Airplane turns around over ocean cause Roosh is passenger (Detained in Iceland)
07-15-2018, 08:45 PM
The UK has officially gone full retard.
Quote:Quote:
After we landed, I asked the American girl for some gum in case I’d have to do some talking. She only had white Tic Tacs. I took them and added, “If they take me off the plane, it was nice sitting next to you.” She gave a weak smile.
Quote: (07-15-2018 09:55 PM)BlueResolute Wrote:
I don't like that Thomas Jefferson quote, mostly cause it's what's being used by the left right now. And there's no drawn line to who it prioritizes more, so it makes unjust and just subjectivity uglier to determine. Still, I'm behind the law of whatever place I reside in less that law threatens my existence as far as death, food, shelter, or water is concerned.
Quote: (07-15-2018 05:47 PM)Avadhuta Wrote:
Whilst the decision to ban Roosh from the UK is completely ridiculous, it is nevertheless legal. He was notified by the government and has acknowledged this publicly.
Quote:Roosh Wrote:
I know I’m banned from England, but it should be safe to have a layover where I don’t have to go through customs, right? Four-hundred dollars was enough motivation to find out.
Roosh then decides to defy this ruling, rationalizing it through a vague legal assumption that should have been verified through proper research and "test" the system in order to save 400$.
He knew there was a risk and he decided to take it. That was a bad call.
Sorry Roosh, this one is on you. You knowingly went against UK law and caused a plane to be turned around thereby messing with the plans of all the other passengers, the crew etc. simply because you wanted to save some money. Or was it the rush of being a rebel?
All in all you got off very lightly considering the costs of this little stunt.
Just my probably very unpopular 2 cents.
Quote: (07-15-2018 10:29 PM)fugly1000 Wrote:
Question for anyone that knows. Aren't airports usually considered a save haven for travel from country to country? More like a international gateway. I believed, that if you don't leave the airport, you can travel freely. I know countries you can't leave the airports during a layover.
Quote: (07-15-2018 10:29 PM)fugly1000 Wrote:
Question for anyone that knows. Aren't airports usually considered a save haven for travel from country to country?
Quote: (07-15-2018 10:29 PM)fugly1000 Wrote:
Question for anyone that knows. Aren't airports usually considered a save haven for travel from country to country? More like a international gateway. I believed, that if you don't leave the airport, you can travel freely. I know countries you can't leave the airports during a layover.
Quote: (07-16-2018 01:48 AM)[email protected] Wrote:
I shudder to think what they would have done to him had he reached the airport. It's not a stretch to say they would have interrogated and jailed him indefinitely.
Quote: (07-15-2018 09:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:
Bottom line is I never imagined they'd turn a plane around. Live and learn.
Quote: (07-15-2018 11:51 PM)placer Wrote:
Quote: (07-15-2018 10:29 PM)fugly1000 Wrote:
Question for anyone that knows. Aren't airports usually considered a save haven for travel from country to country?
Not in the US. There was a famous story of a non-US citizen who got arrested in the mid-aughts when at a US airport waiting for a connecting flight.
Quote: (07-16-2018 01:48 AM)[email protected] Wrote:
I personally would not have taken this risk. It's mind blowing they would turn the flight around but I shudder to think what they would have done to him had he reached the airport. It's not a stretch to say they would have interrogated and jailed him indefinitely.
What's notable is that I haven't heard any outrage over this level of tyranny over a thought crime. Meecham, Robinson, Southern were all covered in the net and MSM but Roosh doesn't even register a blip.
Quote:Quote:
Home Office plan to give jihadis council houses and support part of 'overdue' strategy to combat terrorism
Government plans to give jihadis council houses and other support as part of de-radicalisation programmes have been welcomed as “overdue” by terror experts.
Right-wing commentators have branded the proposals, codenamed Operation Constrain, as “beyond sick” and accused authorities of seeking to bribe extremists.
But analysts say there is an urgent need to coordinate police, intelligence, mental health and social work for thousands of potential threats who are known to authorities but cannot be jailed.
They include the 20,000 extremists who have appeared on the security services’ radars but are not deemed to be a sufficient risk for round-the-clock surveillance – the category that Westminster attacker Khalid Masood, Manchester bomber Salman Abedi and London Bridge ringleader Khuram Butt fell into.
The growing pool will be joined by former Isis members returning from the group’s shrinking territories in Syria and Iraq.
A report released last week said 425 men, women and children have already returned to the UK and the fate of more than 400 other jihadis who travelled to Isis strongholds remains unclear.
Max Hill, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, has been among those calling for a focus on “reintegration” amid warnings that there will not be sufficient evidence to prosecute all returnees or jail them for significant amounts of time.
Quote:Quote:
terror experts