^^ That's what I wanted to analyze a little bit more.
I think it's easy to forget that DC was really, really good in 2001-2008 (in other words, prior to 3 years ago). It was so good that eye contact from girls was happening a LOT, in every single club. I know because I lived through that period. But something happened in early 2009 which absolutely destroyed the ratio. It could be DC's resilience during the recession that drew in large amounts of men from out of state, but I'm not sure.
I work in government IT and have two coworkers, one from Texas and the other from LA, who are a case in point. They both arrived in DC for lucrative jobs. The LA guy has already left town, but the Texas guy is still here and companies were fighting to hire him, until he finally settled on a 6-figure salary of his choice. He used to joke that he'd never had it so good.
There was an article recently to the effect that DC was drawing lots of young people due to good (recession-proof) jobs:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/27...35149.html
But they don't mention the ratios. In the last 3 years that they describe, DC's ratio has become abysmal for men, as some have noticed. It was nothing like what it is now. The article makes it sound like the city is bustling with activity, but obviously the situation on the ground is different. I think the disconnect is in the ratio of the transplants, anyone care to share their thoughts? Also, the 25-34 demographic may have increased, but the under-25 demographic decreased. I think over-25 women, for example, are more likely to not be single.
The government bubble has existed before. In 2004, spending was through the roof, with homeland security and the Iraq war, yet this place was paradise for guys. The difference is that the Texas guy and the LA guy could find jobs in Texas and LA and they didn't have to come here, along with many others. But due to the recession, they ended up here.
In sum, I've been reading all kinds of articles in the press about how DC's becoming younger and trendier, and yet the local males have never struggled more here than in the past 3 years.
However, I wait with interest to see if the government bubble bursts (as mentioned on the previous page). Newt Gingrich predicts that it will in 2012:
http://www.newt.org/news/government-next-bubble-burst
Who knows, maybe the tide will turn soon enough. Also, an improved private economy would return the extra men to wherever they came from.
I think it's easy to forget that DC was really, really good in 2001-2008 (in other words, prior to 3 years ago). It was so good that eye contact from girls was happening a LOT, in every single club. I know because I lived through that period. But something happened in early 2009 which absolutely destroyed the ratio. It could be DC's resilience during the recession that drew in large amounts of men from out of state, but I'm not sure.
I work in government IT and have two coworkers, one from Texas and the other from LA, who are a case in point. They both arrived in DC for lucrative jobs. The LA guy has already left town, but the Texas guy is still here and companies were fighting to hire him, until he finally settled on a 6-figure salary of his choice. He used to joke that he'd never had it so good.
There was an article recently to the effect that DC was drawing lots of young people due to good (recession-proof) jobs:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/27...35149.html
Quote:Quote:
According to U.S. Census Bureau figures released Thursday, the Washington metropolitan area gained roughly 7,000 people between the ages of 25 and 34 in the past three years, according to The Washington Post.
The change is due in part to the availability of jobs in a city that has fared better economically than most others in recent years.
But they don't mention the ratios. In the last 3 years that they describe, DC's ratio has become abysmal for men, as some have noticed. It was nothing like what it is now. The article makes it sound like the city is bustling with activity, but obviously the situation on the ground is different. I think the disconnect is in the ratio of the transplants, anyone care to share their thoughts? Also, the 25-34 demographic may have increased, but the under-25 demographic decreased. I think over-25 women, for example, are more likely to not be single.
The government bubble has existed before. In 2004, spending was through the roof, with homeland security and the Iraq war, yet this place was paradise for guys. The difference is that the Texas guy and the LA guy could find jobs in Texas and LA and they didn't have to come here, along with many others. But due to the recession, they ended up here.
In sum, I've been reading all kinds of articles in the press about how DC's becoming younger and trendier, and yet the local males have never struggled more here than in the past 3 years.
However, I wait with interest to see if the government bubble bursts (as mentioned on the previous page). Newt Gingrich predicts that it will in 2012:
http://www.newt.org/news/government-next-bubble-burst
Who knows, maybe the tide will turn soon enough. Also, an improved private economy would return the extra men to wherever they came from.