[Rigsby]

(04-15-2019 11:07 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

...
lol.
...

Pretty sure you aren't 'laughing out loud'.

"lol"

[Rigsby]

News just in. I just backtraced Tiger Mandingo's IP. Consequences will never be the same again!




Sad!

How to win friends and influence people eh?

Or...

How to alienate anyone that ever had any common ground with you.


Half-jew you say?

[Kona]

(04-15-2019 11:07 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Franz Kafka

He's a Jew.

Aloha!

[trickster]

We are all The Jew in one way or another and that is why this thread exists.

[Irenicus]

(04-15-2019 06:23 PM)911 Wrote:  

The restriction on cellphone porn was actually enforced in Israel weeks before it was in the UK. In any case, the UK's position is very unique in the West, so it doesn't detract from my main point, it's a pretty minor sideshow in my main point establishing that the porn industry is mostly Jewish.

Nope, it's vice versa. Again, you want to discuss things you didn't research. Again, I did some homework for you.

From what I've gathered, the ISP's in the UK had, since 2012, filters blocking access to websites that provide pornographic content - likely due to pressure from their clients.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/i...onths.html


Those filters became mandatory on 27 April 2017, when the Digital Economy Act 2017 was passed. Link down below (you aren't going to read it, I know):

https://services.parliament.uk/bills/201...onomy.html


On the other hand, the Knesset passed a more liberal version of the bill in...January 2019. 2 years after the UK. That law requires the ISP to add filters to pornographic content only if the user asks for it. In UK...those filters are on by default. Here, a snippet of yet another article you will not read:

Quote:

The Knesset approved at a first (that means it became law) reading Tuesday a bill that will require internet service providers to offer their customers censorship of pornographic sites and ensure that a choice is made on the extent to which they wish to block pornographic content, if at all.

The legislation, sponsored by Likud MK Miki Zohar and Jewish Home MK Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, passed with 18 votes in favor and 12 against.

The bill has in the past faced heavy criticism from lawmakers over privacy concerns, among them Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. An earlier version of the bill that was unanimously approved by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation in late October required internet service providers to block pornographic content by default, and only lift site filtering at users’ request.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/knesset-ap...s-to-porn/


If you did a proper research (took me 10 minutes, I have timed it), you would have realized that South Korea has a similar law since 2007. You would have realized that anti pornography laws are also present in other Western countries such as Iceland, Latvia and Estonia. Not only that, but you claimed that Israel started to block pornography weeks before the UK implemented a similar law, despite the fact that the article you have provided did not mention such a thing. Not to mention that Israel was lagging two years behind the UK.


I am sorry, but you are either a liar (and you, as a supposedly "good" Catholic, are not supposed to lie) or not intelligent (like most of the Alt Right/Left) for such discussion. Unlike Leonard, as can be seen a page back.


Sp5 refuted your claim that the porn industry is mostly Jewish, so I won't discuss things that have already been discussed.

Quote:

Your second sideshow issue about Israel pushing infertility is very clumsy, because they are on record of having forcibly sterilized thousands of Jewish Ethiopian women. If that's how they treat some Jewish women, lord knows what they could have done with Palestinians...

My argument has more solid footing than yours, that's for sure.


I know that story much more than you do. That sad fact did happen, was admitted , and proper measures were taken to remedy the situation- which that article did mention.


See, unlike you guys, I will freely admit (and it would not be the first time) that Jews (or Israelis in this case) aren't angels. Like every other nation on the planet.


And finally...you didn't answer my question...if Israelis use various methods to sterilize the Arabs, then how come the Arabs in Gaza (as well the Beduin in the Negev) have insanely big fertility rate?


Don't weasel your way out. And again, read your own articles.

Quote:

Finally, shooting the messenger, the Merchants of Sin site, is pretty clumsy too, because their main argument was mostly based on the works of Jewish scholars like Dr. Nathan Abrams, and strongly buttressed by the statements of Jewish porn industry moguls themselves. Their dossier on the subject, and those of many others, is irrefutable.

A clumsily built site of one of the contributors of the Daily Stormer is certainly a credible source. Is it yours, by any chance ?


And an opinion of one madman (why didn't you provide the full quote, hiding something?) is...an opinion of a madman.



Up your game, son.

[quaker13]

tweet has since been deleted but here it is



https://twitter.com/JewishWorker/status/...6933964802

[Irenicus]

Those guys should be ashamed of themselves.

