[Simeon_Strangelight]

Actually the left won't eat itself. It's part of the progressive post-modernist agenda.

Since the agenda is constantly shifting, then you are being attacked for straying from the current shift even one iota:

That is why the SJWs attacked the current ultra-liberal Jewish Eurovision winner - she is a fat-activist who ticked all the boxes, but was attacked for wearing some Asian-styled attire and style. This is not new - the Bolsheviks killed their own, but were still in charge.

[gework]

[Thot Leader]

"A woman has filed a human rights complaint against a Toronto shelter for female recovering addicts, claiming staff forced her to share a small double room with a pre-operative male-to-female transgender person.

The formal complaint against the Jean Tweed Centre, which runs Palmerston House, followed Kristi Hanna’s efforts to inquire about her own legal rights in this unusual situation, only to be told by Ontario’s Human Rights Legal Support Centre that, by describing her new roommate as a “man,” Hanna was the one engaged in illegal discrimination.

Hanna, 37, is a former paramedic who has lately worked in the service industry, and has been struggling with the lingering effects of sexual abuse and resulting problems with addiction to alcohol and cocaine. She described herself as an “active ally in the LGBTQ community,” but said this conflict has left her feeling as if vulnerable women are unable to voice their own gender-based rights for fear of violating someone else’s.

“It’s affecting everyone in the house. This can completely ruin your recovery, let alone your safety, let alone your life,” Hanna said in an interview.

She spent two nights sharing the room — constantly looking over to make sure her roommate was still in bed, she said — before taking an indefinite leave from the shelter. Hanna had lived for seven months at the central Toronto facility, located in an old Victorian house, but since last week has been staying with friends on couches, as a “transient,” she said. “Those two nights were hell for me.”

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/kri...oplay=true


So, even a woman who considers herself an LGBT ally doesn't want to share a room with a tranny, presumably because a) trannies aren't real women and b) trannies are mentally ill. Who will the left side with: an actual woman who needs shelter because she's been abused, or a mentally ill man who needs shelter for unknown reasons (I'll go on a limb and say it's because of his mental illness).

[Brother Abdul Majeed]

(08-03-2018 12:11 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

"A woman has filed a human rights complaint against a Toronto shelter for female recovering addicts, claiming staff forced her to share a small double room with a pre-operative male-to-female transgender person.

The formal complaint against the Jean Tweed Centre, which runs Palmerston House, followed Kristi Hanna’s efforts to inquire about her own legal rights in this unusual situation, only to be told by Ontario’s Human Rights Legal Support Centre that, by describing her new roommate as a “man,” Hanna was the one engaged in illegal discrimination.

Hanna, 37, is a former paramedic who has lately worked in the service industry, and has been struggling with the lingering effects of sexual abuse and resulting problems with addiction to alcohol and cocaine. She described herself as an “active ally in the LGBTQ community,” but said this conflict has left her feeling as if vulnerable women are unable to voice their own gender-based rights for fear of violating someone else’s.

“It’s affecting everyone in the house. This can completely ruin your recovery, let alone your safety, let alone your life,” Hanna said in an interview.

She spent two nights sharing the room — constantly looking over to make sure her roommate was still in bed, she said — before taking an indefinite leave from the shelter. Hanna had lived for seven months at the central Toronto facility, located in an old Victorian house, but since last week has been staying with friends on couches, as a “transient,” she said. “Those two nights were hell for me.”

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/kri...oplay=true


So, even a woman who considers herself an LGBT ally doesn't want to share a room with a tranny, presumably because a) trannies aren't real women and b) trannies are mentally ill. Who will the left side with: an actual woman who needs shelter because she's been abused, or a mentally ill man who needs shelter for unknown reasons (I'll go on a limb and say it's because of his mental illness).

The transgender issue is truly an "emperor has no clothes" situation.
Everybody knows that human beings with penises are men and men who chop their dicks off are eunuchs, not women.

