I always look for that gleam in their eyes of natural burning desire.

On a first date, I often go for a random kiss as a test to gauge whether the burning desire exists.

Do they passionately kiss back or do I get a lukewarm kiss? (If I get rejected altogether, that's the end of the date for me).

Passionate = a great bang likely awaits that same night. If I don't get it that night, it's going down in the next date or two for sure. High likelihood of a mini-LTR/LTR if I want it.

Lukewarm = Maybe I'll get the bang, maybe in a few dates, often times nothing happens after the first date. Bang will probably be OK if I do get it.

But whether it's one date or one year with a chick, once that burning desire is gone, it is usually gone for good. A key game concept is knowing when that desire is gone or about to be gone and ejecting accordingly.

I think a major difference between blue pill and red pill aware men is that the former can't recognize when the burning desire is not present and/or is gone for good. Chicks looking for a beta bucks prey on men who can't detect what real female desire looks like. The guy in the OP article is a perfect example of failing to recognize what real female burning desire looks like from the get-go.

However, I'm sympathetic to some degree: In places where men have little to no leverage left in the dating market, it can be very difficult for the average men to ever experience genuine female desire; to even get a taste of it. So when any pussy shows any attention, how can they resist? They don't know the difference.

Game fixes a lot this. Game teaches you how to act in a way that gets women hot and bothered. When you get women hot and bothered, you see and experience real female natural burning desire. Once you have experienced this with a few women, there is no going back. I can't even take seriously 30+ women anymore partly because it's virtually impossible for them to have that burning desire. The vast majority of 30+ women are mercenaries who are all about resource extraction. Once you have experienced a 21 year old girl who hangs on your every word and fucks you likes its your last fuck every time (at least until the burning desire is gone), it becomes extremely difficult to entertain going out with 30+ women or those late 20's "ready to settle down/I'm not like that anymore" types of women. MAYBE a pump and dump but that's it.

Personally, I am at a point now where I can recognize the burning desire pretty early via just body language and eye contact. Ultimately, I'll confirm via the first kiss but I can totally understand how inexperience guys can get married/get in a LTR and not recognize it until shit blows up in their face. It's something that has to be developed with experience and a dedication to understanding game concepts. And on top of all that, it something you must pay especially extra attention to in the very, VERY beginning of an interaction with a woman when she is the least invested in you. She should naturally want to be your little whore from the get-go and be treating you like a mini-celebrity as long as you run decent game. If she is not, you're fighting an uphill battle in the short-run and a unwinnable battle in the long-run.

I guess the point is:

Always look and be testing for that burning desire. If it is not there and/or disappears down the line, you are on borrowed time with that chick. If it's a date, get the bang that night. If it's a LTR/marriage, secure your assets.

If there is one hard lesson I've learned in life in dealing with women its that when they have checked out and that burning desire gone, they give ZERO fucks about you or your well-being. When a women has crossed this point, they are potentially very dangerous in a legal and social environment where they have unfair leverage.

Quote: (06-30-2016 09:35 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

I always look for that gleam in their eyes of natural burning desire.

On a first date, I often go for a random kiss as a test to gauge whether the burning desire exists.

Do they passionately kiss back or do I get a lukewarm kiss? (If I get rejected altogether, that's the end of the date for me).

Passionate = a great bang likely awaits that same night. If I don't get it that night, it's going down in the next date or two for sure. High likelihood of a mini-LTR/LTR if I want it.

Lukewarm = Maybe I'll get the bang, maybe in a few dates, often times nothing happens after the first date. Bang will probably be OK if I do get it.

But whether it's one date or one year with a chick, once that burning desire is gone, it is usually gone for good. A key game concept is knowing when that desire is gone or about to be gone and ejecting accordingly.

I think a major difference between blue pill and red pill aware men is that the former can't recognize when the burning desire is not present and/or is gone for good. Chicks looking for a beta bucks prey on men who can't detect what real female desire looks like. The guy in the OP article is a perfect example of failing to recognize what real female burning desire looks like from the get-go.

