Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1064596708875747328][/url]

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1064596708875747328][/url]

Over/under on Mossad operatives drugging a few Hondurans including several children and dumping them smack in the middle of that razorwire while every media organisation mysteriously arrives just in time to make it the new version of this:

The caravan is mostly a smoke-show, but it can open the floodgates ever more. Meanwhile 1-3 mio. move in anyway.

Here a funny incident from the ever so beneficial Somalis:






A high-trust high-IQ orderly well-functioning society dies not overnight. IT dies by a thousand cuts as the people who created the former are replaced by the people who create Somalia, Congo and Honduras - or some Arab violent shithole.

Here the corporation quickly fired the Asian manager for actually doing their job. In the US it's exacerbated by an enormous trillion-dollar diversity industry so a company has to fire their workers almost instantly. Pretty soon everyone will have to pay up front and the food will have to be a behind a secured glass-wall, because you cannot have nice things with those enrichers.

Quote:RT Wrote:

US judge temporarily blocks Trump’s order refusing asylum to illegal migrants from Mexico

A judge has temporarily blocked US President Donald Trump’s order to ban Central American asylum seekers from illegally crossing the border into the country from Mexico.

US District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco placed a restraining order on Trump’s new immigration policy, which was declared last week.

The president “may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” the judge wrote, adding that the rule barring asylum seekers from entering the US outside a port of entry “irreconcilably conflicts” with the existing legislation.

https://www.rt.com/usa/444417-judge-bloc...lGpI4cADqg

Why can anyone other than the Supreme Court order the entire country around like this? What's next, a judge from Newport, Vermont banning Trump from installing new door handles on White House toilets?

^^^ No idea about the US but in my domicile jurisdiction, our version of the SCA (highest court in the land) would have to issue a confirmatory order prior to such an order having any real power of restraint. I would presume something similar for the US

Quote: (11-20-2018 06:09 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

...
Pretty soon everyone will have to pay up front and the food will have to be a behind a secured glass-wall, because you cannot have nice things with those enrichers.

Actually parts of America that are especially-diverse* are creating laws to remove said plastic barriers because they are obviously expressions of racism.

*no whites at all

Quote: (11-20-2018 06:34 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:RT Wrote:

US judge temporarily blocks Trump’s order refusing asylum to illegal migrants from Mexico

A judge has temporarily blocked US President Donald Trump’s order to ban Central American asylum seekers from illegally crossing the border into the country from Mexico.

US District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco placed a restraining order on Trump’s new immigration policy, which was declared last week.

The president “may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” the judge wrote, adding that the rule barring asylum seekers from entering the US outside a port of entry “irreconcilably conflicts” with the existing legislation.

https://www.rt.com/usa/444417-judge-bloc...lGpI4cADqg

Why can anyone other than the Supreme Court order the entire country around like this? What's next, a judge from Newport, Vermont banning Trump from installing new door handles on White House toilets?

Well after two years of draining the next sub layer of the swamp is clearly in sight now. Unless we tackle the issue of activist judges placed by Obama and Clinton the MAGA train is going nowhere.

Quote: (11-20-2018 07:21 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

Quote: (11-20-2018 06:34 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:RT Wrote:

US judge temporarily blocks Trump’s order refusing asylum to illegal migrants from Mexico

A judge has temporarily blocked US President Donald Trump’s order to ban Central American asylum seekers from illegally crossing the border into the country from Mexico.

US District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco placed a restraining order on Trump’s new immigration policy, which was declared last week.

The president “may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” the judge wrote, adding that the rule barring asylum seekers from entering the US outside a port of entry “irreconcilably conflicts” with the existing legislation.

https://www.rt.com/usa/444417-judge-bloc...lGpI4cADqg

Why can anyone other than the Supreme Court order the entire country around like this? What's next, a judge from Newport, Vermont banning Trump from installing new door handles on White House toilets?

Well after two years of draining the next sub layer of the swamp is clearly in sight now. Unless we tackle the issue of activist judges placed by Obama and Clinton the MAGA train is going nowhere.

At this point it's like saying "until we tackle the issue of how to make fire we're never going to get our space program up and running".

All good and well, assuming an unlimited time frame. Better off moving somewhere decent and drawing a line in the sand.

