Quote: (10-28-2015 01:01 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

Googles motto: "Don't be Evil" is no more.

And then there is the orwellian shit the leftists are helping to build.

Quote: (10-29-2015 01:13 PM)Bear Hands Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

Grey supports this argument rather accurately, defining it as “pedophile culture,” with examples like Pornhub’s top category’s being “Teen.” Grey also mentions the rise in labiaplasty and hymenoplasty, procedures that reduce women’s labia and reverse women’s vaginas to “virgin-like tightness.” I’d say all of these are a pretty strong indicator of our society’s sexual desire for pre-pubescent women.

Translation: Men cannot like youthful women without being pedophiles, so men should be on board for pedophile acceptance too. If they do not want to be labeled pedophiles, start showing spinsters attention.

The author and the referenced author seem incapable of understanding the difference between "virginal," or "minimally damaged," and "undeveloped." Whorishness is just assumed once a woman develops.

"Pre-pubescent women" is bullshit phrasing that seems like an attempt at manipulating language to reduce the difference between women and girls. I honestly cannot tell if this article is supposed to be subtle support for pedophilia, the first of many steps towards normalizing it, or an actual condemnation. It pretends to condemn pedophilia but the manipulation towards normalization is evident in the language.

This is fucked up beyond belief. The bloody words are an oxymoron. Fuck their mindtrick and fuck their forked tongue.

The gallows are the appropriate end for those people.

One thing I notice that applies to the current topic as well as many disorders; a common argument is "Well their brain is just hard-wired that way so they aren't at fault and are demonized". Drug addiction: "Well the guy's brain is wired to make him that way so it isn't his fault". Trannies: "Well the guy's brain is wired to make him that way so it isn't his fault". Being a pedo "Well the guy's brain is wired to make him that way so it isn't his fault".

Couldn't that apply to just about anything though?

There was even an article about how neuroscientists have supposedly identified differences in brain structures that will per-dispose them to being sexist: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/10/can...xist.html. The next Roosh gets accused of being sexist he should troll by saying "Oh my brain just makes me like that in the same way the brains of transgender people make them like that. If you are sympathetic towards them then why not me?"

I wouldn't be surprised if some scientist comes out with a paper talking about what sort of brain structure makes someone racist. Would a KKK member be able to say "Well I'm racist and I can't help it but as long as I don't lynch any black people then you should sympathize with me?"

Quote: (10-29-2015 10:49 AM)Troll King Wrote:  

In one of the many responding articles to Nickerson, Alicen Grey raises many exceptional points in her article, “You’ve heard of rape culture, but have you heard of pedophile culture?” at 
feministcurrent.com.

Her article sheds light on the dark fact that, while pedophilia might seem taboo and massively hated, that it is actually not the case. Grey writes that “pedophilia is actually rewarded and celebrated” in our culture.

Grey supports this argument rather accurately, defining it as “pedophile culture,” with examples like Pornhub’s top category’s being “Teen.” Grey also mentions the rise in labiaplasty and hymenoplasty, procedures that reduce women’s labia and reverse women’s vaginas to “virgin-like tightness.” I’d say all of these are a pretty strong indicator of our society’s sexual desire for pre-pubescent women.

Alicen Grey looks like this:





----------------

The most important part of her article mentions "Teen" as the most popular search title on YouPorn. If her article were scientific (or at least pretending to be scientific), she'd find a large sample size of men who regularly search for "Teen" porn, and then ask them why they like it.

Even agenda-driven questions like, "Do you like female porn actresses who are small and thin?" would yield diverse answers like, "Yes, they're my favorite body type." and "No, those small and thin women are ugly. I prefer either big breasted women or thin and tall women, minimum height 5'8"."

But, no. Stupid feminist doesn't even ask why men prefer certain types of porn; she just assumes to know why - and attacks them.

