[Captainstabbin]

(02-23-2019 01:03 AM)Dirtyblueshirt Wrote:  

Combine all that with tech like siri/alexa, which has a database of information, the ability to interact and give responses, and perform simple tasks.

To hell with a sexbot, if it could do this, I'd buy one to replace my secretary! Throw in basic accounting and some paralegal skills and it could replace almost every woman in the workforce.

#MeToo chicks have made men scared to interact with them at work. I won't even let a woman close the door for a meeting! A repurposed sexbot wouldn't talk back, wouldn't waste all day looking at facebook and wouldn't go to HR when she wants a raise or promotion.

[Leonard D Neubache]

Countdown until some dude gets pulled over in the carpool lane while getting a back rub from Synthia and a blowjob from Electra.

[Avoy]

(02-23-2019 01:41 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 01:03 AM)Dirtyblueshirt Wrote:  

Combine all that with tech like siri/alexa, which has a database of information, the ability to interact and give responses, and perform simple tasks.

To hell with a sexbot, if it could do this, I'd buy one to replace my secretary! Throw in basic accounting and some paralegal skills and it could replace almost every woman in the workforce.

It's coming. It's number #9 in the 10 professional jobs that are threatened by advances in big data and machine learning.

Quote:

9. Lawyers and Paralegals
In the discovery phase of a lawsuit, lawyers and paralegals can be required to sift through thousands, even tens of thousands of documents depending on the case. Now, sophisticated databases can use big data techniques including syntactic analysis and keyword recognition to accomplish the same tasks in much less time. In fact, it’s likely that a Watson-style machine learning system could be legally “trained” to review precedent and case history and even draft legal briefs — which has traditionally been the job of lower level law firm associates. But don’t think it’s only the lowly junior associates whose jobs are at risk: lawyers are well paid now to predict the outcome of major cases, but a statistical model created by researchers at Michigan State University and South Texas College of Law was able to predict the outcome of almost 71 percent of U.S. Supreme Court cases. That ability to predict outcomes is possibly the most valuable (and lucrative) service lawyers provide, and it was easily matched by a computer.

[kinjutsu]

(02-22-2019 10:52 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(02-22-2019 09:50 PM)Avoy Wrote:  

This chick's implants are almost in her armpits.

Shes great to watch with the sound off, not a fan of her accent...but yeah totally WB.

As stated else where in the thread.
Once they can make sexbots widely available i fully expect legislation on the types you can own, the number, overall height and size requirements, number working orifices etc..

And lets not forget the people who might like a sexbot that portrays a younger than acceptable age with physical features to match. (I personally think this will be the justification for government oversight)

[nomadbrah]

This thing is going to really take off with deep fakes.

[Avoy]

(02-22-2019 10:32 PM)Captain Gh Wrote:  

This right here! In order to avoid the risk of getting addicted to this... I'm staying away from it! AI Women might essentially become Out of this world Prostitute! Since there won't be a way to make it illegal (I think but Hey)... you can bet they'll make sure you have to Pay for that $hit, and somehow get the government involved with some kind of licenses in order to prevent the easiness of entry, and therefore ensure business profits stay sky high like the casino & Gambling business.

Great idea for Tinder 2.0. Pimp out AI girls. Just swipe right when you get bored and Tinder will generate a new one until they get a match. No need for attachment or long-term emotional investment. I'm sure the girls will be just as flaky to "keep it real."

[MrLemon]

(02-23-2019 03:01 AM)Avoy Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 01:41 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 01:03 AM)Dirtyblueshirt Wrote:  

Combine all that with tech like siri/alexa, which has a database of information, the ability to interact and give responses, and perform simple tasks.

To hell with a sexbot, if it could do this, I'd buy one to replace my secretary! Throw in basic accounting and some paralegal skills and it could replace almost every woman in the workforce.

It's coming. It's number #9 in the 10 professional jobs that are threatened by advances in big data and machine learning.

Quote:

9. Lawyers and Paralegals
In the discovery phase of a lawsuit, lawyers and paralegals can be required to sift through thousands, even tens of thousands of documents depending on the case. Now, sophisticated databases can use big data techniques including syntactic analysis and keyword recognition to accomplish the same tasks in much less time. In fact, it’s likely that a Watson-style machine learning system could be legally “trained” to review precedent and case history and even draft legal briefs — which has traditionally been the job of lower level law firm associates. But don’t think it’s only the lowly junior associates whose jobs are at risk: lawyers are well paid now to predict the outcome of major cases, but a statistical model created by researchers at Michigan State University and South Texas College of Law was able to predict the outcome of almost 71 percent of U.S. Supreme Court cases. That ability to predict outcomes is possibly the most valuable (and lucrative) service lawyers provide, and it was easily matched by a computer.

