[El Rey]

(11-09-2011 10:57 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

(11-08-2011 04:52 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

As long as people like you continue to justify (for whatever reason), defend, promote, and/or simply fail to properly acknowledge the historical inequities at the root of the current conflict and, in doing so, deny the humanity of those who dealt with said inequities, its continuance will be ensured, no matter how much you or myself try to talk about it.

You must respect the humanity of others before they respect yours. The only chance current victims will have to end this current cycle of violence is to make clear to the perpetrators their understanding of this historical inequity and their respect for their humanity, which was lacking for most of the 20th century. Then, and only then will there be a chance for peaceful coexistence and an eventual end to things like Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), resulting in a complete breaking of the "cycle".

One more time: until the above actions are accomplished, there will be no hope of ending current tensions, no matter how much we talk about them.

Your failure to do this is creating your own burden. Such behavior from a people so familiar with the consequences of the disrespect of their own humanity (hearkening back to the Boer War/Genocide) hardly elicits much sympathy.

Here you go again, justifying the present rape and murder of thousands of white people in South Africa.

P Dog does the same thing and so does speakeasy.

So you are all saying that the murders of 3,000 white people (according to Harry's article) in modern times is okay because apartheid happened? You are all indirectly or straight up directly making justifications for that.

Why don't you all come straight out and fucking say it?

I'll go first. There was this story my grandfather would tell me when I was in my early teenage years. A story that would be brought up every once in awhile when we were discussing history. At the time I used to be a sympathizer for the Native Americans who "lost their land". It seems every time I would talk about anything that related to indigenous Americans, it would touch a bitter place in his heart. From this bitterness, he would tell me the story of how the Argentinians exterminated the Indians in the southern part of the land not too long ago. He was an immigrant from Argentina. He told me of how, the indigenous people from the southern Argentina would come up northwards every so often to kill farmers, children, rape and abduct the women. Eventually the Argentinians became so agitated by this that they "declared war" with the Indians. It wasn't a real declaration of war, as they didn't tell the Indians about it. It was just a decision to one day, pull out the chain guns and kill all of those murderous, raping bastards.

Now you know what I would like to see happen in South Africa. I'd like to see every fucking murderer and rapist get a bullet to the fucking head.

Now I'd like to hear what you guys would like to see happen in South Africa because for some reason you all seem to think that the mass murder and rape of white people in South Africa is just fucking dandy or completely justifiable.

This guy has Argentinian roots...that explains everything.

[Excelsior]

(11-09-2011 10:57 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

So you are all saying that the murders of 3,000 white people (according to Harry's article) in modern times is okay because apartheid happened? You are all indirectly or straight up directly making justifications for that.

Why don't you all come straight out and fucking say it?

Now I'd like to hear what you guys would like to see happen in South Africa because for some reason you all seem to think that the mass murder and rape of white people in South Africa is just fucking dandy or completely justifiable.

Oh for fuck's sake...

I can't be bothered, let me just repeat myself again.

(11-06-2011 01:03 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(11-05-2011 06:46 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

I'm sure you don't hate white people, but you must admit that you spent the vast majority of your time explaining why the blacks are doing what they are doing now. By doing so, you seem to make an indirect attempt to justify their actions.

If you couldn't even muster up the time to allude to the fact that killing white farmers en masse and raping their women is amoral than you are no better than Harry Hooligan in this case. To say you are anti-racist is merely hypocritical.

Great, another strawman.

I do not hate white people, nor have I cheered for farm murders (or murders of whites anywhere else, for that matter). I have spent this entire debate arguing against racism and its institutionalized forms by pointing out alternatives to it and its specific consequences (which are almost always horrible). I've spent an inordinate amount of time in here trying to use the consequences of these exploitative systems (as I called them) as further reason NOT to justify them (as HH has been doing with apartheid), because I have never questioned the fact that these consequences are inherently bad.

I have said absolutely nothing to question the amorality of the consequences of institutionalized racism (ex: farm murders, violent crime rise, black-on-white crime increase, hate speech, etc) in any post I have made in this thread. I have said absolutely nothing to question the amorality of hate crime/murder. I have not advocated for their consideration as just actions, nor have I once characterized or phrased these consequences as positives (rather, terms like "shitstorm" were used more commonly instead). To suggest that I have in any way claimed these consequences to be moral or implied as much is pure conjecture on your part.

You're welcome to continue with that if you wish, but I'm not going to entertain it. You are building a strawman I do not plan to fight.

