Quote: (07-11-2013 02:30 AM)nordlicht Wrote:  

Walderschmidt,

I'd be interested to hear from your experiences. Which section did you post in?

Day 1 - Posted this message in casual encounters.

Quote:Quote:

Location (Near DC)

Title: Challenge

If you blow me and get me off in 5 minutes, you can win $50.

Send pictures. I can host.

~George

No replies this day unfortunately.

Day 2. Edited this message and posted it in w4m

Quote:Quote:

Location: (Near DC)

Title: Challenge

If you can blow me and get me off in 5 minutes, you win $50.

Send pictures.

~George

Today - two replies. One spammer replying to my first ad. The second one is a black chick. I'll list our conversation once I get further.

~Wald

Don't host. Get the blower in your car.

I didn't get any real prospects but still this seems promising. Best part is very little time investment, what was already stated. Still, awesome idea.

Quote: (07-10-2013 10:54 AM)chambs88 Wrote:  

Like this style. Little to no investment of time. Also have had decent looking responses, but have only tried for one week.

One thing I've noticed is that it's to your benefit to host. It's easier to demand things and maintain frame control...'be at my place at 9' vs having to figure out her schedule/when you can go over. It makes the whole process one-two emails shorter from initial response to bang, and keeps it low investment. If she can't work around your schedule, then there's nothing lost anyway. I usually invite them over at a time when I would otherwise being practicing music or reading...if she doesn't show, no big deal as I am already occupied with my hobbies. Great way to add lays to chill nights where you could care less what happens.

That's a good point. The more time that passes, the less likely you are to get the bang.

Quote: (07-10-2013 12:31 PM)soup Wrote:  

w4m Craigslist in NYC should be called "Dreggslist"

I don't even bother with the responding to other people's ads. Attractive girls rarely post them and if they do, they're getting flooded with messages. Terrible ROI.

Quote: (07-11-2013 06:06 PM)JayRock604 Wrote:  

I didn't get any real prospects but still this seems promising. Best part is very little time investment, what was already stated. Still, awesome idea.

Yeah, it can be wildly inconsistent. Sometimes it's impossible to reel them in, other times it's a lay up.

The 8 I mentioned...she e-mailed me when I was at the dentist. By the time I left the dentist, she was on the way to my house. Other times I've e-mailed girls for days and suddenly they stop replying.

I have had slight success with sending more dirty stories a day or two later to a lead that went cold though.

Craigslist is easy, as my Lesbian Con showed. Got to love it.

Just banged my first craigslist girl, one of my better lays to be honest. Great investment of time.

Just posted two ads-one in my town oriented to standard sex and another in another city targeted at women looking for an "alternative lifestyle " activity



Now we wait............

Have pulled a couple of bangs in my city, one was very decent looking chick, around 7-7.5. The other was around 6.5

are you including face shots in these ads?

Quote: (07-14-2013 09:22 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

are you including face shots in these ads?

I didn't include a pic in the ad. If the picture they emailed me was good enough, I replied with a pic.

Quote: (07-13-2013 05:27 PM)MrXY Wrote:  

Just posted two ads-one in my town oriented to standard sex and another in another city targeted at women looking for an "alternative lifestyle " activity



Now we wait............

On a related note- I just posted in the New York listings. Will report later with the results.

i've always had this impression that craigslist sucks in terms of the quality of the chicks you can pull there, but i never actually gave this venue a try. i posted an ad just now. will report back if i get a quality bite

Field report for kicks,

Posted pretty much a girl's sex dream bullshit post how she is gonna dress sexy for me, come over to my place at night, get all excited. And how I am gonna take her into the bedroom and nail her without speaking a word. Attached a pic that is heavy filtered with me with my shirt off in a mirror true to CL style... no face... also list my height, ethnicity, and hair/eye color. Age was in the post title thing. 1 mediocre girl and 1 old land whale response. Both seem way DTF. Should put them in the Would You Hit It thread:



Can post the old land whale but why? Is there an easy way to make sure the pics on the forum come out smaller when I link to the image URL?

CL makes me a sad panda.

Just got this gem in my email.

This belongs in the girl hamster thread.

Quote:Quote:

Hello SIR?
I've never had a dom before but ive always fantasized about it. Im a bit of a control freak, in my normal life. I want to try this dom/sub thing because I want to let it all go and let SOMEONE ELSE control ME for a change. Im not sure if id be good at it but I would like to try. Sexually im open to the possibilities.
Im 23 curvy and lush, not petite, but not fat. looking for comfortable no strings/ no drama sex. Im white, i have ivory skin, curly blonde hair, dark blue grey eyes. 5' 6" 200lbs, d&d free, timid at first but bold after, I like to be bold and open if you can take it, to be honest im not looking for a boyfriend or a replacement. I live near Anoka, work in Minneapolis, would love to meet, I liked your bold erotic note.
I have an open marriage with my husband as in he has his own lovers and I have mine. He to damn sweet to play like a dom. but hes ok if I take one on. I'm not into random hook ups or one night stands. I want a guy who's OK with getting sex on a semi regular basis that won't treat me like a slut, or be an asshole to me. im ok with a dom/sub relationship. I want it. I would like to talk and keep in touch in between our nights of passion, not only just booty calls. Beyond that I want drama free and no strings, nothing permanent beyond friendship, but a long term sexual relationship. If your OK with all that then message me back and we can talk and exchange photos.
ill send a picture if you do but sorry I have to know your real first
if interested message back
thank you Sir. from your new possible play toy, Brittany

^^^ Fat bitches have really bought into fat acceptance. How delusional does a woman have to be to acknowledge that she is 5'6" and 200lbs, and then claim that she is not fat?