Magic Leap has gotten, what, a billion dollars in funding in a past few years to produces "this" and their VR goggles. Reading the description of the AI girl, it's very clear that she's going to be integrated into the goggles from the start.

OK so Magic Leap has to very quickly start releasing products that leverage all this tech and give some hope of them making money. Like, next year.

So yeah, a virtual secretary is guaranteed. But that won't be enough revenue to justify the Billion dollar investment. They will almost have to eventually release a AI virtual sexbot with some kind of monthly fee. They need to charge 200 or 300 dollars a month for SOMETHING. That's their business model.

So they provide this technology so you can:

1. Look in the goggles and get a virtual secratary
2. Simultaneously, a clunky metal robot wheels over and gives you a cup of coffee. You don't see the clunky robot. The VR glasses overlay the gorgeous VR girl.

The japanese will pay hundreds of bilions for that technology because they dont' have enough workers and don't want to allow immigrants in.

So then some bright guy in marketing makes a deal with the physical sexbot manufacturer. By now the physical sexbots have bluetooth enabled blowjob-machines built into the head and torso.

1. Look in the goggles and get a virtual stunning girl. Maybe there's a caucasian, japanese, and chinese model you can choose from. Tinder like interface lets you select your favorite.

2. The goggles overlay your fantasy girl on the face of the sexbot (these goggles can totally do that...hell even the new iphones probably have enough AR capability to do that). The AI fantasy girl in the goggles provides the voice and the personality in addition to the AI appearance. It links to the bluetooth enabled physical bot and runs the motors and heaters.

Voila...you have the scene from Blade Runner 2049 where the virtual girl overlays herself over the physical girl to have sex with the hero.

Except we don't have to wait till 2049. All this will be here in < 5 years I predict. AGain magic leap has the almost infinite levels of funding to make this happen.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Frank Zappa predicted all of this thirty years ago on his album Joe's Garage.

On that LP, he envisions a world in which men prefer to have sex with appliances and then end up in prison after being set-up by the Powers That Be for petty, sex-related crimes. In other words, more or less the world we have now.

[eradicator]

Give these bots long hair and ship them to China, Guys in China are in some seriously bad shape thanks to the ice child policy

[Heuristics]

Feminists are already fighting this stuff tooth and nail yet I wonder why they haven't outlawed pornography yet...:

Swedish Feminists Demand State Ban on 'Dangerous' Sex Robots

Quote:

Three Swedish feminist organisations, Sweden's Women's Lobby, the National Organisation for Women's Shelters and Young Women's Shelters (Roks) as well as the empowerment organisation Unizon have published a joint appeal in the newspaper Expressen, in which they demand a state ban on "dangerous" sex robots for men.

The debaters noted that today's sex robots often have the "appearances and attributes typical of the objectifying, sexualised and degrading attitude to women found in today's mainstream pornography".

"Why are men willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a robot that obeys their smallest command?" the feminists asked rhetorically. "A female robot cannot say no to something that the man wants, if she is not programmed to do so", the feminists complained.

The leaders of the women's organisations claimed that fantasies stimulated by such technology may lead to real violence against girls and women. They also drew parallels with pornography, whose consumption, they claimed, leads to sexist attitudes and actual violence. The dehumanisation of women justifies slavery, and the exploitation of the female body through new technology is part of this, they claimed.

The three organisations demanded that an inquiry be made to produce proposals on "how technology and activities that normalise abuse can be restricted and prohibited".

The feminists also want Swedish authorities to make it difficult for "brothels with sex robots and dolls" to open in Sweden. Unlike neighbouring Denmark and Finland, Sweden has yet to open an automated brothel with no human prostitutes. The organisations drew comparisons between sex robots and prostitution.

"Sweden has for 20 years had a regulatory framework that punishes sex buyers and which has reduced the demand for prostitution. <…> Now, Sweden must take the next step and dare to address the ongoing technological developments that are driven by the sex industry at the expense of real women and girls", they concluded.

Lastly, they demanded that such dolls and robots be included in sexual education curricula and addressed from a perspective that portrays the relationship between sexuality and power as problematic.

In 2014, Sweden received its first "feminist" government, which puts a special emphasis on women's rights.

And what the f***, there's already doll brothels in Denmark and Finland?!?