Not a single person in here questioned the amorality of murder. All people in here have been telling you relates to the roots of said violence and the limited options available to end it, and prevent said cycle of violence from repeating itself. Discussing these two things does not equate to a love/desire for mass murder of any one particular group on the basis of their ethnicity or race. They are mere statements of fact regarding the cause, effect, and likely solution to modern violence, not ringing endorsements of death. That is more pure conjecture from you, and you alone.

Either figure it the fuck out or piss off already. Nobody cares for your strawmen.

[Lika]

(11-09-2011 06:25 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

Been that way since I was a kid trying to reason away racism on Stormfront, of all places.

Dude, you're a (super)hero...

(11-09-2011 08:00 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Wonder if you'd be saying this if the situation were reversed.

This is how you and most of the world (encouraged by mainstream media) see the situation. I used to view it like that as well.

Now, after having lived in various African countries (that I have come to love, even though I see their flaws like I see flaws in American or European cultures), I have a different opinion about the situation.

I would say that if, hypothetically, black Africans had settled in a place where there was no living white culture, created enormous wealth with their modern advanced technology and skills (exploiting the natural resources that nobody else on the continent would know what to do about with a very primitive technology), and then would have decided to remain politically separated from the other races that had come to live in the area in much more primitive traditional conditions, knowing that if they gave "One man, One vote", they would sooner or later lose all they had built over centuries and get murdered or would have to flee, then I would say that the black men who would have decided to give the white men political power would have been traitors to their own race.

Absolutely

The funny thing about mainstream media and people like you is that you seem to hold the white South Africans responsible for the poverty of the blacks in SA, whereas it is the exact opposite: If the black South Africans have been relatively richer than the rest of Africans for centuries, it is thanks to the white men there.

Some recognize it and know their future is bleak:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4f0INWfw...re=related

Anyways, as all socio-economic data indicate, SA will pretty soon get back to the development level of the rest of Africa. White influence and wealth creation there will just have been a temporary thing, like in Haïti or Zimbabwe...

   


I predict that one day on this forum, the mere act of saying that Europe is more developed than Africa will be seen as racism, white supremacism, nationalism, and Nazism :-)

Weren't we talking about Russia here?

[Hooligan Harry]

Quote:

Would you have said the same about the whites when the Zulus were trying to fight them off?

You do know that Shaka and Dingaan were responsible for more ethnic genocide than the British and Afrikaans together right? Shaka in particular decimated entire ethnicities and tribes.

Again, selective history and shaming tactics from you. Its getting tired now

[speakeasy]

(11-10-2011 03:22 AM)Lika Wrote:  

I would say that if, hypothetically, black Africans had settled in a place where there was no living white culture, created enormous wealth with their modern advanced technology and skills (exploiting the natural resources that nobody else on the continent would know what to do about with a very primitive technology), and then would have decided to remain politically separated from the other races that had come to live in the area in much more primitive traditional conditions, knowing that if they gave "One man, One vote", they would sooner or later lose all they had built over centuries and get murdered or would have to flee, then I would say that the black men who would have decided to give the white men political power would have been traitors to their own race.
Absolutely

Sure you would. I'd love to see how you'd be reacting if you were a white living under black oppression. Your ass would probably become a suicide bomber. If your rationale is that apartheid was okay because European brought superior technology, well then fuck, I guess we should hope that Earth gets taken over by extraterrestrials thousands of years in advance of us bent on exploiting our planet's resources while treating its native population like rats to be exterminated, a la Avatar but in reverse.

Quote:

The funny thing about mainstream media and people like you is that you seem to hold the white South Africans responsible for the poverty of the blacks in SA, whereas it is the exact opposite: If the black South Africans have been relatively richer than the rest of Africans for centuries, it is thanks to the white men there.

Blacks survived for tens of thousands of years without white intervention. Their societies had evolved to fit their environment. If they were all starving and dying of disease then the continent should've been vacant when the white man showed up, rather than finding proud people who fiercely fought back against invasion. Poverty as we know it didn't exist in such societies, just like it didn't exist in America before Colombus. People lived off the land and thrived. Poverty as we know it today is a problem that was created.

[Deluge]

This is going nowhere. People are too feeble-minded to understand any logic or reason. Your acting like Jizzabel feminists. This is a GAME forum. The purpose of this thread was to discuss the effects of Russian racism against non-ethnic Russians (which includes regular looking white guys if you go back to speakeasy's original post) and the effects of that racism on guys looking to go to Russia to GAME their women.

