Listen to Owen.

Quote: (04-11-2019 06:21 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

Wasn't Einstein a plagiarist?

Yes, of a more powerful Jew.

Bobby Fischer! I remember his days of glory, it was back when he was a kid. A pain in the ass. Autist to the tenth power.

Looked him up, found a story.

Fischer lived in Baguio in the Philippines from 2000 to 2002. At that time he was 57-59.

He looked up with a local girl. She got pregnant and had a baby. He listed his name on the birth certificate, sent the mother support



When he died, there were legal proceedings in Iceland over how to divide his estate. He had married a Japanese woman. He had nephews who would be his heirs. The Filipina mother and kid claimed a share.

They dug up Fischer's body for a DNA sample. The test eliminated him as the father.

^ What does Bobby Fischer getting cucked have to do with anything Sp5?

Did you ever notice that jews, non-whites agitators and feminists always argue in the same ad-hominem way?

That's of course because they all have the same origin. Jewish rethoric is effective at low information, middling IQ listeners, but not to a well informed audience as here.

Quote: (04-11-2019 12:57 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Did you ever notice that jews, non-whites agitators and feminists always argue in the same ad-hominem way?

That's of course because they all have the same origin. Jewish rethoric is effective at low information, middling IQ listeners, but not to a well informed audience as here.

I have noticed this also. In my Kiwi social circles all these non-sequiturs just derail the entire conversation as everyone chases their tails assuming the non-sequiturs are legitimate arguments because they don't actually analyse them. I don't bother listening to them for anything of substance

This "Einstein was a fraud" bullshit just detracts from the credibility of legitimate criticism.

Quote: (04-11-2019 01:21 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  

Quote: (04-11-2019 12:57 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Did you ever notice that jews, non-whites agitators and feminists always argue in the same ad-hominem way?

That's of course because they all have the same origin. Jewish rethoric is effective at low information, middling IQ listeners, but not to a well informed audience as here.

I have noticed this also. In my Kiwi social circles all these non-sequiturs just derail the entire conversation as everyone chases their tails assuming the non-sequiturs are legitimate arguments because they don't actually analyse them. I don't bother listening to them for anything of substance

Also known as every debate between a leftist and a cuckservative.

Quote: (04-11-2019 01:26 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Quote: (04-11-2019 01:21 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  

Quote: (04-11-2019 12:57 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Did you ever notice that jews, non-whites agitators and feminists always argue in the same ad-hominem way?

That's of course because they all have the same origin. Jewish rethoric is effective at low information, middling IQ listeners, but not to a well informed audience as here.

I have noticed this also. In my Kiwi social circles all these non-sequiturs just derail the entire conversation as everyone chases their tails assuming the non-sequiturs are legitimate arguments because they don't actually analyse them. I don't bother listening to them for anything of substance

Also known as every debate between a leftist and a cuckservative.

Yes! I have felt like this for the longest time, where Kiwis were just all leftist and cuckservative. I couldn't be as certain/authoritative about it as I'd like since there was the possibility I was just going crazy. But I left and confirmed that normal people are not like that(at least, in typical non-heated conversation). It's so satisfying getting meaning from social connections. Instead of just like constant babbling by people who want to sound cool and think parroting others and following a certain preset framework/way of thinking is actual conversation . People actually think things through and don't always get sidetracked/derailed just because a subversive changes the narrative!(Note I realise in most places people's thinking changes with subversive narrative changes- but it doesn't happen almost every single time!)

Quote: (04-11-2019 12:57 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

^ What does Bobby Fischer getting cucked have to do with anything Sp5?

Did you ever notice that jews, non-whites agitators and feminists always argue in the same ad-hominem way?

That's of course because they all have the same origin. Jewish rethoric is effective at low information, middling IQ listeners, but not to a well informed audience as here.

Try to follow along. Fischer was used as an authority on the Jews. Questioning the judgment and credibility of someone presented as an authority is not an ad-hominem. Presenting facts which cast a bad light on the authority's judgment is not an ad-hominem.

