Roosh's recent article "How Many Notches Is Enough?" illustrates biased samples. Among other methods, Roosh has specialized in no-date nightgame, particularly in the U.S. and Iceland. The resulting sample of women is disproportionately populated by bar skanks. These women drink a lot, are impulsive, and flaky. They may go a long time between boyfriends, claiming to be "picky". But they are not sexual camels. Instead they have sex when drunk and horny. They offer no relationship value. They are unreliable and will forget you or flake on future dates. So Roosh's fast hit-and-run strategy is optimal for these women.
Roosh's nightgame sample excludes women who rarely hang out in bars (never alone!) and never have one-night-stands. I wonder whether a strong, aggressive approach might scare these women off, and whether a different or slower approach is ever warranted.
DC is a social circle town. There are lots of private parties where you are preselected. There are also semi-private events sponsored by embassies and art/cultural organizations where you need advance reservations to get on the list. The bar scene is small, so the women there are definitely not representative. Bars have a lot of these women:
Type 1: Has a bachelors or masters degree in humanities from a private school that gives all A's, or perhaps a law degree from a third-tier school. But she thinks she is educationally elite. Works for a nonprofit in economic development. Has strong liberal political beliefs. Likes to go to happy hours to meet up with friends.
But bars lack these women:
Type 2: Has a difficult degree and career. Was a virgin well past her teens. Due to work and school priorities, has not had much dating experience. Has conservative beliefs, but is not political.
I suspect you need to tinker with strategies for these two types. In D.C. and Iceland, Roosh heads for the bars. But in other countries he is stuck with little to do. So he approaches women with daygame. He even goes on multiple dates. I suspect this explains why he is meeting higher quality Type 2 women in Eastern Europe and South America.
By analogy, you can probably bang tons of ugly women off Craig's list on the first night. You will get slower results and higher quality off Eharmony or Christian singles. I'm not hating or recommending either approach; it depends on your objectives and target. But I would like discuss whether there is different game for different types of women.
Roosh's nightgame sample excludes women who rarely hang out in bars (never alone!) and never have one-night-stands. I wonder whether a strong, aggressive approach might scare these women off, and whether a different or slower approach is ever warranted.
DC is a social circle town. There are lots of private parties where you are preselected. There are also semi-private events sponsored by embassies and art/cultural organizations where you need advance reservations to get on the list. The bar scene is small, so the women there are definitely not representative. Bars have a lot of these women:
Type 1: Has a bachelors or masters degree in humanities from a private school that gives all A's, or perhaps a law degree from a third-tier school. But she thinks she is educationally elite. Works for a nonprofit in economic development. Has strong liberal political beliefs. Likes to go to happy hours to meet up with friends.
But bars lack these women:
Type 2: Has a difficult degree and career. Was a virgin well past her teens. Due to work and school priorities, has not had much dating experience. Has conservative beliefs, but is not political.
I suspect you need to tinker with strategies for these two types. In D.C. and Iceland, Roosh heads for the bars. But in other countries he is stuck with little to do. So he approaches women with daygame. He even goes on multiple dates. I suspect this explains why he is meeting higher quality Type 2 women in Eastern Europe and South America.
By analogy, you can probably bang tons of ugly women off Craig's list on the first night. You will get slower results and higher quality off Eharmony or Christian singles. I'm not hating or recommending either approach; it depends on your objectives and target. But I would like discuss whether there is different game for different types of women.