I vote this thread be locked. I also vote that the open racists on this forum be IP banned. Although I doubt the later is going to happen.

[Lika]

(11-10-2011 05:15 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

if you were a white living under black oppression

Except Blacks In SA had better living conditions than blacks in neighboring countries. For that matter, as soon as Zimbabwe became a failed economic state (after the expulsion of the white farmers...), many black Zimbabweans tried to come and live in South Africa. Guess what happened: Black South Africans massacred them and chased them out...

(11-10-2011 05:15 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

If your rationale is that apartheid was okay because European brought superior technology

My argument is that apartheid was the only solution for whites to survive in a land where there were no black societies when they arrived, settled and thrived... contrary to America where the Europeans settlers had to kill the natives.

If anything were more logical than the killing of whites in SA, it would be the genocide of whites and blacks in the USA by native Americans....

(11-10-2011 05:15 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Poverty as we know it today is a problem that was created.

Yes, in Africa it was actually involuntarily created (and still is today) by white men through modern hygiene, vaccines, and medicine:

African population went from 100 millions to 1 billion or more in one century and people are increasingly starving because they do not use modern technology for contraception and agriculture. It is a disaster and all humanitarian agencies going to East Africa right now to feed the starving people (without family planning) are reinforcing the problem.

[Hooligan Harry]

If you look at who derailed the thread, I think you will see quite clearly that its the folks in your camp P Dog. It was very, very relevant until Athlone climbed onto his soapbox.

You mean well, but when your views are based on what your teacher once told you, I battle to take it seriously. Athlone is a racist as much as he hates to admit it, he is just so used to his view being considered politically correct and being unchallenged that even impartial disagreement he considers racist now. He cant see how biased and racist his views are either, no doubt he feels the same way about me too.

But I agree and have said this numerous times already. Its going no where. It could have ended ages ago, but people keep dragging it out and it does not help when you resort to labelling people all the time. It only draws them out further.

[Deluge]

HH you started this

Quote:

Genocide Watch, for example, just raised their warning levels to a 7 in South Africa. White farmers who have lived there for over 300 years are being murdered in droves now and its clearly hate crimes. You wont see many stories on that though, and the last story CNN was when a white supremacist farmer was killed. The governing political party has their youth leader singing a song called "Shoot the Farmer" and it sees very little international main stream press. So you even have senior politicians encouraging the behaviour.

I'm not basing shit on what my teacher told me. I'm using his own opinions to support mine. Personally, I find your numerous posts about your opinions on Civil Rights disturbing.

Anyway, I'm going to try and steer this thread back to its original subject matter:

Hate crimes against non-Russians whether they be Asian, Black, Middle Eastern or non-Russian white has been documented, but I believe and Roosh agrees that it is overblown. Many visible minority people have lived in Russia and never experienced such hate crimes.

However YMG was attacked for being Asian by a Russian in the Baltics, thegmanifesto was also attacked, but he is half Irish-half Basque and I doubt race was a factor in his attack in Latvia by a Russian. So I'm not going to say that its completely risk-free.

Curiously, I haven't heard of any form of this violence in Ukraine. Which suggests to me the that its constrained only to ethnic Russians both at home and in their considerable diaspora in the Baltics. If someone is afraid of Russian skinheads, perhaps hit up Ukraine instead. If Ukraine is too much of a shithole, try Poland (particularly Wroclaw and Poznan when universities aren't on holiday) instead.

[DjembaDjemba]

I'm South African, I've studied the history extensively and it was nothing more than an old fashioned land grab at gunpoint. Whites came, took the land, built their own civilization (an extension of Europe) on it, and kicked us out (into small communities called Bantustans).

Unlike Indians however, we were too numerous and bellicose enough to drive whites out one way or another. That pattern repeats all over Africa. The countries least affected by the brutal racism of RSA and Zimbabwe are possibly far more harmonious.

I've been to Kenya, Botswana, Angola, Namibia, and they're all fine countries. In many ways far better than much of South Africa. Angola is changing the most rapidly.

Do I need to argue with retards on the net about it? Will it make my life better? Obviously not.

We got a bunch of bitter angry beta white males bashing all things black, oh shit...what a surprise?

This topic has degenerated into a few revised talking points we've been hearing for the past 400 years, let's see:

1 - blacks are inferior - check
2- whites built civilization in africa - check
3 - without whites blacks can't survive - check
4 - References of Haiti without any historical connotation - check
5 - blind emotions running rampant like female rationalization hamsters - check
6 - talk of returns to the good old days - check
7 - defending a system of oppression so beta white males can build their 'civilization' without competition on someone's land and back - check
8 - Links to questionable websites with derogatory pictures poking fun of Africans - check


And at the end of the day, none of this brings anyone closer to being better at gaming.