Also, Bill Kristol as well.

Then don't realize that they are giving the Alt Retards more justification for their existence with those moronic tweets.


There, I said it!

[debeguiled]

(04-15-2019 11:07 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

I’m glad you said the word “rambling”, because I have no idea what that wall of text above is about. You jump from one thing to the next without any coherent meaning. I’m guessing you are treating this forum as your personal diary.

I may disagree with guys like Sp5 or Irenicus, but at least when I read their stuff I know exactly what they’re saying. Your posts are like the musings of a cluttered and confused mind. It’s like reading Franz Kafka or something lol.

He's just Eleanor's other half.

A madman, but our madman.

[Oberrheiner]

(04-15-2019 05:14 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Ya nobody disputes that some Jews do porn. Everyone knows Ron Jeremy.

You've got Larry Flynt, non-Jew, Staglione, Guccione, etc, etc, too.

You can run down the whole list here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_po..._companies

But so what? It's a legal business.

Interesting argument.

Your daughter comes to you tomorrow with a signed contract with a pornography company, what do you say ?

- "Well it's signed, it's between consulting adults, it's a legal business. Do well my dear !"
- "Oh, thank you daddy !" kisses you on the cheek, gets out the door giggling, goes on to suck some dicks ..

Seriously ?

[Sp5]

(04-16-2019 02:14 PM)Oberrheiner Wrote:  

(04-15-2019 05:14 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Ya nobody disputes that some Jews do porn. Everyone knows Ron Jeremy.

You've got Larry Flynt, non-Jew, Staglione, Guccione, etc, etc, too.

You can run down the whole list here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_po..._companies

But so what? It's a legal business.

Interesting argument.

Your daughter comes to you tomorrow with a signed contract with a pornography company, what do you say ?

- "Well it's signed, it's between consulting adults, it's a legal business. Do well my dear !"
- "Oh, thank you daddy !" kisses you on the cheek, gets out the door giggling, goes on to suck some dicks ..

Seriously ?

Well, I would have failed as a father. My daughter would have poor judgment.

Personalizing the argument means nothing. It's like saying "what if your daughter became an alcoholic."

There are arguments for banning pornography, sure. Any time you want to ban something you have to define it and you have to impose penalties. Same issue as drugs.

There are also arguments in favor of pornography.

Expecting people not to take advantage of a market niche is unreasonable. People are going to try to make bank in any legal way available. It's called "free market economy."

[trickster]

No one is safe and perhaps we are all the jew.

As an Elvis Man, I am shocked.

https://rabbibarbara.com/elvis-presley-jewish/

[Rigsby]

(04-16-2019 12:12 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(04-15-2019 11:07 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

I’m glad you said the word “rambling”, because I have no idea what that wall of text above is about. You jump from one thing to the next without any coherent meaning. I’m guessing you are treating this forum as your personal diary.

I may disagree with guys like Sp5 or Irenicus, but at least when I read their stuff I know exactly what they’re saying. Your posts are like the musings of a cluttered and confused mind. It’s like reading Franz Kafka or something lol.

He's just Eleanor's other half.

A madman, but our madman.

Ha ha yeah. That was funny. I really did laugh out loud. And I'm still laughing inside.

That's how you do it TM. That is how it's done. It's not what you say but how you say it. debeguiled just came right out with it, while you just skirted around the issue and stopped short of saying what you really meant (that I'm mad, so my arguments should not be taken seriously). Fallacious on your part. And quite the passive-aggressive.

I'll give you one thing though TM: you are a Master Baiter!

The thing is, I know I've offended you somehow, but like a woman you won't come out and say what it is. I'm not calling you a woman. I say this respectfully. I don't want to sow disharmony here or derail the thread. But I think you might have got the wrong end of the stick with the point I was trying to make.

So you sniped and you snarked. Genuinely, honestly, I ask you: what is it that so offended you about my post? Was it just the fact that you didn't get the humour?

Forums are a dying medium. You can look it up, but basically, they've been around a while now and are outmoded. All the people in the world that ever wanted to join a forum, joined one, then they either moved on or they kept posting, but in lesser and lesser amounts. The law of mediocrity then takes over along with the tragedy of the commons, and some don't want to play this game anymore.

But in my time of being involved in a few forums, I've come to notice a pattern. We are after all pattern-matching machines working via a massively parallel neural network.