Nutballs like Fischer and nobody nutballs like this Berjerknes are being presented as authorities, as if what they say is some kind of proof.

Plus I thought it was interesting he lived in Baguio.

Quote: (04-11-2019 09:48 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

We don't care about any actual outperformance. They are clearly over-represented for example among chess champions and this is all good and well.

Now let's look at probably the greatest Jewish-born chess champion what he has to say on the topic:

You could have pointed out Fischer's obvious paranoid schizoprenia, but instead you made an attack at his lack of virility.

Quote: (04-11-2019 02:53 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

You could have pointed out Fischer's obvious paranoid schizoprenia, but instead you made an attack at his lack of virility.

I never examined and diagnosed him, nor would I be qualified to do so.

Even in Wikipedia, it said the evidence of schizophrenia was inconclusive and disputed.

The cucking was an example of poor judgment and misadventure that is more relatable and colorful, since many of us have been to the PI and Baguio. No aspersions on his virility.

Quote: (04-11-2019 01:21 PM)Sherman Wrote:  

This "Einstein was a fraud" bullshit just detracts from the credibility of legitimate criticism.

Red Ice Radio did a good piece on Einstein two years ago.

Alrite let's get this thread back on track. Old video of one of the realest-talking Russian politicians (half-Jewish himself!) calling out Jews. This dude just doesn't give a single fuck. Fascinating to listen to.

Can we say with certainty that the Jew didn’t plaigerize the old testament? Or that his handler the elite wasn’t a ghost writer?

We can say with certainty that the Masoretic Text (Hebrew Bible as currently published) has been changed purposefully (knowingly) and that the Septuagint text is the accurate, historical text.

I think that's different than your question, though.

Quote: (04-11-2019 09:48 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

Snip

Now let's look at probably the greatest Jewish-born chess champion what he has to say on the topic:

Interesting quote. Professional chess players are extremely advanced at deciphering their oppositions future objectives and the consequences that may arise.

Most blue-pill NPC folk live in the now with little regard to any adverse effects down the line. That's probably one of the fundamental differences between Blue and Red pill'ers. Foresight.

Quote: (04-11-2019 03:17 PM)Syberpunk Wrote:  

Quote: (04-11-2019 01:21 PM)Sherman Wrote:  

This "Einstein was a fraud" bullshit just detracts from the credibility of legitimate criticism.

Red Ice Radio did a good piece on Einstein two years ago.

The funny part is that the elite boasted that they can make anyone into a genius so long as they have the entire PR machine behind him. They can literally create stars.

There are many people who looked into Einstein and found the man highly lacking.

That said - there are plenty of Jewish geniuses around and those who contributed to science and the world - whether Einstein made notable contributions is up to debate.

This does not invalidate jack-shit. There were far more Jewish brilliant men out there who did not get any recognition, but the case of Einstein is a bit odd and possibly one big PR stunt similar to how they pushed Freud so much.

You will note that they did not promote Jung very much. They like to promote their own - that is part of the tribal nature.

For example - Dr. Joel Wallach was a Jewish vet turned doctor later who did some of the biggest animal tests on supplementation, later also on humans. He is a proponent of orthomolecular medicine, but is rather sued by the FDA at times - always winning until they gave up. He was nominated for the Noble price, but got no recognition because his medical direction is directed against the patentable mainstream crap and would cost them billions - make the people far more healthy. That Jewish doc is forgotten and maligned despite his books being present in every veterinary library in the world. Meanwhile Jonas Salk's polio vaccine is being touted as the best thing since sliced bread.

Here have a look with your normie eyes at the real history of "polio": http://www.vaclib.org/basic/polio/polio1.pdf
It's an article by the Ecologist. The Ecologist is actually a mainstream outlet, but for a few years in the 2000s it had a different team and produced excellent content. The funny part is that The Ecologist has all articles present online since the 1970s except for those years it was actually free. Even if you don't find the article credible and the gamut of sources - it should give you room for thought and maybe you go down that rabbit hole like so many other MDs.