---------------

Quote:Paracelsus Wrote:

It's more likely white girl ignorance. It takes five minutes on Wikipedia to identify paedophilia as sexual attraction towards pre-pubescent (i.e. 0-10) children, as opposed to ephebophilia -- persistent sexual attraction towards late adolescent children (15-19). One suspects she's trying to conflate the two together in people's minds.

I don't think so. For one thing, Alcien Grey isn't white; she's a feminist.

And, for another thing, which social group has a higher relative percentage of its members who are pedophiles? Homosexuals.

Samseau, (I think) posted some links to studies which claim: (1) If a man is homosexual, his identical twin brother is homosexual only 15% of the time. (2) Homosexuals are 21 times more likely to report being molested by a same-sex adult when they were young children.

So the homosexuals are, relatively speaking, the true pedophiles. But this feminist is too busy attacking heterosexual males to realize this.

I don't want to link to the original article, because every website that posted this information has tons of banner ads. (Those interested in reading the full article can cut-and-paste the first paragraph into google.)

So here's Anonymous Conservative's take on it.

----------------------------


An academic conference held at the University of Cambridge said that pedophilia interest is “natural and normal for males”, and that “at least a sizable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children, and normal males are aroused by children.”

The article should have continued:


All the researchers agreed that the best way to address such a situation is for all such men to be brutally murdered wherever they are found, so our noble species will not see its gene pool contaminated with such filth.

In the fifties, it would have said that.

It is not impossible that they are right, technically. In the fifties, children routinely played outside alone, and stories of abductions and sexual assaults were rare enough that parents never gave it a second thought.

When r-selection is normal, you are the abnormal one, and the rabbits have no idea that their abnormal state of degeneracy isn’t normal. The them, it makes perfect sense if many men find themselves aroused by the sight of six year old girls playing with puppies. Right now, acting on that is generally considered abnormal, but give the free resources 100 years, and these same academics would find that many men have at least one time when they can’t keep themselves from molesting a child, and that will be couched as normal and nothing to me ashamed of. Even worse, they would probably be right – and society might not be outraged. Then we would really be the weird ones.

I wonder what Reagan would have done if he had known that accessing the national debt and flooding it into the economy would, 35 years hence, produce a nation filled with degenerate pedophiles, cowardly appeasers, and hopeless communists – even in his own Republican party.

r/K is in its infancy now. Some day, I expect that a population strongly K-ified by shortage will vow never again, and they will use a knowledge of r/K to structure a government designed to actively provoke K in the citizenry through only rewarding those who strive, imbuing children with the warrior spirit through aggressive indoctrination and rewarding aggressive competitiveness, and expelling any who oppose such a mechanism.

It will be a glorious civilization, if it can last the endless stream of copious wealth it will produce.

^^^

Catching up on this thread, it occurs to me that pushing pedophilia may not necessarily be for the elites or even to further the degeneracy but instead to further control the male populace. Maybe through microchips implanted or some sort of deeper police state.

Think about it. If they think that it is perfectly normal for men to find children sexually arousing and they push this narrative, then not only do they further alienate fathers from the family and men from raising the next generation as teachers and coaches but they lay the foundation to continue to further their restrictions on men.

I can here it now:

"Think of the children....If we can stop just one child from getting molested/raped, then isn't it worth [x]...where x = some sort of dystopian method used to control men."

"After all, if you are innocent then you don't have anything to hide or worry about."

Wer'e back with the latest. Miley Cyrus seems to have been enlisted in support of the cause: http://vigilantcitizen.com/musicbusiness...ild-abuse/







This will link in well with that trans-age stuff we saw last week.

I think the rot goes further. Biologically men are attracted to young fertile women who are able to bear children (full secondary-sex characteristics). Modern society (U.S.) deems 18 to be the appropriate age to be an adult and be able to consent to sexual conduct with all other adults. That is all well and good.

However, Feminism and current society bombards our male population with sexual messages featuring "teen" girls in the form of "empowerment."

