It's not easy to listen to her talk. Her voice just is not pleasant at all.

I think she got a lot of money because everybody how broken American health care is and that she might actually be able to fix it.

She was able to do this because her family ties connected her to rich people.

One comment that was odd was that Carreyou says he doesn't like to blame the press because "there was no indication they were dealing with a pathological liar".

Yes there were. There were MANY indications that would have been readily apparent had anyone been covering the topic with even the slightest bit of credulity.

Quote: (03-17-2019 08:30 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

One comment that was odd was that Carreyou says he doesn't like to blame the press because "there was no indication they were dealing with a pathological liar".

Yes there were. There were MANY indications that would have been readily apparent had anyone been covering the topic with even the slightest bit of credulity.

Of course they were guilty. Even Carreyou - he barely managed to get his research off the ground, because the marxist media wanted this SELF-MADE FEMALE BILLIONAIRE TO BE TRUE. They did not care that she had zero know-how and pulled off a technology with a relatively small budget while much bigger competitors failed. And keep in mind - this is a field that has no globalist agenda - the elite doesn't mind if blood tests are done with a finger-prick - in fact it would make it easier for them to sell you more drugs and shit. Medical science is highly manipulated as well as nutritional science, long-term preventitive care as well - but this? No way - if the big companies cannot make it work, then her entire business plan was just smoke and mirrors. Any decent journalist would have managed to dig up dirt and if it were a man, then the con would have blown open a long time ago.

Has there been any higher pussy pass than this in the past couple of decades? Except for Clinton but she is a special case.

Quote: (03-17-2019 11:39 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

Quote: (03-17-2019 08:30 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

One comment that was odd was that Carreyou says he doesn't like to blame the press because "there was no indication they were dealing with a pathological liar".

Yes there were. There were MANY indications that would have been readily apparent had anyone been covering the topic with even the slightest bit of credulity.

Of course they were guilty. Even Carreyou - he barely managed to get his research off the ground, because the marxist media wanted this SELF-MADE FEMALE BILLIONAIRE TO BE TRUE. They did not care that she had zero know-how and pulled off a technology with a relatively small budget while much bigger competitors failed. And keep in mind - this is a field that has no globalist agenda - the elite doesn't mind if blood tests are done with a finger-prick - in fact it would make it easier for them to sell you more drugs and shit. Medical science is highly manipulated as well as nutritional science, long-term preventitive care as well - but this? No way - if the big companies cannot make it work, then her entire business plan was just smoke and mirrors. Any decent journalist would have managed to dig up dirt and if it were a man, then the con would have blown open a long time ago.

All someone would have had to do was ask whether her voice was real, or whether she actually knew how to speak Chinese.

Mark Zuckerberg spoke Chinese in public speeches (it was terrible but at least he tried) yet nobody in the media thought to ask Miss Steve Jobs Wannabe the same request, even while they kept touting how she learned Mandarin and worked in China for a time as part of her prodigy background.

I love this story because it is rock solid proof of how globalists conspire to push their Marxist agenda against all kinds of truth, even if it costs tens of billions of dollars.

It forces normies to think, "If globalists are capable of such a big lie with such ease, what else are they capable of?" And down the rabbit hole they go, and they start to unravel so many other big lies.

If we look at this from a different perspective, Elizabeth Holmes could be considered one of the greatest salespeople of all time. She was able to sell investors a dream for $1.4 billion.

I would also say that the Theranos story is a great case-study on fundamental game principles for the following reasons:

1. Social Proof

Her initial investors were well respected business men with a strong track record of success. Because of the respect people had about their opinions and decisions, everyone threw caution to the wind and dumped all their money into the operation. They provided the social proof she needed to show people that she knew what she was doing and was someone they could trust their money with.

The same concept applies to social situations. If a woman sees a man with a beautiful women, she will curious to know what makes him special. If he is not a particularly attractive man, she will want to find out what resources or qualities does he have that attracts beautiful women. The beautiful woman could be his sister but the other woman will still assume that something is special about him which instantly makes him more attractive.

2. Using Emotion vs. Logical in Persuasion

In the HBO documentary of the Theranos story, people mentioned that Elizabeth succeeded because she told stories. The stories created emotion which is many times more powerful than logic. The investors felt so emotionally invested in this operation that they disregarded the logical path of due diligence that other investors would need for other startups

In game, touching on a woman's emotions evokes a greater response than using logic. Woman many times make decisions on emotion rather than logic. You can get a woman to go along with almost anything if you can stir up her emotions. Most women will stay with a man who treats them poorly because he is able to get her to feel a wide range of emotions which act like a drug to her system. Even though logically she should leave, the emotions hijack her mind.

Just a few thoughts I've been contemplating lately.

UK tabloid says she's engaged:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...rt-up.html

Maybe she's planning to get knocked up to maximize pussy pass for her upcoming legal challenges.

A 27-year-old dude who is well-connected marries a 35-year-old batshit crazy chick? Her "game" is tight, but this dude is a pathetic sap.

The heat is about to get turned up on her.

HBO's documentary will air tomorrow

Quote: (03-27-2019 10:46 AM)JayR Wrote:  

UK tabloid says she's engaged:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...rt-up.html

Maybe she's planning to get knocked up to maximize pussy pass for her upcoming legal challenges.

Pimp of the year

the doc is posted on youtube, it's going to be taken down soon

Quote: (03-27-2019 01:10 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

A 27-year-old dude who is well-connected marries a 35-year-old batshit crazy chick? Her "game" is tight, but this dude is a pathetic sap.

