Quote: (03-24-2016 07:45 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

Throwing some kindling on the fire: as a practicing Christian there are several criteria I look at before I consider someone else "Christian". They are:

1. Do they attend church weekly?
2. Do they understand why the bible is in the order it is?
3. Do they know understand why sexual promiscuity/lgbt is bad in a spiritual sense?
4. Do they understand why women should not be allowed to be preachers?

Using this, most people aren't Christian. In fact, most people are non practicing agnostics floating off of the culture that was given to them by a strong Christian backbone. This non practicing fade of spirituality is why there is a declining birth rate, rampant narcissism, and hedonism seeking behavior.

When man loses his way spiritually, he'll go and seek pleasures to fill an appetite that will never be sated. Ever wonder why we chase women the way we do? The second I stopped trying to impress people was when I started to really gather and build longer lasting assets.

The Muslim problem in Europe is a direct consequence of a culture that lost its way spiritually. It happened in ancient Rome and Christianity replaced the old Gods. Now, as much as it breaks my heart, Christianity may be replaced with Islam. It's a foolish way to go and essentially is cuckoldry at its core.

Too bad the 4 bullet points you listed have nothing to do with the core of Christianity. Otherwise you are correct.

Christ himself stated what is necessary.

Matthew 22:

36 `Teacher, which [is] the great command in the Law?'
37 And Jesus said to him, `Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thine understanding --
38 this is a first and great command;
39 and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself;
40 on these -- the two commands -- all the law and the prophets do hang.'


It's very simple. Love God and Neighbor as you would to yourself.

A huge problem with Christianity today is that most Christians cannot verbalize or remember these easy teachings. I mean the 4 bullet points you presented have literally nothing to do with Jesus's teachings. It's just a bunch of nonsense you learned at one of many Churches responsible for causing apostasy in their members and the current decline of Christian membership worldwide.

If people are Christian, they would love their neighbors as themselves and would never rush to defend murderers who kill their neighbors. Instead they do not believe in God or love themselves, so they defend Muslims in order look holier than their neighbors whom they could care less about.

Quote: (03-24-2016 04:18 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

What other concern is there? Maybe they could steal plutonium. It's far outside the capabilities of terrorists to build a nuclear weapon, even if someone handed them a pile of weapons-grade fissionable material. They're down to making a dirty bomb, I suppose, and while dirty bombs are probably not too fun to be around the hazard from radiation is vastly inflated in the public consciousness.

You still need someone to build it.

ISIS apparently has a reasonable team of specialist engineers at their disposal.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buz...-lab-14942

I'm willing to bet that it's comprised mostly of western educated muslims who could never get even the sluttiest college girls to fuck them so when they were promised a sex slave or three by ISIS over in Iraqistan they jumped at the opportunity.

But again, the idea of these scumbags is to dominate these lands, not destroy them so that for next thousand years not even a single lizard will survive in our desert.

Quote: (03-24-2016 05:09 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

I read the european invasion thread, it's very clear these are uneducated third world savages. In the states they're educated for the most part, unfortunately for Europe they got the shit end of stick courtesty of that cunt Merkel.

I don't disagree with you that some muslims adapt much better to western societies than others and live perfectly normal and productive lives, but apart from those low iq savages that are coming to conquer and destroy Europe we all know that there are plenty of muslims that have been living in western countries for many years or were already born there, grew up there, were educated there, experienced the culture there and they still either radicalize at some point or are silent collaborators to the radicalized ones. That's a huge problem, how to distinguish between normal and good people that just want to get on with their lives and not hurt anyone, that don't want to be involved with all this mess and the radicals/accomplices/collaborators/sympathizers? What's the percentage of each group. Is it 90% normal people - 10% radicals/sympathizers? Is it 10% normals - 90% radicals? How can we know and should we take a chance when the survival of our countries, societies and culture is at stake?

I don't think it will ever happen because Europeans now are weak and emasculated but if war were ever to come to Europe between us and the Islamic world unfortunately the normal, well adapted, productive and good members of the muslim communities would be caught in the middle.

Quote: (03-24-2016 06:00 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 03:21 PM)Parzival Wrote:  

Deus vult!

I like that band, Saltatio Mortis, I've watched them live many many years ago, in what feels now like another life.