The parallel with the immigration issue is pretty stark. In this particular article, the woman describes herself as an "ally of the LGBT" community. I guess she is, she just doesn't want to be around some of them, just like the white liberals in their white enclaves who support immigration as long as they themselves don't have to be around certain immigrants.

[Thot Leader]

This thread got me thinking about the oppression hierarchy. Maybe it could have its own thread but I figure there are enough threads nowadays. Here's how I see it:

1) Muslims
2a) trannies
2b) gays
3) blacks
4) illegal immigrants
5) women
6) ((( )))

EDIT: In Canada and Australia, aboriginals may rank at 3), with blacks at 4)

Muslims sit atop the oppression hierarchy because they are a (mostly) low IQ, brown/black minority who come from shithole (impoverished and/or war-torn) countries. But there is more. Muslims give zero fucks what women, gays or other minorities think, meaning they pass the shit test (I recall watching a MGTOW video on this very topic, if someone knows what I'm talking about please post it). They don't give a fuck about hurting other minorities (why slavery persists today), gay rights, women's rights, etc. So, their "oppressed people" status grants them entry into the race, and their zero fucks given attitude is what wins it for them.

If not for Islam, trannies would win simply because they're the most dysfunctional/fucked up and the craziest. If there were more of them they could probably challenge Islam, but 0.3 percent of the population isn't going to challenge 1.6 billion (worldwide; 5-10% of some European countries). Gays are similar to trannies but not necessarily mentally ill; on the contrary, most of them are able to lead successful lives, so they can’t really be seen as all that oppressed, despite all the attacks they have been subjected to.

Blacks are up there for obvious reasons, but then they often harbor sentiments against the other groups on this list, and that keeps them knocked down a peg or two.

Illegal immigrants tend to be poor, non-white, and have sob stories about crawling out of shithole nations. They may have ranked higher if more of them seemed to care about politics and the control of information (most just care about working/earning a living). Their status is largely propped up by women and (((the political left))) more than by their own efforts.

The reason women rank so low is that they are the ones whose tendency toward pathological altruism creates the whole oppression hierarchy in the first place. If it were up to men, this would be a non-issue. Aside from sex, women’s most apparent form of value is in their capacity for empathy and altruism, ie taking care of others. In the end this will burn them, but of course they are instinctual creatures and can’t understand cause/effect.

((( )))’s standing is similar to that of women. Part of their status in society comes from standing up for oppressed people (makes them look like innocent good guys, can't be criticized). In order to maintain this status, they need to allow other groups to rank ahead of them. They concede the Oppression Olympics to win, shall we say, a bigger prize.

[Thomas Jackson]

^ I think blacks have to be #1 in the US. You can 100% get away with being statements about Islam that would get you crucified if made about blacks. Jews should be higher too.

[ChicagoFire]

(08-03-2018 12:33 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

Snip

I don't know if your ranking is accurate (to be fair I'm out of the loop with how American pop culture is run for the most part) but is there a hierarchy? Yes. Don't take that as a shot, good sir I have no interest in watching TV, movies, or the media.

I know some well meaning classic liberals that will criticize certain groups (i.e. Islam, year zero environmentalism) behind closed doors but you bet your ass that if you even say anything that is dear to them (i.e. sexism) they will chew you up. Several takeaways:

1) If you're not with the young hip in crowd you're a loser. Yes, Islam is a death cult and therefore you must be a Nazi. HATE CRIME!
2) Supporting "oppressed minorities" is fine and dandy but for some of the older liberals that know how gays operate (pedos, drugs, etc), how socialism has historically failed (there are unfortunately ignorant exceptions to this one), and the true meaning of Islam they don't voice their concerns for good reason. Yet they support the Democratic party in a spectacular act of mental gymnastics. FYI I'm center right and through personal experience I learned not to talk politics around certain people. Like I said, it takes an Olympian like level of gymnastics ability to not agree with certain Democrat talking points yet still want to support them anyways.

[Easy_C]

The other reason why Muslims are at the top is because they're the final step in the process. Their society produces a lot of obedient, low IQ types who will perform savage acts without question. Remember that EVERY socialist revolution ends with the extermination of the disruptive personalities who started the movement. Muslims will be the group to carry out that cleansing.

