[CynicalContrarian]

(05-02-2018 07:45 PM)NightVale Wrote:  

(05-02-2018 08:25 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Yet what arrangement is there to prevent her from claiming (demanding) child support two years down the track

Nothing can prevent a sperm donor in Australia from being taken to court and being made to pay child support if ordered to by the court.
The Federal Family Act overrides State law.
There's been some outcry now that sperm donors who want to be part of a child's life have taken the mother to court and been granted shared custody.

Noting the oft used euphemism - "baby batter".

I take it you cannot actually have your cake & eat it to...?

[Bluto]

(05-02-2018 02:59 PM)Tiger Man Wrote:  

To answer the question, there is nothing preventing the woman from seeking financial support from the biological father. All that paperwork is signed for the mother's benefit. It basically states that he renounces all future claims to custodianship and the like. For those who have read Taleb's thoughts on the application of Jensen inequalities to real life situations, look at this one. He is carrying almost no upside and limitless downside. She is the opposite. Welcome to the Brave New World!

Also, governments across the globe are already funding this to the tune of billions of dollars. I remember a huge scandal in Canada a few years ago when it was revealed that the Quebec healtcare system was funding IVF for women who had no chance of conceiving. I believe they "attempted" with a few hundred women who were 45+ and not a single one carried to term. But, thanks Canadian taxpayers. Sorry, I mean merci!

This dude is either crazy or one of those built beta male types. I know it runs contrary to a lot of the Alpha/Beta talk on the web, but there are some seriously Blue Pill guys who happen to be yoked, good looking, and tall. Physicality does not, by itself, make you RP or game aware. But, hey, at least he isn't a hereditary autistic who managed to knock up over twenty women without their knowledge of his condition. And that guy is far from the only one. It isn't like this hasn't happened before. But, back in the day, we had the Mongol Khans seeding teenage peasant girls across central Asia. Now, we have Beta male computer jockeys shooting a last ditch attempt in to a coterie of cavernous, post-wall, retired(?) sluts. The former, arguably, improves the stock. To the victors go the spoils, and the best material moves in to the future. The latter leads us to idiocracy. Hey, did you know that 1 in 59 kids in the United States now has autism? I wonder if I can put my finger on anything that might be contributing to that.

Bring on the Sharia? More like, cut 100% of government funding to any of this kind of stuff. Further, remove the ability of the government to "compel" (with a gun, of course) men to pay for this kind of ridiculous behavior from women. On an actual religious note, I am beginning to think that much of the academic theological work of the Catholic Church is completely accurate when it comes to sex. The Church would have a field day with this.

Which church, the gelded version of today or the church of yore where they actually had enough balls to preach what you are agreeing with?

[Kid Twist]

I've seen a few comments here like "The market will correct itself" or "Eventually they learn the hard way."

It's not that I don't agree that these are true to an extent, but what do people really mean when they say this?

No one seems to have learned anything.

[SeaFM]

It means they end up in sperm banks when they are in their 40's because no man wants them.

[Tiger Man]

(05-02-2018 08:47 PM)Bluto Wrote:  

(05-02-2018 02:59 PM)Tiger Man Wrote:  

To answer the question, there is nothing preventing the woman from seeking financial support from the biological father. All that paperwork is signed for the mother's benefit. It basically states that he renounces all future claims to custodianship and the like. For those who have read Taleb's thoughts on the application of Jensen inequalities to real life situations, look at this one. He is carrying almost no upside and limitless downside. She is the opposite. Welcome to the Brave New World!

Also, governments across the globe are already funding this to the tune of billions of dollars. I remember a huge scandal in Canada a few years ago when it was revealed that the Quebec healtcare system was funding IVF for women who had no chance of conceiving. I believe they "attempted" with a few hundred women who were 45+ and not a single one carried to term. But, thanks Canadian taxpayers. Sorry, I mean merci!

This dude is either crazy or one of those built beta male types. I know it runs contrary to a lot of the Alpha/Beta talk on the web, but there are some seriously Blue Pill guys who happen to be yoked, good looking, and tall. Physicality does not, by itself, make you RP or game aware. But, hey, at least he isn't a hereditary autistic who managed to knock up over twenty women without their knowledge of his condition. And that guy is far from the only one. It isn't like this hasn't happened before. But, back in the day, we had the Mongol Khans seeding teenage peasant girls across central Asia. Now, we have Beta male computer jockeys shooting a last ditch attempt in to a coterie of cavernous, post-wall, retired(?) sluts. The former, arguably, improves the stock. To the victors go the spoils, and the best material moves in to the future. The latter leads us to idiocracy. Hey, did you know that 1 in 59 kids in the United States now has autism? I wonder if I can put my finger on anything that might be contributing to that.

Bring on the Sharia? More like, cut 100% of government funding to any of this kind of stuff. Further, remove the ability of the government to "compel" (with a gun, of course) men to pay for this kind of ridiculous behavior from women. On an actual religious note, I am beginning to think that much of the academic theological work of the Catholic Church is completely accurate when it comes to sex. The Church would have a field day with this.

Which church, the gelded version of today or the church of yore where they actually had enough balls to preach what you are agreeing with?

I am talking The Church. The old school church. Give me SSPX refusing to give communion to a bloated unmarried woman because they think she might be pregnant. I'm talking men, and only men, that lean so far to the traditionalist right, that they are a hair away from being excommunicated. Actually, some of them already were. Those are the guys I want preaching to me.

[BlueMark]

(05-02-2018 09:45 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  

I've seen a few comments here like "The market will correct itself" or "Eventually they learn the hard way."

It's not that I don't agree that these are true to an extent, but what do people really mean when they say this?

No one seems to have learned anything.

"The market will correct itself" means there's going some economic and/or social collapse. If the only way back to a proper functioning society is through a calamitous event, then we are in for tough times. And there will still be a substantial preexisting population of cat ladies and kids raised by single moms.

[SeaFM]

Or maybe enough young girls will read this article and think of how pathetic and sad this woman is, and they will make different choices for their own futures.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(05-03-2018 03:19 AM)SeaFM Wrote:  

Or maybe enough young girls will read this article and think of how pathetic and sad this woman is, and they will make different choices for their own futures.

[TigOlBitties]

"Desperately Seeking Semen"

At least she admits to being a cum dumpster.