Are soldiers in the military white knights for defending a country that women reside in?

france shows its real face (A dump)

there is nothing romantic, sexy, great about that place!!! once you get past the shinny monuments it's a pretty shitty place with little to none redeeming qualities about it (french people are specially a big con)

Quote: (05-25-2015 11:35 AM)mikado Wrote:  

Two thugs come to the girl, corner her and want to scar her in the face with a knife.

Captain Save-a-Hoe wants to talk the thugs out of that, they don"t listen to him and slap the girl.

He hits one of them, that one falls on the floor.

After that they run after the guy and manage to hit him several time on the leg and the lung.

No one cared to help him stop the bleeding, or call the police/hospital.

Meanwhile the girl just "excused herself" for that.

This will keep on happening every single time when some mangina or some feminist guy is going to try to save-a-ho

These manginas, not minding their own business, get stabbed
because of their brainwashing.

Of course he would have never saved a man cornered
and attacked by thugs.

The white knight did that because the ho was a young girl...

This stuff will keep on happening, men will keep on
getting scarred for life, while the girls with their life saved
will just smile and walk away

Quote: (05-25-2015 12:21 PM)mikado Wrote:  

Sure, man.

When you hear a thug saying he will scar a girl with his knife.
Knowing you are not related to her.
Knowing you have no weapon of your own, or no fighting background (Martial Arts, Boxing etc) in case he attacks you.
Knowing this happened in a city where at least weekly people die because of a gang or thugs? in the city nicknamed "the capital of Kalachnikov" ?
Would you still go talk to them, rather than calling the police and minding your business?
Also: would he have done the same if it was a man, and not a girl?
Not so sure.

Here's my question:

Why wasn't this dude carrying his own knife he knows he's in one of the most dangerous cities in the world?

Quote: (05-26-2015 03:50 AM)dads Wrote:  

Are soldiers in the military white knights for defending a country that women reside in?

A modern western military - especially the US military. Somewhat yes.

Quote: (05-27-2015 10:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Here's my question:

Why wasn't this dude carrying his own knife he knows he's in one of the most dangerous cities in the world?

Even better is the extendable baton - that way you don't get mired into lawsuits by cutting up someone too much, you can keep several assailants at bay.



Knife fights are tricky, because you have to get real close. The reach of a baton is priceless and you can break bones with that baby. France is not the US where any low-life can pull a gun on you, because it's highly restricted there.

Another example of how we misplace manosphere terminology when associating with real life.

I would agree he was brave and had balls. Nowhere close to a white knight. He deserves a forum referral from any of us.

Props for thread title though.

Quote: (05-28-2015 03:40 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote: (05-27-2015 10:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Here's my question:

Why wasn't this dude carrying his own knife he knows he's in one of the most dangerous cities in the world?

Even better is the extendable baton - that way you don't get mired into lawsuits by cutting up someone too much, you can keep several assailants at bay.



Knife fights are tricky, because you have to get real close. The reach of a baton is priceless and you can break bones with that baby. France is not the US where any low-life can pull a gun on you, because it's highly restricted there.

Not sure about France, but collapsible batons are highly restricted weapons in many places, as they fit the criteria of a concealed weapon.

It's not generally illegal in most places in carry a big stick, but carrying a weapon designed to easy to hide and surprise a victim with is often not legal.

For example, collapsible batons are restricted to sworn LEO in Canada. Even certified security guards can't carry them. They can carry a one-piece baton, but it has to be visible.

You also can't conceal carry a knife with a blade length greater than three inches in Canada or anything the mechanical opener.

Switch blades are illegal in some states. It's even illegal to carry handcuff keys in some states. Not sure about collapsible batons.

My point being, be careful to not assume that weapons are legal for carry, just because they aren't a gun. Restrictions are often a lot more wide spread than that.