On one end of the spectrum of forum archetypes, you have what I call the Grandiloquent Master. He sometimes drops in from time to time and deems to share his great wisdom with the plebs. But he's usually someone that has significantly contributed to what a forum means. They have value. They have arrogance in spades, but they also have a reason to hold that arrogance. And they probably are just tired of all the shitposting by noobs too. That is one extreme.

Then on the other end, we have the Snipers. Sometimes known as 'Drive-By Posters'. Otherwise known as 'trolls'. But I never use that word. It's meaningless now. Like the word 'fascist'.

You, TM tend to fall more in to the Sniper or Drive-By Poster end of the spectrum. You don't outright insult, so can't get banned. You will somewhat skirt around an issue so can't be accused of going off topic. You won't re-engage when someone takes the time to engage with you. You are somewhat disruptive, which makes you good fun, to an extent, but not so disruptive you get banned.

You post consistently. And are never far away to impart your words of wisdom on all matters. Even outside your field of expertise (which is what? exactly?).

Like the Sniper, you take the shot, get in, get out. Infiltrate, exfiltrate.

And you watch from a distance as your bullets sow confusion and chaos below. It's not just fishing and baiting, it's raining anarchy down from above. It does end up having a somewhat disruptive effect on the forum though, but the debate you generate, when people engage with you (such as I) with good will, is an overall plus. So all good there. No harm no foul.

You are still a Master Baiter, though!

I'll admit you got me good. But even though I knew I was being baited, I was in a good mood and happy to play along.

The thing is, I'm not sure what you stand for either. You say you are half-jewish, but you are constantly banging on about da jews! That is one thing that has pinged my radar about you.

We have some kind of communication breakdown here (which I am happy to clear up if you like), even though I've put you in the taxonomy of Forum Sniper.

Let me draw a parallel with another poster: Foo1sgold. He's got a lot of posts, gives out very contrary opinions, someone said he had a lot of neutral reps. I've seen him take some serious flak here on this board. But I like him. I've repped him. Because I believe he posts in good faith.

Now I'm not saying you don't. But you are contrary, oftentimes on appearances just for the sake of it.

Foo1sgold doesn't write very long posts, he often rubs people up the wrong way - he could be seen as a Forum Sniper. But he's not. He acts in good faith. He's just a 'rugged individual'. And the corner stone of America and this forum is built on that rugged individuality. He doesn't do snark. He doesn't do passive-aggressive. He says what he wants and if people don't like it, he'll just take a back seat and bow out of the argument, as the bigger man.

He also generates debate, and that is a good thing. He is respectful, for the most part, though he can get a bit 'heated' sometimes. It's not out of bounds.

If anything, he is the archetype of the Forum Joker/Fool. (clue)

Speaking truth to power. It's quite an art. It's one of the rarest of the Forum Archetypes. A fine line. Very few can straddle it for very long. Not interested in winning friends and influencing people, he does win a few people over along the way. It's quality not quantity with this archetype.

But enough rambling. I've already gone way off-piste.


That was a cheap shot against me TM. I've probably over-shared a bit too much, I know, and let all you strangers on the internet (not just the people in this forum) in to my world a bit too much.

But does a difference of opinion justify:

Striking from the shadows.

Skulking back in to the night.


Cheap, easy, shots.

I ain't even mad bro'!


I know I'm a bit of an oddball, but I'm not trying to teach anyone anthing. I'm not trying to tell anyone how to think. I'm just posting some opinions and doing a bit of shitposting, while I can. Respectfully.

Your attempt to 'mental health' shame me backfired somewhat on your part. I would hate it if you discouraged others from opening up a bit, letting us all in to their world. It is through the experience of others that we become richer, when it is given from the heart. Right or wrong.

This isn't beef, it's just food for thought.

But you've given me inspiration to write a bit more on this subject. Get some more things off my chest...

So I guess the forum should thank you for exciting debate!

But you knew that already. You've got it down to a fine art.


You can ask questions. You can even call me a mad motherfucker. I won't report you, won't think less of you. But don't snipe and snide and snark me.

Say what you mean. I'll answer in good faith.

I'm only shitposting most the time anyway, so don't understand why others don't get that. When I got beef with you, or I want to be direct, you will know.

Phew, I feel half a stone lighter now!


And I'm still laughing.

