Quote: (06-24-2018 04:25 PM)Checkmat Wrote:
[quote] (06-20-2018 12:28 AM)Roardog Wrote:
(06-19-2018, 11:40 PM)the Thing Wrote: [quote='Roardog' pid='1803989' dateline='1529391631']
As you say, this may not reflect the reality. You may just not have had good enough game to get her on the first date but a tonne of other guys have before you. Or she could be a reformed party girl and you're just the first schmuck to be subjected to her arbitrary "no more sex on the first date" rule.
Your caveman brain doesn't take any of that into consideration, it just takes the present events and translates that into a feeling of attraction or not.
What about a girl that is young enough to be in her party years but maintains a 2-3 date rule for sex? For instance, an 18-year old is too young to be a reformed slut. I guess she COULD have been a slut from 16-18 and now she's going to be more "responsible" but that's pretty rare IMO.
I'm going to have to disagree with this point. I've interviewed many, many women who were highly promiscuous in their high school years and, subsequently, decided to "clean up their act" when they got to college. Just so we all know what level of promiscuity I am talking about, I was seeing women who had double-digit sexual partner counts before 18. Once in college, they decided to reinvent themselves and went on a no sex until X variables are satisfied. In this case X could be anything from a number of dates or a certain period of time to exclusive dating. Without the information provided by the girl's background (which would be known wherever she came from) the girls were free to rewrite the rules. And, the men in her new social circle were none the wiser. It wasn't exactly 90% of women, but this was a very common situation.
Currently out of office.