Quote: (03-24-2016 10:08 PM)Teutatis Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 05:09 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

I read the european invasion thread, it's very clear these are uneducated third world savages. In the states they're educated for the most part, unfortunately for Europe they got the shit end of stick courtesty of that cunt Merkel.

I don't disagree with you that some muslims adapt much better to western societies than others and live perfectly normal and productive lives, but apart from those low iq savages that are coming to conquer and destroy Europe we all know that there are plenty of muslims that have been living in western countries for many years or were already born there, grew up there, were educated there, experienced the culture there and they still either radicalize at some point or are silent collaborators to the radicalized ones. That's a huge problem, how to distinguish between normal and good people that just want to get on with their lives and not hurt anyone, that don't want to be involved with all this mess and the radicals/accomplices/collaborators/sympathizers? What's the percentage of each group. Is it 90% normal people - 10% radicals/sympathizers? Is it 10% normals - 90% radicals? How can we know and should we take a chance when the survival of our countries, societies and culture is at stake?

I don't think it will ever happen because Europeans now are weak and emasculated but if war were ever to come to Europe between us and the Islamic world unfortunately the normal, well adapted, productive and good members of the muslim communities would be caught in the middle.

Well educated, technically oriented, ~115 IQ muslims gave us 9/11. I'd rather have ficki ficki, a concert hall shooting and a small scale airport bombing than that.

Quote: (03-24-2016 04:05 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 04:02 PM)Blaster Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 12:02 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

Time for a good hashtag that reflects the Merkelization of Europe

Like #SpreadYourLegsForIslam

#BendOverForIslam

#soulmatesforMerkel

You could start a hashtag war by starting with IslamIs and adding to it

#IslamIsDeath
#IslamIsLame (whatta buncha Islameists Amirite!)
#IslamIsEvil
#IslamIsMal
#IslamIsMurder

Quote: (03-25-2016 12:36 AM)Walker Wrote:  

Well educated, technically oriented, ~115 IQ muslims gave us 9/11. I'd rather have ficki ficki, a concert hall shooting and a small scale airport bombing than that.

Can we have neither?

Quote: (03-24-2016 07:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

39 and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself;

Wait.

Did Jesus advocated tribalism and nationalism?

Quote: (03-25-2016 01:57 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 12:36 AM)Walker Wrote:  

Well educated, technically oriented, ~115 IQ muslims gave us 9/11. I'd rather have ficki ficki, a concert hall shooting and a small scale airport bombing than that.

Can we have neither?

Good luck trying to strip of their citizenship/park in camps people born, raised, married, working here in the West etc etc since 2-3-4 generations.

I don't think the constitution of any western country will be tweaked to do that.

Quote: (03-25-2016 02:23 AM)mikado Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 01:57 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 12:36 AM)Walker Wrote:  

Well educated, technically oriented, ~115 IQ muslims gave us 9/11. I'd rather have ficki ficki, a concert hall shooting and a small scale airport bombing than that.

Can we have neither?

Good luck trying to strip of their citizenship/park in camps people born, raised, married, working here in the West etc etc since 2-3-4 generations.

I don't think the constitution of any western country will be tweaked to do that.

I was talking about not having 9/11 and concert hall shooting and a small scale airport bombing neither

I agree,

muslims that people see as "moderates" here aren't muslims at all. They don't go to a mosque.
They don't always eat halal and they don't fast.

They don't put a cloth on their women's head and they don't pray at all, but if you'd ask what religion they follow they'd say islam.

An Albanian girl i used to bang who didn't wear a hijab said to me she didn't wear one because she felt like religion was something you should "feel" and not a rulebook you should follow. (we couldn't hang out in public because she was afraid to encounter one of her brothers ).

all in all i don't consider these people muslim.

other than that, me being vocal hasn't helped me and i'll have to keep my political views to myself, people are distancing them from me and i've been getting a lot of loatheful stares. I don't think this is helping the cause of waking people up.

Quote: (03-25-2016 03:00 AM)gallia Wrote:  

I agree,

muslims that people see as "moderates" here aren't muslims at all. They don't go to a mosque.
They don't always eat halal and they don't fast.

They don't put a cloth on their women's head and they don't pray at all, but if you'd ask what religion they follow they'd say islam.

An Albanian girl i used to bang who didn't wear a hijab said to me she didn't wear one because she felt like religion was something you should "feel" and not a rulebook you should follow.

