Quote: (11-22-2015 06:58 PM)Captain Gh Wrote:  

To be fair, some of you guys are being way too harsh on this one! Some of this Hoes are good looking and skinny. We cannot expect for a roster of women to be perfect 10's like we men cannot be expected to all be Calvin Klein models. I'm the first one to call a cunt a cunt, but we have to be fair at the same time.

I'd like to remind you these are 18/19/20 y/o's. And they participate in athletic activity. Even if they did not participate in sport, girls of this age shouldn't have a cottage cheese thigh/ass rate of 90%+. Even the few not overweight have a double ass going on, no developed glutes. There's literally 2 girls out of that bunch that have a body that college athletes should.

It's not about being Calvin Klein models- anyone can have a healthy body weight- and girls of this age, participating in this activity, definitely should.

I see some women and male feminists here.

1. Female looks generate some 80% of their entire sexual market value, thus it is infinitely more important than with a man.

2. These are colleg girls - at the height of their genetic peak and top metabolism. They are fat and doughy now, how will they look at 30 or 40?

The calander is wrong for a variety of reasons:

1. They are too fat despite working out.
2. They are proud of it and post their pics.
3. They will likely still get laid easily enough and will get thousands of thirsty Betas professing their undying love to them, so that it may seem still great.

It is a tragedy frankly - mostly for men, while the women revel in their 'power'.

Way to ruin a sock fetish.

Who is in favour of the women's volleyball team getting naked?

Quote: (11-23-2015 05:56 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Who is in favour of the women's volleyball team getting naked?

Yup. All for it.





And these are what female college level athlete ass should look like.

What's the over/under on this lardturtle being able to run a full quarter mile?

Quote: (11-23-2015 06:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  

What's the over/under on this lardturtle being able to run a full quarter mile?

I'd wager her heart is in serious danger from just putting her socks on.

For my 4000th RooshV Forum post, I present to you, the US Women's Olympic Volleyball Team:





Much better.

Suits has begun the healing of our collective retina.

Fuck, look at how many tattoos the volleyball team has! But I'm not going to complain... it's still a huge improvement over these British Capybaras.

I this really all that surprising? Rugby is a game of strength and aggression, and it's not shocking that women who participate aren't exactly the most svelte and feminine.

For example, a woman in the forward pack in the video below wouldn't be at an advantage if she had a thigh gap and visible ribs. Humpty Dumpty curvy would be the body shape these woman would be aiming for in order to be an effective scrummager.






Rugby is a wonderful sport. However, women's rugby is the domain of ugly, dumpy dykes. There is no such thing as an attractive female rugby player. Can you spot one WB in the photo below of the New Zealand team?

[/align]

Here's some eye bleach for anyone who would like to learn the basic rules of rugby.

There is a team of naked rugby players in Dunedin, New Zealand. Why anyone would want to play or watch a contact sport with a bunch of naked dudes is beyond me. But it became slightly more interesting when this girl joined the side. Her father must be proud.

The first picture looked much better on my phone...

Quote: (11-23-2015 07:15 AM)Horus Wrote:  



There is a team of naked rugby players in Dunedin, New Zealand. Why anyone would want to play or watch a contact sport with a bunch of naked dudes is beyond me. But it became slightly more interesting when this girl joined the side. Her father must be proud.

Sweet mother of taints. A naked scrum? That would be the gayest formation on the planet.

Quote: (11-23-2015 07:15 AM)Horus Wrote:  



There is a team of naked rugby players in Dunedin, New Zealand. Why anyone would want to play or watch a contact sport with a bunch of naked dudes is beyond me. But it became slightly more interesting when this girl joined the side. Her father must be proud.

What is that thing?

Ita Agatha Truchbull!!!

I don't understand why they didn't at least photoshop the cellulite. It would be easy in those black and white pictures. Anyone could do it.

I mean, until now I thought that most women were at least aware of their short-comings and would never put them on public display. Only when the man is already at home with them, with dimmed lights.

This is absolutely the worst thing I have ever seen in my entire life. Compare that to the already ridiculous Dove commercial



Here you can guess at the fine line the producers walked with picking the "models", photoshop and make-up to produce the least attractive, yet not obviously aesthetically offensive picture.

With these rugby creatures it's just:

"We're ugly. We don't care. You don't care. You're gonna love it anyway. Now give us money and attention."

Holy shit. Now they are losing even their subconscious shame about being disgusting on a large scale.


I better adopt a Ron Swanson frame real soon. No other way to stay sane these days.

   

Nobody should be surprised.

I've met some of the female rugby players at my university. All of them are at least chubby and some are admitted carpet munchers. They're manly women who get low-standard dick because thirsty men think a woman who plays any sport for the university is automatically high-status and attractive.

But it's definitely laughable when these women at the same time want to throw themselves in a presentation of sexual appeal. They think they can be manly and sexy at the same time; e.g. Rhonda Rousey.

I get that it's for charity, but you know that all of them thought it was a good idea because "we're women and we're sexy and we're naked, so guys will love it and buy it."

And let's be honest, I'm sure many thirsty betas with low standards at Oxford bought it and proudly hung it up, thinking it's 'clutch' and dudebro and shit.

Quote: (11-23-2015 06:27 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Fuck, look at how many tattoos the volleyball team has! But I'm not going to complain... it's still a huge improvement over these British Capybaras.

Please don't get carried away. I know this thread has been traumatic, but having a go at capybaras? I won't have it. Capybaras are better than these women in every way. In addition to being the world's largest rodent, they have

Better bodies:




Refined sense of the ridiculous:




Know how to relax:





I know this thread is making you lose hope, but PLEASE leave the regal and unimpeachable capybara out of the equation. They are beyond reproach.

Would you want me taking my frustrations out on eels?

Why, sure!

Quote: (11-23-2015 05:03 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

I see some women and male feminists here.

1. Female looks generate some 80% of their entire sexual market value, thus it is infinitely more important than with a man.

2. These are colleg girls - at the height of their genetic peak and top metabolism. They are fat and doughy now, how will they look at 30 or 40?

The calander is wrong for a variety of reasons:

1. They are too fat despite working out.
2. They are proud of it and post their pics.
3. They will likely still get laid easily enough and will get thousands of thirsty Betas professing their undying love to them, so that it may seem still great.

It is a tragedy frankly - mostly for men, while the women revel in their 'power'.

4. Most of these women would be from the top tier of Britain's class system meaning that they wouldn't be seen with most men.

Quote: (11-23-2015 12:26 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Why, sure!

Okay. I will sing:

"When sharp teeth

Give you grief

From a hole

In the reef

That's a-moray."

Quote: (11-23-2015 06:27 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Fuck, look at how many tattoos the volleyball team has! But I'm not going to complain... it's still a huge improvement over these British Capybaras.

After about 15 minutes I did not see a single tattoo. Like what you did there.