However, I'm sympathetic to some degree: In places where men have little to no leverage left in the dating market, it can be very difficult for the average men to ever experience genuine female desire; to even get a taste of it. So when any pussy shows any attention, how can they resist? They don't know the difference.

Game fixes a lot this. Game teaches you how to act in a way that gets women hot and bothered. When you get women hot and bothered, you see and experience real female natural burning desire. Once you have experienced this with a few women, there is no going back. I can't even take seriously 30+ women anymore partly because it's virtually impossible for them to have that burning desire. The vast majority of 30+ women are mercenaries who are all about resource extraction. Once you have experienced a 21 year old girl who hangs on your every word and fucks you likes its your last fuck every time (at least until the burning desire is gone), it becomes extremely difficult to entertain going out with 30+ women or those late 20's "ready to settle down/I'm not like that anymore" types of women. MAYBE a pump and dump but that's it.

Personally, I am at a point now where I can recognize the burning desire pretty early via just body language and eye contact. Ultimately, I'll confirm via the first kiss but I can totally understand how inexperience guys can get married/get in a LTR and not recognize it until shit blows up in their face. It's something that has to be developed with experience and a dedication to understanding game concepts. And on top of all that, it something you must pay especially extra attention to in the very, VERY beginning of an interaction with a woman when she is the least invested in you. She should naturally want to be your little whore from the get-go and be treating you like a mini-celebrity as long as you run decent game. If she is not, you're fighting an uphill battle in the short-run and a unwinnable battle in the long-run.

I guess the point is:

Always look and be testing for that burning desire. If it is not there and/or disappears down the line, you are on borrowed time with that chick. If it's a date, get the bang that night. If it's a LTR/marriage, secure your assets.

If there is one hard lesson I've learned in life in dealing with women its that when they have checked out and that burning desire gone, they give ZERO fucks about you or your well-being. When a women has crossed this point, they are potentially very dangerous in a legal and social environment where they have unfair leverage.

I wish I could like this post twice.

For you young cats out there, LISTEN TO THIS MAN. Especially the parts about female desire (learning to recognize it, and not settling for anything less) and women giving zero fucks once they're done with you.

Quote: (06-30-2016 08:24 AM)Sumanguru Wrote:  

"Which nationalities?"

All of them.

The only question is how much will society let them get away with it.

The social rules of the society (i.e. nationality) she comes from linger in her mind as her moral code. To take an extreme example, you think most Saudi women will go dick pin-cushion the moment she gets off the plane? It takes time to unwind a moral code, and some never will.

I side with Linux on this one. The claim that "all women are like that" is just laughable. I could believe Bosch if he said "All aussie bogan chicks are like that". But to say all women globally (and Linux is a confirmed global connoisseur), simply doesn't fit reality. Even "all women can become like that" is stretching it.

Believe it or not, the world still has something called a 'shy girl', and 'chicks who want to get married at 20'. Live in a socially fucked up society long enough and you risk thinking that shit is normal.

I've seen more than a few cute, demure, submissive Korean/Pinay/German/Polish/etc girls who, once hitched to a soldier, got their ticket to the Land Of The Great PX and, after a few years of Amerika, become more bitter, obese, spiteful, vindictive feminist harpies than the home-grown versions usually aspire to. (Yeah, anecdotal )

The cultural environment has amazing powers of conditioning and change. "Finding a foreign girl" ain't the magic bullet.

So, yeah, no dog in this fight, but if pressed, I lean Bosch.

Quote: (06-30-2016 10:02 AM)Sumanguru Wrote:  

I wish I could like this post twice.

For you young cats out there, LISTEN TO THIS MAN. Especially the parts about female desire (learning to recognize it, and not settling for anything less) and women giving zero fucks once they're done with you.

No doubt. Great advice.

Quote: (06-28-2016 05:58 PM)pitt Wrote:  

Quote: (06-28-2016 05:02 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

Quote: (06-28-2016 03:45 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  

Given all the science that is now saying that women with high partner counts have significantly diminished pair-bonding ability, I'd say he has reason to be concerned about his wife's past.