[saner]

"A female robot cannot say no to something that the man wants"

This. They are terrified of losing their power.
It is dawning on them that their vagina is the ONLY thing of value they have today. None will admit that it is because THEY have abandoned the symbiotic values they brought to traditional relationships.

Guess what ladies, we are also abandoning the symbiotic value that you counted on us for. Protection, money, guidance, security, compassion, staying with you as you get old and wrinkly....... Fuck it, not appreciated anyway.

Oh, and where are the cries for banning vibrators, dildos and Fifty Shades of Grey? Fucking hypocrites.

[RatInTheWoods]

Actually if you see a hot babe through your VR goggles kneeling between your legs, and some sort of vacuum device gives you a great blowjob at the same time, this could be the crossover point that makes bank and starts the investment to go forward from there.

Imagine the market of incels with this device in their basements, sales would go through the roof. We almost have this tech now.

[Avoy]

(02-23-2019 01:51 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

Magic Leap has gotten, what, a billion dollars in funding in a past few years to produces "this" and their VR goggles. Reading the description of the AI girl, it's very clear that she's going to be integrated into the goggles from the start.

OK so Magic Leap has to very quickly start releasing products that leverage all this tech and give some hope of them making money. Like, next year.

So yeah, a virtual secretary is guaranteed. But that won't be enough revenue to justify the Billion dollar investment. They will almost have to eventually release a AI virtual sexbot with some kind of monthly fee. They need to charge 200 or 300 dollars a month for SOMETHING. That's their business model.

So they provide this technology so you can:

1. Look in the goggles and get a virtual secratary
2. Simultaneously, a clunky metal robot wheels over and gives you a cup of coffee. You don't see the clunky robot. The VR glasses overlay the gorgeous VR girl.

The japanese will pay hundreds of bilions for that technology because they dont' have enough workers and don't want to allow immigrants in.

So then some bright guy in marketing makes a deal with the physical sexbot manufacturer. By now the physical sexbots have bluetooth enabled blowjob-machines built into the head and torso.

1. Look in the goggles and get a virtual stunning girl. Maybe there's a caucasian, japanese, and chinese model you can choose from. Tinder like interface lets you select your favorite.

2. The goggles overlay your fantasy girl on the face of the sexbot (these goggles can totally do that...hell even the new iphones probably have enough AR capability to do that). The AI fantasy girl in the goggles provides the voice and the personality in addition to the AI appearance. It links to the bluetooth enabled physical bot and runs the motors and heaters.

Voila...you have the scene from Blade Runner 2049 where the virtual girl overlays herself over the physical girl to have sex with the hero.

Except we don't have to wait till 2049. All this will be here in < 5 years I predict. AGain magic leap has the almost infinite levels of funding to make this happen.

I think you're right. VR and various physical "enhancement" devices will be adopted widely before bots -- and perhaps be even more compelling. The Elite will love this because it puts less strain on the planet. Less pollution, less consumption of manufactured goods, etc.

The sad side effect is that people will end up preferring this reality over their own real-world one. You can already see this in the way girls love to use photo beauty filters and snapchat style overlays to present themselves to the world. They delude themselves and others everyday with this fake persona and they are OK with it. And also how people get lost in a TV series while binge watching on Netflix.

The human brain can adapt to a virtual environment and quickly perceive it as real under the right conditions. The big hurdle for VR is presenting everyone with a unified space or world to interact in. I'm sure Facebook is working on that. Actually, this whole scheme is not much different than what was shown in the movie The Matrix. But instead of everyone of being used as a battery by the AI/robot overloads, you'll be a revenue/tax generating engine for the Elite as you voluntarily strap yourself to a device in your bedroom.

[Leonard D Neubache]

They will let you have your toys, but only for as long as it takes to rob you of everything else while you are literally blinded by VR goggles.

You get the velvet shackles first. The ones that come after will be made of barbed wire, the barbs in place for their own sake.

Quote:

“OBEDIENCE IS NOT ENOUGH. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy--everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty toward the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always--do not forget this, Winston--always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever.”

What's missing in Orwell's 1984? The question of what creatures gain sustenance from human suffering.

[Avoy]

(02-23-2019 10:56 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

They will let you have your toys, but only for as long as it takes to rob you of everything else while you are literally blinded by VR goggles.

You get the velvet shackles first. The ones that come after will be made of barbed wire, the barbs in place for their own sake.

Quote:

“OBEDIENCE IS NOT ENOUGH. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy--everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty toward the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always--do not forget this, Winston--always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever.”

What's missing in Orwell's 1984? The question of what creatures gain sustenance from human suffering.

