Quote: (04-05-2014 08:30 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  

Most people I know getting anything (bangs or gfs) online do so off twitter, fb and IG.

Traditional dating sites = night game online
Regular sites = Day Game

LOL your signature!

I want to see a case study on this and other examples of micro fame game.

I don't think it would be too difficult to be twitter famous. Maybe someone here can try it.

This new generation is too lazy to create content. All you have to do is tweet things people would agree with and you get retweets.

I could do ten of these a day

Quote: (04-05-2014 05:13 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Bangs 200 girls from Twitter.... does photo-op with woman old enough to be his mom.

I'd hit that... nothing wrong with an older woman as long as used correctly

Quote: (04-05-2014 10:16 PM)magellan Wrote:  

I want to see a case study on this and other examples of micro fame game.

I know a guy whose has somewhere over 50,000 followers on tumblr. If a girl in Australia in her late teens or early 20's has a tumblr and likes indie music or is part of that scene she probably follows him. He started blogging maybe 4 years ago, and racked up a lot of followers because he made a lot of band GIF's and has a memorable band related url. He's of average height, kinda chubby and below average looking but has a very long curly fringe that girls dig. Dude is a massive beta and his voice literally sounds gay (he posts videos from time to time so his fans know this), but he gets a ridiculous amount of pussy on a platter from his followers online and in real life, he gets recognized by fans most nights he goes out, especially at gigs. The crazy thing about it all is that these girls literally ONLY like him because they know he has so many followers on tumblr. They rationalize it by saying they like his blog or his hair, but really his fame is the only attractive thing about him. I don't even like the guy but when his fans find out I know him I get a "DHV" by association.

Thanks to his fame he landed a 6.5-7 girlfriend for a while who he already knew through social circle and now lives in a sharehouse with a few hot girls, but that's it. A lot of his fans actually started to "ship" him and an equally tumblr famous female art blogger in our city who looks like she could be one of those exotic faced catwalk models (as opposed to conventionally beautiful), she actually became attracted to him but for reasons unknown to me he turned her down, which was a shame because when I met her I figured she was slutty.

If he had just basic game he could have a regular flow of cute young girls on his dick, but alas his internet fame is virtually completely wasted.

Roosh has said the future of game is fame + steriods + spam approaches.

I think he may be right - at least on the first.

The Franco thread and this show that fame can lead to massive abundance.

What that article in the OP's post horribly fails at is telling us how this guy built a massive social media following. If the article were written by anyone in the manosphere, our first thought would have been to break down his game.

There as a lot of twitter accounts with mass followers, but not all are by regular(ish - he's a TV producer with a clothing line - dude gets media) dudes of meh looks, and not all convert their followers into social proof and pussy.

If niche fame is the next level of game we need to start breaking it down. I'm all ears.

The biggest thing I've noticed is just to be there.

1. Put out easily digestible content
2. Make easily relatable content(media, writing, etc)
3. Be an early adopter of a social network

The early adopters of insta, tumblr, etc who put out content all have fans.

Quote: (04-05-2014 04:57 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

Great story but very few men could survive the drama of 200 woman in one year and make it out alive...

No to mention , online girls flake the most . Sometimes I stack three dates on a Saturday night and watch the excuses come .

Quote: (04-06-2014 01:43 AM)Valhalla Wrote:  

The biggest thing I've noticed is just to be there.

1. Put out easily digestible content
2. Make easily relatable content(media, writing, etc)
3. Be an early adopter of a social network

The early adopters of insta, tumblr, etc who put out content all have fans.

What are the early networks now we should be adopting?

He got people by mass following loads and he recycles tweets, it's simple what he does, he followed me once.

I don't believe that much in this story. If he would be so successful, he would know that boasting in a tabloid in the way he did will really not help his prospects. Come on, showing private phone messages, and that picture with the not-so-bangable-MILF? ahah

Quote: (04-07-2014 06:33 AM)Frank Mackey Wrote:  

boasting in a tabloid in the way he did will really not help his prospects.

Have you seen the replies from chicks in the last couple of days? I'd say it does help him.

Quote: (04-07-2014 08:55 AM)casio Wrote:  

Quote: (04-07-2014 06:33 AM)Frank Mackey Wrote:  

boasting in a tabloid in the way he did will really not help his prospects.

Have you seen the replies from chicks in the last couple of days? I'd say it does help him.

I checked his twitter briefly, and continue to think he's a troll. Now he's boasting that 100 of the girls, he did not meet through twitter. I always find rather non-sense to boast about numbers in this way. 200 women? who cares... I would be more than happy to bang 20 cool and attractive girls per year and maintain some micro-relations with a few of them, the rest of the time I have other things to do in my life

Sure, it wouldn't be for me neither. Although he does say the daily mail (?) misquoted him, which is something I would believe for a sensation story like this.
Still, there are some nice girls sending some very insinuating texts to him, so I don't know why it wouldn't be true.
200 in life (let's say 160, just because) over 4 years isn't infeasable by any means.

Preselection. Women want what other women want. If 50k other woman want a guy, what greater gift to herself than to bang him?

The greatest gift a woman can receive from a man is the gift of self-esteem. I am sure as fuck these girls dying to be conquered by him are directed to do so by that desire.

Props to him, he's found an angle that works for him. I would definitely have a beer with him if he came to my region.

He could have done great numbers but I don't believe he has done 200.

I don't get why people are hating on him. Insofar as he has gotten several lays from Twitter without being a celebrity beforehand, he has something to teach us. I don't know shit about getting laid off Twitter, do you?

