Here are just a few passages from the Quran which show that the suicide bomber did PRECISELY what he is compeled to do by the religion of peace. Note that there is nothing here which can be misinterpreted. The meaning and intent of these commandments is very clear. The commandments explicitely describe who should be killed and how they should be killed. Try comparing this to other Holy texts and try to tell me that all religions deserve equal respect.

Quote:Quote:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".

Quote:Quote:

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."

Fucking sick:

Little girls. The religion of peace hits little girls.

Sadly, I've become relatively cold to this, because I know that the sorry pussies we have for "leaders" won't do a thing and instead lecture us all on the evils of "racism" and "Islamophobia." It's hard to get angry when you won't use it.

It's a bit like the Odyssey, where the suitors are eating the West out of house and home, insulting the hosts, disgracing the women, depleting the goods and displacing the children from the inheritance. This goes both for the pussies in office and their beloved peasant imports.

Do the people take up their bows or do they simply shiver at being called "racist?"

Edit: As if to prove my point, that post above me shows up.

Quote: (05-23-2017 10:57 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Here are just a few passages from the Quran which show that the suicide bomber did PRECISELY what he is compeled to do by the religion of peace. Note that there is nothing here which can be misinterpreted. The meaning and intent of these commandments is very clear. The commandments explicitely describe who should be killed and how they should be killed. Try comparing this to other Holy texts and try to tell me that all religions deserve equal respect.

Quote:Quote:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".

Quote:Quote:

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

Quote:Quote:

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quote:Quote:

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:02 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

Fucking sick:

EDIT: Already posted.

I notice these attacks don't happen in Poland or Hungary. I wonder what they are doing differently there?

At this point, anyone who supports open borders globalism is aiding and abetting in these terrorist attacks. They are supporting the enemy, which is Islam.

That makes them the enemy as well.

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/867049822490112000][/url]

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:12 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

I notice these attacks don't happen in Poland or Hungary. I wonder what they are doing differently there?

Or Japan for that matter. Here is a list of terrorist attacks in Tokyo.


They just got lucky I guess.

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:22 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:12 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

I notice these attacks don't happen in Poland or Hungary. I wonder what they are doing differently there?

Or Japan for that matter. Here is a list of terrorist attacks in Tokyo.


They just got lucky I guess.

Yeah, some countries get all the breaks.

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:15 AM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  

At this point, anyone who supports open borders globalism is aiding and abetting in these terrorist attacks. They are supporting the enemy, which is Islam.

That makes them the enemy as well.

If there is any upside to constant terror attacks in Western Europe, is that is gives Eastern European states a solid foundation for the argument against the EU in taking in migrants from muslim countries.

It also reinforces the idea amongst the population of these nations that they must continue to vote in right-wing, nationalist governments so as to keep the argument and barrier to islamic migrant entry alive.

delete

Quote: (05-23-2017 08:31 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

Thankfully I had no work in the city centre itself, on other days I would be balls deep in gridlock and snowflakes losing their minds about some white power nationalists such as Tommy Robinson being the real monsters.

It's an odd white power nationalist who allows Sikhs and Hindus into the English Defence League, isn't it?

Quote: (05-23-2017 12:02 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  

Some of you have mentioned that incidents like this would red-pill degenerate airheaded women. You are naive to think this way. The most you will see out of thots is virtue-signalling on social media for attention and smoothing things out to avoid further conflict, that's just their evolutionary nature.

First post in a while—something a lot of men need to grasp is that there is a fundamental reason why women will always try to placate invading tribes: they do not face the same annihilation men face if a new tribe moves in and takes over, and so did not evolve any in-tribe loyalty.

Let's look at some tribal primates like chimps: what happens if one tribe defeats another?

The males are slaughtered
The females change possession
Previous male offspring are slaughtered

Note the one group here which isn't getting slaughtered? It's no surprise there are profoundly different behaviours manifesting across the sexes in humans when it comes to the topic of 'how to treat enemy tribes'.

To be sure, the fact that mass third world immigration benefits the elites (lower wages, increased state power, fractured population blocs which can be easily cowed into non-threatening action under the banner of identity politics) is only a tangential reason for mass migration. This was the guaranteed outcome from the moment women received the vote.

Most men I know are, at least in private, against muslim migration. We're talking at least 70%. Well over 90% of all the women are strongly for it.

Our grandfathers consigned our sons to oblivion when they gave women the vote. Sad, but true.

Universal political franchise was a terrible mistake—not enough people have skin in the game or the broad rationality to be trusted with something as important as the managing of a nation.

