IRT teaches us what to do when women are drunk


Real men don't rape.

WYHDSW?
(Would You Have Drunken Sex With ? )

Whether or not some is a man has no distinct corellation to whether or not they perform rape.

Women can rape too.

Quote: (05-23-2014 09:50 AM)soup Wrote:  

Whether or not some is a man has no distinct corellation to whether or not they perform rape.

Women can rape too.

It's called " He could not have been raped, if it was the case he would have fought against her and/or not have an erection" . Or if it was a young boy "He should be grateful a woman taught him about sex, when I was his age I did not get that"

If she ain't fucking she's got to go. I ain't running a flop house.

It is common among tribal and primitive cultures to raid other tribes and rape their women.

Every single human being on the planet is a descendant of a rapist.

Think about that.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:12 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

It is common among tribal and primitive cultures to raid other tribes and rape their women.

So is cannibalism in some cultures. What's your point?

Quote:Quote:

Every single human being on the planet is a descendant of a rapist.

Think about that.

So?

Quote: (05-23-2014 09:52 AM)mikado Wrote:  

It's called " He could not have been raped, if it was the case he would have fought against her and/or not have an erection" . Or if it was a young boy "He should be grateful a woman taught him about sex, when I was his age I did not get that"

Actually I totally agree with that. Even if a man is somehow too weak to put up a physical defense against a woman, I don't see how it's possible that a man has nonconsensual sex and keeps an erection at the same time. Even if he's drugged with viagra, he needs to have arrousal to get a boner. The odds that a man is both physically too weak to resist a woman and also mentally too weak to control his boner when he really doesn't consent to sex, are just too damn low to be worth consideration. Same goes with sexual harassment. There is no way a woman can sexually harass you when you can slap her away like a mosquito.

I will go one step further and say a man is NOT justified to hit back when a woman hits him, just like you should not hit back a kid who hits you, simply because kids and women are like dwarves in comparison to men, the giants. How?

A woman's upper body is only HALF as strong as a man of equal weight. And that's only if he's equal weight, meaning 50 kilos or something. Considering an average weight gap of 20-30 kilos between men and women, only whiny MRAs should complain about men assaulted by women.

This dude needs to mind his own house before talking shit.

Relevant:

   

Ghengis Khan. Great man. Warrior. Father to thousands. They even built a Great Wall to honor him

Quote: (05-23-2014 09:50 AM)soup Wrote:  

Whether or not some is a man has no distinct corellation to whether or not they perform rape.

Women can rape too.

Soup is right. One of my ex lizards, her friend raped her boyfriend. Got him drunk, pilled up and asked him if he wanted to play bondage. She tied him up and then buggered him with one of her strap ons. They (the lizard and the female rapist) all laughed about this over drinks.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:36 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

Ghengis Khan. Great man. Warrior. Father to thousands. They even built a Great Wall to honor him

That's what I think everytime I hear this phrase. I think that rape is a terrible crime but at the end of the day who's a real man - Genghis Khan and countless other invaders throughout history? Or a nice-guy hipster who tucks a drunk girl into bed instead of taking advantage?

Disclaimer - I would tuck the girl into bed too. I don't think raping a woman makes you a real man.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:33 AM)turkishcandy Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2014 09:52 AM)mikado Wrote:  

It's called " He could not have been raped, if it was the case he would have fought against her and/or not have an erection" . Or if it was a young boy "He should be grateful a woman taught him about sex, when I was his age I did not get that"

Actually I totally agree with that. Even if a man is somehow too weak to put up a physical defense against a woman, I don't see how it's possible that a man has nonconsensual sex and keeps an erection at the same time. Even if he's drugged with viagra, he needs to have arrousal to get a boner. The odds that a man is both physically too weak to resist a woman and also mentally too weak to control his boner when he really doesn't consent to sex, are just too damn low to be worth consideration.

I guess if a woman drugs you and shoves an inanimate object up your ass while your unconscious, that makes it OK since you didn't have an erection??? Also, this ignores the fact that people can be physically aroused without actually wanting sex. This is the same justification pedophiles who have molested young boys, saying "oh, he had an erection, he must have wanted to be molested." Human psychology and physiology aren't as simplistic as you make them out to be.

Quote:Quote:

Same goes with sexual harassment. There is no way a woman can sexually harass you when you can slap her away like a mosquito.

That's again assuming that harassment is just a matter of one person being able to overpower the other. I don't think you've really thought this through.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:36 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

They even built a Great Wall to honor him

Actually, the Great Wall was built about a millennium before Genghis Khan as even born.

delete

If she really drank that many beers, she's going to be getting up every 20 minutes to piss like a mule, or ...he's going to have a urine soaked mattress for the next two months.

Haha tuthmosis is the master of irt jpegs.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:06 AM)vinman Wrote:  

If she ain't fucking she's got to go. I ain't running a flop house.

I think that would be the best course of action in this case. Wake her up, tell her she's gotta go (unemotionally).

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:41 AM)Sargon of Akkad Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:36 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

They even built a Great Wall to honor him

Actually, the Great Wall was built about a millennium before Genghis Khan as even born.