As a mixed race person, (Black south African dad and white Canadian mother), I wouldn't be here if white and black didn't get together and make sweet love.

Therefore I will carry the torch, no matter how many pitiful beta clowns (white and black) bitch and complain about the thought of black males and non blacks.

In short, I have the world's smallest violin for the world's most ardent ethnocentrics. Chinese, White, Native Indian, Bantu, Phillipinas, fuck who cares...pussy is pussy.

I will fuck women from your race, like it or not. I might even impregnate one soon.

I came to this board because some of the greats post here, Mixx, Gmac, the G Manifesto, Roosh, etc.

If this board gets taken over by a bunch of fascist little cockroaches, well...it's been fun.

[Lika]

(11-10-2011 08:02 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

As a mixed race person, (Black south African dad and white Canadian mother)

(11-10-2011 08:02 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Whites came, took the land, built their own civilization (an extension of Europe) on it, and kicked us out

Kicked you out? I thought you were half white dude...

You sound very objective for sure.

The fact that you insult and hate anyone who might have a different opinion on South Africa and the world than you (ie: Whites are evil and Africans developed a great modern technologically advanced civilization in Africa... "Pandora style" ), proves that

YOU are the IMMATURE BETA COCKROACH

[DjembaDjemba]

Quote:

Kicked you out? I thought you were half white dude...

You sound very objective for sure.

I am very happy of both my white and black heritage. However, most white people from Western Europe (even recent arrivals) don't consider me part of the 'community', no hard feelings. That's fair enough. Sometimes, as a non white "Canadian", my Canadianism even gets questioned, usually by people who don't even have Canadian ancestry.

Most of my white friends are from Eastern Europe or the Middle East.

Quote:

The fact that you insult and hate anyone who might have a different opinion on South Africa and the world than you (ie: Whites are evil and Africans developed a great modern technologically advanced civilization in Africa... "Pandora style" ), proves that

Look, it's the pot calling the kettle African. You insult a whole race of people over several posts and now you get your panties in a knot. I love it how black haters insult a whole race of people, then get all defensive when they get called for their bullshit.

And the best part is, like an angry feminist, you didn't even properly read over my post and jumped to the conclusion that I said anywhere blacks built civilizations. I didn't even get into that. I'm not planning to have a pissing contest over who's ancestors built the bigger civilization because I don't care, quite frankly.

I'm on this blog to learn tips and tricks on game, travel, and lifestyle. Not to argue with Eurocentrics about who's got the biggest historical cock (the race version of feminists).

[Lika]

(11-10-2011 08:59 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

You insult a whole race of people over several posts and now you get your panties in a knot

I don't insult any race. I state facts:

1. Whites created wealth in South Africa through modern Western technology and skills

2. Africa is a poor continent with low technology that makes most of its income by taxing foreign businesses to exploit their natural resources.


Describing reality is too much for most of you African/American guys, you call it racism.

Hence your pathetic attempt to describe Angola as a rich fast developing country because prices are extremely high there:

Here is reality:

"the gap between the haves and the have-nots continues to widen.

"What we are seeing is a small minority of people getting richer, while there is a majority of people getting poorer and poorer and poorer,"

The chasm between the rich and the poor is evident everywhere, particularly in Luanda, where beggars roam outside city centre apartments which command rents of more than $25,000 a month and land mine victims spend their days helping people park their oversized Sports Untility Vehicles (SUVs) in the hope of a few bucks for an evening meal.

No jobs

Angola’s oil boom may have brought millions of dollars into government coffers, but it has created few jobs, and the thousands of construction sites around the country – signs that the country is rebuilding itself after many years of war - mainly use imported labour from China and other Asian countries. As a result, few Angolans have benefited from these job opportunities."
http://ipsnews.net/africa/nota.asp?idnews=48475


African/Americans usually stand on race issues exactly where American feminists usually stand on gender issues.

Think about it...

You are at the forefront of politically correct bullshit and you are proud of it.

The rest of the world does not think like you.

Call them all NAZIS

I repeat: Africa is a POOR underdeveloped continent. Call me a racist, again and again... like a feminist would call a realistic man a misogynist to discredit him.