Feminism and current society simultaneously lambastes male biological sexuality and questions adult legal relationships between men and younger women where the women are OVER 18 but LESS than 30.

Feminism links 30-40+ guys sleeping with women in their 20s to pedophilia. (It's creepy)

Restrict and demonize male sexuality.

and, as mentioned in multiple responses, Feminists don't give two hoots about older men and younger men, even where it really is pedophilia.

Quote: (12-20-2015 04:42 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

I think the rot goes further. Biologically men are attracted to young fertile women who are able to bear children (full secondary-sex characteristics). Modern society (U.S.) deems 18 to be the appropriate age to be an adult and be able to consent to sexual conduct with all other adults. That is all well and good.

However, Feminism and current society bombards our male population with sexual messages featuring "teen" girls in the form of "empowerment."

Feminism and current society simultaneously lambastes male biological sexuality and questions adult legal relationships between men and younger women where the women are OVER 18 but LESS than 30.

Feminism links 30-40+ guys sleeping with women in their 20s to pedophilia. (It's creepy)

and, as mentioned in multiple responses, Feminists don't give two hoots about older men and younger men, even where it really is pedophilia.

In the same way rape is redefined as regret sex. Pedophilia is redefined as a desire of nubile young women.

Whilst the real problem is swept under the rug and like in the case of Nicholas Nyberg explained away:




Restrict and demonize male sexuality.

Quote: (10-30-2015 02:26 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Quote: (10-29-2015 10:49 AM)Troll King Wrote:  

In one of the many responding articles to Nickerson, Alicen Grey raises many exceptional points in her article, “You’ve heard of rape culture, but have you heard of pedophile culture?” at 
feministcurrent.com.

Her article sheds light on the dark fact that, while pedophilia might seem taboo and massively hated, that it is actually not the case. Grey writes that “pedophilia is actually rewarded and celebrated” in our culture.

Grey supports this argument rather accurately, defining it as “pedophile culture,” with examples like Pornhub’s top category’s being “Teen.” Grey also mentions the rise in labiaplasty and hymenoplasty, procedures that reduce women’s labia and reverse women’s vaginas to “virgin-like tightness.” I’d say all of these are a pretty strong indicator of our society’s sexual desire for pre-pubescent women.

Alicen Grey looks like this:





----------------

The most important part of her article mentions "Teen" as the most popular search title on YouPorn. If her article were scientific (or at least pretending to be scientific), she'd find a large sample size of men who regularly search for "Teen" porn, and then ask them why they like it.

Even agenda-driven questions like, "Do you like female porn actresses who are small and thin?" would yield diverse answers like, "Yes, they're my favorite body type." and "No, those small and thin women are ugly. I prefer either big breasted women or thin and tall women, minimum height 5'8"."

But, no. Stupid feminist doesn't even ask why men prefer certain types of porn; she just assumes to know why - and attacks them.

---------------

Quote:Paracelsus Wrote:

It's more likely white girl ignorance. It takes five minutes on Wikipedia to identify paedophilia as sexual attraction towards pre-pubescent (i.e. 0-10) children, as opposed to ephebophilia -- persistent sexual attraction towards late adolescent children (15-19). One suspects she's trying to conflate the two together in people's minds.

I don't think so. For one thing, Alcien Grey isn't white; she's a feminist.

And, for another thing, which social group has a higher relative percentage of its members who are pedophiles? Homosexuals.

Samseau, (I think) posted some links to studies which claim: (1) If a man is homosexual, his identical twin brother is homosexual only 15% of the time. (2) Homosexuals are 21 times more likely to report being molested by a same-sex adult when they were young children.

So the homosexuals are, relatively speaking, the true pedophiles. But this feminist is too busy attacking heterosexual males to realize this.

"Grey supports this argument rather accurately, defining it as “pedophile culture,” with examples like Pornhub’s top category’s being “Teen.”"