Quote: (05-28-2015 05:54 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (05-28-2015 03:40 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote: (05-27-2015 10:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Here's my question:

Why wasn't this dude carrying his own knife he knows he's in one of the most dangerous cities in the world?

Even better is the extendable baton - that way you don't get mired into lawsuits by cutting up someone too much, you can keep several assailants at bay.



Knife fights are tricky, because you have to get real close. The reach of a baton is priceless and you can break bones with that baby. France is not the US where any low-life can pull a gun on you, because it's highly restricted there.

Not sure about France, but collapsible batons are highly restricted weapons in many places, as they fit the criteria of a concealed weapon.

It's not generally illegal in most places in carry a big stick, but carrying a weapon designed to easy to hide and surprise a victim with is often not legal.

For example, collapsible batons are restricted to sworn LEO in Canada. Even certified security guards can't carry them. They can carry a one-piece baton, but it has to be visible.

You also can't conceal carry a knife with a blade length greater than three inches in Canada or anything the mechanical opener.

Switch blades are illegal in some states. It's even illegal to carry handcuff keys in some states. Not sure about collapsible batons.

My point being, be careful to not assume that weapons are legal for carry, just because they aren't a gun. Restrictions are often a lot more wide spread than that.

It's illegal in France. Unless you work in security and have a licence.

And yes France is overrun by immigrants.

The sad thing is that the Nationalist party Front National won 25% of votes. Yet I know NO ONE who admits to voting FN, because they are afraid to be labeled as racist.

This is the mentality here.

Quote: (05-28-2015 10:10 AM)Edelweiss Wrote:  

It's illegal in France. Unless you work in security and have a licence.

And yes France is overrun by immigrants.

The sad thing is that the Nationalist party Front National won 25% of votes. Yet I know NO ONE who admits to voting FN, because they are afraid to be labeled as racist.

This is the mentality here.

Heh - so everyone is best unarmed except for the criminals and cops. Whenever that was the norm in history sooner or later shit happened. Did not know that such a simple baton is banned.

Fucking great. Then I would propose a cool steel walking cane. So far it's not forbidden yet. You can always say you are frail in the knees or goth.

I say good on the guy for being brave but, in a society where I'm not allowed to carry a real weapon for my/others protection you can bet your ass that the only thing I would have done is call the police.

Take the girl out of the equation entirely. Are these really the kind of cocksuckers you want running around your neighborhood, robbing and threatening innocent people with lethal weapons?

If it happened in front of me where I live I would've shot the knife-wielding pricks. This is the sort of bullshit street crime lowlifes engage in when they know there's only a slim chance they'll be killed doing it. The behavior just escalates until they finally murder someone.

When the danger involved in a particular kind of crime goes up criminals will switch to some other type of crime that is less hazardous to their health and socially disruptive. Which do you prefer? The occasional burglary when no one's home or home invasions? Armed robbery or credit card fraud?

It should be considered a civic duty to eliminate these sacks of shit from the community, because if they're allowed to flourish the whole damn place falls apart.

As for the kid, he was brave. Most people would've run off, which in isolation is a smart decision but when the streets are ceded to these scumbags everyone suffers.

Quote: (05-28-2015 10:48 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

Take the girl out of the equation entirely. Are these really the kind of cocksuckers you want running around your neighborhood, robbing and threatening innocent people with lethal weapons?

If it happened in front of me where I live I would've shot the knife-wielding pricks. This is the sort of bullshit street crime lowlifes engage in when they know there's only a slim chance they'll be killed doing it. The behavior just escalates until they finally murder someone.

When the danger involved in a particular kind of crime goes up criminals will switch to some other type of crime that is less hazardous to their health and socially disruptive. Which do you prefer? The occasional burglary when no one's home or home invasions? Armed robbery or credit card fraud?

It should be considered a civic duty to eliminate these sacks of shit from the community, because if they're allowed to flourish the whole damn place falls apart.