A madman, but our madman.

Cheeky bugger!

[Rigsby]

Usually when I get in to a philosophical debate, I like to ask the question:

What is the question?

Here we have the 'Jewish Question'.

What exactly is that question?

I kind of feel like I'm being 'jewed' already.

Are jews bad people?

Do they have a disproportionate represenation among the arts/banking?

Should we round them all up in cattle trucks and burn them?

What exactly is the fucking question?


First though, just a little reminder that anyone even asking this 'question' is seen as an outright loon. And I know some very sane and responsible people that would just laugh at you for even uttering the words.

So we are playing about here. Musing. I'll go along with it.

Where to start?

One of the first things I think of when the whole 'Jew' thing comes up is how they are hated for being related to usury.

Now, the whole banking system in the Western world (and beyond) is based on this heinous concept. To the extent that they make it very difficult for you to pay off loans, because they want to keep bleeding you dry. That is my naive take anyway. I am what Paracelsus would call 'an economic ignoramus'. I'll admit it.

I'm trying to pay off a few small debts I just racked up, but fuck me it's not so easy. They just don't want to take my money. But they do threaten to take all my possessions if I don't pay up on time. Like war, usury is a racket. It's nothing too bad - small potatoes - I'll sort it out. But what an eye-opener.

Usurey preys on the vulnerable and the ignorant and the 'economic ignoramuses' among us. I take full responsibility. As if I couldn't anyway.

No wonder Jesus threw the money-lenders out of the temple. No wonder the money-lenders hate Jesus so much!

But look at who perpetrates this system. Most of them aren't jewish. They probably don't have any faith. They are probably muslim or Christian if they do have faith. I've talked to both trying to get my finances sorted out. They wouldn't let me buy anything with my visa card even though I had the money in the account, and I was not in debt. That's another story. But remember, (((they))) hold the reins of power.

It's a long story, but it's been a big fight to be able to pay off what I owe (small amount), because (((they))) want to keep me in debt slavery. New laws came in recently in the country (UK) to stop the money-lenders bleeding you dry (for a small amount), but they have made it even harder again, seeing their gravy train about to run dry.

So that is usury. I'm an economic ignoramus, but even I know the system is rigged and corrupt. It needs to be destroyed. Hopefully with a few people getting banged up along the way. Good luck with that.


What was the question again?

Oh, porn!

Yeah, it's true. Disproportionate representation at the top of Jewish interests. But all in cahoots with your government, who aren't really that Jewish. And all in cahoots with all the wankers who keep lapping it up, knowing it isn't really fulfilling themselves in any way. 16 year old boys, younger. 16 year old girls, younger. The statistics are out there. Big data doesn't lie. Someone wrote a book on that.

In the UK, you can have a 16 year old girlfriend. I had one once. I was 10 years older than her. I've spoke about her before - Brazilian Japanese girl, who I 'rescued' one night.

But you can't have a 16 year old girlfriend if you are a music teacher and in a position of power. You can't take photos of your 16 year old girlfriend. This is probably for the good anyway, I'm not arguing against that here. Just the hypocrisy.

Forget all that.

It's a fact that 13 year olds access porn. Younger again. Pre-teens.

They do it illegally, but they still do it.

Your government doesn't care. They don't care about the 'kids', even if they do bring in a wanking license. Just like Theresa May (UK prime minister) and her husband having shares in the biggest pot growing medical mary jane industry in the UK, whilst keeping it illegal and punishable by imprisonment if you grow it, they are farming out the ID schemes via facebook and your Visa card so you can have a quicky shufty in between your tea and crumpets! Crikey!

Farming it out to Jewish interests. MindGeek, ManWin, etc. etc.

Yeah, we get it.

Stop fucking watching porn!

Stop fucking watching Hollywood movies.

But it's not so easy to boycott Israel. There are laws against that. Punishable by imprisonment if you try to pull that shit. It is illegal to boycott Israel in more than one country.

Yeah, we got jewed alright.

Now, let's spin it back around the other way.

I once looked after and cared for a 90 year old South-African jewess. She was a lovely lady. A complete bitch actually, but we got on. Coz I made it quite clear from the start I was not going to tolerate her bullshit, and I let it be known to her that I'd seen her kind of BS a million times before.

Once the air settled, we got on famously.