I predict one of several futures for Europe:

1) Europe becomes part of the expanding Islamic world;
2) Europe eventually turns to more extreme ideologies (some flavour of fascism, perhaps) and Europe returns to being a Christian monoculture;
3) The hard Left rebrands itself as the 'anti-Islam' party in the coming years and manages to use cultural momentum to stage a 'glorious revolution', once Islam is really unpopular.
4) Islam, at least in any organised form, is outlawed as a revolutionary, anti-Western ideology and all mosques etc. are demolished, followed by mass deportation. This is probably the most desirable of the options, but only if it happens sooner, rather than later. The longer things are allowed to continue, the more entrenched the police state will become. At best, Starship Troopers here we come.

Here's some things that won't be in the future of Europe:

Multiculturalism
Feminism
Liberalism (at least in any recognisable sense)
Women's suffrage (or universal suffrage in general)
Islam OR everything that's not Islam, depending on Europe's choice. To be clear, that would include music, dogs, bacon, alcohol and not being woken up at 5am in the fucking morning by the call to prayer.

Quote: (05-23-2017 10:15 AM)kavi Wrote:  

Boys, cannot throw out Islam and still entertain Christianity, two sides of the same coin.

The only real challenge to Islam can only come from Atheists and those who see the Monotheistic Dualistic wordview as the danger that it is.

A bit hypocritical to respect Christianity and call Islam names, there isnt too much difference in the two.

Bullshit

Suspected Manchester concert bomber identified.

Wait...for...it...

Salman Abedi

Color me shocked...

Quote: (05-23-2017 08:23 AM)Dismal Operator Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2017 07:41 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

Since it was mostly girls who died, there is a very good chance the media will spin this as a narrative of "toxic masculinity" and come after us instead.

Already started:

Surely the article goes on to discuss the horrible treatment of women in the radical Islamic community which the attacker was a part of? Let's find out:

Quote:Quote:

British authorities have identified a suspect in what appears to have been a suicide bombing and an act of terrorism outside an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England on May 22. Details are still emerging, but as of late Monday night, authorities had confirmed 19 people dead and more than 50 injured.

The victims of Monday’s bombing will almost certainly be mostly girls and women. The Grande fan demographic also includes a number of older millennial women, gay men, and general lovers of pop music, of course, but her live concerts are largely populated by tween and teenage girls and their moms. By staging the attack at a Grande show, the perpetrator or perpetrators chose to target children who may or may not have had an adult around to help them through an emergency situation.

And they targeted fans of an artist whose global brand is one of blissful, unsubdued feminine sexuality. Grande has long been the target of sexist rhetoric that has deemed her culpable for any sexual objectification or animosity that’s come her way. Her songs and wardrobe are sexy, yet she’s maintained a coy, youthful persona; the combination has led some haters to argue that she’s made her fortune by making people want to have sex with her, so whatever related harm befalls her is entirely her fault.

Like her pop-superstar predecessor Britney Spears, Grande has advanced a renegade, self-reflexive sexuality that’s threatening to the established heteropatriarchal order. If the Manchester bombing was an act of terrorism, its venue indicates that the attack was designed to terrorize young girls who idolize Grande’s image. Terrorism works by making people afraid to go about their daily lives, doing the things that make them feel human and whole: going to work, shopping at the mall, traveling by plane, dancing to Latin music at a gay club, singing along to a fun pop tune that lets young women envision themselves as powerful, sexual beings. All concertgoers whose nights ended in panic or tragedy on Monday will suffer some degree of post-traumatic consequences in the coming months and years. But the teens and children in the audience, who are still in the middle of developing their conceptions of themselves and the world, may find those notions irrevocably altered.

Some observers on Twitter are using this moment to take cheap shots at Grande’s music and roll their eyes at the makeup of her audience, as if a disproportionately young, female fanbase makes an artist somehow unserious. “MULTIPLE CONFIRMED FATALITIES at Manchester Arena. The last time I listened to Ariana Grande I almost died too,” one Boston-based journalist tweeted. Meanwhile, some reports are saying dozens of unaccompanied children are holed up at hotels, waiting alone until their parents and guardians can come find them. These girls are survivors of an orchestrated attack on girls and girlhood, a massive act of gender-based violence.

Huh, turns out Islam had nothing to do with this. Mr. Abedi was actually acting on behalf of the "established heteropatriarchal order."

Quote: (05-23-2017 10:15 AM)kavi Wrote:  

Boys, cannot throw out Islam and still entertain Christianity, two sides of the same coin.

The only real challenge to Islam can only come from Atheists and those who see the Monotheistic Dualistic wordview as the danger that it is.

A bit hypocritical to respect Christianity and call Islam names, there isnt too much difference in the two.

So wait, the quoted article says people with penises who aren't gay don't count as victims?