"Teen" is the most searched for word because man in his natural state prefers to breed with young, fertile women. Historically women started getting pregnant in their teens. Men's attraction to teens is hardwired in human biology.

All this has NOTHING to do with pedophilia.

Pedophilia means the attraction to young women (or men) who have not yet developed secondary sex characteristics. In other words, children per se, like the kind you'd find in elementary school.

When MOST men search for teens, they're searching for high school hotties -- the 18-year-olds who can't help but be sexy, not kids on the playground.

50 to 100 years ago, men didn't need to "search" for 18-year-olds, because they were marrying them at that age, if not younger. My grandparents on my dad's side married at 18 (she was actually a few months younger) and had my father by 21. I'm not alone in this.

Note to Alcien Grey: Before writing an essay that revolves around a word, look up the fucking word. Pedophilia is NOT men searching on PornHub for legal 18-year-olds. Those are not children. They are WOMEN who could also be overseas dying for their country or voting in your next president.

Quote: (12-20-2015 09:24 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

Quote: (12-20-2015 04:42 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

I think the rot goes further. Biologically men are attracted to young fertile women who are able to bear children (full secondary-sex characteristics). Modern society (U.S.) deems 18 to be the appropriate age to be an adult and be able to consent to sexual conduct with all other adults. That is all well and good.

However, Feminism and current society bombards our male population with sexual messages featuring "teen" girls in the form of "empowerment."

Feminism and current society simultaneously lambastes male biological sexuality and questions adult legal relationships between men and younger women where the women are OVER 18 but LESS than 30.

Feminism links 30-40+ guys sleeping with women in their 20s to pedophilia. (It's creepy)

and, as mentioned in multiple responses, Feminists don't give two hoots about older men and younger men, even where it really is pedophilia.

In the same way rape is redefined as regret sex. Pedophilia is redefined as a desire of nubile young women.

Whilst the real problem is swept under the rug and like in the case of Nicholas Nyberg explained away:

Restrict and demonize male sexuality.

Damn, that is hard to watch. The internet machine can turn an SJW whisper into a scream, but pointing out their hypocrisy? Well, it won't stand for that!

Quote: (10-30-2015 02:26 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Quote: (10-29-2015 10:49 AM)Troll King Wrote:  

In one of the many responding articles to Nickerson, Alicen Grey raises many exceptional points in her article, “You’ve heard of rape culture, but have you heard of pedophile culture?” at 
feministcurrent.com.

Her article sheds light on the dark fact that, while pedophilia might seem taboo and massively hated, that it is actually not the case. Grey writes that “pedophilia is actually rewarded and celebrated” in our culture.

Grey supports this argument rather accurately, defining it as “pedophile culture,” with examples like Pornhub’s top category’s being “Teen.” Grey also mentions the rise in labiaplasty and hymenoplasty, procedures that reduce women’s labia and reverse women’s vaginas to “virgin-like tightness.” I’d say all of these are a pretty strong indicator of our society’s sexual desire for pre-pubescent women.

Alicen Grey looks like this:





----------------

The most important part of her article mentions "Teen" as the most popular search title on YouPorn. If her article were scientific (or at least pretending to be scientific), she'd find a large sample size of men who regularly search for "Teen" porn, and then ask them why they like it.

Even agenda-driven questions like, "Do you like female porn actresses who are small and thin?" would yield diverse answers like, "Yes, they're my favorite body type." and "No, those small and thin women are ugly. I prefer either big breasted women or thin and tall women, minimum height 5'8"."

But, no. Stupid feminist doesn't even ask why men prefer certain types of porn; she just assumes to know why - and attacks them.

---------------

Quote:Paracelsus Wrote:

It's more likely white girl ignorance. It takes five minutes on Wikipedia to identify paedophilia as sexual attraction towards pre-pubescent (i.e. 0-10) children, as opposed to ephebophilia -- persistent sexual attraction towards late adolescent children (15-19). One suspects she's trying to conflate the two together in people's minds.