These are my Turkish friends, both girls and guys. They tell me they're "fake Muslims" who don't pray or any of that stuff because they find it a bit distressing.

Incidental muslims are much like incidental Christians. They just happened to be born into a Muslim/Christian family even though they don't practise the religion.

People like that will choose a place to live that's nice or close to work or whatever.

The roiling masses of backward assholes crammed into places like Molenbeek are the ones you have to worry about. Their segregation is not incidental, it is quite deliberate.

So all this pointless debate about "good muslims" and "bad muslims" is 99 percent irrelevant.

Deport every muslim that lives in the ghettos and that's the vast, and I mean VAST majority of your problems gone in one fell swoop.

Those islamo-slum scumbags are not Frenchmen or Belgians of Germans etc. They are Iraqis and Afghanis and Syrians that just happen to be living in Europe.

Quote: (03-25-2016 03:08 AM)Space Cowboy Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 03:00 AM)gallia Wrote:  

I agree,

muslims that people see as "moderates" here aren't muslims at all. They don't go to a mosque.
They don't always eat halal and they don't fast.

They don't put a cloth on their women's head and they don't pray at all, but if you'd ask what religion they follow they'd say islam.

An Albanian girl i used to bang who didn't wear a hijab said to me she didn't wear one because she felt like religion was something you should "feel" and not a rulebook you should follow.

These are my Turkish friends, both girls and guys. They tell me they're "fake Muslims" who don't pray or any of that stuff because they find it a bit distressing.

this was my experience with the turkish people I met while studying abroad. they inherited traditions and values but were still drinking, meeting girls, pretty normal guys to be honest. cant speak much for the older generations or people from smaller cities, but even amongst the turks in Berlin there are many that fit into this category

@Samseau, you're rightthanks for that extra point. It was late when i wrote that and I foolishly rolled that into points 2 and 3. It should be point five and the most important one of all.

http://www.freitum.de/2016/03/die-ss-ua-...g-des.html

Quote:Quote:

Ultimately, it is so that the SS has pervert the undoubtedly peaceful core of Nazism and radicalized young people without prospects. The majority of the members of the NSDAP was resumed his normal daily transactions to and there are numerous reports known to those parents helplessly stood when her son, yesterday a very normal Hitler boy who enjoyed his life, suddenly in a sleek Hugo Boss uniform as brainwashed by the final solution fabled.

Even and especially in the Reich Security Main Office, there were moderate forces, with which one could certainly discuss a peaceful future of the different ethnic groups in the Reich.

You have to see a lot of demands of the leader in a historical context, and may not be especially strong underlining of the common good aside, otherwise you have not understood "Mein Kampf".

This constant mentioning of the Holocaust is nothing more than water to the mills of the populists who ignore in their hatred that the vast majority of terrorist victims eventually were German itself!

Some satirical text...

http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/artic...essel.html

Quote:Quote:

Special police forces have again searched a house in Brussels on Friday. At the beginning of the raid in the Schaerbeek district there were two explosions, reported the news agency Belga and the public broadcaster RTBF. A man is intended to be arrested. Witnesses also shots were heard.

The police have asked residents to stay in the homes, the report said. The environment has been sealed off, heavily armed and masked forces and army vehicles were in use.

Investigators had already arrested six suspects in the night raids. As the prosecutor told, five were arrested in the center of Brussels, another in the suburb of Jette.

Three of the suspects were arrested "on our doorstep", said a spokesman for the authority. According to a report in the newspaper "La Libre Belgique" the three men were together in a car on the road. Why they were staying near the building of the Federal Prosecutor's Office, was initially unclear.

Two men were seen on images of surveillance cameras in addition to the three suicide bombers on Tuesday, are more volatile.

How RTBF reported, it also came on Friday morning to a further arrest in the town of Forest. An official confirmation had not initially.

Also arrests in France and Germany

From French police sources said, the raid in Brussels am on Friday in connection with the arrest of Islamists from the previous day: In Argenteuil near Paris a suspect was arrested, the have close contacts with the alleged mastermind of the Paris attacks of November, Abdelhamid Abaaoud maintained, should. With the arrest of a new attempt was prevented, according to Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve.

In Germany, according to "mirror" Two suspects were arrested: Close to Dusseldorf a suspected Salafist, in Greater Gießen turn a man who should have a suspicious SMS on mobile phones.

There had be new explosions and more arrest. I did read that they expect about 400 ready ISIS members in Europe so far.

