[Vill@in]

(11-27-2017 07:52 AM)Sumanguru Wrote:  


A bit more candid than the posey one above. At arm's length tho.

She is giving him the "I'm going strap on that 12 inch Black Mamba dildo and pound your ass tonight, no lube" and he's all like "heheh ok".

[Scoundrel]

I see couple photos like this all the time on Facebook. The woman is looking at the camera, while the man is focused on the woman. I guess it's supposed to imply that she's so beautiful he can't take his eyes of her, but to me it looks like a dog looking to its master for guidance and/or approval.

[catoblepa]

At least he ackowledges how strong the male desire is. Looking at some comments on the article you can find feminists claiming that men and women are the same and men exploit women sexually not because of sex per se but because they crave power more than anything else. Like I would have sex with ugly women as long as I can exercise my power over them. Those kind of comments give me fast spreading cancer.

[Jetset]

(11-27-2017 04:24 PM)Vill@in Wrote:  

She is giving him the "I'm going strap on that 12 inch Black Mamba dildo and pound your ass tonight, no lube" and he's all like "heheh ok".

I think you have it backwards.

He's just requested it, and she's so ashamed to be married to him.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(11-27-2017 08:54 AM)Jetset Wrote:  

...

While the rest of the post was good, this meme is the meme to end all soyboys.

Pinpoint brutal clarity of message. If this meme were a laser it could cut in half a planet in another solar system.

[Chowder Head]

(11-27-2017 01:34 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/935070500807614465][/url]

Why would James Woods punish himself by living in Toronto? He can afford to live anywhere.

[StrikeBack]

(11-27-2017 06:05 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:  

I see couple photos like this all the time on Facebook. The woman is looking at the camera, while the man is focused on the woman. I guess it's supposed to imply that she's so beautiful he can't take his eyes of her, but to me it looks like a dog looking to its master for guidance and/or approval.

It's the reversal of the beautiful masculine-feminine polarity in a traditional marriage, that's why it looks weird and ugly.

Many photos of my wife and I have me looking at the camera or out towards the world, while she leans on and looks at me. Our wedding photographers even tried to get us to do the typical ones you described above, like on social media, and my wife flat out refused to.

[Vasily Zaytsev]

(11-27-2017 11:24 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

You'd have probably never guessed it otherwise, but Stephen Marche belongs to a (((certain group))):

Is it possible for any search engines to view which sites someone uses?? I noticed you were using incognito mode...

[Super_Fire]

(11-27-2017 10:42 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

For all of you guys who assumed Stephen Marche is likely a guy who projects his weird perversions, your pervdar was spot on.

Dude wrote a "fiction" piece called The Shomer and the Boreal Owl, all about a man's (cough cough Marche) so-called struggle with bestiality.

https://thewalrus.ca/the-shomer-and-the-boreal-owl/

Called that shit.

[JayR]

(11-27-2017 06:54 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:34 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/935070500807614465][/url]

Why would James Woods punish himself by living in Toronto? He can afford to live anywhere.

Pretty sure Woods does not live in Toronto and is just quoting the author, who does. Woods' sarcastic point is that this Toronto cuck's got no business
lecturing anybody on manhood.

[Chowder Head]

(11-27-2017 08:00 PM)JayR Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 06:54 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:34 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/935070500807614465][/url]

Why would James Woods punish himself by living in Toronto? He can afford to live anywhere.

Pretty sure Woods does not live in Toronto and is just quoting the author, who does. Woods' sarcastic point is that this Toronto cuck's got no business
lecturing anybody on manhood.

LOL I didn't even notice the quotes.

[CynicalContrarian]

These soycialist subversives can't die off soon enough.

Ironic considering how much they love evolution.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(11-27-2017 06:54 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:34 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/935070500807614465][/url]

Why would James Woods punish himself by living in Toronto? He can afford to live anywhere.

[Fender_Bender]

(11-27-2017 07:02 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 06:05 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:  

I see couple photos like this all the time on Facebook. The woman is looking at the camera, while the man is focused on the woman. I guess it's supposed to imply that she's so beautiful he can't take his eyes of her, but to me it looks like a dog looking to its master for guidance and/or approval.

It's the reversal of the beautiful masculine-feminine polarity in a traditional marriage, that's why it looks weird and ugly.

Many photos of my wife and I have me looking at the camera or out towards the world, while she leans on and looks at me. Our wedding photographers even tried to get us to do the typical ones you described above, like on social media, and my wife flat out refused to.

Good for pointing that out. Had crossed my mind in the past seeing people's FB photos and cucklords like this guy. It is oddly unsettling to look at photos like this - they are unnatural and seem to exude (intentionally or not) a sense of smug power from the female as beta gazes at her like a puppy dog in a "look don't touch" holding pattern. Looks all too natural to this guy though, he's lucky to get a clammy HJ every few months in his current situation.

[El Chinito loco]

(11-27-2017 11:24 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

You'd have probably never guessed it otherwise, but Stephen Marche belongs to a (((certain group))):

The real question is how hard was (((Stepehen Marche))) cumming into his potted plant while he was writing this degenerate trash?

It's never a surprise now how it's always one of the tribe coming up with this shit.

[puckerman]

Growing up, I honestly didn't know that "men" like this even existed. I don't now if I ever encountered one until I moved to Austin. Then I realized that my first cousin of mine has always been one of these pussies.

To be brutally honest, I have to wonder how this "guy" was raised. What did these guys see when they were growing up? Who were his male influences? Did he have any?

