Posts: 4,676
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 11:24 AM
He is not smooth at all.He is also offensive at many cases no good calibration.Every girl requires different style.
Posts: 165
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 12:17 PM
Agree with Greek Kamaki.
Best day game player is Paul Janka. Dude closes like a champ while looking like a shady serial killer.
I think Janka's laid back indirect style is what works best on American girls.
Also like this guy:
Granted, it looks like an English dude picking up what appears to be a 30+ foreign woman not fluent in English on home turf so it's like playing in the bush leagues compared to local young American girls.
Posts: 900
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
13
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 01:50 PM
I prefer the stuff Roosh talks about in Day Game. I'm biased because that casual, relaxed style comes naturally to me anyway, but I can't help feeling that whilst most girls enjoyed the guy in the OP's presence, he was more of an entertainer than anything else. The super-extrovert style looks good on camera, but I wonder how it would compare on a datasheet. I bet he gets numbers easily, but the flake rate must be through the roof.
Quote: (03-05-2016 02:42 PM)SudoRoot Wrote:
Fuck this shit, I peace out.
Posts: 4,676
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 03:06 PM
Paul Janka is really good.It is exactly the right tone.Also the body language is very good.He is also Czech I think and Czechs are usually very smooth.
Posts: 28
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
1
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 05:52 PM
He's entertaining and most is for show. And when he is offensive it's kinda like a metaphor to the guys watching, somethin like "don't be so afraid of saying something stupid".
Posts: 3,352
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
78
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 09:58 PM
The first guy is just trying to be a youtube comedian- his pickup style is awful
Janka on the other hand, is very skilled. His body language is excellent, and his manner of speaking is relaxed, confident and well paced, and he cycles through the routine very smoothly. Nice work
"If anything's gonna happen, it's gonna happen out there!- Captain Ron
Posts: 8,774
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 10:32 PM
These guys are clowns compared to my boy Sasha.
Posts: 5,900
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
183
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-09-2012, 11:14 PM
While I agree that Paul Janka has great body language, vibe, confidence, etc, I still wanna know what his close rate is. Although one thing I can say is I'm in L.A. and in these clips he's in Austin. Austin chicks are way more down to earth and approachable. L.A. girls are approachable but extremely flaky. I have a hard time that with these 5 minute interactions, his date/bang conversion is very good. However, I can imagine him absolutely killing it at night.
"...so I gave her an STD, and she STILL wanted to bang me."
TEAM NO APPS
TEAM PINK
Posts: 165
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-10-2012, 11:58 AM
I'm thinking Janka intentionally obscured his good looks with a scruffy beard, shades, and hat so guys wouldn't claim that he was racking up numbers due to his looks. Goes to show that strong body language, tonality, and a confident masculine dominant frame can compensate for a "shady" appearance.
PJ claims he number closes about in 1 in 3 approaches, averages 1-2 mins a number close, and he gets 40 a week. At an 11% conversion rate that's about 4 lays for 40-80 mins work in set. Not bad at all. Far more efficient than one 45 minute set that may or may not lead anywhere.
Problem is this numbers game approach is only feasible if you live in a high pedestrian traffic area with lots of girls. NYC or any American college town would be ideal.
Posts: 11,055
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
152
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-10-2012, 01:35 PM
I think I'm starting to like those Sasha videos. I made it all the way to 1:06 this time. It also made me realize that I need my own theme beat
Posts: 2,212
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
95
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-12-2012, 08:13 AM
ok obviously this vitaly dude is mainly fucking around with girl for his little show so it's more about making his show entertaining than meeting and getting girls he likes.
paul janka on the other hand is full on shark and does awesome job, guy who is actually cool and his interactions are casual fun and most importantly natural. that's what i mean by 'being normal'. best public daygame videos no doubt.
as opposing to sasha who is full clown, rushing and robotically spitting same shit, dancing monkey vibe and his jittery makes him look like a premature ejaculator.
however "how many bf do you have?" is the same 'wrong' thing to say as saying "my grandma is now officially on facebook". it can't be really labelled as mistake by default since content always depends on the context so every interaction is case by case basis.
in this particular case he crossed the line a bit later. at first when she was still sceptical about him, he started BF thread which was unnecessary and very edgy (multiplied by the fact that he's stranger) in that moment but got away with it. until 7:24 when he said "...imaginary" and she smiled. after that moment he messed up by insisting on the topic and getting too confrontational too early. too bad cause until that she was at least a bit attentive, bit smilling and looking at him.
not to mention that i cringe watching trying hard to hook a girl instead of screening from the get go. but that's just me.
Posts: 165
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
bunch of fun daygame clips
07-12-2012, 10:46 AM
There are multiple levels of communication. Broadly these can be simplified into two categories.
1. What is actually being said. This is largely irrelevant.
2. What is being sub-communicated i.e. everything else apart from the words.. This is where "seduction" actually happens.
Insecure chodes like Sasha focus on the words. They build elaborate structures which force them to take actions like kissing the girl, touching her etc.
Natural players like Paul Janka (ie. the guys who fuck 100's of girls without ever learning about any "method") understand that the actual conversation is unimportant. The actual styles they use are very differentiated but there is one thing which they all have in common. Good sub-communications.
The best players I've met actually use mostly boring and generic conversation as this is the easiest way to not trigger logical objections from the girl. The reason they get results is because they use non-verbals to communicate pure sexual dominance.
Routines guys eventually get a feel for the correct actions, they begin to project the right non-verbals and sub-communications. This is why they eventually get laid. Unfortunately they wrongly rationalize that it is the scripts and elaborate "routines" which they spent so long creating which got them the results.