Everything in that quote sounds about right until you get to "The sex instinct will be eradicated." Then it goes for full Communist dystopia. The Elite and Big-tech will allow people to remain entertained and sexualized as it's a better form of control and gives people a perceived sense of freedom through choice and unlimited options to stimulate their minds.

I think it will get to the point where people won't get as excited for real humans, as they can only get turned on by their unattainable in the real-world digital or bot preferences. People will have to donate sperm and eggs to keep the human race going. Those kids will be raised by the state ("the community") until adulthood. I can see the Democrats already salivating at the thought.

[questor70]

Those who are disenfranchised in the sexual marketplace have always retreated into fantasy. And not just men. Women have their romance novels. Point being that pleasure is ultimately all in the mind, not the physical reality. Like that scene in The Matrix where Cypher is eating fake steak and he says "ignorance is bliss".

The fact is that if the end goal is just sexual gratification, VR and sex bots are a hell of a lot less work and hassle than the real thing. So you can shame it all you like, but people tend to always pursue the easy road. Look at Bob Kraft who just got busted for propositioning a whore or Jeff Bezos getting divorce-raped. The liabilities of women are there no matter how elite you are.

[CynicalContrarian]

(02-23-2019 03:13 PM)Heuristics Wrote:  

Feminists are already fighting this stuff tooth and nail yet I wonder why they haven't outlawed pornography yet...:
...

Which is an indication of how threatened they are to these things already, when the damned things aren't even wholly realistic, nor viable, nor widespread.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(02-23-2019 03:13 PM)Heuristics Wrote:  

Feminists are already fighting this stuff tooth and nail yet I wonder why they haven't outlawed pornography yet...:

Swedish Feminists Demand State Ban on 'Dangerous' Sex Robots

Quote:

Three Swedish feminist organisations, Sweden's Women's Lobby, the National Organisation for Women's Shelters and Young Women's Shelters (Roks) as well as the empowerment organisation Unizon have published a joint appeal in the newspaper Expressen, in which they demand a state ban on "dangerous" sex robots for men.

The debaters noted that today's sex robots often have the "appearances and attributes typical of the objectifying, sexualised and degrading attitude to women found in today's mainstream pornography".

"Why are men willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a robot that obeys their smallest command?" the feminists asked rhetorically. "A female robot cannot say no to something that the man wants, if she is not programmed to do so", the feminists complained.

The leaders of the women's organisations claimed that fantasies stimulated by such technology may lead to real violence against girls and women. They also drew parallels with pornography, whose consumption, they claimed, leads to sexist attitudes and actual violence. The dehumanisation of women justifies slavery, and the exploitation of the female body through new technology is part of this, they claimed.

The three organisations demanded that an inquiry be made to produce proposals on "how technology and activities that normalise abuse can be restricted and prohibited".

The feminists also want Swedish authorities to make it difficult for "brothels with sex robots and dolls" to open in Sweden. Unlike neighbouring Denmark and Finland, Sweden has yet to open an automated brothel with no human prostitutes. The organisations drew comparisons between sex robots and prostitution.

"Sweden has for 20 years had a regulatory framework that punishes sex buyers and which has reduced the demand for prostitution. <…> Now, Sweden must take the next step and dare to address the ongoing technological developments that are driven by the sex industry at the expense of real women and girls", they concluded.

Lastly, they demanded that such dolls and robots be included in sexual education curricula and addressed from a perspective that portrays the relationship between sexuality and power as problematic.

In 2014, Sweden received its first "feminist" government, which puts a special emphasis on women's rights.

And what the f***, there's already doll brothels in Denmark and Finland?!?

The idea that porn leads to "violence against women" was shot down once and for all in a landmark article from 2006 titled "How Internet Porn Prevents Rape." This article, which looks at actual data, was published by Slate (link here).

These Swedish feminists are taking their ideas from the 1980s in the U.S., back when feminists and Christians simply made up the idea that porn led to violence.

Now the Swedes are saying the same thing about sexbots: They'll lead to "violence against women." This is clearly bullshit. What they're really worried about is that sexbots will 1). Raise the standard for real life women and 2). Give men a(nother) reason not to deal with women at all.

[catoblepa]

I need to write to my buddy Elon Musk to urge him to speed up the research on sexbots. If he puts his mind into it, we're gonna have Stepford Wives level sexbots sooner than we expect.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(02-24-2019 06:32 AM)catoblepa Wrote:  

I need to write to my buddy Elon Musk to urge him to speed up the research on sexbots. If he puts his mind into it, we're gonna have Stepford Wives level sexbots sooner than we expect.

Funny you should mention "Stepford Wives."