Just another way of saying NAWALT. No offense, but I don't see how your experience of having been married several times equates to you having any particular expertise in picking LTR/marriage prospects. And, anecdotes != data.

I don't care about this particular situation, but it's bullshit to suggest that partner count doesn't matter in general, which is what it seems like you're doing. It doesn't take a scientific study to see that the more sexual partners your wife had before you, the more likely you are to end up divorced.

Totally agree with you.

There are many sluts who have kids and end up living with someone (actually most of sluts don't really end up being alone). Are they usually good wives? Fuck no.

A woman will usually behave according to her past acts, once a whore, she will always be a whore. Remember that, internalize that and you will have less bullshit to deal with.

In my experience, the more sexual partners a girl had before me,
the more likely:

- she was viewing sex as a sport and there was no emotional bonding,
men were just numbers for her

- the more slutty she was overall

- the more unreliable was overall

- the more she was flirting with any attractive guy, by default

- the more she was judging me only on my sexual performances

And it makes sense from every point of view.

It's logical that at any given time,

someone who loves sausages, will of course eat more sausages

than an average person.

Quote: (06-30-2016 11:35 AM)seniol Wrote:  

It's logical that at any given time,

someone who loves sausages, will of course eat more sausages

than an average person.

I love you guys.

Easily my favorite quote of the day.

The Black Knight, I wanted to stand up shout amen when you wrote that !

Quote: (06-28-2016 08:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

A girl only learns to be that much of a skilled whore by years of committed, regularly dick-sucking, where if you laid them out end to end you'd have a couple of miles of dickroad that she's gobbled up like Pacman.

Seriously hilarious.

I don't think either of you are right 100%

I'd say that of course there are varying degrees, so not all women are exactly the same.

Generalizations are useful.

Almost all women are like that (AAWALT).

Effectively, all women are like that, but just like the best rules there will be some exceptions or at least variations.

Personal opinion is that the best way to 'get' that burning desire is just to be good in the sack. When I was younger and just cared about 'adding notches' on my belt I just pumped and dumped, usually it was pretty boring to be honest, and the girls rarely called back; when I started using good foreplay then I'd meet women (some of whom were 'first date bangs' who didn't even know a thing about me who'd keep inviting me back for more sex.)

I think it's really a cognitive dissonance thing, because physical desire is purely a "biological" drive, while 'platonic' relationships are more intellectual. I think that good game is necessary on a first impression to get her into the sack to begin with, but after that if you can give her hot, steaming orgasms, then you've more or less got her hooked.

Boggles my mind how many guys are married for years and don't even know what good sex feels like, along with deluding themselves into believing that "women just don't like sex" as much as men; I think if some married dude has to "ask" for sex then that right there is a testimony to his lack of skills in the sheet- if a guy is good at it then she'll be asking him.

Quote: (06-30-2016 09:35 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

When a women has crossed this point, they are potentially very dangerous in a legal and social environment where they have unfair leverage.

Great point on "social leverage". If/when things go south, women can bounce back in an instant. I've seen women move to a place where they knew no one and within a week have a boyfriend and a social circle. And it's not uncommon. It's uncommon for men though. I've see plenty of men where it takes them years to get a girl and have a social circle upon moving to a new place. This is the leverage they have.

Quote: (06-30-2016 09:35 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

...
However, I'm sympathetic to some degree: In places where men have little to no leverage left in the dating market, it can be very difficult for the average men to ever experience genuine female desire; to even get a taste of it. So when any pussy shows any attention, how can they resist? They don't know the difference.
...

You don't have to bounce around on a porn site for long to determine the difference between a woman desperate to worship dick and a played out, dead-eyed meatsack.

I reckon that blue pill guys would recognise the difference but they actually think the former is a Hollywood myth.

Quote: (06-30-2016 04:50 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

When you say all women are like this, could you clarify the nationalities involved?

All of them.

Remember, most Female Goals don't need to move progress beyond Step 2 to be achieved. Step 3 and 4 are purely-dependant upon how fearful the girl is of the punishment for transgression. I'd posit that ever aboriginal girl I've known seemed to entirely-exist in Steps 3 and 4.