That's also why Hispanic immigrants are above both women and blacks: neither of the latter shows signs of being usable to clear out the undesirables. From the elites perspective they're only good for votes

I also imagine that our own elite has no small amount of envy over how the Saudi Royal Family and other Mslim royalty is able to govern an opulently rich country by decree while keeping the workers ignorant and in abject poverty. Islam so far has proven to make that kind of society happen in a way Atheism and "sciencism" have largely failed to do.

[CynicalContrarian]

(08-03-2018 12:33 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

This thread got me thinking about the oppression hierarchy. Maybe it could have its own thread but I figure there are enough threads nowadays. Here's how I see it:

1) Muslims
2a) trannies
2b) gays
3) blacks
4) illegal immigrants
5) women
6) ((( )))
...

I'd say there's an element of - how many "oppressed victims" can one fit on the head of a pin?

[Thot Leader]

(08-04-2018 08:14 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

The other reason why Muslims are at the top is because they're the final step in the process. Their society produces a lot of obedient, low IQ types who will perform savage acts without question...

I also imagine that our own elite has no small amount of envy over how the Saudi Royal Family and other Mslim royalty is able to govern an opulently rich country by decree while keeping the workers ignorant and in abject poverty. Islam so far has proven to make that kind of society happen in a way Atheism and "sciencism" have largely failed to do.

This is true, but the tradeoff is Islamic societies are a lot less productive for these exact same reasons. Freedom produces science, commerce, arts, culture, etc. Maybe we're reaching the endgame stage where the elites actually want to shut the lights off, so to speak.

(08-03-2018 04:09 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  

^ I think blacks have to be #1 in the US. You can 100% get away with being statements about Islam that would get you crucified if made about blacks. Jews should be higher too.

Good point. I guess there are slight differences between the US, Canada, Western Europe and Australia due to each one's particular legacy of colonialism, slavery, or their geographic proximity to certain shitholes.

[Teedub]

(08-03-2018 12:33 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

This thread got me thinking about the oppression hierarchy. Maybe it could have its own thread but I figure there are enough threads nowadays. Here's how I see it:

1) Muslims
2a) trannies
2b) gays
3) blacks
4) illegal immigrants
5) women
6) ((( )))

EDIT: In Canada and Australia, aboriginals may rank at 3), with blacks at 4)

Muslims sit atop the oppression hierarchy because they are a (mostly) low IQ, brown/black minority who come from shithole (impoverished and/or war-torn) countries. But there is more. Muslims give zero fucks what women, gays or other minorities think, meaning they pass the shit test (I recall watching a MGTOW video on this very topic, if someone knows what I'm talking about please post it). They don't give a fuck about hurting other minorities (why slavery persists today), gay rights, women's rights, etc. So, their "oppressed people" status grants them entry into the race, and their zero fucks given attitude is what wins it for them.

If not for Islam, trannies would win simply because they're the most dysfunctional/fucked up and the craziest. If there were more of them they could probably challenge Islam, but 0.3 percent of the population isn't going to challenge 1.6 billion (worldwide; 5-10% of some European countries). Gays are similar to trannies but not necessarily mentally ill; on the contrary, most of them are able to lead successful lives, so they can’t really be seen as all that oppressed, despite all the attacks they have been subjected to.

Blacks are up there for obvious reasons, but then they often harbor sentiments against the other groups on this list, and that keeps them knocked down a peg or two.

Yeah but if you're gay or black and stray from the narrative, you're sometimes treated worse than white nationalists. Look at the way some famous established rappers chucked Kanye under the bus after his Trump tweets. Or how Milo Y has been treated since time immemorial, or Ann-Coulter if we're talking about women. Meanwhile straight white men can do terrible stuff, but as long as they're publicly on board with the progressive agenda they're safe.

White SJWs are also white supremacists when you actually break everything down, but that's a post for another day.

[CynicalContrarian]

If you want a good laugh.
Go to Twitter & see the latest for the #OH12 election feed.