Oh - and as far as vaccines go - the chosen tribe are even greater believers in it. They are the most vaccinated ethnicity and have above average autism and various developmental diseases compared to the people in the same socio-economic bracket. That in itself should give you an inclination that the elite don't care too much about their lesser brethren. Heck - they might view inoculation like Napoleon - if it does not kill you, then it shows you that you are fit enough for war. Though - it weakens you for life, but who cares - the elite needs you mainly betwen 18-50 and women are needed even for less than that.

So the clever Jew has tricked the world into believing thst polio is a virus that must be vaccinated?

WTF are you talking about? Vaccination is a world-wide program - a scam of epic perception. Jews are in reality greater believers in it with negative results to their tribe, but it's a selective process anyway. And yes - some Jewish doctors like Salk knew well enough that the virus did not cause polio since half of the "infected" had no trace of it. But when they stopped the DDT spraying, then polio disappeared. Plus - they changed the very definition right after the vaccine to make it appear having a miraculous treatment. In fact - they discontinued the oral one in the West because of massive side effects. All vaccinated had in fact increased rates of paralysis, because that is what DDT overdosing does to you.
In addition polio was called a summer disease that did not affect the poorest and richest. Why? Because you ingested most of it in fruit that was then mainly available during summer - the very rich and the poor had fruits of different venues than the supermarket and they did not get sick. Also it was only "spreading" in areas where DDT was sprayed - now other pesticides.

But as I said - the topic is not in itself related to Jewish supremacism since they are true believers in it as well.

Quote: (04-12-2019 06:44 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

WTF are you talking about? Vaccination is a world-wide program - a scam of epic perception. Jews are in reality greater believers in it with negative results to their tribe, but it's a selective process anyway. And yes - some Jewish doctors like Salk knew well enough that the virus did not cause polio since half of the "infected" had no trace of it. But when they stopped the DDT spraying, then polio disappeared. Plus - they changed the very definition right after the vaccine to make it appear having a miraculous treatment. In fact - they discontinued the oral one in the West because of massive side effects. All vaccinated had in fact increased rates of paralysis, because that is what DDT overdosing does to you.
In addition polio was called a summer disease that did not affect the poorest and richest. Why? Because you ingested most of it in fruit that was then mainly available during summer - the very rich and the poor had fruits of different venues than the supermarket and they did not get sick. Also it was only "spreading" in areas where DDT was sprayed - now other pesticides.

But as I said - the topic is not in itself related to Jewish supremacism since they are true believers in it as well.

I'm just wondering, Simeon. Is there any accepted history that you believe is true?

Is it all a scam? Was there a "Roman Empire?" Did Armstrong and Aldrin walk on the moon? Is there, in fact, a "moon?"

^Lol. He’s all about the “globalists” and how everything has been pre-determined by them. Oh and you have to read the Reece commission reports as well as Carol Quigley. Then he contradicts himself by saying “we shall see what happens” even though he believes how the elites will always win regardless of what we say or do.

Between someone who's actually done the reading and someone who's laughing at the guy who's done the reading I'll go with the literate guy.

Quote: (04-12-2019 09:56 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

^Lol. He’s all about the “globalists” and how everything has been pre-determined by them. Oh and you have to read the Reece commission reports as well as Carol Quigley. Then he contradicts himself by saying “we shall see what happens” even though he believes how the elites will always win regardless of what we say or do.

Instead of dismissing Carroll Quigley out of hand Mandingo, why not see for yourself first what he's all about? There is a great summary of Tragedy and Hope (1,000 page long, half of it not all that interesting) by Joe Plummer, which is a great introduction to Quigley's work:



The PDF and the audiobook versions are available for free on Plummer's site:

https://www.joeplummer.com/

Series of video interviews as a good intoduction:

https://www.joeplummer.com/interviews-with-joe

So the jew only tricked us into thinking polio is a virus? That is the normie thinking among the brainwashed medical community.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/books...-hate.html


looks like the french are growing tired of their antics. Yellow vest movement doesn't seem to be letting up anytime soon