But note Step 4: what transgressive behaviour has been normalised or is on its way to being normalised in their home or adoptive cultures? I was disappointed to see the signs of Westernised behaviour creeping into Eastern European Girls, particularly after the hype, and my country is full of Fat Asian Girls. As such, I believe if you marry a foreign bride, her behaviour is eventually going to be poisoned by her adoptive culture.

It seems they're always, always ready to degrade the social boundaries via Step 4 normalisation where they only need to get a bunch of women to emphasise with their rationalisation for transgression to change the culture.

As such, every culture is threatened by transgressive female behaviour. Look at how fundamentally-fucked up the male / female sexual marketplace has become just from 50 or so years of Radical Feminism. Things degrade shockingly-fast.

I believe this is why the majority of cultures have always placed such heavy-restrictions on female behaviour and sexuality. I vaguely remember a study into this when I was younger. Rice, maybe? I think he studied 150+ cultures and noted that the stronger the Power Balance in favour of the men of that society, the more tightly-female sexuality was controlled. There's various theories floated for this, and ideas of Male and Female Control are popular.

I expect it's because they understand Steps 1-4 I outlined above: there is no behaviour a woman can't rationalise away and then try to normalise, and thereby, completely destroy functional society. It's instinctual. You mightn't think a foreign girl is capable of being a Bad Girl, but have you never seen her show Mischievous or Malicious Behaviour, no matter how outwardly well-behaved? C'mon - it doesn't matter how feminine she is, you know that Giggle. Goddamn, you should have seen the new Indian transplant nurses instantly start forming power cliques to ostracise each other at our local hospital.

Without it, you end up with #Shoutyourabortion and unescorted Muslim girls twerking on the Underground in Hijabs.

Quote: (07-01-2016 04:55 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

But note Step 4: what transgressive behaviour has been normalised or is on its way to being normalised in their home or adoptive cultures? I was disappointed to see the signs of Westernised behaviour creeping into Eastern European Girls, particularly after the hype, and my country is full of Fat Girls.

Look at how fundamentally-fucked up the male / female sexual marketplace has become just from 50 or so years of Radical Feminism. Things degrade shockingly-fast.

True, even in Eastern Europe things are going downhill fast.

Girls are getting fatter, and they are glued to their smartphone
80% of the time.

Groups of girls "just wanna have fun" and they mainly take selfies
and show off with whatever accesories their parents bought.

It's hard to have any kind of intelligent discussion with them

Quote: (06-30-2016 10:29 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

Believe it or not, the world still has something called a 'shy girl',

Every Madonna has a Whore waiting to come out in the bedroom, if you free her from her shackles.

Quote:Quote:

and 'chicks who want to get married at 20'.

And are longing for adventure and the possibility of 'what might have been' by 40?

Once thing I remember from my Grandparent's generation is just how resigned to unhappiness women often seemed by middle-age. This made me naturally sympathise with Feminism as a child, thinking that couples that unhappy with each other would be better off apart, particularly as the children had always left home by then.

Of course, that was before I understood that menopause was making these women naturally less-affectionate towards their husbands; and that women are generally-unhappy and dissatisfied with their life's circumstances, regardless of what it is.

AWALT, even if it's toned down to simple day-dreaming about other possibilities.



What usually saved them from this state was grandchildren.

Quote: (07-01-2016 07:38 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

What usually saved them from this state was grandchildren.

Thus, in a way, children are tantamount for a woman’s stability and happiness, correct?

Seems to make sense, as the bitterest women I know, be they my age (20's), 30's, 40's or older are those who have no children. The worst are those who have no children and proudly proclaim they will NEVER have children.

Damn dick munching Pac-Women who spit poison, that's what they are.

All Women Are Like That. All Women. Your mother; your sister; your wife; even the most pious of Nuns are Like That.

Which brings us to the question: what's the difference between a pious and happy Nun like Mother Angelica, and a bitter, burned-out divorcee or husband-hating shrew?

