^ Forgot to mention: I believe the setup for the final destruction of the Catholic Church in Australia as a Catholic - not Reform Judaism / Sabbatean-Frankist - Construct will be the 2020 Plenary Council. All other Churches have, effectively, fallen to Sabbatean-Frankist Heresy: you know them by their fruits.
The 2020 Plenary Council is about involving the
Laity in deciding the future of the Church. The point of Catholicism, as opposed to the Heretical Schisms that have already fallen, is that belief and direction is supposed to flow from a clear line of Successive Authority of Agreed Leadership that dictates Theology: agreed belief have to resonate with the infused knowledge of the Holy Spirit, which is something those in a State of Grace
know, rather than
figure out.
This way Reason - what you instinctively 'know' - which is immune from the Demonic - takes precedent over Emotion - what you 'feel' - which is susceptible to Demonic Influence. Any kind of weakness that causes longing in the Sensible Faculties is what is known as
Concupiscence, which can only exist contrary to Reason.
Due to the Fall and Original Sin, left to our own devices, without Grace and the Holy Spirit,
we will always instinctively choose what is wrong over what is right.
Do you see how Theology is starting to fill in the gaps of all the Sociological Observations I've made over the last few years? when I theorized about the Degenerate Triad back in 2014, I said it was Symbolic / Emotional / Irrational thought, guaranteed a Fascist Mindset. Concupiscence explains this: Emotion
guarantees Irrational thought, guaranteeing a Satanic Subjective Morality, rather than the firm, guiding light of Objective Morality.
As the Sabbatean-Frankists have made their final play to fully-claim culture over this decade, have you noticed how
hyper-emotional everyone is acting, (including our elected 'alpha' leaders)? It's design, not co-incidence.
This explains the danger of the Plenary Council: the Laity, who exist in various states of imperfection - are supposed to be
guided, not
guide, otherwise Concupiscence guarantees they will choose what is Easy (conforming to the world), rather than what is Hard (either holding fast or returning to tradition). The Church Authority agreeing to this overturns the Succession of Authority dictated by the Natural Law, which means,
it becomes outside of God's protection, and the Satanic can enter and influence.
As such, the Church is throwing open the doors to Subversion, which means, predictably, that the advertising for the council on their own websites reeks of GloboHomo, where White Men are removed from the picture entirely, and White Girls get to feel all warm and squishy about being seen as the holy saviours of diversity.
![[Image: home-4.jpg]](http://plenarycouncil.catholic.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/home-4.jpg)
Note how the Propaganda - and it
is propaganda - uses what I've termed before as the
Apple Aspirational style to sell a false, heightened-reality, which, trying it back to Theology, means presenting a Subjective, not Objective Truth.
As such, this has predictable appeal to Busybody Women who are incapable of the Humility Jesus teaches them to practice, at threat of damnation, thinking he can't possibly mean them, because, well, everyone else should humble themselves before what they FEEL to be the truth, because they're not Unprofitable Servants, but the Holiest in their Church.
So, I did some image searching, expecting a sea of predictable Subversive Hair ('the Merkel') and disordered bodies, seeing if I could guess the intention from, well, outward signs of the demonic. Doing this I discovered that the Catholic Websites in Australia seem just are just as strictly-controlled as anywhere else, and most times, comments aren't allowed.
So, I'd see a picture like this:
![[Image: lana-turvey.jpg]](http://catholicleader.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/lana-turvey.jpg)
...think "Hair above the chin, subversion from within", mentally-note the disordered presentation (obesity suggesting an inability to control concupiscence when it comes to food, and the chicken wing arm selling a false reality that she has a waist), and then see if the interview was what I'm learning to think of as 'Hyper-Sanctimonious Feel-Vomit', where she feels she knows better than a 2000 year old Patriarchal Institution.
There were many examples of this kind of thing, but I'll single this woman out, because, it turns out, she is the
Facilitator of the Plenary Council in Australia. Remember what I said about busy-body women?
I'll throw up some extracts:
Quote:Quote:
LANA Turvey-Collins does not shrink from the challenge of leading a high-stakes national conversation about the future of the Catholic Church in Australia.
A woman leading anything but her children is in direct opposition to the natural law and Jesus' teaching on humility. She's not in a State of Grace, therefore, she is outside God's Protection, and anything she teaches is corruptible by the Demonic.
Quote:Quote:
she is leading a three-year “transformative journey” with the cultural reform of the Church on the table.
A digression to explain where this is about to go:
About five months ago, I woke up in the middle of the night with infused knowledge, and, over the next few days, scribbled out a theological map of how the universe functions in a series of predictable polarities. I didn't share it with anyone because, well, it will sound crazy to anyone who is
of the world, and it seemed contrary to humility to share it, so I want to make clear this knowledge was delivered to me, and not from me, but I do want to point out one very telling polarity I noted.