I don't think so. For one thing, Alcien Grey isn't white; she's a feminist.

And, for another thing, which social group has a higher relative percentage of its members who are pedophiles? Homosexuals.

Samseau, (I think) posted some links to studies which claim: (1) If a man is homosexual, his identical twin brother is homosexual only 15% of the time. (2) Homosexuals are 21 times more likely to report being molested by a same-sex adult when they were young children.

So the homosexuals are, relatively speaking, the true pedophiles. But this feminist is too busy attacking heterosexual males to realize this.

You notice the ever expanding definition of childhood? 1st it was up to 18 now its up to 20.

New developments:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/paedop...65956.html

Quote:Quote:

Paedophilia is a “sexual orientation” like being straight or gay, according to a criminal psychologist.

The idea that sexual attraction to children is an “orientation” is highly controversial as it suggests that offenders cannot change.

But, writing on the Reddit networking website, the psychologist said it was possible to treat child sex abusers on “the understanding that the attraction may always remain”.

The psychologist set up the “ask me anything” thread on Reddit. Their identity was not revealed but was verified by the website.

Asked “can paedophiles actually change?”, the expert wrote: “I believe Paedophilic Disorder is a sexual orientation with individual that are attracted to child features. In other words, an individual with paedophilia has the same ingrained attraction that a heterosexual female may feel towards a male, or a homosexual feels towards their same gender.

“With that being said, it needs to be said that sexuality is more of a spectrum than a finite category. We know that heterosexuals may engage in homosexual behaviour, and deny they are bisexual or homosexual.

The twisted and degenerate social-justice train is really full steam now.

(((orientation)))

This pseudo-psychologist's tack is a well-used one that flies under the radar of most people.

He isn't revealing a new "orientation".

He's muddying the waters of semantic meaning. This is the purpose of the article.

He's expanding the meaning of the word "orientation" to include personal definitions that are not gender based. In essence, he's creating a third category of gender "being" aside from male and female. To legitimize pedophilia he's raising the child-state out of something that is of development, to the same category as non-developmental gender, thus erasing its deviancy. Once people accept pedophilia as a type of gender preference, they have erased the ability to attack it without attacking other gender preferences.

He concludes, in the quoted text block, by reinforcing his semantic "adjustment" in the minds of readers by assuming that a preference for children is on the "sexuality spectrum" with males, females, and who knows what else. Thus, we can see that this pedophilia ploy is also a means of further muddying gender as a category.

I wonder what the average homosexual would say about their beloved "sexuality spectrum" now being co-opted for pedophilia. Serious question.

'Orientation' was always a bullshit label. There are only two types of sexuality: normal and deviant. If you want to fuck people of the same sex, or children, or animals, you don't have "a different orientation". You are defective.

Quote:Quote:

Called I'm a paedophile, you're the monsters, the piece explained how he believed his molestation as a child was the reason he is now sexually attracted to young girls. He also mentioned his membership of the "Virtuous Paedophiles" forum - an online community of paedohpiles who have vowed never to act on their sexual urges.

How is this difficult to understand?

You get beaten by your parents growing up, risk is high you'll beat your own children.

Pedophilia is not an 'orientation' but a re-enactment of abuse, namely switching the roles in moving from victim to abuser, which gives the abused a sense of power which of course was completely lacking when he or she was abused.

The reason why society refuses this simple and statistically verifiable truth is that it then requires a closer look at the parents, family members and persons of authority within the pedophiles vicinity.

The same is true for schizophrenia, here almost half have a history of childhood abuse and neglect: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21620159. The rest can probably be explained by substance abuse and a miniscule part biological.

Social workers and psychiatrists who usually deal with both pedophiles and scizophreniacs, like all other public employees, do not like confrontation and having to ask unpleasent questions to parents and family.

Often the abusing family will back the abuser and distance themselves from the child.