Re-imagining of some historical events:

1. [1962] Abbyville, Kansas judge bans withdrawal of Jupiter missiles from Turkey, proclaims Kennedy's actions based on Islamophobia.
2. [1964] Madison, Nebraska judge suspends the application of the Civil Rights Act because it fails to mention furry asexual two-spirit transgenders.
3. [1981] Eastport, Maine judge halts Iran hostage crisis talks over violations of Iran officials' constitutional rights.

Quote: (11-16-2018 10:11 AM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

The military is already down there, why not just have the snipers pick them off when the get to the top, that'll stop the climbing real quick.

Firebombing (White and Asian) children in WW2 = Not a Crime Against Humanity.

Arresting (brown) Amerindians breaking the law = Crime Against Humanity.


Honestly the west was subverted and conquered before most people on this forum were born. If the old school West was still alive Afghanistan would be the safest and most western country in Asia right now (and would be economically booming).

The west right now is like the Sultanate of Rum. It still calls itself the west but it isn't (demographically or society). Just like Rum ("Rome") called itself Rome but it wasn't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Rum

Quote: (11-20-2018 08:56 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  

Quote: (11-16-2018 10:11 AM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

The military is already down there, why not just have the snipers pick them off when the get to the top, that'll stop the climbing real quick.

Firebombing (White and Asian) children in WW2 = Not a Crime Against Humanity.

Arresting (brown) Amerindians breaking the law = Crime Against Humanity.


Honestly the west was subverted and conquered before most people on this forum were born. If the old school West was still alive Afghanistan would be the safest and most western country in Asia right now (and would be economically booming).

The west right now is like the Sultanate of Rum. It still calls itself the west but it isn't (demographically or society). Just like Rum ("Rome") called itself Rome but it wasn't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Rum

Shooting down Arab protesters at Israeli border = legitimate defense of borders

Preventing mass undocumented army-sized ingrates to enter a country akin to an invasion = Crime against Humanity goy! You better take those migrants or our media, Hollywood and finance will choke the life out of your economic recovery goy!

Oh - and the Chinese, Japanese, Saudis would have shot down the invaders just the same. It's only the White Western countries which are forced to take in any number of eternally ungrateful civilization destroyers.

It really isn't "white nations" solely affected by migration. Lebanon and Jordan have more migrants than locals at this point. Pakistan, Turkey, Kenya etc. have more refugees and migrants than they can deal with. Mainly from neighbouring countries just like America.

Hell, South Africa has 5 million foreigners on fraudulent docs (read, bought) from Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Nigeria, Malawi, Somalia, Ethiopoa, India, Pakistan, China etc. all who have arrived post-1990. That figure excludes naturalised migrants and their children. We're easily looking at 15-20% foreigners who have arrived in a 20 year space and nobody (regardless of race) wanted or wants them.

Trump needs to channel global hate for migration. Maybe tweet about refugees destroying Jordan or Bangladeshis illegally crossing into India. Flip the script and stir the pot.

Quote: (11-20-2018 09:02 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

Quote: (11-20-2018 08:56 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  

Quote: (11-16-2018 10:11 AM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

The military is already down there, why not just have the snipers pick them off when the get to the top, that'll stop the climbing real quick.

Firebombing (White and Asian) children in WW2 = Not a Crime Against Humanity.

Arresting (brown) Amerindians breaking the law = Crime Against Humanity.


Honestly the west was subverted and conquered before most people on this forum were born. If the old school West was still alive Afghanistan would be the safest and most western country in Asia right now (and would be economically booming).

The west right now is like the Sultanate of Rum. It still calls itself the west but it isn't (demographically or society). Just like Rum ("Rome") called itself Rome but it wasn't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Rum

Shooting down Arab protesters at Israeli border = legitimate defense of borders

Preventing mass undocumented army-sized ingrates to enter a country akin to an invasion = Crime against Humanity goy! You better take those migrants or our media, Hollywood and finance will choke the life out of your economic recovery goy!

Oh - and the Chinese, Japanese, Saudis would have shot down the invaders just the same. It's only the White Western countries which are forced to take in any number of eternally ungrateful civilization destroyers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees_on_Jeju_Island

700,000 Koreans took their time to sign an online petition to kick out Arab men (who are primarily economic migrants and some may had came for sex). One never sees that level of coordination or consciousness in any white western country.