Quote:Quote:

Rule #1: Everything I want, I believe I deserve.

Rule #2: What's the least amount of effort I can expend to get what I believe I deserve as quickly as possible?

Rule #3: If the quickest and laziest route to achieving what I believe I deserve would require serious moral or social transgressions, then those rules don't apply to me, because of how righteously-deserving I am.

Rule #4: If I am stigmatised for any moral or social transgressions in the righteous pursuit of what I believe I deserve, then what is the least amount of effort I can expend to defuse criticism, deflect blame or escape punishment?

While the four points that AB lists apply particularly to women, the underlying entitlement is a cultural universal. People in general want something for nothing, bread and circuses, and both capitalism and communism try and reduce everything to a mechanical, financial metric. More stuff good; less stuff bad. The average person becomes a consumer, a whining child, demanding more milk.

The difference between a pious Nun and a cock-addicted tramp is two fold; gratitude, and an accurate self-image.

Gratitude is the least common emotion you'll find in humanity. Animals have it in spades; give a dog food and it'll love you forever. Do a man a favour, and he'll plot to destroy you. It takes an active, concerted effort to feel this emotion.

As for an accurate self-assessment; Mother Angelica would point out that we all clearly deserve Hell, but for the Grace of Christ. She takes the first rule and flips it on its head; she deserves the worst, and anything better than that is a blessing.

While I don't believe in a literal Garden of Eden, it certainly goes a long way to explain what's messed up with our species.

EDIT: Corollary: All Men are Lazy Pussies. We neither want to toil against the Earth, nor do we want to lead our wives (Beta Male Adam). It's a constant force of will not to succumb to this innate desire for weakness, even though we know that being a lazy pussy will make us miserable.

Only human beings need radio commercials during the summer to remind them to drink water.

Honestly I don't think it's that big of a deal when a woman has a high count. It's only a real issue if you don't have a high count yourself and/or she's gonna cheat on you.

Most girls 7 and up are gonna have a high count, they've just had too much dick thrown at them throughout their lives.

The only thing that matters is whether they will stay faithful to you, and I am a firm believer that your GAME is much more important in keeping them loyal than the girl's sexual history. Even girls with low counts will cheat when they are with a lame guy and they have the opportunity to cheat with a higher-value guy.

Quote: (06-30-2016 09:35 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

I always look for that gleam in their eyes of natural burning desire.

On a first date, I often go for a random kiss as a test to gauge whether the burning desire exists.

Do they passionately kiss back or do I get a lukewarm kiss? (If I get rejected altogether, that's the end of the date for me).

Passionate = a great bang likely awaits that same night. If I don't get it that night, it's going down in the next date or two for sure. High likelihood of a mini-LTR/LTR if I want it.

Lukewarm = Maybe I'll get the bang, maybe in a few dates, often times nothing happens after the first date. Bang will probably be OK if I do get it.

But whether it's one date or one year with a chick, once that burning desire is gone, it is usually gone for good. A key game concept is knowing when that desire is gone or about to be gone and ejecting accordingly.

I think a major difference between blue pill and red pill aware men is that the former can't recognize when the burning desire is not present and/or is gone for good. Chicks looking for a beta bucks prey on men who can't detect what real female desire looks like. The guy in the OP article is a perfect example of failing to recognize what real female burning desire looks like from the get-go.

However, I'm sympathetic to some degree: In places where men have little to no leverage left in the dating market, it can be very difficult for the average men to ever experience genuine female desire; to even get a taste of it. So when any pussy shows any attention, how can they resist? They don't know the difference.

Game fixes a lot this. Game teaches you how to act in a way that gets women hot and bothered. When you get women hot and bothered, you see and experience real female natural burning desire. Once you have experienced this with a few women, there is no going back. I can't even take seriously 30+ women anymore partly because it's virtually impossible for them to have that burning desire. The vast majority of 30+ women are mercenaries who are all about resource extraction. Once you have experienced a 21 year old girl who hangs on your every word and fucks you likes its your last fuck every time (at least until the burning desire is gone), it becomes extremely difficult to entertain going out with 30+ women or those late 20's "ready to settle down/I'm not like that anymore" types of women. MAYBE a pump and dump but that's it.

