I actually got this news from a female. Iceland has outlawed the genital mutilation of males. Naturally, I wonder if doctors in any other countries will pay attention.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...17696.html

Icelanders are informed, intelligent people. Good for them in outlawing a barbarous practice which should have been outlawed a long time ago.

And as usual from that article, it's anudder Shoah:

Quote:Quote:

Mr Tamimi said he was particularly concerned about the potential impact of the bill on the small Jewish community.

“Even if there is just one Jew, it is very bad to criminalise him,” he said. “It’s very bad for Iceland to get that name, that they don’t want Jews. This is one way of saying they are not welcome.”

And I have to register a pleasant surprise. Because I was expecting transgender hypocrisy on the subject...

Quote:Quote:

“Jews are welcome in Iceland. But this is about child protection and children’s rights. That comes first, and before the religious rights of the adult.

“Every individual, it doesn’t matter what sex or how old… should be able to give informed consent for a procedure that is unnecessary, irreversible and can be harmful. His body, his choice.”

... i.e. I was expecting Iceland to permit rampant sex reassignment for children and so on.

But it turns out Iceland's a bit of a shitlord when it comes to trannie madness:

https://gayiceland.is/2016/trans-people-...-inhumane/

Quote:Quote:

Another major challenge trans people are facing in regards to the Icelandic health care system, is the stigma associated with being diagnosed as mentally ill. “You see in Iceland trans people still need to be diagnosed with a mental disorder to be able to get health care, and they put up with it even though that’s not the case, even though they’re perfectly sane, just so they can get the health care they really need,” Fox explains. “And by mental disorder I’m referring to the outdated definition “gender identity disorder”, which health care officials in Iceland are using as a diagnosis for trans people, instead of the most recent and up to date diagnosis “gender dysphoria”.

This is good, important shit. Recognising it's fucking misfiring neurons and not a genuine identity is a good view to have of this transsexualist bullshit. And it seems that while they indulge kids who think they're the wrong identity, I don't see any indications that they dole out the hormone-fucking pills to screw the kid's brain.

Does anyone have statistics or numbers on where male genital mutilation is practiced and where it is not?

Does anyone have any ideas or theories on how this practice have influenced Jewish men and shaped Jewish culture?

Stats.

I think there's two possibly intertwined reasons for circumcision. First, you will find circumcision practiced as a male initiation rite in many primitive tribes. Tribal practices share a lot of similar traits around the world. This is one of them. They could be biologically influenced, influenced by deep culture or both.

The other option is that is was a practice related to health. The Torah is full of advice that probably had some mixed superstitious-observational recommendations regarding food, hence kosher. Problems with the foreskin are common today and it's possible some culture creator in the ancient world put out the trend that people should be circumcised because of that.

But because the practice is so old there is little we can do but guess. Judaism's source culture are the Canaanites, who seem to have practiced circumcision, but before that nothing is known.

Around 1/3 of human males are circumcized, mostly in Muslim countries, sub-saharian Africa and North America.

Quote: (03-09-2018 02:50 AM)Montrose Wrote:  

Around 1/3 of human males are victims of genital mutilation in which they had no choice, mostly in Muslim countries, sub-saharian Africa and North America.

Fixed.

I heard somewhere that circumcision in North America started to be practice because they thought it will make males stop fapping. So here we also have religious reasons, although different from usual "covenant with God" routine.

Interestingly, in Hero With a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell one can read entire chapter dedicated to male genital mutilation and why certain culture practice it. Most disgusting and weird is the account of one tribe which even may be from Australia which practiced both circumcision and vertical cutting into shaft. They make a slit in the shaft to simulate vagina. Yes, you read that correctly. They believe that unity with gods is represented through some kind of male womb/hermaphroditism belief.
Other cultures inject into this snake god which wants to suck your dick. There is always connection between sexual energy represented as a sperm and gods which want it so circumcision is some kind of a deal to prevent that.

You girls need to harden up and stop crying about circumcision...I bet no-one would step up for the treatment Australian aboriginal style...

Link: The Unambal Aborigine Tribe of North West Australia

For the young man circumcision is followed by subincision when his beard starts to grow. The young man is seated on rock while his penis is split open with a stone knife along its full length on the underside. The penis, once split open, is pressed flat against the rock on which the young man is sitting.

Characteristic exposure of the urethral lining in a subincised penis

Ok, this is NSFW and shocking






[Mod: Linked to image]

http://i63.tinypic.com/501ohy.png

^Jesus Christ man you don't just go posting photos like that without warning

Quote: (03-09-2018 04:57 AM)Ice Man Wrote:  

^Jesus Christ man you don't just go posting photos like that without warning

Yeah, good point...I edited to include a warning

#AllCulturesAreEqual

Hoodies in a place called Iceland make sense.

Not a huge fan of adopting the language of those on the left. There's already a perfectly good word for the procedure- circumcision. There's no need to borrow the language of the other gender, because FGM is pretty different in regards to outcome and rationale.