Thing is most white western countries were the same but the leadership caste sneaked in multiculturalism and liberalism over time. No western country ever had a referendum on whether the floodgates would be open to non-European cultures (as far as I know).

Democracy doesn't work if a tiny cadre (less than 1% of the human population) can completely subvert and destroy the civilization.

Has there ever been a time when there was no mass human migration? Borders and boundaries have never been respected. The very idea of nation states is relatively new. Not condoning illegal migration but it is a natural and negative reality like drug abuse, crime and poverty. Thus, you cant negotiate with starving and desperate people.

Quote: (11-20-2018 03:21 PM)Pride male Wrote:  

Has there ever been a time when there was no mass human migration? Borders and boundaries have never been respected. The very idea of nation states is relatively new. Not condoning illegal migration but it is a natural and negative reality like drug abuse, crime and poverty. Thus, you cant negotiate with starving and desperate people.

Not true. The instances of mass emigration were pretty rare historically speaking, they were triggered by extraordinary events like the Hun invasion into Europe in the 5th century. Most mass migrations today are not organic, they were created by globalists engineering war, chaos and extreme economic duress. Honduras and Haiti for example were raped by Clinton/Obama, and in Honduras at least, a zionist takeover of their power structure followed by a neoliberal leaching of their economy.

In Haiti billions of dollars in aid have been siphoned off by Clinton cronies and the people have been left with the tag, the country spiraling further into abject misery. Even in places like Haiti, there are quality local elites who could right the ship if they're given a chance, those type of people get eliminated instead.

In much of the middle east and African Sahel, stable nation-states ruled by strongmen have been torn apart by neocons, economies and livelihood deliberately destroyed, sending tens of millions of migrants into Europe.

Quote: (11-20-2018 03:21 PM)Pride male Wrote:  

Has there ever been a time when there was no mass human migration? Borders and boundaries have never been respected. The very idea of nation states is relatively new. Not condoning illegal migration but it is a natural and negative reality like drug abuse, crime and poverty. Thus, you cant negotiate with starving and desperate people.

You've got to be kidding, right? Ever heard of the Great Wall Of China? You think they built that one out of boredom? Although the technology didn't exist back in the days borders have ALWAYS been vigorously enforced. And anyone who managed to slip through basically was on his own without any protection or support from the people or the country he had entered illegally.

Our ancestors understood perfectly well that full sovereignty within a region was only accomplished by enforcing their borders. A group of even a few hundred people would have been immediately flagged as an invasion force and thus swiftly dealt with.

Anyway, none of this really matters. We live in a fast paced and densely populated world now, which makes it the more crucial that we are vigilant about who enters our respective realms.

If you want to know what unenforced territorial claims resulted in then ask the people who declined to enforce their territorial claims.

Ah. Sorry. You can't. They're all dead.

Quote: (11-20-2018 03:21 PM)Pride male Wrote:  

Has there ever been a time when there was no mass human migration? Borders and boundaries have never been respected. The very idea of nation states is relatively new. Not condoning illegal migration but it is a natural and negative reality like drug abuse, crime and poverty. Thus, you cant negotiate with starving and desperate people.

Every single word in this paragraph comprises the primary reason why there exist this thing called a country's "military".

Indeed this entire paragraph is the single best justification out there for a military that faithfully protects the borders. Traditionally the best way to deal with accumulating garbage is to have someone come round and do the very dirty job of removing it, not suggesting that the garbage has a right to sit on the kerb and invite more garbage to join it.

Mass human migration might have been a fact, but just as much a fact is that it was traditionally resisted, often successfully, by whoever happen to be in the place said mass human migration was going to.

Mass, unquestioned, "legitimate" mass migration in our era has been the result of one thing: the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, which as originally designed was only supposed to apply to the diasporas of Europeans whose countries had been bombed to fuck and had decided it wasn't worth trying to rebuild. It was originally meant as a stop-gap measure in the same way that the UN itself originally commenced its existence as a military alliance against the Axis and to keep any of the 26 countries who first went in from sneaking off to make a separate peace with Germany, Italy, or Japan. America is almost unique in the world that it hasn't adopted the Refugee Convention into law as such, it's only endorsed the Convention as basically a good idea.

