https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...SApp_Other
Of course there is always are short supply of suitable men for women. No matter what. When a man in average just get a like of every 115. woman at tinder, when women look online for a level 20 % higher then them, when 80 % of men not suitable for men, its good that courts give women the right to now sue.
Guess the next step is to randomly sue men, because they are not suitable and lead to a rape trauma.
This woman is 47 and has already 3 kids. She lived in the illusion or maybe get sold it by this dating side, that there are enough men for her. She has no common sense, that a man that match her requirements can date a woman 20 years younger with no kids at all. Her time is up...
Quote:Quote:
A divorcee seeking a wealthy boyfriend has won £13,100 in damages from an elite dating agency after it failed to introduce her to the match she hoped would be “possibly the man of my dreams, the father of my child”.
Tereza Burki had sued Seventy Thirty, based in Knightsbridge, central London, for deceit and misrepresentation. On Wednesday the high court ruled it had misled the businesswoman about its “exclusive” membership.
“This case is about a woman looking for romantic happiness who says she was tricked into shopping in the wrong place, paying a large sum to a dating agency which, she says, made promises but failed to produce the goods.”
Burki, 47, a mother of three who lives in Chelsea, approached the dating service in 2013 in pursuit of a new partner. “Her requirements were not modest,” the judge observed.
What she wanted was a “sophisticated gentleman”, ideally employed in the finance industry. It was important that he should lead a “wealthy lifestyle” and be “open to travelling internationally”.
Her most important requirement was a willingness to have more children since she had always wanted four. Burki was encouraged by what she read about Seventy Thirty and eventually signed up, paying £12,600.
The judge said the agency’s then managing director, Lemarc Thomas, claimed there was a substantial number of wealthy male members actively engaged in its matchmaking services who were a sufficient match for Burki’s desires.
This was false and misleading, said the judge, because there were only about 100 active male members altogether. That number could not “by any stretch of the imagination” be described as a substantial number, even without considering how far that number would have to be reduced to allow for compliance with her criteria.
Ruling on the agency’s libel claim, Parkes said he had not found the business was a fundamentally dishonest or fraudulent operation, although at the time it probably had a short supply of suitable men.
“We are a niche, exclusive agency, not a mainstream, mass-market online dating service. We are not going to have thousands of members because there simply aren’t thousands of single, wealthy, high-calibre prospects out there,” Ambrose said.
Of course there is always are short supply of suitable men for women. No matter what. When a man in average just get a like of every 115. woman at tinder, when women look online for a level 20 % higher then them, when 80 % of men not suitable for men, its good that courts give women the right to now sue.
Guess the next step is to randomly sue men, because they are not suitable and lead to a rape trauma.
This woman is 47 and has already 3 kids. She lived in the illusion or maybe get sold it by this dating side, that there are enough men for her. She has no common sense, that a man that match her requirements can date a woman 20 years younger with no kids at all. Her time is up...
We will stand tall in the sunshine
With the truth upon our side
And if we have to go alone
We'll go alone with pride
For us, these conflicts can be resolved by appeal to the deeply ingrained higher principle embodied in the law, that individuals have the right (within defined limits) to choose how to live. But this Western notion of individualism and tolerance is by no means a conception in all cultures. - Theodore Dalrymple