Quote: (01-24-2019 12:56 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:
Quote: (01-24-2019 12:32 PM)Sherman Wrote:
What is happening is very serious. Phillips is a career criminal and probably a psychopath, and career criminals know how to manipulate people and situations. There are now left-wing professors defining "ignoring someone" as privileged behavior. When you are on a street, and you are approached by some aggressive stranger, your best strategy is to ignore him. Think of an aggressive panhandler getting in your face. If you defend yourself physically, you are at risk of being arrested by police who follow the leftist agenda of their city. But now they are even cutting off your most intelligent defense - ignore and keep walking. The bottom line is at some point we have to decide to fight and possibly die or live a life in slavery and submission. There are people in power who hate us. Rest assured that there are millions of criminals out there who have picked up on their new opportunity. You may be a victim tomorrow.
Really? So ignoring someone is "privileged behavior" now?
Has anyone else noticed that with this situation, the left have totally undercut several major points they've been making for years? Talk about situational ethics.
1). If ignoring someone is "privileged behavior," then that means all the girls who ignore men on the streets who want to talk to them are now in the wrong.
2). If the MAGA boys were "asking for it" because of what they wore (hats), then I guess women are "asking for it" because of what they wear.
The left (and its media lackeys) have no cogent points or ideas. What they're saying now is basically "Everything white men do is wrong, including just standing there and existing."
Change the race and gender of these boys and the media coverage would be totally different.
I don't understand your puzzlement, DOBA. What is happening here makes perfect sense and is entirely logical. Conquered people do not enjoy the same rights and privileges as their conquerors. In Moorish Spain for example, a Moor could fuck a Spaniard's daughter but if a Spaniard tried to fuck a Moor's daughter all snackbar would break loose. I think you understand the mechanism and logic of this real historical example instinctively and realize the situation between the Moors and the Spaniards was perfectly cogent. You would certainly not walk up to the Moor and ask him "why" he's being so "unreasonable." He'd laugh in your face and tell you, in so many words, Vae Victis (woe to the vanquished).
Today not just Spaniards but virtually all whites are a conquered people, with the
possible exception of the Russians. Of course, their conquerors still primarily depend on trickery and manipulation to exercise control and that control is achieved by convincing whites to cooperate in their own disenfranchisement. For this reason, their masters are still light with the whip hand, lest excessive enthusiasm spook the herd and whites become less cooperative before they are entirely safely locked in the cattle pen.
As the demographics continue to deteriorate and less and less cooperation from whites is needed to maintain control, the whip hand will become heavier and heavier. It is already becoming heavier, of which the Covington story is just one example. It's only going to get worse from here. Eventually the demographics will turn entirely and
no cooperation from whites will be required, freeing the whip hand to be as heavy as it damn well pleases. At that point, you probably want to be somewhere far away, and without access to the news.
Pretty depressing shit, sure, but I assure you
it is entirely cogent. You're a good guy DOBA as are most white people, which is probably why you do not see the logic of this instinctively. Unfortunately, it is far better to be nasty, cynical, and cunning, which white are not, and so they will be the eloi of the future.