I would go and fetch roses from her kept grounds and put them in displays for her, even though her eye sight was going. She could still smell the sweet aroma. I helped her up in the middle of the night when there was no one else around and she had fallen. I made breakfast for her and we chatted as the sun rays come through the large windows, hitting off the AGA. We talked about her earlier life. How she had been one of the first people to fly in a plane over the sea (Sea-Planes).

Her family just wanted to put her in to a home to get the million or so quid for the 'ranch', but one son, did the right thing. These were her flesh and blood that wanted to imprison her. Already millionaires in their own right. They couldn't wait to jew the old jewess and finish her off.


Now, I don't know if anything with all of this has to be with being jewish.

I just make my observations as flawed as they are. I'm not even coming from a religious perspective, as I'm not really religious, as most of you know.


Another thing about usury while I remember.

In prison in the UK there is a thing called 'double bubble' - a kind of loan sharking that goes on from more experienced inmates towards young first timers. You don't have a shower gel or pack of baccy? No problem, I'll lend this to you. Pay me back when you can. Thanks, say the new initiates, happy to have something they need and even more happy to make the bond. Little do they know they are being played.

Double bubble, means you pay back twice what you get. 1 shower gel - 2 shower gels given back. 1 pack of baccy - 2 packs given back.

Can't pay, won't pay?

No problem, Double bubble is now double that: that's 4 shower gels, 4 packs of baccy. And you will pay. People get arms and legs broken, have family members assaulted for this petty shit.

Is that not usury?

Are they jews?

Nah, this shit has always gone on.

The money lenders have reached higher status and are ripping us off in a fashion even worse than the prison thugs.

But as above, so below.

Money lending goes on at all stratas of society. Pay-day loans? Jewish are they?

Man's inhumanity to man.

Not the most eloquent argument in the world. I could have put it better, I know, but still.


Music business?

Another one they got sewn up. But they can not exist without willing victims and initiates. Our accountant (for my band) was called Cohen. Most charming man you would ever meet. Hard to dislike him. Accountants often second as managers in the music business.

You can't con an honest man.


What was the question again?

Yeah we get it. But the goyim are more than happy to go along with it all for fun and profit.

I don't hate the jews. I admire them.

I even understand why the hold the goyim in such contempt.

Black people might identify with their 'race' more than white people identify with their 'race', but they still end up murdering each other at a far higher proportion than that of which they murder whites.

Black on black crime in London is through the roof. Operation Trident - look it up.

So even though they 'identify' and have a certain amount of solidarity with each other, it's not true solidarity. They don't really look out for each other. Just as whites don't look out for each other. Then again, we don't murder our brothers as much as they do, so that's something.

What was the question?

And then just look how much whites and blacks fight, the deep racial divides between us.

Have we been 'jewed'?

Mos def.

But it is within our hearts for us to take responsibility. But we don't because we fear. No one wants to die by death by baseball bat. And I've come close. And I know others who have come closer. Still, at least they didn't end up being racists, even if it was black thugs threatening to crush their skulls.

What was the question again?

The whole lot is a total fucking mess.

Yes we are being fucked about by the puppet masters.

More and more we are being bullied and conditioned in to being either extreme aggressors or extreme cowards - polarised.

Black people: get your fucking house in order.

White people: get your fucking house in order.

Everything else falls in to place.


There is one thing (((they))) fear more than anything else: unity between blacks and whites. But we just keep playing in to their hands.

Don't blame the fucking jews.

I think now would be a good time to stfu on my part.


Another long ramble I know. Hopefully I made a point or two.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(04-16-2019 05:37 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(04-16-2019 02:14 PM)Oberrheiner Wrote:  

(04-15-2019 05:14 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Ya nobody disputes that some Jews do porn. Everyone knows Ron Jeremy.

You've got Larry Flynt, non-Jew, Staglione, Guccione, etc, etc, too.

You can run down the whole list here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_po..._companies

But so what? It's a legal business.

Interesting argument.

Your daughter comes to you tomorrow with a signed contract with a pornography company, what do you say ?

- "Well it's signed, it's between consulting adults, it's a legal business. Do well my dear !"
- "Oh, thank you daddy !" kisses you on the cheek, gets out the door giggling, goes on to suck some dicks ..

Seriously ?

Well, I would have failed as a father. My daughter would have poor judgment.

Personalizing the argument means nothing. It's like saying "what if your daughter became an alcoholic."