The D's are absolutely livid that the Greens seemingly cost them a close election now that the R guy is ahead...

https://twitter.com/hashtag/oh12?f=tweet...s&src=hash

[Easy_C]

(08-07-2018 09:40 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

If you want a good laugh.
Go to Twitter & see the latest for the #OH12 election feed.

The D's are absolutely livid that the Greens seemingly cost them a close election now that the R guy is ahead...

https://twitter.com/hashtag/oh12?f=tweet...s&src=hash

These people are even stupider than I imagined......they're all blaming the Green Party for the loss when even if you added every Green Party vote to the Ds (unlikely best case scenario) they STILL would have lost.


They're literally so stupid that they're incapable of adding four digit numbers.

[CynicalContrarian]

(08-07-2018 09:46 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

These people are even stupider than I imagined......they're all blaming the Green Party for the loss when even if you added every Green Party vote to the Ds (unlikely best case scenario) they STILL would have lost.


They're literally so stupid that they're incapable of adding four digit numbers.

They're now saying these Green voters are even worse than Trump voters!

[Moto]

(08-03-2018 12:33 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

This thread got me thinking about the oppression hierarchy. Maybe it could have its own thread but I figure there are enough threads nowadays. Here's how I see it:

1) Muslims
2a) trannies
2b) gays
3) blacks
4) illegal immigrants
5) women
6) ((( )))

For a while I've been thinking of a making up a game, like Rock Paper Scissors, to poke fun at the victim hierarchy that could hopefully go viral. For example, Muslim Woman Tranny. Muslim beats woman, woman beats tranny, tranny beats muslim. Something like this, just need the right hand signs and recent news events that highlight why one beats another.

For hand signs, tranny could look like scissors but the thumb making a package between the fingers. Still working out the rest, but maybe someone else here can think of better choices from the victim hierarchy and hand signs.

[gework]

It escalates:



Not much to the article. Guy shot himself in the college bathroom, left a $100 bill for the janitor to clean up his mess.

It reminds me of the article that begins something like,

"The name Trump is being quietly uttered to professionals up and down the country. One such professional says she has coined a term for her client's ailments, Trump Anxiety Disorder."

The DSM can now add blowing a hole in your arm to the list of severe symptoms.

[CynicalContrarian]

^
"You should have aimed for the head..."

[infowarrior1]

I recommend everyone to read the 2 articles linked in this tweet:

[url=https://twitter.com/thespandrell/status/1033952483951820800][/url]

This explains the left seeming to eat themselves yet continuing to win in the long term.

[Al O'Peesha]

#BoycottTheGuardian trending on Twitter now. Something to do with their treatment of Corbyn and a woman who edits a left-wing fanzine, amongst other things...

Holy shit, I'm clicking between this and the Kavanaugh hearing on the Donald Trump thread. What a night!

[Thot Leader]

https://verysmartbrothas.theroot.com/wha...1829651234

Quote:

What Taylor Swift Did Is Cool, I Guess. But We Need Fewer White People to Vote, Not More

Earlier this week, millions rejoiced as sentient Facebook algorithm Taylor Swift emerged from her rhinestone-studded cocoon of caucasity to reveal that she recently discovered racism and the importance of voting. This act apparently caused a massive voter registration spike. According to Kamari Guthrie, director of communications for Vote.org, as many as 65,000 people registered within a day after Swift’s politically charged Instagram post.

Also, related, you know the alternative (and better) ending to I Am Legend, where Will Smith was actually the monster and the zombies were only attacking him because he kept kidnapping and killing them? Well, with the newly woke Swift and the comatose Kanye, this is how it feels to be a (former) resident of Yeezus Island in 2018.

Anyway, even with a healthy cynicism of her motives, Swift becoming so outspoken so close to such an important election would seem to bode well for us. (In this context, “us,” of course, is “people who are sane” and “people who are not evil.”) Since it’s safe to assume that the people Swift has the most influence over are millennials, and since younger people are more likely to be progressive, her act might actually have a substantive positive effort on the polls. Perhaps she might even swing a race or two.