Personally, I am at a point now where I can recognize the burning desire pretty early via just body language and eye contact. Ultimately, I'll confirm via the first kiss but I can totally understand how inexperience guys can get married/get in a LTR and not recognize it until shit blows up in their face. It's something that has to be developed with experience and a dedication to understanding game concepts. And on top of all that, it something you must pay especially extra attention to in the very, VERY beginning of an interaction with a woman when she is the least invested in you. She should naturally want to be your little whore from the get-go and be treating you like a mini-celebrity as long as you run decent game. If she is not, you're fighting an uphill battle in the short-run and a unwinnable battle in the long-run.

I guess the point is:

Always look and be testing for that burning desire. If it is not there and/or disappears down the line, you are on borrowed time with that chick. If it's a date, get the bang that night. If it's a LTR/marriage, secure your assets.

If there is one hard lesson I've learned in life in dealing with women its that when they have checked out and that burning desire gone, they give ZERO fucks about you or your well-being. When a women has crossed this point, they are potentially very dangerous in a legal and social environment where they have unfair leverage.

Quote: (07-01-2016 12:13 PM)rini Wrote:  

All Women Are Like That. All Women.

Rule #1: Everything I want, I believe I deserve.

Rule #2: What's the least amount of effort I can expend to get what I believe I deserve as quickly as possible?

Rule #3: If the quickest and laziest route to achieving what I believe I deserve would require serious moral or social transgressions, then those rules don't apply to me, because of how righteously-deserving I am.

Rule #4: If I am stigmatised for any moral or social transgressions in the righteous pursuit of what I believe I deserve, then what is the least amount of effort I can expend to defuse criticism, deflect blame or escape punishment?

Also:

Let's take

person X who loves sausages and ate over the last years on average
6 different sausages in a week

and compare it to a most average person Y who eats on average
1 sausage in a week

at any given point from 2017, who is more likely
to eat more new sausages ?

Person X or person Y ?

Quote: (07-01-2016 12:31 PM)rungoodinc Wrote:  

Honestly I don't think it's that big of a deal when a woman has a high count. It's only a real issue if you don't have a high count yourself and/or she's gonna cheat on you.

Most girls 7 and up are gonna have a high count, they've just had too much dick thrown at them throughout their lives.

The only thing that matters is whether they will stay faithful to you, and I am a firm believer that your GAME is much more important in keeping them loyal than the girl's sexual history. Even girls with low counts will cheat when they are with a lame guy and they have the opportunity to cheat with a higher-value guy.

The more partners women have, the less they are able to maintain a LTR, that's an established fact. Promiscuity damages women.

From the original post, the guy mentioned 50 videos with 30 men. She's a straight up whore. Who records that many sexual encounters if they're not a porn star? Question 2. How many guys has she fucked off camera? Gotta be triple digits.

Quote: (06-30-2016 09:35 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

I always look for that gleam in their eyes of natural burning desire.

On a first date, I often go for a random kiss as a test to gauge whether the burning desire exists.

Do they passionately kiss back or do I get a lukewarm kiss? (If I get rejected altogether, that's the end of the date for me).

Passionate = a great bang likely awaits that same night. If I don't get it that night, it's going down in the next date or two for sure. High likelihood of a mini-LTR/LTR if I want it.

Lukewarm = Maybe I'll get the bang, maybe in a few dates, often times nothing happens after the first date. Bang will probably be OK if I do get it.

But whether it's one date or one year with a chick, once that burning desire is gone, it is usually gone for good. A key game concept is knowing when that desire is gone or about to be gone and ejecting accordingly.

I think a major difference between blue pill and red pill aware men is that the former can't recognize when the burning desire is not present and/or is gone for good. Chicks looking for a beta bucks prey on men who can't detect what real female desire looks like. The guy in the OP article is a perfect example of failing to recognize what real female burning desire looks like from the get-go.

