I saw this link in another thread. http://www.datemedc.com/2011/07/i-should...-once.html
the tl;dr version is that the girl just wants fun and guys are way too persistent.
"One by one, we started telling of our encounters with certain men who pushed their ways past our persistent "no's." Men who were bound and determined to get into our apartments after we said we weren't comfortable letting them in. Men who, upon gaining access to our apartments by pleading to use the bathroom or putting forth some other such excuse, attempted to undress us even after we said we weren't comfortable going there.
We kept saying "no," but they kept saying, "Come on. Please?"
In some cases, they pushed us past the point of saying no. To the point of saying, "Fine. Just get it over with.""
Then the author goes on to say that persistence leading to "fine get it over with" sex is equivalent to rape.
What is everyone's opinion on this?
I personally think she's full of shit, she wouldn't let him in her house if she had no desire, however small it may be, to fuck him. The guy would have had to get to some level of attraction for her to even let him get that close to her.
This also brings up another question, Have you ever been in a situation where it seems a woman just caved in to persistence and had "fine just get it over with" sex?
I personally have been there once, a girl called me over late at night, we were FWB. I was drunk she was sober. I start trying to initiate and she stops me, I am persistent. She tells me she can't because she likes some other guy and hes amazing etc. I ask her if hes made a move, he hasn't I make fun of him for being a beta wimp. I try again, she gets pissed and tells me I can stay there but should stop trying to 'rape' her. I retort by making a mention of the sexual assault posters on campus "got consent" and one thing negating 'yes' is if they're under the influence so I jokingly tell her shes the one raping me. Shit goes downhill. I get out of there right quick.
the tl;dr version is that the girl just wants fun and guys are way too persistent.
"One by one, we started telling of our encounters with certain men who pushed their ways past our persistent "no's." Men who were bound and determined to get into our apartments after we said we weren't comfortable letting them in. Men who, upon gaining access to our apartments by pleading to use the bathroom or putting forth some other such excuse, attempted to undress us even after we said we weren't comfortable going there.
We kept saying "no," but they kept saying, "Come on. Please?"
In some cases, they pushed us past the point of saying no. To the point of saying, "Fine. Just get it over with.""
Then the author goes on to say that persistence leading to "fine get it over with" sex is equivalent to rape.
What is everyone's opinion on this?
I personally think she's full of shit, she wouldn't let him in her house if she had no desire, however small it may be, to fuck him. The guy would have had to get to some level of attraction for her to even let him get that close to her.
This also brings up another question, Have you ever been in a situation where it seems a woman just caved in to persistence and had "fine just get it over with" sex?
I personally have been there once, a girl called me over late at night, we were FWB. I was drunk she was sober. I start trying to initiate and she stops me, I am persistent. She tells me she can't because she likes some other guy and hes amazing etc. I ask her if hes made a move, he hasn't I make fun of him for being a beta wimp. I try again, she gets pissed and tells me I can stay there but should stop trying to 'rape' her. I retort by making a mention of the sexual assault posters on campus "got consent" and one thing negating 'yes' is if they're under the influence so I jokingly tell her shes the one raping me. Shit goes downhill. I get out of there right quick.