Posts: 15,023
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
216
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 12:18 PM
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
Posts: 8,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 12:24 PM
Quote: (10-12-2012 06:36 AM)Pacesetter20 Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2012 04:20 AM)megatron Wrote:
could you please explain speakeasys chart for me? is it total bs?
It's not complete B.S. it is just misleading. Look at the dates, it doesn't take into account when they went into office, but allowed a 1 year gap for their policies to take affect, which is debateable, but this is like saying that 9/11 is Clinton's fault because it technically occured during FY2001, whose budget was appoved by Clinton.
Plus it covers FY13 (for Obama), which just started.
Obama could rape goats and sacrifice little children, and speakeasy would still defend him . Stop wasting your time.
Posts: 1,255
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
25
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 03:48 PM
The biggest tell that Biden won the debate is to compare the reactions from either side.
Some lines of argument I've heard from Republicans today: Biden was rude and disrespectful; he laughed, smirked, and interrupted too much; the moderator was on his side; Ryan did a good job on Libya and Syria; the debate was a draw.
Some lines from Democrats: Ryan got his ass handed to him; Biden was passionate and brutally honest; Biden didn't let Ryan get away with his bullshit; Biden scored a lot of points with women in the abortion exchange; Biden won hands down.
That should tell you all you need to know. Besides the obvious asymmetry in Democrats claiming a win and Republicans claiming a draw, notice that the commentary is all about Biden (whether positive or negative) and hardly at all about Ryan; also, the fact that Republicans are championing Ryan's performance on issues like Syria that almost nobody will vote on is a big giveaway that they don't think he won on the more salient issues. I still don't think it will move the polls much, though--vice presidential debates rarely have a large effect on the outcome of the election.
Posts: 4,074
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
56
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 03:51 PM
Biden did a good thing for Democrats, but possibly a bad thing for Obama. Now people will (and should) hold Obama to a higher standard: your VP can bring it, what about you? Maybe Obama doesn't even give a shit. I mean, he will make millions after he's done being president.
Posts: 171
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
0
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 04:23 PM
A bit of history about first debates:
Incumbent Gerald Ford lost to challenger Jimmy Carter.
Incumbent Carter lost to challenger Ronald Reagan.
Incumbent Reagan lost badly to Walter Mondale.
Incumbent George H.W. Bush lost to Bill Clinton.
Many thought incumbent George W. Bush lost to John Kerry.
Clinton is an exception. He had no problem beating down Bob Dole.
It's not uncommon for incumbents to lose to challengers.
But last night, Biden made me cringe. Smiling and laughing so much looked unprofessional. It was also distracting when you're trying to focus on what's being said.
I thought he had two specific moments that helped his performance:
One, he hit Ryan upside the head for criticizing stimulus money, but he himself asked for stimulus money for his state because in his words, it would help create jobs.
Two, as usual, Ryan had few specifics when pressed on how he and his partner will pay for their proposed tax cuts.
At the same time, Biden didn't make a compelling argument for why they should retain the office.
Posts: 538
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
16
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 04:27 PM
Tbone,
You need to fix that history of yours. Ronald Reagan (an incumbent) beat Walter Mondale in what I believe was the biggest Presidential election landslide in American history, which still stands to this day.
Posts: 538
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
16
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 04:29 PM
Tbone,
I see. In that case, I have no comment.
Posts: 468
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation:
10
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 04:50 PM
All Ryan had to do was let Biden talk (and laugh, grimace, smile, chuckle, and chortle) and make an ass of himself. All he did last night was lock up the moron vote.
Posts: 15,023
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
216
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 05:00 PM
Quote: (10-12-2012 04:50 PM)ManAbout Wrote:
Your average Republican voter right here:
There's just no reaching those (depressingly numerous) people...at all.
The sheer, unadulterated ignorance (and likely bigotry-"not like us" my ass) makes it impossible.
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
Posts: 2,633
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 05:16 PM
Quote: (10-12-2012 04:18 PM)soup Wrote:
I'm all into self-improvement and getting in shape etc. but, c'mon: this guy in these pictures?
Do you want him to be your master?
![[Image: original.jpg]](http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/181u5acpq4f8yjpg/original.jpg)
Dude looks like a buffer, gayer version of Screech from Saved By the Bell.
Posts: 1,682
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
25
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 05:27 PM
I couldn't finish watching the VP debate because it was so agonizing, but I thought Biden had more impressive style. Ryan came off more like a dork.
The problem (in my view) is that Romney is totally right - foreclosures and bankrupticies are totally necessary in order to keep the economy healthy. Unsuccessful contracts will terminate themselves, but what Biden is really arguing for is to keep these unsuccessful deals alive a little longer to alleviate the grief and pain their failure causes. Essentially kicking the can down the road. Doing this decouples reward from risk and leads to unsustainable behavior, like excessive risk-taking on Wall St, because everyone is going to believe Wall St is "too big to fail". Risk-premiums decrease and business deals that would not fly in a normal environment are possible because financing is cheaper.
Romney, as a private equity man, totally understands that most of our economic problems today are due to kicking the can down the road the past two-three decades. The problems of tomorrow will be too. Obama seems to believe that the power of government and wishful thinking can turn a host of bad business ideas into good ones. In the final analysis, that thinking is fundamentally flawed and absolutely commonplace among college academics and many economists too (like Krugman). These guys never read or understood Smith, Bastiat and Say and think Keynes somehow had the final word.
A successful, sustainable economic system requires that a continous rejuvination where those contracts that do well are renewed, and the ones that failed are buried. The choice is between a move towards a system where reward and risk again go hand-in-hand vs more of the last 20-30 years of can-kicking, quick-fixes and junkie behavior.
A year from now you'll wish you started today
Posts: 694
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
VP Debate Thread
10-12-2012, 05:37 PM
Bush and Obama are both socialists.