That term first came into being because it was the title of a 1972 novel by Ira Levin, which imagined that the nice-looking, submissive housewives in a suburban town were actually robots.

It was made into a movie a few years later and helped further fuel the women's movement of the 1970s, by redefining non-working wives as soul-less and inhuman. In one scene, a female photographer does some research and find the housewives were once feminist activists.

If you all ever wonder what turned wives into worker bees, "The Stepford Wives" was one such thing. Middle America might not have been reading Ms. Magazine or reading feminist literature, but they were absorbing the messages anyway in novels and movies like "The Stepford Wives."

[Aurini]

(02-24-2019 02:39 AM)Avoy Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 10:56 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

They will let you have your toys, but only for as long as it takes to rob you of everything else while you are literally blinded by VR goggles.

You get the velvet shackles first. The ones that come after will be made of barbed wire, the barbs in place for their own sake.

Quote:

“OBEDIENCE IS NOT ENOUGH. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy--everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty toward the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always--do not forget this, Winston--always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever.”

What's missing in Orwell's 1984? The question of what creatures gain sustenance from human suffering.

Everything in that quote sounds about right until you get to "The sex instinct will be eradicated." Then it goes for full Communist dystopia. The Elite and Big-tech will allow people to remain entertained and sexualized as it's a better form of control and gives people a perceived sense of freedom through choice and unlimited options to stimulate their minds.

I think it will get to the point where people won't get as excited for real humans, as they can only get turned on by their unattainable in the real-world digital or bot preferences. People will have to donate sperm and eggs to keep the human race going. Those kids will be raised by the state ("the community") until adulthood. I can see the Democrats already salivating at the thought.

Replace "The sex instinct" (which as you point out is so primordial that some people fuck cars, and others fuck plants) with "Eros": erotic love. Romance. Intimacy.

I've been doing a lot of thinking about this lately. Comparing White girls to Asian girls (who are lagging behind on the cultural rot). Thinking about the aspergers induced by birth control. The generalized anti-erotic culture: MeToo, Strong Empowered Women, Evil White Men - all of these tropes are anhedonic, they prevent the mixing of opposites by turning everybody into grey mush. We're already living in a (largely) post-eros world. Getting your nut is easy; game a chick, or download some porn. But finding erotic love with a modern woman?

Good fucking luck.

I think I'll be writing an article on this shortly. Some reflections on my recent ex connected some dots for me.

[Lunostrelki]

(02-24-2019 02:39 AM)Avoy Wrote:  

Everything in that quote sounds about right until you get to "The sex instinct will be eradicated." Then it goes for full Communist dystopia. The Elite and Big-tech will allow people to remain entertained and sexualized as it's a better form of control and gives people a perceived sense of freedom through choice and unlimited options to stimulate their minds.

I think it will get to the point where people won't get as excited for real humans, as they can only get turned on by their unattainable in the real-world digital or bot preferences. People will have to donate sperm and eggs to keep the human race going. Those kids will be raised by the state ("the community") until adulthood. I can see the Democrats already salivating at the thought.

I think that even that could be considered an Orwellian eradication of the sex instinct. The ecstasy that once used to be reserved for the creation of families, men's own families, gets hijacked by the elite (Party) for its political ends. In 1984 it was presented as a crude Stalinist or North Korean-style dystopia—Orwell clearly underestimated the power of technological progress—but the underlying process is the same: commodify, distort, and disintegrate human nature.

[TravelerKai]

(02-22-2019 05:58 PM)Repo Wrote:  

Who am I kidding I'd bang

I love short hair, but that is boy length. Need to be neck or shoulder for me. WNB.

[Captainstabbin]

(02-23-2019 06:26 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

This thing is going to really take off with deep fakes.

Imagine dudes getting a 3D scan from a few pics of the hot girl at the gym, then posting video of him railing her with a giant smile. Bonus points if he can sample her voice for the AI.

It's got nothing to do with cultural issues, but I'd laugh at that.

[Sooth]

(02-24-2019 05:43 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 06:26 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

This thing is going to really take off with deep fakes.

Imagine dudes getting a 3D scan from a few pics of the hot girl at the gym, then posting video of him railing her with a giant smile. Bonus points if he can sample her voice for the AI.

It's got nothing to do with cultural issues, but I'd laugh at that.

Or a girl submits her 3D scan to an online 50 shades of grey type dude who loads it up onto a fembot and then does a custom porn scene.

The fembot will have a refrigerated womb, so the dudes load is bagged and tagged, DHL is called and the cumshot is delivered to Stacies closest IVF center.