I'll give you slight context. Think of this construct as a stream flowing from Right, with to Left. If you don't constantly-swim against the current - actively fight - you will be pulled to the Left due to Original Sin.
There are three States (Opposition to the Law, Neutrality, Concordance to the Law), and in using the word Neutrality I'm probably poorly-trying to describe a mid-point that I'd suggest doesn't exist, because there is no true neutrality in this battle. Think of it more as the point most swimmers are tossed into the stream, bar those in Scripture who are free of Original Sin, such as the Blessed Mother.
Opposition to the Law <--- Neutrality <--- Concordance to the Law
Expanding that, as you are drawn downstream you go through three predictable and observable stages from Neutrality, being: Party, Pervert, Pathetic, being the collecting pool / fetid swamp the stream terminates in.
Let me fill it in:
Opposition to the Law <-- Pathetic <-- Pervert <-- Party <--Neutrality <-- Concordance to the Law.
Between Concordance and Neutrality, the Saints have marked out the stages of Purgative, Illuminative and Unitive, Unitive being the source, the living spring.
Opposition to the Law / Pathetic <-- Pervert <-- Party <--Neutrality <-- Purgative <-- Illuminative <-- Unitive / Concordance to the Law.
You can only swim upstream by the choice of your free will and self-abnegation. Yes, your free will can also take you downstream, but the current carries you down there whether you consent or not, particularly if you pretend there's no stream and no current, and make a habit of feeding the concupiscible appetites. If you share in the 'Yes' of Perfect Consent - 'be it done unto me according to they word', what is known as Mary's Fiat, for she never disobeyed his will - you end up deeply-united to the God in the Living Spring.
Most of us can only swim upstream so far in our lives due to our attachments, so purification via fire in purgatory takes us the rest of the way. If you want to get further during your own life, but it seems impossible to swim, St Therese of Liseux has many beautiful writings on accepting your littleness and humility, which, applying it to my metaphor, means you place
perfect trust in Jesus to bring you upstream rather than trying to swim there yourself. This isn't Protestantism or Quietism, it involves the 'Yes' of Perfect Consent in infusing every tiny action of your day with Love, but it's achievable by everyone.
The further downstream you are, you see Truth more Subjectively - in an emotional and false manner - and the further upstream you are, you see Truth more Objectively - via reason and infused knowledge.
Note that this
doesn't mean where you
believe you are on the Political Spectrum as being an effective judge of your moral state. The most common tell of believing in Subjective Truth I've noticed is someone stating that they believe that they're 'a Good Person'.
I was talking to an old woman from Church the other week who told me that I was more 'Saintly' than her. My reply was to laugh: "How can you say that? You see me at Confession almost every day."
She looked down her glasses at me and touched my hand. "Ah, but you haven't heard what I confess, Dear."
My point being, as you swim upstream, you realistically understand via reason your innately-corrupted nature, so you can't deny it, or present a false image of your holiness. This is why Jesus says, 'even the just man falls seven times a day'.
As such, certain presented, observable behaviours in others clearly spells out where those around you are in the stream, allowing you to make more theologically reliable judgments of who or what you're dealing with based on reason, since emotion will lie.
As such, predictable polarities come into play: the further downstream you are, you'll believe a subjective falsehood, whilst upstream, you'll only believe objective truth, and I suspect all of these could clearly be mapped out. My sketch lists about 40 of them so far until I put it aside out of the fear of presumption or arrogance.
I'll give you an example of this in practice:
The other day, I was challenged on her about someone mocking Christianity, his construct being Ned Flanders - so his idea of Christians was shaped by the (((media))), and could see the answers to what he was asking was something he was unprepared to accept: the necessity of bearing your cross, and choosing the hard action over the easy one. I knew he was incapable of hearing a hard truth, given his video game addiction, which feeds concupiscence, guaranteeing feminine reactions to stimulus. This is why his writing is so often inflammatory and mock-masculine, calling to action, when it's really just an impotent cry of someone powerless, but he can't help but respond that way, because feeding the Concupiscible appetites gives the Demonic control over the Irascible Appetites, anger being one of them. He can't help but get triggered, because training the pleasure centers to be rewarded by laziness and false accomplishment can only result in this.
I've noticed since I gave up video games four years ago, I've gradually gotten greater and greater control over my anger, though I still have my moments of irritation.
I could also see he Satanically Inverted the thread - as above, labeling the Good with the Sins of the Evil - meaning, the thread became about how the Satanists actively destroying society weren't the real threat, Christians were.