Quote: (03-25-2016 01:59 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 07:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

39 and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself;

Wait.

Did Jesus advocated tribalism and nationalism?

Gotta be careful on that one, as the SJWs will insist it means "Thou shalt love thy hadji and mexican neighbors as thyself."

It's okay the robots are here to save us...

Quote: (03-25-2016 10:00 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 01:59 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 07:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

39 and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself;

Wait.

Did Jesus advocated tribalism and nationalism?

Gotta be careful on that one, as the SJWs will insist it means "Thou shalt love thy hadji and mexican neighbors as thyself."

Both of you are partially correct and incorrect.

Jesus did advocate tribalism, but not on the basis of race, label, or any other nationality.

The parable of the good Samaritan is who Jesus' classifies as your neighbor - the guy who goes of his way to help you, care for you, and love you, when you're bleeding out on the side of the road. The others who ignore you are not neighbors, even if they happen to share the same nationality or race as you.

Jesus also says there is no greater love than to give your life for your friends. John 15:

Quote:Quote:

9 According as the Father did love me, I also loved you, remain in my love;
10 if my commandments ye may keep, ye shall remain in my love, according as I the commands of my Father have kept, and do remain in His love;
11 these things I have spoken to you, that my joy in you may remain, and your joy may be full.
12 `This is my command, that ye love one another, according as I did love you;
13 greater love than this hath no one, that any one his life may lay down for his friends;

The ideal of the soldiers standing back to back to the last man is the ultimate example of holy men. Again, it doesn't matter what race or nationality they belong to - as long as they display their act of love, or more commonly understood as loyalty, trust, and benevolence, they are your neighbor.

This is verified by the Apostle Paul on the subject of love. 1 Corinthians 13:

Quote:Quote:

4 The love is long-suffering, it is kind, the love doth not envy, the love doth not vaunt itself, is not puffed up,
5 doth not act unseemly, doth not seek its own things, is not provoked, doth not impute evil,
6 rejoiceth not over the unrighteousness, and rejoiceth with the truth;

So the Christian ideal is to love your neighbor with the utmost patience and respect, constantly searching to improve their lives with the truth, and never out of selfish desire.

But this sort of love is only reserved for your neighbors, which it feels like 99% of modern Christians neglect to mention. Enemies do not get this love, although Jesus does command us to love our enemies, Jesus does not say to love thy enemies as thyself (Matthew 5:44). Enemies get a lesser form of love - the act of mercy we extend to those we conquer. Mercy, an unknown concept in the Islamic world it seems.

Think about it - Muslims are blowing up airports, subways, shooting up concerts, and do you see "moderate" Muslims rushing to help the victims of these places? Or do they merely go, "Not my problem, ISIS isn't true Islam." Are these the type of people who would help you while you're bleeding out after being attacked?

-

And tangential to this fact - how many women qualify as your neighbor? How many women would lay down their life to protect you? How many women would be patient with you through your flaws?

Hence the conclusion of Ecclesiastes 7:

26 And I am finding more bitter than death, the woman whose heart [is] nets and snares, her hands [are] bands; the good before God escapeth from her, but the sinner is captured by her.
27 See, this I have found, said the Preacher, one to one, to find out the reason
28 (that still my soul had sought, and I had not found), One man, a teacher, I have found, and a woman among all these I have not found.
29 See, this alone I have found, that God made man upright, and they -- they have sought out many devices.

Thus we can see why it is only men who are allowed to run the Church, as women are not reasonably expected to love their neighbors as man can be.

Everything I've said above used to be common knowledge. It was for thousands of years. But sometime in the 18th and 19th centuries people stopped teaching the ancient traditions as they were, and twisted the messages for their own ends. The Christians ended up with World Wars, extreme apostasy, broken families, and now a suicidal support of Islam. All of these things are merely symptoms of the root cause - a loss of neighborly love and disbelief in God. Without obeying Jesus' Greatest Commandments, there is no way to stop Western Culture's decline.

Gentlemen, a lot has been said on the topic already. I would request your attention so we can focus on the real issues at hand here.

Let us recap how this all started in the first place. Ultimately, this conflict has started because major European politicians (and their billionaire financiers, such as George Soros) brought these people here by the millions.