However, I'm sympathetic to some degree: In places where men have little to no leverage left in the dating market, it can be very difficult for the average men to ever experience genuine female desire; to even get a taste of it. So when any pussy shows any attention, how can they resist? They don't know the difference.

Game fixes a lot this. Game teaches you how to act in a way that gets women hot and bothered. When you get women hot and bothered, you see and experience real female natural burning desire. Once you have experienced this with a few women, there is no going back. I can't even take seriously 30+ women anymore partly because it's virtually impossible for them to have that burning desire. The vast majority of 30+ women are mercenaries who are all about resource extraction. Once you have experienced a 21 year old girl who hangs on your every word and fucks you likes its your last fuck every time (at least until the burning desire is gone), it becomes extremely difficult to entertain going out with 30+ women or those late 20's "ready to settle down/I'm not like that anymore" types of women. MAYBE a pump and dump but that's it.

Personally, I am at a point now where I can recognize the burning desire pretty early via just body language and eye contact. Ultimately, I'll confirm via the first kiss but I can totally understand how inexperience guys can get married/get in a LTR and not recognize it until shit blows up in their face. It's something that has to be developed with experience and a dedication to understanding game concepts. And on top of all that, it something you must pay especially extra attention to in the very, VERY beginning of an interaction with a woman when she is the least invested in you. She should naturally want to be your little whore from the get-go and be treating you like a mini-celebrity as long as you run decent game. If she is not, you're fighting an uphill battle in the short-run and a unwinnable battle in the long-run.

I guess the point is:

Always look and be testing for that burning desire. If it is not there and/or disappears down the line, you are on borrowed time with that chick. If it's a date, get the bang that night. If it's a LTR/marriage, secure your assets.

If there is one hard lesson I've learned in life in dealing with women its that when they have checked out and that burning desire gone, they give ZERO fucks about you or your well-being. When a women has crossed this point, they are potentially very dangerous in a legal and social environment where they have unfair leverage.

I wish it were possible to super-like a post.

Quote: (06-30-2016 05:45 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

Boggles my mind how many guys are married for years and don't even know what good sex feels like, along with deluding themselves into believing that "women just don't like sex" as much as men; I think if some married dude has to "ask" for sex then that right there is a testimony to his lack of skills in the sheet- if a guy is good at it then she'll be asking him.

That is very true. There's a lot of sex freaks out there who don't know it yet. The first orgasm they get where their whole body shakes will change that.....and if you're the one to give it to them it can produce a very powerful attachment.

Quote:Quote:

Personally, I am at a point now where I can recognize the burning desire pretty early via just body language and eye contact. Ultimately, I'll confirm via the first kiss but I can totally understand how inexperience guys can get married/get in a LTR and not recognize it until shit blows up in their face. It's something that has to be developed with experience and a dedication to understanding game concepts. And on top of all that, it something you must pay especially extra attention to in the very, VERY beginning of an interaction with a woman when she is the least invested in you. She should naturally want to be your little whore from the get-go and be treating you like a mini-celebrity as long as you run decent game. If she is not, you're fighting an uphill battle in the short-run and a unwinnable battle in the long-run.

That right there is key to running good game. Some of Player Supreme's older materials have some great stuff in them about eye contact and how to use it in the game, and those early writings are more or less the gold standard of how to manage women. Remember that if she's looking she's choosing but if "she ain't choosing, she's loosing".

Quote: (06-30-2016 01:29 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Quote: (06-28-2016 08:31 PM)nek Wrote:  

Quote: (06-28-2016 07:11 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

I said I understood why she wasn't willing to try something new because she was probably burntout from all the bar pick ups and coffee meetups she had.

Based on years of observation, I've noticed people generally find the dreadful relationships they deserve.

Can you elaborate on this?

Nobody simply wakes up one day flat broke, chained to a landwhale and five screaming brats.

Thank Jeesus and the seven Gods! I woke up this morning with empty pockets and a dead arm thinking this Orca and her screeching spawn were mine.
Thank God, for LDN.
Last time I drink JaegerMeister.