Did they really? I thought thought the point of the Great Wall was to keep Mongolian invaders out of China. I guess they've been raping and pillaging for a long time.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:53 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:41 AM)Sargon of Akkad Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:36 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

They even built a Great Wall to honor him

Actually, the Great Wall was built about a millennium before Genghis Khan as even born.

Did they really? I thought thought the point of the Great Wall was to keep Mongolian invaders out of China. I guess they've been raping and pillaging for a long time.

Those were the Xiongnu, also a nomadic people in what later would become Mongolia. They're believed to be more related to the Huns who pillaged Rome much later.

The Great Wall was assembled (from smaller, pre-existing walls) around the 3rd century BC. The Mongol Empire didn't start until around the 13th century AD. They conquered China and Genghis' descendants simply adopted Chinese culture and fashioned themselves into a Chinese dynasty. Nothing to do with the Great Wall.

Quote: (05-23-2014 10:41 AM)Sargon of Akkad Wrote:  

I guess if a woman drugs you and shoves an inanimate object up your ass while your unconscious, that makes it OK since you didn't have an erection??? Also, this ignores the fact that people can be physically aroused without actually wanting sex. This is the same justification pedophiles who have molested young boys, saying "oh, he had an erection, he must have wanted to be molested." Human psychology and physiology aren't as simplistic as you make them out to be.

When I wrote this as a reply to Mikado mentioning man-rape-erection connection, surely I excluded this kind of extreme shit like a woman tying you up and sticking some objects in you or hitting you in the head with a shovel and sucking you What I meant was straight sex. A man forcing himself on a woman can is just not comparable to a woman forcing (how?) herself on a man, and such extreme scenarios above are exception without me having to say it. Btw, comparing this to pedophilia is comparing apples to banana boats.

Personally, If a woman raped me (just straight sex, no up in the ass or shovel in the head shit), I wouldn't compare myself to a female rape victim, or pedophilia victim. I might even be flattered and tell the story to my friends.

Great Wall was built by Qin Shi Huang, the one who united the seven kingdoms to keep the northen barbarians at bay, seven kingdoms, the wall, shit, that sounds familiar.

I've watched a chinese tv series about Gengis Khan before and all I remember is goat milk.

Quote: (05-23-2014 11:11 AM)Felix88 Wrote:  

Great Wall was built by Qin Shi Huang, the one who united the seven kingdoms to keep the northen barbarians at bay, seven kingdoms, the wall, shit, that sounds familiar.

Holy shit, I had never even bothered to make that connection before.

Quote: (05-23-2014 11:05 AM)turkishcandy Wrote:  

When I wrote this as a reply to Mikado mentioning man-rape-erection connection, surely I excluded this kind of extreme shit like a woman tying you up and sticking some objects in you or hitting you in the head with a shovel and sucking you What I meant was straight sex. A man forcing himself on a woman can is just not comparable to a woman forcing (how?) herself on a man, and such extreme scenarios above are exception without me having to say it.

Rape is defined as sex with an unconsenting partner, whether or not that includes "straight sex" or forced Penetration with an inanimate object doesn't matter. Plus, as I've already said, you didn't take into account the fact that it's possible to be physically aroused without actually wanting sex. A man who's drugged is by all means capable of being raped.

Quote:Quote:

Btw, comparing this to pedophilia is comparing apples to banana boats.

No it isn't. Either way, the main point of that statement wasn't pedophilia as much as it was the fact that men and boys can be physically aroused without actually desiring sex.

The whole video looked like some white knight fantasy.

Girl comes over talks about breaking up with her bf and then passes out drunk on his bed then he gets to be her prince charming by putting her to bed unharmed. I'm waiting for the second part of the video where she wakes up and gets back with her boyfriend with that guy standing there dick in hand.

Also i'm not advocating the guy raping her but he is the sexless innkeeper as people have posted before.

About how women "rape" men, I wouldn't consider it rape but after every Friday and Saturday night there are guys waking up next to a fatties, after being too drunk and "thirsty" to properly think about the situation. Its funny that after a situation like this a guy probably comes to the conclusion he needs to reign in his drinking while a girl thinks she was "raped".

I've had a girl ride me with me being basically asleep from working a double shift, and another ride me while I was passed out drunk. I just had a softy and she still went to town with it, the other time she was basically just humping my junk.

The whole you need a boner for male rape thing is reverse propaganda to only vilify men. Now I "consented" to fuck those two women I passed out because I was horny, but I was far from physically able to actually fuck. If the roles were reversed for my two cases it would be deemed rape even though I "consented" by taking my clothes of and getting BJs from both those broads.

So since Kosko is a two time rape victim... Where are my cookies and my TEDx Talk. I should start trolling feminist rape talks then since (by their own shitty definitions) I have been raped, twice!

Drunken sex is not rape. If you buy food from McDonalds while drunk and regret feeling like a fattie the next day, does that mean McDonalds stole from you?

Likewise, if a woman has sex with some man while drunk and regrets feeling like a slut the next day, does that mean the man raped her?