It started with the Syrian conflict, which was instigated by Western powers and their Sunni allies in order to oust Assad and install a regime that would allow a natural gas pipeline through Syria onward to Europe, breaking Russia's gas monopoly on Europe. "Moderate Rebels" with links to Al Qaelda, of which ISIS was an offshoot, of which $billions were spent on, were given $billions worth of advanced weaponry to oust Assad. I'm assuming most of you are familiar with the connections, which have already been demonstrated in great detail.

A secondary effect of this conflict was the creation of millions of displaced people. For the first time in modern history, political leaders decided to open the borders of their governed states to a mass of millions of culturally hostile invaders. There was little or no vetting done on the identity of the invaders (the leaving of multitudes of non-Sryian passports before EU border checks has been well covered), and the pot was sweetened with ridiculously generous welfare benefits for the migrants.

World news engineered support for the mass importation of these people. The narrative was strictly controlled so that the only seemingly reasonable conclusion was to swing open the borders and provide a warm bed for them. Emotional imagery (the dead boy washed up on the shore) was employed despite being later proven to be fraudulent or against the narrative (the boy was the son of the human trafficker driving the boat). The narrative was strictly controlled to not allow opposing arguments (such as Israel's or Australia'a successful border security programs, or the complete lack of hospitality of the neighboring Islamic countries). Please note that this was the first time in modern history that the mass movement of people into the very heart of a diametrically opposed society was even discussed, let alone embarked upon. There are no analogues in: Ukraine, Georgia, Libya, Palestine, Lebanon, Sudan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Rwanda, and so on perhaps as far back to Roman times.

The goal of the leaders of Europe was to import millions of hostile people in the first place, which will be used for an as of yet unknown future goal. Before the goal can be foisted on the subjects (that would be us), there must be a conflict which necessitates it's implementation. That's how the Hegelian Dialectic works.

Goal: Oust Assad
Thesis: Syria is an oppressive regime
Antithesis: We must do something to stop Assad from hurting innocent civilians
Synthesis: Launch military campaign to oust Assad

...

Goal: Create internal conflict and instability within Europe
Thesis: Millions of refugees are suffering in the Middle East
Antithesis: We must do something to help them
Synthesis: We must import them by the millions into our countries

...

Goal: Create a police state within Europe
Thesis: Terrorists continually kill us and threaten our safety and security
Antithesis: Let's stop importing them by the millions; infiltrate and dismantle their radical training schools within in our country, and make integration into Western society a requirement for continued residency. We must do something to protect the innocent.
Synthesis: We must enact draconian surveillance laws, expand the use of automated policing, and curtail personal liberties in the name of safety and security.

The radical Muslims are just pawns in this game. Your real attention should be focused on our rulers and their designs.

On a final note, I can't get on board with the notion that we can somehow blame the average European for this. In reality, they have about as much say in this as your average American had in mass NSA data collection, the PATRIOT act, the 2009 NDAA, so on and so forth. Alt right leaders have risen among them despite being threatened with jail time (Le Pen), being disenfranchised at the polls (UKIP), and threatened by domestic police forces. Politicians like Orban have risen to power against all odds, and natalist sentiment is reaching critical mass within other countries (such as Poland). The ones who vocally support suicidal policies in the media and on social platforms are usually paid shills, women performing empty status signalling, or those just trying not to stick out from the crowd. Anyone with half a brain and a functioning instinct knows which side of an issue is the "correct" (socially approved) one. Which side of an issue is correct is decided from above. They are not independent actors, and are only repeating the narrative which is given to them by the media. Many, if not most are against this abomination they're being subjected to. I stand by them, I have a lot of time for my European brothers.

Related:

'BERLIN — A European Union military force with power to intervene in member states. A new “Marshall Plan” to radically redesign whole regions of the world and impose regional government. A United Nations empowered to manage it all. Christendom under siege. And the end of nationhood as it is understood today. That is where the “refugee crisis” is heading, as the engineered disaster wreaks havoc across Europe and beyond. Despite the appearance of chaos, though, it is all by design, with a series of radical goals in mind.

While the establishment’s demands on Europe to accept millions of Middle Eastern refugees have been couched in “humanitarian” rhetoric, the real agenda is nothing of the sort. Rather than helping out their fellow human beings, globalist forces actually created the refugee crisis and the suffering behind it. And they are using it to advance multiple, related agendas — primarily globalism and statism. That the crisis is being exploited to undermine Western culture, national sovereignty, and even nationhood itself is now beyond dispute. Top globalists are openly bragging about it.

