Posts: 181
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-18-2011, 10:34 PM
The topic title refers to a book that is meant to serve as an expose of the "seduction industry."
Among his arguments:
1. Most self-proclaimed PUA's who solicit their services to teach people to get laid rarely get laid themselves. He describes one PUA who became a workshop instructor for Mystery's company after having gotten one lay.
2. He calls the Mystery Method nonsensical and convoluted to the point that it's destructive to a man's chances at getting laid. His key sticking point on MM is the "seven hour rule," and how it is a stupid, unnecessary time frame that most competent seducers can work under.
3. Game is not "the great equalizer" in male-female relationships, and that you must cultivate a positive aesthetic and psychological image of yourself via "great success" in a particular field. Once you have achieved success in an endeavor, lays should come naturally to you.
4. Surprisingly, he never advocates "grinding" out with tens of approaches before finally getting a lay. He even derides that strategy, saying that it's not actually game: approach enough women and one is going to like you enough to fuck you.
5. Most pickup material is "mental masturbation."
Has anybody else read this (short) book? A lot of the stuff he says goes against the thinking of a lot of bloggers I read regularly, i.e. Roissy and Roosh. I looked around the forum for a thread on this but nothing came up.
Posts: 254
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
2
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-18-2011, 10:56 PM
Meh, the truth is somewhere between the fervor and the skepticism.
Lots of people selling snake oil and plenty of people either selling or giving away good information.
Also, this book seems to be taking particular aim at MM, which is nothing new, and all it's doing is espousing a different view of seduction.
DISCLAIMER: I don't know what I'm talking about and my posts are opinion, not advice.
Quote:Gmac Wrote:
your time > her feelings
Posts: 181
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-18-2011, 11:01 PM
Yeah, I don't think he's a legit game denialist, he just has a more casual natural view on seduction.
Posts: 568
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
21
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 12:57 AM
There is a little truth in point 4 depending on your perspective. On one hand, he is correct that just approaching a bunch of women doesn't mean that you are smooth, or have what many would consider game. In addition, he is also correct that if you approach enough chicks at least a few will eventually fuck you.
However, I would argue that actually approaching women, while ridiculously basic, is the biggest stumbling block many guys have. I remember back in college, when I was in full on beta (bordering on omega) mode. One of the first big changes for me was seeing this chubby, frumpy looking guy go from never going out with chicks to dating girls all of the time. I asked him what was his secret. He said "I found out that if you ask girls out, most of the time they will say yes, even the hot ones."
Even though I saw his results, I still didn't believe him. It wasn't until I asked one of my female friends and she told me that she would give any guy who asked her a shot with at least one date that I tried it out. Turns out he was completely right. I went from no dates and a bunch of female friends, to multiple dates a week. I even started getting laid on a semi-regular basis. It wasn't spectacular numbers, but it was better than most guys on campus, other than the jocks and super-pretty boys. If I had actually learned to escalate better I would have absolutely destroyed college.
My personal opinion is that if guys just did 3 things, you could throw out all of the strategies, negging, cocky/funny, DHV, being alpha stuff and you would still get 10 times as much poon as you were getting before. Here it is:
1)Approach often
2) Escalate continuously
3) Be persistent
That's it. Unless you have horrible hygiene or a personality disorder, doing that all of the time will get you laid pretty regularly. You may not be able to regularly score 10's with just that, but lets be honest. most guys would be happy if they could CONSISTENTLY bang chicks around the same looks as them without having to commit to some kind of LTR. In truth, the fact that so few guys can actually even do this explains why so many men wind up marrying some sub-par chick that is giving him pussy on a semi-regular basis.
Posts: 11,959
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
163
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 01:28 AM
While I agree that everyone could benefit from those 3 points, I find that viewing the world through rose-tinted glasses. The massive amounts of friendzoning, flaking, "I gotta do something, sorry" and etc would make a wreck out of someone long before he managed to get any success just with that. But maybe I've just been very unlucky.
"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for
squid that has never crossed your mind before
Posts: 16
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 02:20 AM
Like someone said before, I think the truth lies in between.
Some of his key points listed out are spot on, and there really is a shitton of mental masturbation.
With that being said, here's what I think are some fundamentals that people sometimes overlook(a lot):
-basic social skills
-working out and dressing well
-being able to recognize women that are interested and escalating there
-approaching enough women - it really is a numbers game. You can increase your ability, but you still will have to do the approaching and it's inevitable you'll face rejection .
