Posts: 35
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
Any .com, .net, or .org is exposed to seizure or threats of seizure at any time
03-13-2018, 10:10 PM
I'm glad someone is bringing this to light. YouTube is purging numerous conservative channels, even neutral but alternative news channels like Press For Truth.
I hope that domains aren't next. With the death of the free internet, comes tyranny.
Posts: 3,876
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
85
Any .com, .net, or .org is exposed to seizure or threats of seizure at any time
03-14-2018, 12:25 AM
Good info to know. The more they censor the internet, the more offline connections with men you trust will matter. That's why it is also important to build solid male friendships and teach the red pill in real life too.
John Michael Kane's Datasheets: Master The Credit Game: Save & Make Money By Being Credit Savvy
Boycott these companies that hate men: King's Wiki Boycott List
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. -Albert Einstein
Posts: 16,771
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
212
Any .com, .net, or .org is exposed to seizure or threats of seizure at any time
03-14-2018, 03:39 AM
If they want to censor you, then they will do it. The Dailystormer is a site I don't agree with, but it's telling that they are offline while child porn sites on Tor and other venues are still active.
The thing is this - there is not much you can do about it unless the bulk of humanity is aware of the issue and willing to rebel. Good luck with that.
Posts: 4,783
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
203
Any .com, .net, or .org is exposed to seizure or threats of seizure at any time
03-14-2018, 03:42 AM
They can ban sites, but they can't ban the flow of information.
For a worst case scenario, all conservative voices should have a contingency plan: Put videos and/or writing out on Pirate Bay, Soul Seek, or other P2P sites, where people can just download them.
While it might seem like it would take readers and/or viewers more effort to watch videos or read books they have to download, it's actually easier once you get in the habit. Once the info is on your computer, it's yours and there are none of YouTube's commercials for stupid movies or pop-up Web pages.
Plus, you get to keep this stuff permanently if you want. How many times have you seen a brilliant political video on YouTube, then gone back to check it out again and it's gone? Lots of times. Downloading the content will prevent this.
This isn't 1995. We're not on 56K modems anymore. Anyone can make a video and anyone can download the video in seconds. Hell, on PirateBay you can download your favorite TV show seconds after it airs. On Soul Seek, people on opposite sides of the globe swap obscure albums from 1950.
Since Big Tech can't ban every blog or Web page in history (or the comments sections), it should be easy enough to let people know they can look on P2P sites for the "disappeared" blogs or YouTube channels.
The larger question is: What does it say about our society today that people have to hide ideas from the authorities and behave like the illegal pirate radio stations of the 1960s, always trying to elude the government?
Posts: 1,424
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
10
Any .com, .net, or .org is exposed to seizure or threats of seizure at any time
03-14-2018, 05:11 AM
Quote: (03-14-2018 03:42 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:
They can ban sites, but they can't ban the flow of information.
Sorry to say that they can and they will, looking for the futur of Internet you'll find the
splinternet:
Quote:Quote:
Both The Economist and WIRED are worried about the “splinternet”. The UK research organisation NESTA thinks it could “break up” the world wide web as we know it.
What is this awkwardly named idea? It’s the concept that someone’s experience of the internet in Turkey, for example, is increasingly different from their experience of the internet in Australia.
Travellers to China, in particular, will be familiar with this phenomenon. Thanks to the government’s tight control, they have to use Baidu rather than Google as their search engine, and are unable to access Facebook or news sites like The Economist and the New York Times. Sauce
Meanwhile YouTube turns to Wikipedia to help debunk "conspiracy theories" spreading on its platform, I don't care much about YouTube as I only watch "non threatening" content but more about what (((they))) call conspiracy theories because 20years ago it was called investigation journalism and if YouTube can do it others will too...
Tell them too much, they wouldn't understand; tell them what they know, they would yawn.
They have to move up by responding to challenges, not too easy not too hard, until they paused at what they always think is the end of the road for all time instead of a momentary break in an endless upward spiral