“I will ask the governments to cooperate, to recognize that sovereignty is an illusion — that sovereignty is an absolute illusion that has to be put behind us,” declared former Goldman Sachs chairman Peter Sutherland, an ex-member of the Bilderberg Steering Committee who currently “serves” as the UN special representative of the secretary-general for international migration. “The days of hiding behind borders and fences are long gone. We have to work together and cooperate together to make a better world. And that means taking on some of the old shibboleths, taking on some of the old historic memories and images of our own country and recognizing that we’re part of humankind.”

Billionaire globalist and open-borders zealot George Soros, in denouncing European officials trying to control the human tsunami coming across their borders, similarly declared, “Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.”'

Full article here:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news...uild-power

Quote: (03-25-2016 11:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 10:00 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

Quote: (03-25-2016 01:59 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

Quote: (03-24-2016 07:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

39 and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself;

Wait.

Did Jesus advocated tribalism and nationalism?

Gotta be careful on that one, as the SJWs will insist it means "Thou shalt love thy hadji and mexican neighbors as thyself."

Both of you are partially correct and incorrect.

Jesus did advocate tribalism, but not on the basis of race, label, or any other nationality.

The parable of the good Samaritan is who Jesus' classifies as your neighbor - the guy who goes of his way to help you, care for you, and love you, when you're bleeding out on the side of the road. The others who ignore you are not neighbors, even if they happen to share the same nationality or race as you.

Jesus also says there is no greater love than to give your life for your friends. John 15:

Quote:Quote:

9 According as the Father did love me, I also loved you, remain in my love;
10 if my commandments ye may keep, ye shall remain in my love, according as I the commands of my Father have kept, and do remain in His love;
11 these things I have spoken to you, that my joy in you may remain, and your joy may be full.
12 `This is my command, that ye love one another, according as I did love you;
13 greater love than this hath no one, that any one his life may lay down for his friends;

The ideal of the soldiers standing back to back to the last man is the ultimate example of holy men. Again, it doesn't matter what race or nationality they belong to - as long as they display their act of love, or more commonly understood as loyalty, trust, and benevolence, they are your neighbor.

This is verified by the Apostle Paul on the subject of love. 1 Corinthians 13:

Quote:Quote:

4 The love is long-suffering, it is kind, the love doth not envy, the love doth not vaunt itself, is not puffed up,
5 doth not act unseemly, doth not seek its own things, is not provoked, doth not impute evil,
6 rejoiceth not over the unrighteousness, and rejoiceth with the truth;

So the Christian ideal is to love your neighbor with the utmost patience and respect, constantly searching to improve their lives with the truth, and never out of selfish desire.

But this sort of love is only reserved for your neighbors, which it feels like 99% of modern Christians neglect to mention. Enemies do not get this love, although Jesus does command us to love our enemies, Jesus does not say to love thy enemies as thyself (Matthew 5:44). Enemies get a lesser form of love - the act of mercy we extend to those we conquer. Mercy, an unknown concept in the Islamic world it seems.

Think about it - Muslims are blowing up airports, subways, shooting up concerts, and do you see "moderate" Muslims rushing to help the victims of these places? Or do they merely go, "Not my problem, ISIS isn't true Islam." Are these the type of people who would help you while you're bleeding out after being attacked?

-

And tangential to this fact - how many women qualify as your neighbor? How many women would lay down their life to protect you? How many women would be patient with you through your flaws?

Hence the conclusion of Ecclesiastes 7:

26 And I am finding more bitter than death, the woman whose heart [is] nets and snares, her hands [are] bands; the good before God escapeth from her, but the sinner is captured by her.
27 See, this I have found, said the Preacher, one to one, to find out the reason
28 (that still my soul had sought, and I had not found), One man, a teacher, I have found, and a woman among all these I have not found.
29 See, this alone I have found, that God made man upright, and they -- they have sought out many devices.

Thus we can see why it is only men who are allowed to run the Church, as women are not reasonably expected to love their neighbors as man can be.

Everything I've said above used to be common knowledge. It was for thousands of years. But sometime in the 18th and 19th centuries people stopped teaching the ancient traditions as they were, and twisted the messages for their own ends. The Christians ended up with World Wars, extreme apostasy, broken families, and now a suicidal support of Islam. All of these things are merely symptoms of the root cause - a loss of neighborly love and disbelief in God. Without obeying Jesus' Greatest Commandments, there is no way to stop Western Culture's decline.

