[Goldin Boy]

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/local_news/...ontroversy

The girl's a 7.5 imo. It looks like somebody is jealous. Opinions?

[Tuthmosis]

Translation: "It is my right to look and act like a slut--even at an institution designed for learning."

[Caligula]

Haha that guy who says it would be unprofessional looks like he's trying to white knight his way into the the pants of one of his fatty co-editors.

Looks like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

[Goldin Boy]

(01-10-2012 12:30 AM)Caligula Wrote:  

Haha that guy who says it would be unprofessional looks like he's trying to white knight his way into the the pants of one of his fatty co-editors.

Looks like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

The dude sounded like he was queer to me. Rejecting that pic was a passive-aggressive way for the female editors to "get back" as the HB for looking better than them...put together.

[Alpha]

(01-10-2012 12:39 AM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

(01-10-2012 12:30 AM)Caligula Wrote:  

Haha that guy who says it would be unprofessional looks like he's trying to white knight his way into the the pants of one of his fatty co-editors.

Looks like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

The dude sounded like he was queer to me. Rejecting that pic was a passive-aggressive way for the female editors to "get back" as the HB for looking better than them...put together.

I don't think it's even that - I honestly think the woman and her daughter fighting to have the picture put in the year book are wrong.

I don't think the picture is appropriate to put in a school year book. There has to be a degree of professionalism - and women whining and suing and fighting to have shit like this done is the reason America is as fucked up as it is.

Abandon Ship, I say. I'll die for my country, I will not die with my country.

[Goldin Boy]

(01-10-2012 08:31 AM)Alpha Wrote:  

(01-10-2012 12:39 AM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

(01-10-2012 12:30 AM)Caligula Wrote:  

Haha that guy who says it would be unprofessional looks like he's trying to white knight his way into the the pants of one of his fatty co-editors.

Looks like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

The dude sounded like he was queer to me. Rejecting that pic was a passive-aggressive way for the female editors to "get back" as the HB for looking better than them...put together.

I don't think it's even that - I honestly think the woman and her daughter fighting to have the picture put in the year book are wrong.

I don't think the picture is appropriate to put in a school year book. There has to be a degree of professionalism - and women whining and suing and fighting to have shit like this done is the reason America is as fucked up as it is.

Abandon Ship, I say. I'll die for my country, I will not die with my country.

I agree with you, to an extent. The formerly hot mom is living vicariously thru her daughter. A feminazi lawyer smelling a payday will take this case and they could win.

But the yearbook people are just screwing with her. In the vid, they said that the COULD use the modeling photo....on a $300.00 personal page. She can show how hot she is but it's gonna cost her. Imo the hamster makes most women incapable of making leadership decisions.

[Roosh]

[bengalltigerr]

(01-10-2012 12:39 AM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

(01-10-2012 12:30 AM)Caligula Wrote:  

Haha that guy who says it would be unprofessional looks like he's trying to white knight his way into the the pants of one of his fatty co-editors.

Looks like someone has a chip on their shoulder.

The dude sounded like he was queer to me. Rejecting that pic was a passive-aggressive way for the female editors to "get back" as the HB for looking better than them...put together.

Unprofessional looks? haha, slutty looks would have only made the yearbook more interesting, but the feminists interfered