[Basil Ransom]

What Anglophone cities is it easiest to bang many women, beautiful women, or both?

Some criteria to consider: Male-Female Ratio, Female Attractiveness, Male Competition aka Swagger, Bitch Shield Level.

Secondary Criteria: International Population, Female Class & Intelligence, Sprawl, Sluttiness.

The Candidates:

Los Angeles - Spread out, lots of attractive women around, but they're driving. Guys here tend to have a lot of swagger. Range of hot spots and low key ones. Surplus of men. [I live here]

New York - Lots of hot girls walking on any given street in Manhattan. Unparalleled number of attractive women. More SWPL (yuppie beta) men dying to be cuckolded. People generally ruder, at least initially. Surplus of women.

Toronto - never been there, but more slim women, more white women, people are unfailingly polite, and the guys are pussies, so I've heard.

London - was there only briefly, but the girls are god damn ugly. Whatever love I had for England disappeared upon seeing how ugly they are. And it's not just the teeth. They're also supposedly among the sluttiest in the world, shortest hemlines I've seen around. Lots of foreigners, but mostly undesirable ones.

Copenhagen - Girls are beautiful, tall, slim, blonde. I would just stop and stare at the cute girls riding by on bicycles everywhere. With the height and the bicycles, these chicks have killer calves, legs, ass. Everyone's polite, but I found it hard to build a connection with them. The girls are a little light on the personality, few really stood out. And the girls on wheels were generally a lot hotter than the girls in bars. Danes aren't xenophobic, but they are insular. Everyone is extremely proficient in English. City is very walkable, generally safe. Went there for study abroad, but if I had to choose again, I'd probably pick New Zealand, France, or Australia.

And those I don't know about: Miami, Chicago, San Francisco, San Diego, Boston, Philadelphia, Houston, Phoenix, Austin, Atlanta. Oh, and DC.

If you've any experience with any others, describe. Minneapolis, Nashville, Dallas, Seattle, Portland, etc.

[kerouac]

I've lived in NYC, LA, DC, and SD.

NYC is a pretty easy place to get laid if you live there and develop yourself a good social network. Even if you don't have a good social network, you can get hooked up pretty easily. I wasn't as active back then, but my friend was getting girls in bars all the time. It's worth to note that this friend had the most direct game I've ever encountered. He gets kicked out of bars all the time, which can be annoying, but the amount of girls he makes out with in one night (and sometimes screws in the bathroom) is dumbfounding.

LA is a really good place too, once you get to know the good bars and clubs. There are a lot of high quality beauties here with beautiful tans and pretty easy going personalities. I would say the girls here have it together, although there are many loonies running around. (Watch Kiss Kiss Bang Bang). Pick up and LA go side by side, and if your game isn't tight, staying here long enough you'll witness enough game to get your game up hyper speed.

DC sucked. Girls on average were butt ugly. Although there were some more of the prettier girls from the universities in and around Dupont Circle and Georgetown. Roosh would obviously know the most about this, but I have a good feeling he has good reason to keep the good spots secret

SD is pretty good. It's definitely really chill, and if you're from the big city game you can plow through many girls here in no time.

Miami, i've visited, and the tourist girls are looking for action. It was really easy with the tourists. Also I like that a lot of Euros and South Americans come here for vacation. The locals seem to run in packs. The Cuban chicas are beautiful, but I have the feeling it's more of a social networking game with them, because it's rare to see them solo or without a group of guys around them.

San Francisco, I visited for a week at my friend's place, and the girls are generally FUGLY. I would say it's one step below DC. There is the Mission which is good for nightlife (and where I saw the better looking girls), and it shouldn't be too hard to pull a chick here. One of my friends up there seems to have an alright time, and I wouldn't say his game is super tight. The girls in SF are hippyish/feministas so they're all about hooking up.

[Dman]

I've got laid in Auckland and Wellington (New Zealand) with ease, however I hardly have experience with anywhere else to compare them with

[Roosh]

Washington D.C. - Where the nerds come home to roost. Large number of girls don't take care of themselves physically, and put minimal effort into their dress. There is a stunning lack of quality, but same goes for the guys who generally have zero game. If you have game you can make a living pulling 7's and the occasion 8's. Need to get out of town if you want to meet 9's.

Cordoba, Argentina - Hottest girls in the world, but language barrier and cultural factors (they are termed "hysterical" by Argentine men), make it hard to get laid unless you stay for a while and work both day and night angles. You work hard for arguable returns, as you will not be getting the hottest the city has to offer unless your Spanish is above proficient.

[thegmanifesto]

Chicago is super underrated. Fly girls and the door is always open.

Toronto is low profile insane. Crushes San Diego, DC, SF.

DC is generally horrible.

The top 1% is really good though.


- MPM
The Guide to Getting More out of Life
http://www.thegmanifesto.com

[Kish]

Some good info here. Maybe some of us can add or edit some of these suggestions. Any new ideas on where to swoop?
Spring is in the air..........

[MiXX]

(08-07-2009 12:28 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Toronto is low profile insane. Crushes San Diego, DC, SF.


- MPM
The Guide to Getting More out of Life
http://www.thegmanifesto.com

Really? But over in the Toronto Thread, guys that live in Toronto say it is the worst place to get try and get laid in Canada and everyone should swoop in Montreal.

Can you break this down more?

[Excelsior]

(08-06-2009 11:01 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

Copenhagen - Girls are beautiful, tall, slim, blonde. I would just stop and stare at the cute girls riding by on bicycles everywhere. With the height and the bicycles, these chicks have killer calves, legs, ass. Everyone's polite, but I found it hard to build a connection with them. The girls are a little light on the personality, few really stood out. And the girls on wheels were generally a lot hotter than the girls in bars. Danes aren't xenophobic, but they are insular. Everyone is extremely proficient in English. City is very walkable, generally safe. Went there for study abroad, but if I had to choose again, I'd probably pick New Zealand, France, or Australia.

Roosh might have a little something to say about this assessment due to his recent experiences. Judging from his anecdotes, I'm not so sure it'd be favorable.

[thegmanifesto]

(04-11-2011 01:12 PM)MiXX Wrote:  

(08-07-2009 12:28 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Toronto is low profile insane. Crushes San Diego, DC, SF.


- MPM
The Guide to Getting More out of Life
http://www.thegmanifesto.com

Really? But over in the Toronto Thread, guys that live in Toronto say it is the worst place to get try and get laid in Canada and everyone should swoop in Montreal.

Can you break this down more?

Mixx-

I have never been to Montreal, (was supposed to meet you there last year but couldn't go) so I really can't do the Montreal VS Toronto comparison.

I really did well in Toronto and I liked the place.

There were tons of girls and the guys were extremely docile (at least to what I am used to).

I think I have broken down where I stayed on here before and where I went out.

I also was there in June I think, so the weather was perfect.

Suited Down worked extremely well.