Quote: (05-23-2017 10:15 AM)kavi Wrote:  

Boys, cannot throw out Islam and still entertain Christianity, two sides of the same coin.

The only real challenge to Islam can only come from Atheists and those who see the Monotheistic Dualistic wordview as the danger that it is.

A bit hypocritical to respect Christianity and call Islam names, there isnt too much difference in the two.

I knew there was a Muslim apologist hiding in the thread somewhere. Secularism in Europe is a reason they are ahead of US in becoming a third world muslim caliphate. Secular societies will always have their void filled with a degenerate ideology aka islam communism.

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:12 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

I notice these attacks don't happen in Poland or Hungary. I wonder what they are doing differently there?

Is there a list of terrorist attacks out there showing the number of attacks in countries that haven't been involved in bombing and occupying middle eastern countries over the last few decades? Not getting political, I am genuinely interested in seeing those stats.

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:22 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Quote: (05-23-2017 11:12 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

I notice these attacks don't happen in Poland or Hungary. I wonder what they are doing differently there?

Or Japan for that matter. Here is a list of terrorist attacks in Tokyo.


They just got lucky I guess.

But think of all the lamb kebabs they are missing out on

This was a very British Terrorist attack.

It wasn't our 911 (even the events of 7/7 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_200...n_bombings - weren't our 911). This was just a shot over the bows. But our 911 is coming, have no question about that.

This was a very specific and perfectly timed attack, and I'll explain why later, but first, let's cover a bit of other ground with regard to terrorism in the UK.

So far we have escaped the whole terrorist thing 'relatively' unscathed (no disrespect to the victims of the IRA or the more recent Islamic attacks - I'm talking big picture here). Many many people have brought up the fact that these terrorists are amateurs. Many of us have refrained from explicitly pointing out ways that many more people could be killed in a far more efficient fashion. For obvious reasons. But we have reached the point where the Daily Mail is now printing bomb-making manuals in its news stories, and so many other people on other forums are asking 'why don't they do this?', that I'll just share this one example with you of how sheer carnage can be achieved. I'm not saying anything anyone hasn't thought when they pass through a major train station in the UK.

Btw, that bomb-making article in the Daily Mail was pretty much all you need to realise how easy it is to make a bomb. They went through the 3 critical components and gave examples of materials and also construction. It was gratuitous. Oh, they also explained about timers and how to construct one. I won't link to it, but you can find it if you look for that autistic twat that just got jailed for planting a viable device on a tube train.

Funnily enough, the same thought occurred to me this morning as it always does: why here? why now? why not somewhere where they can really do serious damage? say Victoria station for example. And lo and behold, I was browsing /pol/ and I came across the fact that Victoria bus station had been evacuated due to a bomb scare. Absolutely nothing about it in the news. The terrorists have already won.

And the irony is this: It was when I was in Victoria train station that I had a frightening thought. Jesus, there are about 3000 fucking people here, it would only take 3 suicide bombers carrying those super-heavy backpacks full of the most deadly and efficient plastic explosives to take out practically a majority of them. In such a confined space, with triangulation, the carnage unleashed would be equivalent to 911. The amount of dead might not reach such a high level (though it may exceed it) but the disruption to infrastructure would be unimaginable.

3 people. Willing to die in the name of Allah to punish the infidels and kaffirs. That is all it would take. Not a massive leap really, is it?

Don't worry, I'm not saying anything any of them haven't already worked out for themselves. There are even worse things you could do, but I give this example as being pertinent what with Victoria being closed today.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...s-bag.html

It is on Buckingham Palace road. You may not be able to get to the actual Royalty in this country, but you can get to a symbol of it.

There are dozens and dozens of such train stations in London.

But terrorism is not just about high-casualty rates. It is about the symbolism. And what better way to show you mean business than target mainly female children? Such ruthlessness. Such callousness. It's the equivalent of heads on sticks to project your psycho-power.

Make no mistake, the big one is coming, and it's coming soon, but this attack served another purpose apart from blind terroristic projection of power. It was payback, all the while being a warning as well.

The body-count here wasn't what mattered. This was about quality, not quantity.

I'll get to the point of why in my next post. My computer's still messed up so I'll just put this quickly out there before it totally crashes on me again. Sorry about that.

The problem isn't waking people up to the "Islamic threat."

In truth, there is no Islamic threat. The muslims are only here because we have traitors who open the gates to them in the first place.

Islam is a symptom of a much more serious cultural AIDS killing us from within.

Getting people to wake up on the cultural AIDS is far more difficult. Hating on Islam is easy because it is visible. The average right-winger recognizes this. But try explaining to them how Islam got here, and suddenly no one wants to address the (((fundamental problems))).