There are arguments for banning pornography, sure. Any time you want to ban something you have to define it and you have to impose penalties. Same issue as drugs.

There are also arguments in favor of pornography.

Expecting people not to take advantage of a market niche is unreasonable. People are going to try to make bank in any legal way available. It's called "free market economy."

I am personally against the Jews-bad argument when it comes to porn. Yes - it's dominated by them, but it was also led by the Italian mob a few decades ago.

Though part of it is explained by a few aspects:
+ no Christian morals holding them back - the US was very protestant-puritanical in the past
+ good connections to their other brothers in Hollywood lending equipment and shit
+ happy to fuck lots of shiksas

If you want to limit porn consumption among the young - which in my opinion every country on Earth must do, then you do the following:

+ request internet ID if you want to watch it - Israel and the UK are rolling out those systems, though I am certain that this will be misused by the globalists and is the first stepping stone to increased internet control, but it's good on that front.

+ In addition you research the entire industry front, right and center, then publish official campaigns telling the girls, that most are doing one-and-dones, because of severe repercussions to their family life, the overwhelming amount of girls are barely making 30-40.000$ even if they do dozens of shoots. When it's money you are after, then stripping or escorting pays you far more and is far more consistent with less public scrutiny. Most girls are simply not aware of it. There are strippers attempting to do porn until they realize that they make more stripping than sucking cock on camera.

Those two measures would already limit porn tremendously. I don't like to ban it fully, because then you have cops busting people's doors over some Hustler magazines which is retarded. Limit the market and the supply of stupid young girls and it goes down.

Larping about "Jews do porn" is not going to change things. If there were no Jews in the US, then porn would have grown anyway and likely Italians and Russians would be doing most of it.

[Manbeline]

I'll do you one better, Strange.

Do not go after the market. Everytime someone does, it ends up doing something opposite of what they wanted. The true answer is to make the men less dependent on porn. To do that requires us to take back the male culture in the west. Women need to be shamed, men need to be told it is a good thing to shame, and men need to take leadership roles again.

Only then do you decrease porn usage back to those exceptional few who will always have low will or were born with unfortunate charismatic circumstances. When the women see that they make more money being housewives than strippers or porn stars, then you can relax back in your chair and sigh in relief at a job well done.

[Pride male]

How is the jewish conspiracy to take over the world any different from what the Romans, Mongols, Arabs, Turks and English attempts at ruling the world and enslaving the masses?

[debeguiled]

(04-18-2019 11:43 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

How is the jewish conspiracy to take over the world any different from what the Romans, Mongols, Arabs, Turks and English attempts at ruling the world and enslaving the masses?

tl;dr: subversion.

One of the best things Jordan Peterson ever said was when he asked the question:

"How do you know when the left has gone too far?'

His point was, obviously the left is going too far now, but never gets called out. It is obvious when the right goes too far because you have Nazis, racial supremacy, jackboots.

The answer is, it is harder to tell when the left has gone too far because they do everything behind a facade of empathy and caring for the downtrodden, they lie in other words, and in its way, subversion can be worse than an iron fist because you are not only being pushed down, you are confused and don't know who your enemies are.

The Jews wrote the book on subversion, and all the others are just using the same playbook which is, walk all over people and when they complain, curl up into a little ball and play the victim.

We have been indoctrinated since an early age to see only the victim side of the Jews, in our schools, in the media, and even in our personal relationships. Their narrative is our narrative.

When I started getting red pilled about the Jews, it didn't, and it won't change much about my daily life or my political views.

The only difference is when I read something or deal with people, I will be somewhat harder to fool, and I will be more skeptical.

I just don't like being made a fool of, whoever is behind it, and the more you look into this deplorable question, the more you see the man behind the curtain, and the more you see him, the better able you are to keep from being taken advantage of, and that applies to anyone who wants to take advantage of you.

Don't you want to be clued in?

That's all I want.

To be a little more aware today than I was yesterday.

[Oberrheiner]

(04-18-2019 11:43 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

How is the jewish conspiracy to take over the world any different from what the Romans, Mongols, Arabs, Turks and English attempts at ruling the world and enslaving the masses?

Starting from your own country and expanding your territory by invading your neighbors, that's just the normal way of life.
You know it's going to happen, you can defend against it, either you succeed or you perish with honor, but it's frank and honest - you get what you deserve.
This is how noble animals behave, it's the way of nature.