The Refugee Convention wasn't meant to have general application across all space and time, but that's the character it has taken on. And like all efforts at naive interventionism, it can't be easily tinkered with to make it fit local circumstances better, it's imposed from the top down, and it applies universal principles which, per Nassim Taleb, are rarely if ever a good idea.

Absent the Refugee Convention, even leaving aside shaming the fuck out of Germany for its Nazi past, there would not have been million-man new Islamic invasions from Turkey. There would instead have been a very quickly-composed military alliance between Germany and a few Balkan countries, a massing on the western side of the Dardanelles, several warnings along the lines of Achtung Ahmed, a short and impressive fireworks show, and a return to the status quo. With optional reconquest of Constantinople.

I think Pride Male may think of Africa until recently where things were more unclear, but even there they had big tribes which would have simply demanded allegiance of another tribe moving in. But in Asia and Europe border enforcement was normal for at least 500-1000 years.

The Romans at one time stopped enforcing their borders and it resulted in their total collapse. A few foreigners slipping in or working is one thing - mass invasion of this scale is utterly new. Look at Japan and Saudi Arabia - or Israel - they fully reject the idea of open borders.

And the refugees coming over to Jordan or Turkey vs the ones in the West have a huge difference: one are a cheap labor force for the elite while living in relative squalor as well powerless poor migrants, while in Europe they get pampered and helped on all levels with the license to rape and get lenient sentences. I doubt that Jordan or Turkey would give a rapist of a Turkish girl 15 weeks of some bullshit fine. They would have sentenced him to 15 years and the prison inmates together with the guards would have killed him behind bars. That would be the end of the Afghani rapist in Turkey or Jordan.

South Africa is just unable to defend their borders due to incompetence. In Europe it's not that - it's malevolence.

Can’t get worked up about it anymore. No use letting others get to you. Suffice it to say only couple countries on earth where the defense of borders is in question and the media brainwashes the people to feel sorry for the invaders.. Democrats will continue to have no serious plans on the issue to hasten to voting bloc

It’s hard to fight against illegal immigration when the MSM brainwashes the populace to accepting it

Case in point, looking up the caravan on Wikipedia. It will state that the caravan is fleeing “gang violence” as a fact in the first paragraph and the sources will be from pro illegal sources

In Europe after the year 800 - maybe the biggest changes were:

1. Tatars taking over Crimea from Goths (Stalin later deported the Crimeans back to Asia and many sneaked back in after 1990)

2. Hungarians moving into Hungary. But they technically took it from the Avars (who may had been Asian looking or best case scenario looked like Chechens).

3. Constantinople being changed into Turkish but (IIRC) the Ottomans later forced various Christians to go live in there. It was allegedly a 50% - 75% European city until the 1860s or something.

The rest of Europe was extremely stable and the other changes were mainly cultural / language (not genetic or whole populations being replaced).


Then Asia is even more stable than Europe ever was. The Mongols were too small in number to actually change China, Korea or Vietnam. The only place the Mongols changed were arguably areas of Afghanistan (the Hazara minority) and whole swathes of Central Asia (which had Iranian language speakers but today most of them look Asian. Maybe the only remnants of the original people are like mountain Uzbeks?).

Maybe the biggest demographic change in Asia was Taiwanese Aboriginals being outnumbered by Han Chinese (especially after 1945) and ethnic Manchu becoming a minority in Manchuria.

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1066783003836329987][/url]

Quote: (11-25-2018 06:17 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Quote:[/url]

"Freedom isn't free! It cost folks like you and me.
And if we don't all chip in, we'll never pay that bill.
Freedom isn't free! No there's a hefty fucking fee.
And if you don't throw in your buck o'five who will?

What would you do if someone told you to fight for freedom?
Would you answer the call, or run away like a little pussy?
'Cause the only reason that you're here is
'Cause folks died for you in the past
So maybe now it's your turn to die kickin' some ass!"

Does any know where I could donate to support the wall or the people defending it?

Edit; I google it and found this. Is it legit? How would I vet it?
[url=https://www.fundthewall.com/]https://www.fundthewall.com/