The truth is that mental illness does not magically appear whether pedophilia or other kinds. Childhood abuse and neglect is the clear cut number one cause of it. Trying to rationalize pedophilia as an orientation is condoning child abuse and is pure evil.

If pedophiles can't change, then I think they should be executed. No normalizing this shit at all.

The minute homosexuality was removed from the DSM normalizing other deviant sexual predator freaks was inevitable - and here we are. I hope the leftists are happy with what they've done.

And if this shit does somehow get normalized which is looking more and more likely, I'll go full Punisher on these motherfuckers. I'd rather die while taking out as many of these people as possible than to live in a world where child fucking is normal.

Quote: (04-07-2016 10:59 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Trying to rationalize pedophilia as an orientation is condoning child abuse and is pure evil.

The far left doesn't care, it has nothing to do with "science" or psychology.

They'll just call anything they want to do an "orientation".

Some time ago a left wing SJW blogger (Richard Carrier) left his wife to have no strings attached sex with a bunch of women and decided to declare it "polyamory" and claim it was an "orientation".

And back in the 1970s, NAMBLA (pedophile organization) was a sub faction within the gay rights movement.

The same goes with the push to normalize transgenderism - all of a sudden biology and science don't matter; weirdos on Tumblr can just make up 50 different "genders" and claim as such because it's what they "feel like".

Feelings override science apparently.

Hell, Roosh V should just declare "rape" and orientation (hell there's even a word for it called "biastophilia") and demand "tolerance" from the SJWs who accuse him of "rape promotion".

Quote: (04-07-2016 12:29 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

And if this shit does somehow get normalized which is looking more and more likely, I'll go full Punisher on these motherfuckers. I'd rather die while taking out as many of these people as possible than to live in a world where child fucking is normal.

If there is anything that can cause a Civil War in this cucked world, normalizing pedophilla has to be it.

Quote: (04-07-2016 05:32 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

If there is anything that can cause a Civil War in this cucked world, normalizing pedophilla has to be it.

Agreed; while there may be a handful of (leftist) parents who could be convinced of this evil, surely the population as a whole would not agree to their children being molested? If there's anything to mobilise the mobs, it's the safety of their children.

That said, pederasty in ancient Greece was common...

Quote: (04-07-2016 11:50 AM)captain_shane Wrote:  

If pedophiles can't change, then I think they should be executed. No normalizing this shit at all.

I'm against totalitarian regimes who execute defectives, but molesting children absolutely disgusts me. If anyone laid a hand on my nephews or nieces I wouldn't sleep until I found them.

I used to joke with my buddies in high school that if everyone wants to accept gays, why not give them a big gay island where they can be themselves and build a society based on their values? Almost a decade later, I've decided we need to give the extreme left a large chunk of land mass and resources so they can finally build their resourced-based utopia. All of us evil bigots and capitalists can get out of their way and let them build paradise. I mean, since the straight white man has been keeping them down with patriarchy for countless millennia, they should emerge as a world superpower almost immediately.

Quote: (04-07-2016 07:14 PM)wi30 Wrote:  

why not give them a big gay island where they can be themselves and build a society based on their values? Almost a decade later, I've decided we need to give the extreme left a large chunk of land mass and resources so they can finally build their resourced-based utopia. All of us evil bigots and capitalists can get out of their way and let them build paradise. I mean, since the straight white man has been keeping them down with patriarchy for countless millennia, they should emerge as a world superpower almost immediately.

Because this isn't driven by gay rights. It's driven by Trotskyist communism, which is completely utopian and internationalist. By definition, it's mission is to change the entire world and create their utopia on Earth. Anything differing group from one that conforms to their social agenda, on Earth, is an enemy and not merely a differing group. Imo, gay rights and legitimizing pedophilia are merely two methods of sociopolitically corrupting the group(s) that might otherwise be able to offer political push-back to internationalism.