It would be interesting to see how replicable his hustle is.

Quote: (04-06-2014 01:15 AM)Deluge Wrote:  

Quote: (04-05-2014 10:16 PM)magellan Wrote:  

I want to see a case study on this and other examples of micro fame game.

I know a guy whose has somewhere over 50,000 followers on tumblr. If a girl in Australia in her late teens or early 20's has a tumblr and likes indie music or is part of that scene she probably follows him. He started blogging maybe 4 years ago, and racked up a lot of followers because he made a lot of band GIF's and has a memorable band related url. He's of average height, kinda chubby and below average looking but has a very long curly fringe that girls dig. Dude is a massive beta and his voice literally sounds gay (he posts videos from time to time so his fans know this), but he gets a ridiculous amount of pussy on a platter from his followers online and in real life, he gets recognized by fans most nights he goes out, especially at gigs. The crazy thing about it all is that these girls literally ONLY like him because they know he has so many followers on tumblr. They rationalize it by saying they like his blog or his hair, but really his fame is the only attractive thing about him. I don't even like the guy but when his fans find out I know him I get a "DHV" by association.

Thanks to his fame he landed a 6.5-7 girlfriend for a while who he already knew through social circle and now lives in a sharehouse with a few hot girls, but that's it. A lot of his fans actually started to "ship" him and an equally tumblr famous female art blogger in our city who looks like she could be one of those exotic faced catwalk models (as opposed to conventionally beautiful), she actually became attracted to him but for reasons unknown to me he turned her down, which was a shame because when I met her I figured she was slutty.

If he had just basic game he could have a regular flow of cute young girls on his dick, but alas his internet fame is virtually completely wasted.

This is ridiculous. A ridiculous goldmine. I'm going to do some research into good niches to do some tweeting in and get my micro fame game on.

We needs a micro-fame thread. It's going to be the new game.

I don't think twitter game is worth attempting to replicate unless you're rich or famous. Not even if you're good looking, there's far better avenues to get laid from.

Quote: (04-07-2014 11:19 AM)casio Wrote:  

Sure, it wouldn't be for me neither. Although he does say the daily mail (?) misquoted him, which is something I would believe for a sensation story like this.
Still, there are some nice girls sending some very insinuating texts to him, so I don't know why it wouldn't be true.
200 in life (let's say 160, just because) over 4 years isn't infeasable by any means.

I'd say the paper probably spruced the story up, for sure.

Some girl where I used to work was in the news recently for trying to kill her mum. Newspapers and media got pretty much all of her details wrong.

Quote: (04-08-2014 03:03 AM)MattC Wrote:  

Quote: (04-07-2014 11:19 AM)casio Wrote:  

Sure, it wouldn't be for me neither. Although he does say the daily mail (?) misquoted him, which is something I would believe for a sensation story like this.
Still, there are some nice girls sending some very insinuating texts to him, so I don't know why it wouldn't be true.
200 in life (let's say 160, just because) over 4 years isn't infeasable by any means.

I'd say the paper probably spruced the story up, for sure.

Some girl where I used to work was in the news recently for trying to kill her mum. Newspapers and media got pretty much all of her details wrong.

Yes, it's completely crazy, and tabloids in UK are really not an exception. It would be better to invite the guy here to explain how he achieved this.

I suspect that this type of thing makes "game traditionalists" uncomfortable because it appears to threaten some long-established mantras: that social media is bullshit, and that in-person approaching is the best way to do everything. I am a traditionalist and was raised on 1990s style approach game.

But hearing and seeing some of these Tinder stories is blowing my mind. Guys are banging quality girls just by blasting through a cell phone, without having to beat the pavement like we all had to do. Is that better? I don't know. But I sure am jealous.

How are you going to advise a young guy in his 20s to go out and beat the pavement and run day game, when he can just pick up his cell phone and swipe through OK Cupid or Tinder? No one has given any satisfactory answer to this question, from what I've seen. It's not enough just to hate on social media. It comes down to: what are you offering that is better? Or: show me why your way is better.

I'm not saying that I would try to do what this guy is doing. I'm just saying that maybe the traditionalists need to be open to the idea that Twitter, Tinder, and OK Cupid may render a lot of old school things irrelevant. This is seems pretty clear right now, from what I've seen. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.

I know one guy on this Forum who is getting quality bangs off of Tinder constantly. There is something to be said for efficiency.

If you can swipe through Tinder and net a whole bunch of phone numbers, who's going to reject that in favor of running around doing cold approaches? Before everyone jumps all over me, notice I'm not saying that is the best way. I'm just saying that it makes you think hard questions about time, efficiency, and cost/benefit.

With the way that society is going, it's not hard to imagine a future where even talking to a strange woman will be seen as "creepy" or "rapey."

He does look good for a British lad. He has slightly effeminate looks, he's slim and his quiff is working Remember it's not hard to bang British lizards, a large amount of slappers there, if you have that look, you're Gold.

One night me and one of my mates (a white geeza) went out raving. He looks similar to this twitter guy except he has more colour, his hair is different and packs more muscle. A shy guy though.

Long story short, we met two Kent birds in the lineup to the rave. I saw him kissing one down later on that evening and he went home with the two of them (for a casual threesome).

Now, I'm not disputing the conquests of this lad here. What I am saying is that it is very reasonable in the UK.

He is also from the same neck of the woods I grew up in.

^^ Yes micro-fame gives so much social proof and access. It is valuable because even micro-fame is much much more scarce than a guy that works out, dresses well, and is charming.

We should have more threads that post ideas and examples of micro-fame.