Being able to sum up someone like that - to place them clearly in the stream - means I can see a lengthy response would have been a waste of my time. It's not being uncharitable, there are limits to who you're supposed to preach to.
Yesterday, I read him complaining about wanting a leader who would tell the country they'd have to do it hard to survive, so, without knowing it, expecting a society he thinks would be better off with Christianity to do the Hard Thing of Bearing A Cross, which always sounds like insanity to anyone of the world.
He's bearing two contradictory beliefs without seeing the hypocrisy = subjective truth = far downstream. Emotional / Irrational / Symbolic therefore Fascist, therefore "It is morally righteous to kill your enemies". His subjective reality is he's on the Right, but he's objectively no-different in thought from the Left.
If things get hard, guys need to be able to know who they can rely on, meaning, emotional thought is a liability, and these sort of men aren't reliable or trustworthy.
Why I brought all that up:
Note this woman speaking of 'cultural reform'. Two of the Downstream / Upstream Polarities I noticed was Progress / Tradition, and Transitory / Eternal. You've noticed how the Left talks of the need for society to change to 'advance', usually presented via Inversion as being Moral Advancement, which only ever means 'retreat from the natural law into guaranteed societal dysfunction'.
Whilst this was knowledge I knew via reason in the moment, I don't always understand it right away. I find I can always identify if it's Objective Truth or not by what I consider
subtle reinforcements, where the subject comes up again via little observable patterns in my surroundings, conversations, or readings. This is why I respond to the writing of St Ignatius of Loyola, who obviously had a similar brain, and could map out the patterns.
As I've gotten deeper into Theology, certain concepts about the Divine Nature have become clearer, and I recently-understood God is Eternal and Unchanging. I do the Divine Office Readings each day, and, following that pattern, these ideas were reinforced over the last couple of mornings.
Everything up to Jesus is prophecy, Jesus himself fulfills the promise and dictates eternal truth. With the book of Apocalypse, public - though not private - divine revelation ends, and nothing can ever contradict established truth.
There is no need for change.
Societal change itself therefore can only exist for the interests of Demonic Subversion.
This is why this woman is so dangerous, with her talk of Cultural Reform. I severely-doubt she means go back to the Latin Mass and the 40 Day Fasts of Lent and 24 Day Fast of Advent. Man, old school Catholics were
hardcore. Reform, by it's nature, is to destroy the established law.
Quote:Quote:
A Queenslander, with strong academic credentials and with her own life-changing experiences in Africa, Mrs Turvey-Collins acknowledges the robust public debate the plenary will generate, and its ground-breaking potential.
(((Academic credentials))).
'In Africa' = Brown People Saviour.
Huh, I wonder what kind of change she wants.
Quote:Quote:
“Women’s role in leadership in the Church is something personally relevant,” she said.
So, Reform Judaism.
Quote:Quote:
“I am a 39-year-old woman and if my husband and I have kids, I want our daughters to have a place in Church.
...I'm a 39-year-old woman...
...
If My husband and I have kids...
See the Subjective Reality?
Quote:Quote:
“There is already so much great leadership going on and women every day in all sorts of places – lay women, religious women, Catholic teachers, nurses, doctors, scientists and theologians.
i.e., women who are disobeying the Natural Law and the prescriptions of Humility.
Quote:Quote:
The last plenary council, held in 1937, was an exclusively male gathering, with only bishops, theologians and superiors of male religious orders attending.
Note the implication that's a bad thing.
Quote:Quote:
a richly diverse community
Reform Judaism.
Of course, she went to Africa, as these women worship the victimhood of brown skin.
Quote:Quote:
“It was the first place I had ever experienced being in the minority,” she said.
Christians aren't supposed to care about being in the minority, because we understand most of the majority is
of the world. But the undercurrent here is, of course, Reform Judaism.
Whilst I attend a Latin Mass, note that it was driven out of the Cathedral here by these types of busy-body facilitator woman. Why? Because the Latin Mass is lead by men only, and they just love to get up and have everyone pay attention to them by doing the readings, and they just couldn't abide being told to sit down, cover their head with a veil, and shut up and worship God.
Note that I've long decided if I'm ever asked to deliver readings, I'll politely-decline and stay humble in my seat.
I'm calling it now: 2020, the Catholic Church in Australia will be killed and worn as a skin-suit.
I've got to duck out. I'll write about the Latin Mass in a couple of hours.
![[Image: 1539634216-1064448330-960x540.jpg]](https://1v1d1e1lmiki1lgcvx32p49h8fe-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/1539634216-1064448330-960x540.jpg)
![[Image: JpX7D.png]](https://i.stack.imgur.com/JpX7D.png)
