO-MIGA mindset, as seen in post above, are a good indication that Vox is being on target.
Still don't see it. Okay, he criticizes the 'cosmopolitans' when others won't. Fine.
The criticism you are responding to is questioning his character, not addressing the finer points of his views.
Day's problem is that he comes across as oversensitive, weirdly obsessed with guys like Peterson to the point that any old criticism will do, and extremely quick to ban people and call them gammas.
To use an old game term, he is extremely uncalibrated, and seeing him on his darkstreams, he is defensive and prickly even with his supporters, and seems about to snap any time someone makes a comment he doesn't like. He speaks at length about his genius and superiority with apparently no awareness that truly superior people don't need to do this.
His eyes look shifty and bad, as if he can't bear to look at the camera. I know people will start bleating that ad hominems are fallacies or whatever, but come on.
This is like reading a pick up book that sounds good and then when you see the guy who wrote it you immediately sense alarm bells going off. He is such a sad little man!
Any criticism like this gets dismissed as a 'putdown' like you dismissed it, when this is one of the main ways we decide about who to listen to and who to believe. Do they seem like the kind of person they claim to be?
And then you do the very thing you are criticizing other people of doing, making a sweeping character assessment of the person criticizing and saying their very form of criticism is a validation of Day's writings.
That doesn't make sense. Even if the person is doing exactly what you are saying they are doing, it still doesn't validate anything about Day, it only makes the guy doing the criticizing look bad.
You don't even address BBgun's criticisms, just dismiss him with your own putdown (cucked RINO-MIGA).
To address it, you would have had to explain the state of near rage and obsessiveness that Peterson seems to draw out of him, and his itchy ban hammering and gamma shaming that comes across as serious projection.
It isn't really effective though to dismiss someone using the same technique you are criticizing though.
“The greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents.”
Carl Jung