I've had some decent experiences on CL when I was in NYC. But in the South, the vast majority of responses are from fat women. Not worth banging unless you really need a slump buster.

So I just put up two that are basically sex fantasies. One w a pic, one without, in the M4W and casual encounters section. Is that what people are doing to get results here?

Quote: (07-15-2013 08:20 AM)assman Wrote:  

^^^ Fat bitches have really bought into fat acceptance. How delusional does a woman have to be to acknowledge that she is 5'6" and 200lbs, and then claim that she is not fat?

I've had some decent experiences on CL when I was in NYC. But in the South, the vast majority of responses are from fat women. Not worth banging unless you really need a slump buster.

Well, these women are all supposedly 5'5" 200 lbs.



Using the same body describer table I linked to earlier in the thread, the first two fall into the chubby to fat range. The first one is a mess but if you take some of the weight from the second girls belly and move it to her ass, I wouldn't consider her fat. The third I don't consider fat at all. A few months in the gym and turning some fat into muscle without even losing weight and she is looking right. #4 looks like she may be hiding a belly but I probably wouldn't call her fat either. Again, relocate the weight from her midsection to her ass and/or tits and we're good to go. Not to mention these women are an inch shorter.

This chick is listed at 5'10" 200.



I'm not saying these are ideal body types but I don't think every woman 200 pounds or above is automatically fat.

Enigma, good call putting pics to the height/weight.

So I did this and put an ad up last night. Iv'e gotten a lot of lovely spam with women and their boobs out but my first actual hit came today. Some woman offered me 150 bucks to go down on her. She wouldn't send me a picture though and wanted me to send a picture of my body and face with my number. The spam comment isn't me doubting that this works, I'm sure it does. The spam just amuses me.

On a side note has anyone else experienced girls replying with the correct subject and no body message, just a picture that says if you're real reply and say blah blah blah? Sometimes they include a real email address. I've been assuming this is also spam but wanted some other opinions on it.

I totally agree with what you are saying. I would probably bang the girl in the 3rd pic. However, I am 6' 165# so these girls are significantly larger than me which is a definite turn off.

She actually sent me a pic...damn she is ugly. Very much like the girl in pic 1. I would show you but nobody wants to see that shit.

Quote: (07-15-2013 05:10 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

Quote: (07-15-2013 08:20 AM)assman Wrote:  

^^^ Fat bitches have really bought into fat acceptance. How delusional does a woman have to be to acknowledge that she is 5'6" and 200lbs, and then claim that she is not fat?

I've had some decent experiences on CL when I was in NYC. But in the South, the vast majority of responses are from fat women. Not worth banging unless you really need a slump buster.

Well, these women are all supposedly 5'5" 200 lbs.



Using the same body describer table I linked to earlier in the thread, the first two fall into the chubby to fat range. The first one is a mess but if you take some of the weight from the second girls belly and move it to her ass, I wouldn't consider her fat. The third I don't consider fat at all. A few months in the gym and turning some fat into muscle without even losing weight and she is looking right. #4 looks like she may be hiding a belly but I probably wouldn't call her fat either. Again, relocate the weight from her midsection to her ass and/or tits and we're good to go. Not to mention these women are an inch shorter.

This chick is listed at 5'10" 200.



I'm not saying these are ideal body types but I don't think every woman 200 pounds or above is automatically fat.

@ Slacker101
Yeah CL uses a proxy email setup so you can keep emailing back and forth without giving away your email address to potential spammers.

I've used CL on and off instead of going clubbing because i was lazy haha.
The quality varies wildly.
I posted back in november looking for someone to unleash my dominance on. Posted a shirtless pic wit my face blurred out. Had a few replies i choose the the girl that's a 7.5 in the pictures...
I'm preparing myself for her to be a 6.5 or a 6 but when she arrives shes easily a 9. She lost a point because her hair was cut short.

Another time last summer I posted "looking for fun tonight". Nothing crude. Shirtless pic.
After i filter the gay men, spammers and land whales i find a girl who passes the boner test, but her face is out of the frame. I'm thinking there's always doggy style if shes butt ugly.
She get to my place and i open the door to see a girl that works at the same company i do but in a different department who has a long term bf.
Suffice it to say she gave up all 3 holes to me. i face fucked her plus alot of other extremely nasty things that you'd never think she'd be into. We became fuck buddies for 6 months till i left the company.

Ok posted this last night, got one response saying "nice story" and that's it.

Granted, I'm in Bangkok. I imagine this would do better in the US.

Will continue to tinker and report back.

No hits thus far on my New York ad from a few days ago. The ad I posted is similar to the "Challenge" format posted earlier in this thread. Any advice on modification or is it simply trial and error/reposting several times?

Cleveland Ohio, plenty of scams/spam and one hit, an older woman who emailed me offering me 150 bucks to go down on her. Other than that it is dry. This is after 3 days, I'll report back after around a week.

i posted mine past midnight sunday night. i played the angle of a workaholic, mid-30s married man in the field of finance who prefers to stay at hotel rooms and invite selected girls to join him on a privilege basis rather than go home to the wife.

when i checked up on it the following morning, i had 4 responses complete with pics in my inbox -- 1 40s landwhale, 1 fuckable slightly overweight mid to late 20s, 1 really fuckable mid 20s, and 1 ok early 20s. i haven't responded to any of them yet due to office work load but if this is the type of result i can get from 1 ad, it may be worth it to make this venue a part of my set of lead generation mediums.

first time i posted a personal ad ever btw. never done online dating sites too.