That said, of the 65,000 (and counting) that Taylor Swift supposedly inspired to register, I doubt that there are very many black people in there. I’m sure there are some sprinkles of pepper in that sea of salt, but that’s some lonely-ass pepper. Unfortunately, even deeper than my cynicism of Swift is my well-earned skepticism of white people’s voting habits. Never in the history of America has “more white people voting” been a good thing for anyone who wasn’t white.

So much of the push towards voter registration is directed at blacks and other people of color, but we ain’t the problem. When we vote, the vast majority of us take a look at the ballot box and choose the candidates who are the most sane and the least evil. Even with the shitty choices we’re so often given, 90 percent of us still manage to choose the right ones.

Maybe we’re getting it all wrong. Maybe instead of trying to get more of us to vote, the push should be to get less of them to vote. Maybe on Election Day, we should erect targeted barricades at each and every crucible of whiteness, from Cracker Barrel to Lululemon, so they can’t escape until voting is over. Maybe we should push to have soccer moms and suburbanites take citizenship tests before they’re able to vote, and maybe these tests should have unanswerable questions like “Where is Egyptian Musk manufactured?” and undoable tasks like “Sing the third verse in Lift Every Voice And Sing.” Maybe we should just scratch everyone named “Susan” from the polls. Just think about how much better our country would be for everyone—women, the LGBTQ community, Muslims, immigrants, and even Kappas—if only like 17 white people were able to vote.

Of course, I’m not saying that I don’t trust white people at all. (I don’t, but that’s not what I’m saying here, today.) If, for instance, I’m in need of a plumber today and that plumber happens to be white, I will give Sully the Plumber the benefit of the doubt. I also trust white people making coffee and pouring beer, but perhaps that’s only because I don’t drink either. But when it comes to voting ... yeah. I trust them as far as I can see them. Which sucks since voting is done behind a curtain.

So maybe, if Taylor Swift really wants to do some good, she should tell her millions of followers that the midterm elections are happening on Black Friday. Which, all things considered, could even eventually be a pun.

[gework]

Yesterday feminists were stressing out about The Guardian referring to people who menstruate as menstruaters. If you look at any feminist feed you will probably find they've retweeted about ten outrage tweets over this betwixt their own.





It seemed so over the top to me I wondered if there was something I was missing out on, or if it was some form of left-satire. It's real.

So a women of colour tries to bring awareness of the suffering of women having periods while working. She cites a YouGov survey to add credence to her argument. However, she decided to change the word "women" in the survey to "menstruaters". No doubt to avoid causing offense to queers.

The result: She's pilloried by white lesbians on Twitter. The pernicious head of white feminism rises again.

[questor70]

Apparently this happened today. Double dose of SJW nuttery, fat-acceptance and the left eating its own.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/reb...43e32303d2

[CynicalContrarian]

(11-06-2018 02:17 PM)questor70 Wrote:  

Apparently this happened today. Double dose of SJW nuttery, fat-acceptance and the left eating its own.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/reb...43e32303d2

Quote:

Rebel Wilson Apologizes For Claiming To Be First Plus-Size Romantic Comedy Star
The "Isn't It Romantic" star said she was "deeply sorry" for overlooking Queen Latifah, Mo’Nique and other actresses who've come before her.

Rebel Wilson.
Tackling the -big- issues...

[IntermediateBanger]

The left is a school of fish, many want to be the one to choose the new direction, more often than not those are the ones that get devoured.

[mr-ed209]

The influence of the lefts cult in academia is growing to the point of self mockery.

Stormy Daniels was granted speaking time at the Oxford Union, for no other likely reason than she might be able to slander Donald Trump over her affair in 2006. Video linked below, I cringed hard when she joked about her 'gag reflex' a min or so in and couldn't really watch any more of it. Why one of the UK's top academic institutions is giving a platform to some washed up, publicity seeking thot goes to show just how far the liberal agenda can stretch to desecrate it's 'hate figures'. Anyone with a rational impartial mind would surely have to see the absurdity of what is going on.