Samseu's interpretation of Christianity and in particular of 'love thy neighbor' is the same as I've heard from the few Christians left here in Europe who actually take the scripture seriously. The exact debate of who the neighbor is, came up during a debate about refugees and such, where these right wing Christians made the good point that the Good Samaritan and Love Thy Neighbor was not meant to be seen as One World Multi Culti nonsense.

As for the part I bolded, common sense and common knowledge is almost entirely gone. It is not in any way restricted to Christianity, but also to knowledge of history, knowledge of biological realities, knowledge of men and women.

Most Westerners live in states of willfull ignorance. Women can't cook, men can't provide any resources out of nature. No one has the faintest idea about their historical origins or the principles of which they came from.

A common thing I hear with media people, politicians and millenials is defining what makes their country as 'equal rights (between men and women), democracy, free speech'. These are modern and abstract ideals and in no way tell the story of Europe or individual European countries. They are falling hook line sinker for the globalist new religion.

They're really parroting Marx. Equality means redistribution by force, democracy means mob rule, freedom of speech means no opposition to Islam or Feminism.

I've said before, Northern Europe is almost entirely Marxist. Where communists failed economically they have succeeded entirely culturally. I've heard so called 'right wing' politicians quote Marx, unaware they're doing so.

We live in inherently evil societies now. I don't think calling it that is too much. It is evil. I wouldn't want any part of it if I was an immigrant either. I've lived 5 years abroad, I hate having to come back and live here now. I wish it would all burn to the ground if not for the fact I and those I care about would burn down with it too.

The worst sin of post-modernist dictatorship, besides the feminism, the theft by taxation, the lack of freedom of speech, the worst is that the left wants you to parrot their lies as well. You have to thank your mugger for the priviledge. It is profoundly evil and history will write it as such. We didn't understand what it was 10 years ago, but we do now.

For anyone who doubts that our "best and brightest" are living in a fantasy world, look at this article in The Columbia Spectator:

Quote:Quote:

Columbia’s vigils and memorial services allow us to mourn victims and condemn terrorism. Moving forward, however, they should condemn not only terrorism, but also the specific Islamophobic attitudes and policies that facilitated the recent attacks.

First of all, it is important to recognize that terrorist attacks are usually not arbitrary events without any justification—they often are responses to institutionalized hate and oppression. Unfortunately, the Brussels attacks are not that surprising because Islamophobia is widespread in Belgium.

It comes as no surprise that the municipality Molenbeek—the site of one of the explosions—has an unemployment rate of more than 25 percent where the majority of Muslim youths are denied equal access to the labor and housing market. This is just the tip of the iceberg of Belgium’s Islamophobic attitudes and policies. Thus, although Islamophobia is certainly not the only reason the Brussels attacks occurred, it needs to play a critical role in explaining these attacks.

Nomadbrah:

My "interpretation" is quite literally word for word the actions taken by the Apostle Paul, who advocated segregation between believers and non-believers. Non-believers are very unlikely to be your neighbor. Paul, who said, "be of this world but not in this world," was also read the exact same way by every early Church father.

This is why both the early Christian Churches, Catholic and Orthodox, prohibited mixed marriages. Even to this day, on the Catholic Encyclopedia, is the ancient teaching on mixed marriages:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09698a.htm

Quote:Quote:

Technically, mixed marriages are those between Catholics and non-Catholics, when the latter have been baptized in some Christian sect. The term is also frequently employed to designate unions between Catholics and infidels. From the very beginning of its existence the Church of Christ has been opposed to such unions. As Christ raised wedlock to the dignity of a Sacrament, a marriage between a Catholic and a non-Catholic was rightly looked upon as degrading the holy character of matrimony, involving as it did a communion in sacred things with those outside the fold. The Apostle St. Paul insists strongly on Christian marriage being a symbol of the union between Christ and His Church, and hence sacred. The very intimacy of the union necessarily established between those joined in wedlock requires a concordance above all in their religious sentiments. Holding this doctrine, it was but natural and logical for the Church to do all in her power to hinder her children from contracting marriage with those outside her pale, who did not recognize the sacramental character of the union on which they were entering (see Marriage).