Also not a huge fan of countries telling their citizens what to do with their children. Circumcision is pretty benign, outside of the very rare accidents, and isn't something the government should be encroaching on

There is the practice and then there is the stigma around ant-eater dick. Especially for American chicks and a lot of men in the US. You can't really have a conversation about it because it denigrates into a shit throwing match where "who wants a sock for a dick?" vs "we aren't mutilated bro/aren't Jewish".

Then when it gets past that stage it then descends into racial arguments where the feelings of Jews and Muslims are put on a pedestal.

Quote: (03-09-2018 09:03 AM)Sonoma Wrote:  

Not a huge fan of adopting the language of those on the left. There's already a perfectly good word for the procedure- circumcision. There's no need to borrow the language of the other gender, because FGM is pretty different in regards to outcome and rationale.

Also not a huge fan of countries telling their citizens what to do with their children. Circumcision is pretty benign, outside of the very rare accidents, and isn't something the government should be encroaching on

Not always, sometimes it's just a small nick in the clitoral hood. There's a wide variety of different practices in regards to FGM as well, and not all of them are the full-on removal of the clitoris most people associate with the term.

Utterly irrelevant though—if it's so important for your child to have this pointless and irreversible procedure performed so they can go to Valhalla, they can have it done when they're old enough to decide for themselves that it's what they want.

Sonoma says you shouldn't infringe on people's freedom to mutilate their own child's dicks. It's called circumcision and it's not that bad apparently. It's likely he was circumcised judging from his location too.

I say good for Iceland, outlaw barbaric jewish / islamic / whatever practises.

Iceland: "We're banning circumcision".
Jews: "We don't want that."
Iceland: "That is because your "we" is apparently different from our "we". Feel free to fuck off.

While banning circumcision is a fine decision and there are even Jewish folk advocating for it (Seinfeld even alluded to it on his show), I would not equate it with Female genital mutilation. Because in their case the clit is really mutilated (with varying degrees).

For men - the process should be banned because it causes a long-lasting physical trauma for the kid (you can even measure stress levels being higher for several months after). The practice is just utterly outdated and unnecessary.

Circumcision makes no sense. If we're going to remove part of a boy's penis without his consent, it would benefit society even more to remove the whole thing.

Since we've already established it's OK to alter a boy's body, who is to say removal of the penis would be wrong per se? You can't on the one hand say "Remove this" and then turn around and say "But not that!"

We've established there is no consent, so anything goes. Hear me out before you react, please. I think I have a good argument here.

If the penis is the primary instrument of rape (which it is) and if circumcision is legal (which it is), then you'd kill two birds with one stone by simply removing the penis. Sexual assault would be a thing of the past.

But there's more. One good argument in favor of circumcision is that it helps prevent disease. Therefore, penis removal would be even better since it would prevent both disease AND rape.

Granted, men would lose out on pleasure. But paraplegics who have no sensation in their groin area can orgasm when they get their necks rubbed (and such), so this is a solution to that.

Removing the penis of boys would also be a cost-saving measure. Public and private sector buildings could get rid of urinals and only have to deal with toilets.

Furthermore, penis removal would assure equality, since men would no longer have an appendage that harms so many women.

And finally, this measure would appease both Jews and Muslims. They'd get their beloved circumcision and so much more.

Since all of these arguments have now been made public, I would like to conclude this post by stating that anyone who doesn't support removal of the penis is a rape apologist. On top of that, they're people who hate Muslims and Jews, and want to waste money and keep the sexes unequal.

Therefore, in conclusion, men who want to keep their penises intact support hate. Feel free to argue against this, but that makes you a hatemonger who supports rape.

Excellent point. I may add that since abortion is legal and killing a baby inside or outside the womb is pretty much equivalent, it should be legal to kill babies once they are born (particularly if they are boys)

Quote: (03-10-2018 06:11 AM)Montrose Wrote:  

Excellent point. I may add that since abortion is legal and killing a baby inside or outside the womb is pretty much equivalent, it should be legal to kill babies once they are born (particularly if they are boys)

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03...0411.short

Science is way ahead of you - bio-ethics is great, isn't it?

Quote:Quote:

Law, ethics and medicine
Paper
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

This is not the only paper published on the topic. Some argue that parents should have the right to kill their children up to age 3.

Quote: (03-10-2018 06:11 AM)Montrose Wrote:  

Excellent point. I may add that since abortion is legal and killing a baby inside or outside the womb is pretty much equivalent, it should be legal to kill babies once they are born (particularly if they are boys)

I'm personally against 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester abortion, but approve of 4th through 51st trimester abortion.

Her body, her choice.

Circumcision does significantly reduce the risk of catching STDs. You would think on a forum full of players it would have more support

Quote: (03-10-2018 10:23 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Circumcision does significantly reduce the risk of catching STDs. You would think on a forum full of players it would have more support

That's fine.

You can consent to getting a strip of flesh torn off of you when you're old enough to make the decision for yourself.

Stefan Molyneux has done some good segments on this.

I could never bring myself to bring such pain to an innocent human being.

Yet another Semitic gift to Europeans that keeps on giving.