Back where I grew up, I know boys who grew up without fathers. They still grew up to be real men. They would never embarrass themselves by writing drivel like this.

[king bast]

If you ignore everything but the conclusion, it's hard to disagree with him:

Quote:

let’s start with a basic understanding that masculinity is a subject worth thinking about. That alone would be an immense step forward. If you want to be a civilized man, you have to consider what you are. Pretending to be something else, some fiction you would prefer to be, cannot help. It is not morality but culture — accepting our monstrosity, reckoning with it — that can save us. If anything can.

That says to me "know thyself, know what you want and be unapologetically masculine."

How did he get the right answer, while every bit of his reasoning is wrong?

[Conscious Pirate]

^ even a broken clock is right twice a day. Read his fiction. He's broken as fuck & no doubt a fan of soy.

Molyneux's not having it...

[Paracelsus]

(11-28-2017 02:21 AM)king bast Wrote:  

If you ignore everything but the conclusion, it's hard to disagree with him:

Quote:

let’s start with a basic understanding that masculinity is a subject worth thinking about. That alone would be an immense step forward. If you want to be a civilized man, you have to consider what you are. Pretending to be something else, some fiction you would prefer to be, cannot help. It is not morality but culture — accepting our monstrosity, reckoning with it — that can save us. If anything can.

That says to me "know thyself, know what you want and be unapologetically masculine."

How did he get the right answer, while every bit of his reasoning is wrong?

I wouldn't call it the right answer. He says culture, not morality, will save us. Anyone who thinks that, looking at our present culture, is insane. Absolutely insane.

Remember your Taleb: all it takes to convert a vast mass of indifferent, tolerant, bored people is a small minority of intolerant, virtuous people. All it took to ditch Bertrand Russell -- deep thinker but certified degenerate -- from his university position was a few intolerant right wing women. But that sort of change takes the conviction of morality, not the anchorless, loose idea of culture; individual morality in that scenario is against culture.

And anyone who thinks he is a monster has self-hatred issues that our present culture will not cure in a thousand years.

[king bast]

Isn't morality an integral part of culture, and therefore inseparable from it?

[Conscious Pirate]

How can you claim that morality & culture are inseparable when we are witnessing the decline (or manipulation, if you like) of morality in front of our very eyes, & yet the culture continues to "evolve" & exist?

The two are very separable & operate as concepts on different levels. Morality (or more accurately our concept/definition of such) is no more integral than any other part of our culture that we deem "inconvenient".

[Paracelsus]

(11-28-2017 02:48 AM)king bast Wrote:  

Isn't morality an integral part of culture, and therefore inseparable from it?

Only in this respect: to destroy the latter, you must debase the former. This has been the rule of civilisation from the Roman Empire onwards. Morality is held inwardly, it is a matter of character, it is the internal rules by which a person chooses to live, their integrity. Its operative mechanism is guilt. Culture, so far as it shapes a society, is all external behaviours and the expectations of others. Its operative mechanism is shame.

Confusing morality with culture is to succumb to the siren song of the Left, moral relativism: to first say that morals are artificial ideals imposed by society and one's location in the world. From there it is a short, dark hopscotch game to reach the poisoned vein in anthropology that there is no such thing as a universal human nature.

[king bast]

(11-28-2017 03:02 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

How can you claim that morality & culture are inseparable when we are witnessing the decline (or manipulation, if you like) of morality in front of our very eyes, & yet the culture continues to "evolve" & exist?

The two are very separable & operate as concepts on different levels. Morality (or more accurately our concept/definition of such) is no more integral than any other part of our culture that we deem "inconvenient".

For most people, "morality" extends only so far as 1.what is legal, and 2. What they think those around them want to hear.



Note in the conventional phases - "most adults do not progress past this stage".

So when a majority, or at least a large segment of the population hold a "morality" that was intitially dictated to them, and then reinforces itself via social pressure, it becomes a very big part of the culture - For example the recent gay marriage thing. Leftists genuinely believed it was their moral imperative to vote for it, as a result of their morality being inextricably intertwined with the pervasive culture. If the cultures fucked, a majority of peoples sense of morality is fucked.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

(11-27-2017 07:26 PM)Vasily Zaytsev Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 11:24 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

You'd have probably never guessed it otherwise, but Stephen Marche belongs to a (((certain group))):

Is it possible for any search engines to view which sites someone uses?? I noticed you were using incognito mode...

Not directly - you simply visiting a search engine tells them nothing other than what you're searching for right then. However, since you visit many Google Analytics-equipped websites every day, Google will have a general profile of you based on your browsing habits and then they can suggest search terms to you based on that profile.

Incognito mode will partially stop this because cookies and scripts get deleted after you close the browser, but that's not why I was using it. I was simply at an office and didn't want to leave a trail.

For sustained untrackable browsing, use an adblocker addon. You can't always remember to use incognito, and it's a hassle to live without any cookies at all.

[debeguiled]

(11-28-2017 02:36 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

^ even a broken clock is right twice a day. Read his fiction. He's broken as fuck & no doubt a fan of soy.

Molyneux's not having it...

This was a good and righteous video.

In his way, Molyneux is saying that we all affect and influence one another, and the idea that women don't influence what men are like, by who they decide to have children with, and also by how they raise their boys, makes no sense.

He also points out that this sort of sweeping generalization about a gruop would be widely criticized if it were made about any group but men.

It is so easy to simply say that the problem is men, period, and that is why people do it, not because it is true.