Having no country, invading others while trying to pass as one of them, subverting them from within and plotting to use their own too-big-for-their-own-good empathy to import false "good savages" and breed them out ?
This is just shameful.
Anyone who is not clever and paranoid can get caught by such betrayal.
It's the way parasites and insects behave.

And yes, I do behave that NAJALT.
But those who are, damn ..

[Sp5]

(04-18-2019 11:57 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  

The Jews wrote the book on subversion, and all the others are just using the same playbook which is, walk all over people and when they complain, curl up into a little ball and play the victim.

For fuck's sake, Socrates was forced to commit suicide for subverting the Athenian state and society.

You could add Sophocles, Aristophanes at a minimum to the list of classical Greek subversives.

Go through the Romans, Plautus, Suetonius, Tacitus

Jesus was a Jew, I'll grant you that. Crucified for subversion.

Machiavelli laid out theory and practice

The Irgun in British Palestine used Michael Collins and the IRA as their model for guerrilla warfare and subversion.

The Black Hand, the Sicilian Mafia

Yakuza, the Chinese Tongs.

[nomadbrah]

(04-18-2019 01:26 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jesus was a Jew

No, there's no proof of that.

Jesus was from Galilee, which was inhabited by greeks, celts and other levantine people.

Quote:

The region's Israelite name is from the Hebrew root galil, an ultimately unique word for 'district', and usually 'cylinder'. The Hebrew form used in Isaiah 8:23 (or 9:1 in different Biblical versions) is in the construct state, "g'lil hagoyim", meaning 'Galilee of the nations', i.e. the part of Galilee inhabited by Gentiles at the time that the book was written.

[Sp5]

(04-18-2019 01:44 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 01:26 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jesus was a Jew

No, there's no proof of that.

Jesus was from Galilee, which was inhabited by greeks, celts and other levantine people.

Quote:

The region's Israelite name is from the Hebrew root galil, an ultimately unique word for 'district', and usually 'cylinder'. The Hebrew form used in Isaiah 8:23 (or 9:1 in different Biblical versions) is in the construct state, "g'lil hagoyim", meaning 'Galilee of the nations', i.e. the part of Galilee inhabited by Gentiles at the time that the book was written.

OK, so more evidence that Jews did not "write the book on subversion"

[nomadbrah]

(04-18-2019 02:32 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 01:44 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 01:26 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jesus was a Jew

No, there's no proof of that.

Jesus was from Galilee, which was inhabited by greeks, celts and other levantine people.

Quote:

The region's Israelite name is from the Hebrew root galil, an ultimately unique word for 'district', and usually 'cylinder'. The Hebrew form used in Isaiah 8:23 (or 9:1 in different Biblical versions) is in the construct state, "g'lil hagoyim", meaning 'Galilee of the nations', i.e. the part of Galilee inhabited by Gentiles at the time that the book was written.

OK, so more evidence that Jews did not "write the book on subversion"

Paul aka Saul was a jew though and it's essentially his church.

[trickster]

So Jesus was not the Jew but Elvis is.

[debeguiled]

"Wrote the book" is an idiomatic phrase.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/wrote+the+book+on

Quote:

To be well known for being extremely experienced in or knowledgeable about something; to be renowned as an expert in something; to know nearly everything about something.

Treating it like a declarative sentence and then listing a bunch of other people doing the same thing as a refutation is idiotic, and I know you aren't idiotic.

You are either deep in some sort of denial or playing dumb to gain an advantage.

This is just silly, and it is pointless to engage with you when you do this.

[Irenicus]

(04-18-2019 03:04 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 02:32 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 01:44 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 01:26 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jesus was a Jew

No, there's no proof of that.

Jesus was from Galilee, which was inhabited by greeks, celts and other levantine people.

Quote:

The region's Israelite name is from the Hebrew root galil, an ultimately unique word for 'district', and usually 'cylinder'. The Hebrew form used in Isaiah 8:23 (or 9:1 in different Biblical versions) is in the construct state, "g'lil hagoyim", meaning 'Galilee of the nations', i.e. the part of Galilee inhabited by Gentiles at the time that the book was written.

OK, so more evidence that Jews did not "write the book on subversion"

Paul aka Saul was a jew though and it's essentially his church.

So, according to you, some Jew Saul (Paul) created Christianity in order to subvert the West?

My God... .