As for the kid, he was brave. Most people would've run off, which in isolation is a smart decision but when the streets are ceded to these scumbags everyone suffers.

I have a couple of friends who serve in the police in France. And I can assure you that they are FED UP.
Prisons are full and thugs arrested end up staying 24 hours at the police station before being released, awaiting trial.

Trials are also a farce with most sentences being nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

Many of the street thugs are recurring offenders who have served little time in prison.

All this, coupled with the prohibition of carrying arms, created a society where criminals roam fearless from the cops. They KNOW they will get away with it. It's almost like a jungle in some areas.

Cops are demotivated and citizens are more concerned about being called a racist than about being robbed, let alone help someone in need AGAINST non-whites. And you can thank schools, universities, medias and political parties for that social-liberal shit.

I was born in the wrong century.

Edelweiss is right: no guns, no weapons, no taser, nothing...
A jeweller was sent to jail for 7 years after preparing a trap for burglars , that he suspected would come to his shop. He killed with a weapon one of them; a youngster , 17 yo.

Quote: (05-28-2015 11:45 AM)mikado Wrote:  

Edelweiss is right: no guns, no weapons, no taser, nothing...
A jeweller was sent to jail for 7 years after preparing a trap for burglars , that he suspected would come to his shop. He killed with a weapon one of them; a youngster , 17 yo.

Well then, if I was trapped in such a Tyrannical society, I wouldn't help anyone. I would join the thugs and start killing gov officials and police.

Actually it was a shop owner (selling tobacco, lottery tickets etc). But you get the point.

Quote: (05-28-2015 12:26 PM)mikado Wrote:  

Actually it was a shop owner (selling tobacco, lottery tickets etc). But you get the point.

Yes, the political class, surrounded by bodyguards armed with all manner of weaponry unavailable to everyone else, don't give a fuck what happens to the peasants.

Some things never change.

Quote: (05-28-2015 12:03 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (05-28-2015 11:45 AM)mikado Wrote:  

Edelweiss is right: no guns, no weapons, no taser, nothing...
A jeweller was sent to jail for 7 years after preparing a trap for burglars , that he suspected would come to his shop. He killed with a weapon one of them; a youngster , 17 yo.

Well then, if I was trapped in such a Tyrannical society, I wouldn't help anyone. I would join the thugs and start killing gov officials and police.

That would not solve anything. They have well trained SWAT teams in case they truly need them.

I guess they are not concerned with the disruption of the life of normal citizens.

The funny part is that they are teaching it in school to the new generation: "Don't fight back when someone attacks you, just report him to the teacher." There are students who fought back against bullies and got arrested by the police. The problem of course is that this does not work in real life. People who have nothing to lose don't give a rat's ass about laws against owning a gun.

In Switzerland they sent to a remote farmer to prison after having killing a burglar. I wonder what the super-rich do? Get exemptions for 24h security in the house?

Forget it - you can hire armed security, but you cannot arm yourself. In the world there are those who are more equal than others:



http://www.praetorian-bodyguard.com/
So it's perfectly alright for them to be armed with a military-grade assault rifle in a densely populated area, but it is forbidden for normal Joel to carry a stupid baton?

Simple solutions to a complicated world: The Tunisian boy should have been rich enough to hire private bodyguards. The punks probably would not have attacked in his presence.

Is this threats of disfigurement thing out of the ordinary?

Quote: (05-28-2015 03:40 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Even better is the extendable baton - that way you don't get mired into lawsuits by cutting up someone too much, you can keep several assailants at bay.



Knife fights are tricky, because you have to get real close. The reach of a baton is priceless and you can break bones with that baby. France is not the US where any low-life can pull a gun on you, because it's highly restricted there.

Extendable batons and beaters are illegal where I'm from, not sure about where I live now. If you go upside someone's head with one expect it to be treated like any other use of potentially lethal force. I say fuck it, carry a tazer or carry a handgun. Learning to fight with your hands isn't a bad idea as well...