I'm telling you.

She fucks with the remorseless vigor that only a hardened sociopath can deliver.

It's like the scene in "Gone Girl" right before she stabs the simp, every time. It's the only explanation for all of this.

My fave comment:

"I wonder which voice she uses when they have sex?"

Quote: (03-27-2019 10:46 AM)JayR Wrote:  

UK tabloid says she's engaged:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...rt-up.html

Maybe she's planning to get knocked up to maximize pussy pass for her upcoming legal challenges.

Quote: (03-27-2019 07:49 PM)Jetset Wrote:  

Quote: (03-27-2019 01:10 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

A 27-year-old dude who is well-connected marries a 35-year-old batshit crazy chick? Her "game" is tight, but this dude is a pathetic sap.

I'm telling you.

She fucks with the remorseless vigor that only a hardened sociopath can deliver.

It's like the scene in "Gone Girl" right before she stabs the simp, every time. It's the only explanation for all of this.

Quote: (03-27-2019 07:54 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

My fave comment:

"I wonder which voice she uses when they have sex?"

Guys, I hate to break it to you, but in that photo, the dog is the only one who's getting some.

Quote: (03-28-2019 05:26 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Guys, I hate to break it to you, but in that photo, the dog is the only one who's getting some.

I'd 'like' your comment. Yet I wouldn't want to give the wrong impression.

Knew she was a fraud since day 1. No such thing as successful female CEO that produces anything innovative.

I still don't understand 2 things:

1. Why is Billy Evans engaged to this radioactive woman?

2. Why does Holmes act like she is going to beat the courts? I know the pussy pass is real but she's committed massive fraud on the level of Bernie Maddoff.

Quote: (03-28-2019 10:04 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  

Knew she was a fraud since day 1. No such thing as successful female CEO that produces anything innovative.

I still don't understand 2 things:

1. Why is Billy Evans engaged to this radioactive woman?

2. Why does Holmes act like she is going to beat the courts? I know the pussy pass is real but she's committed massive fraud on the level of Bernie Maddoff.

Its worse than that. People and doctors made medical decisions based on Theranos' faulty test results. That's patient endangerment. That is a far worse crime than the deceit of sophisticated, high net worth investors who mostly deceived themselves in not doing any due diligence prior to investing in Theranos.

Quote: (03-28-2019 10:04 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  

Knew she was a fraud since day 1. No such thing as successful female CEO that produces anything innovative.
...

Bueller?
Bueller?
Female Elon Musk...?
Female Elon Musk...?

Quote: (03-28-2019 10:04 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  

Knew she was a fraud since day 1. No such thing as successful female CEO that produces anything innovative.

I still don't understand 2 things:

1. Why is Billy Evans engaged to this radioactive woman?

2. Why does Holmes act like she is going to beat the courts? I know the pussy pass is real but she's committed massive fraud on the level of Bernie Maddoff.

I simply ignored the whole thing. What I noticed was that I'd heard absolutely nothing about the product or technology itself, just the media slathering over Holmes being a visionary genius and lots of "girrrrl power" mental masturbation. I don't care much for cults of personality so once I decided it was an empty cult of personality I just tuned out.

I didn't catch the fraud(because I dismissed at as trivial hot air early on) but I also feel confident saying I would not have fallen for the scam had I been in the other investor's shoes.

I was flying a lot in spring and summer of '14 when I saw all of those magazine covers featuring Holmes in airport magazine stands. I just assumed the whole thing was hype and thought they might make some useful technology (microfluidics) along the way. The fraud began unraveling the following year and her photo no longer graced the the airport magazine stands.

About to watch that documentary; hoping it doesn't punish me further with the story of her sorry simp cuck boyfriend.

That couple is emblematic if everything wrong with San Fran - thirsty dudes with money, has-been women with too many options, globohomosexual worldview, overpriced everything, modern day Gomorrah - or is it Sodom?

None of it is surprising, unfortunately.

What the media made her look like:


What she actually looks like:


She looks like a boy with long hair.

Yet there are tons of articles online that describe her as "young and attractive." Because apparently the bar for white blonde female beauty is not very high in Silicon Valley.
https://medium.com/@kitanyaharrison/eliz...9cfe6333a3
https://slate.com/culture/2019/03/elizab...lture.html
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17329748

^it isn't. The lame scene of the bay area has been discussed ad nauseum in many threads. At the peril of your libido, avoid.


Oh yeah - that HBO documentary was actually worth a watch, but the shorter one did a better job comparing her real voice to the put on baritone she still presents publicly. I was glad to see in the end that the old man George Schultz finally came around to the reality that Holmes is a fraud. Good to know he won't die a fool.

I guess Tim Draper finally smelled the coffee too, since even a year or so ago he was still defending Holmes and the Theranos dream/fraud. Seeing him wearing a Bitcoin tie during his interview makes me think he's still desperately looking for the next big thing.

I'm not surprised that people with Theranos on their resume have a tough time finding work either. As a prospective employer I'd want to know what the hell they were doing on a day to day basis with an idea that so obviously wasn't working. Why couldn't they get another job somewhere else, did they knowingly perpetuate a lie, etc. Meanwhile their former boss is prancing around Burning Man with her new simp, assuming she isn't going to spend a few years in prison. If she isn't jailed the example set will be worse than Smollett's dismissal.

Quote: (04-04-2019 08:25 PM)BlueMark Wrote:  

...
She looks like a boy with long hair.
...

Good thing she never hooked up with Mark Zuckerberg.
Would not want to picture their proverbial 'love children'...