-having enough game - knowing how to tease women and be firm with them(boundaries whatnot which actually ties into just having some damn standards)
-having hobbies, interests, passions that you pursue - a good lifestyle
What I think game is:
I really believe that "game" really is more for women that are on the fence and being able to manage logistics. I used to think that meeting and seducing women was some intense battle where I had to "frame control" women and put her in her place when in reality, women want to fuck and want guys to fuck them(I know this sounds stupid, but too times women are treated like they're some mortal enemy). In retrospect, more women were interested in me than I thought and I just was too idiotic to recognize the signs or do something.
However, I say all of this after having gone through a shitton of mental masturbation, excessive reading, and approaching women before I finally moved on to being a normal guy who has some game.
If you're a normal guy with social skills that dresses well, works out, and has a relatively interesting life, I think it's almost a given you should have a few options. Having "game" then would be like icing on a cake - it'd only make things better
Posts: 314
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation:
8
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 03:00 AM
if Sleazy's angle is simply debunking Ross Jeffries and Mystery, he can join the club. That's like a guy writing a book debunking that the moon is made of cheese. Duh.
Mystery and Ross are clowns that don't take their job seriously. It's kind of obvious to NORMAL people, but if you're a guy who has ZERO experience with women, then you don't really know the difference I guess.
I've been a dating coach for men for 5 years and I treat my job just like any other coach or consultant or trainer. I work hard to figure out the best ways to get results for my clients. Fundamental to that is that I practice what I preach in my personal life. You wouldn't hire a personal trainer if he had a pot belly. But you also wouldn't hire a guy that was naturally skinny. You'd want a guy who had figured out how to get a six pack and bench 350, and could teach it to you.
If you're looking for an expert, it means you want elite results. Approaching a lot of women and trying to escalate will get you laid on occasion. If you want higher quality and quantity (as us guys do), then you find someone who's much much better than you.
My clients tend to be very driven, success-oriented, intelligent successful guys in other areas, and want elite results in this part of their lives. Most of them are already good with women. They want to be excellent.
If I have a 40 year old engineer, doctor, or business owner coming to me for live coaching, I need to be able to demonstrate AND transfer the skills to him in short order. I need to be able to show him what's truly possible with the right mental tools.
SOME people in my field are serious, but most are not. I see the dating coach field as the medical field in it's early days. It was a joke - bloodletting? cmon...this is where the whole snake oil joke comes from. In the late 1800's, people really did think snake oil did something. Cocaine was seen as a cure for having "weak blood." Now the medical field is legit. A big part of this is peer review and institutionalized standards. Success/life/dating coaches aren't even close to that kind of industry-imposed standard and probably never will be.
Pick your mentors/sources wisely. Just look at the guy - can you imagine the hot girls in your school or that you know wanting to suck his dick? If no, then you're probably right.
Posts: 181
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 03:31 AM
I probably should have done some more digging on this guy before I posted his manifesto.
This Aaron Sleazy guy ironically writes his own PUA books, and has his own forum where he mostly posts to himself about picking up women.
Posts: 7,818
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
343
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 08:42 AM
Enough with this keyboard jockey debunking.
Can we get back to talking about game?
Posts: 6,695
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
146
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-19-2011, 10:35 PM
Quote:Quote:
1) Approach often
2) Escalate continuously
3) Be persistent
This is essentially "sarging" -- sorry, it doesn't work as well as you'd think... in and of itself. It's like trying to brute force your way through everything in life. Sure, it'll work once or twice, but it's not surefire method. It's not game either.
Vice-Captain - #TeamWaitAndSee
Posts: 423
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2010
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-20-2011, 02:19 AM
Quote: (12-19-2011 10:35 PM)Gmac Wrote:
Quote:Quote:
1) Approach often
2) Escalate continuously
3) Be persistent
This is essentially "sarging" -- sorry, it doesn't work as well as you'd think... in and of itself. It's like trying to brute force your way through everything in life. Sure, it'll work once or twice, but it's not surefire method. It's not game either.
I see both sides here. In my historical dry spells, I was approaching zero women. Maybe I would Forrest Gump my way into dating a woman in my social circle. But more likely I would get motivated and do something, anything. It could be approaching, personal ads, speed dating. Anything worked better than being a hermit.
But there is no question I have benefited from improved skills. It's an interesting question, because we don't have a controlled sample of guys who approached with and without studying game.
The "approach and escalate" concept makes a lot of sense. I doubt you call appearance, alcohol, and logistics game, or at least non-obvious game. Gmac, can you suggest two or three important game concepts that would improve these results?
Posts: 19,387
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
413
Debunking the Seduction Community
12-20-2011, 11:52 AM
Game denialist nonsense by a guy who wants to replace game with just another flavor of game.