All who speak/learn russian must watch:Russian Red pill blog: Russian is orginal lang
09-17-2014, 03:18 AM
I want to introduce you all to my favorite Red pill Russian blog that I fallow:
http://www.fit4life.ru/ by Dennis Borisov
This blog deals mainly with bodybuilding and nutrition but also touches many other subjects like red pill relationship advice, exposing feminism (he calls it matriarchy), teaches men to be lovers and not providers.
He also talks about topics you cannot hear in anglosphere. Of particular interest to me is this video in which he demonstrates how Russian language may be the original european language. This contradicts many thing we were taught in history at school, but as we all know history is written by winners.
Basically he reveals that many English words have their roots in Russian suggesting that in past Russian influence was much wider then official history admits.
I am not sure what to think of this. He may be just spilling Russian propaganda, but on the other hand he is right in that for me being a natural Russian speaker it is easier to learn and understand other languages like English and German - even easier than to English and Germans themselves because I kind of intuitively know how the English words have originated. It is also logical that the Russian being probably the most rich and complicated language in the world with many tenses, would be the original and the simple flat English would be a very derrived. According to his theories Latin is basically a made up language fabricated in somewhere 17th century to conceal that Modern western languages have come from Russian and so the myth of Rome and Latin language was created. He argues that Rome was actually a proto-Russian civilization with an actual center in Constantinople.
More about his view on real (alternative) history:
This is a must watch for everyone who speaks or learns Russian. I would like if anyone could make any arguments for or against what is said here because it has left me puzzled. Everything he says seems wrong from historic perspective as we know it, bet everything he says seems legit from linguistic perspective. You will never believe him if you cannot speak Russian. But if you know Russian then it will make you question many things.
http://www.fit4life.ru/ by Dennis Borisov
This blog deals mainly with bodybuilding and nutrition but also touches many other subjects like red pill relationship advice, exposing feminism (he calls it matriarchy), teaches men to be lovers and not providers.
He also talks about topics you cannot hear in anglosphere. Of particular interest to me is this video in which he demonstrates how Russian language may be the original european language. This contradicts many thing we were taught in history at school, but as we all know history is written by winners.
Basically he reveals that many English words have their roots in Russian suggesting that in past Russian influence was much wider then official history admits.
I am not sure what to think of this. He may be just spilling Russian propaganda, but on the other hand he is right in that for me being a natural Russian speaker it is easier to learn and understand other languages like English and German - even easier than to English and Germans themselves because I kind of intuitively know how the English words have originated. It is also logical that the Russian being probably the most rich and complicated language in the world with many tenses, would be the original and the simple flat English would be a very derrived. According to his theories Latin is basically a made up language fabricated in somewhere 17th century to conceal that Modern western languages have come from Russian and so the myth of Rome and Latin language was created. He argues that Rome was actually a proto-Russian civilization with an actual center in Constantinople.
More about his view on real (alternative) history:
This is a must watch for everyone who speaks or learns Russian. I would like if anyone could make any arguments for or against what is said here because it has left me puzzled. Everything he says seems wrong from historic perspective as we know it, bet everything he says seems legit from linguistic perspective. You will never believe him if you cannot speak Russian. But if you know Russian then it will make you question many things.