[DjembaDjemba]

(11-10-2011 09:36 AM)Lika Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 08:59 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

You insult a whole race of people over several posts and now you get your panties in a knot

I don't insult any race. I state facts:

1. Whites created wealth in South Africa through modern Western technology and skills

2. Africa is a poor continent with low technology that makes most of its income by taxing foreign businesses to exploit their natural resources.


Describing reality is too much for most of you African/American guys, you call it racism.

Hence your pathetic attempt to describe Angola as a rich fast developing country because prices are extremely high there:

Here is reality:

"the gap between the haves and the have-nots continues to widen.

"What we are seeing is a small minority of people getting richer, while there is a majority of people getting poorer and poorer and poorer,"

The chasm between the rich and the poor is evident everywhere, particularly in Luanda, where beggars roam outside city centre apartments which command rents of more than $25,000 a month and land mine victims spend their days helping people park their oversized Sports Untility Vehicles (SUVs) in the hope of a few bucks for an evening meal.

No jobs

Angola’s oil boom may have brought millions of dollars into government coffers, but it has created few jobs, and the thousands of construction sites around the country – signs that the country is rebuilding itself after many years of war - mainly use imported labour from China and other Asian countries. As a result, few Angolans have benefited from these job opportunities."
http://ipsnews.net/africa/nota.asp?idnews=48475


African/Americans usually stand on race issues exactly where American feminists usually stand on gender issues.

Think about it...

You are at the forefront of politically correct bullshit and you are proud of it.

The rest of the world does not think like you.

Call them all NAZIS

I repeat: Africa is a POOR underdeveloped continent. Call me a racist, again and again... like a feminist would call a realistic man a misogynist to discredit him.

Boy oh boy you're all over the place.

I can't waste my time getting into misinformation.

My question is, how does Africa's underdevelopment and poverty affect you?

It makes little difference to me, either way. And I'm actually a descendant of first generation immigrant from Africa. How does Africa's development affect your ability to game? It certainly doesn't affect mine.

If you have your inner game tightened, what issue do you have with blacks?

Africa is underdeveloped relative to the other continents, and sure you can point it out till you're blue in the balls. I hope by pointing it out...it, um...makes your game better.

The rest of the world isn't that 'bad'. I know because I've had very pretty solid success with pussy in "rest of the world" lol.

PS: Even women from unapologetically Eurocentric countries have given it up for the great mulatto hype. I've dated girls from Argentina, Chile, 2 Brazilians, and even a girl from Andorra. (Much respect to Mixx and Roosh because I've followed their guides to the letter with the South American girls and I've had wonderful success).

So the 'rest of the world' may not think like 'us'. But hey, if panties are dropping, what's the issue?

[DjembaDjemba]

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

[Moma]

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

I think in terms of lizards, most guys here just want the best looking reptile. I don't give a fcuk if she's Empress of China if she looks like an Asian Oprah. Fcuk her upbringing and fcuk her social status. Not trying to wifey her. The only time I consider her upbringing is whether she'll wig out on me on some dysfunctional shyt.

So as long as she's not psycho, I'm happy to push into her stomach.

With most interracial snacking, I think divide and conquer is the best strategy. This concurs with what you say about don't let her peeps find out.

This usually goes for all groups and not just Asians. I advise all hunters to be subtle when popping reptiles so as to reduce the population of haterville.

[Pusscrook]

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

[DjembaDjemba]

(11-10-2011 01:24 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

You think nationalism is increasing globally?

I think it's decreasing.

[Pusscrook]

(11-10-2011 01:35 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:24 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

You think nationalism is increasing globally?

I think it's decreasing.

If you think its decreasing, then maybe one should spend a bit of time in particular countries (not a vacation) to understand the increase. If you feel that the "arab spring" is not interconnected with nationalism, then spend some time there. If you think the reason that there has been at least a 300% increase all across Europe since 2000 and it is not a precursor to nationalism, then spend some time there. Germany has more hate groups than they did in 1932, and more (NDP) party members are in council seats today in many towns. The idea of nationalism, today, is different than it was 60 years ago. It's not about extermination of a race, it is about preservation. Therefore, to the naked eye, subtle changes go undetected and protected. When you become engrossed in a culture, and put down the articles, or have mental jousting on a forum, you can analyze the stench with clarity. Is this a mental exercise or facts based upon what is happened on the ground?

On a related item,This is 2011, so let me pose this to you ...... Why do you think Blacks and Mexicans don't get along as well as Whites and Mexicans ? Why do you think Afro-Colombians are at the bottom of the barrel in Colombia to this day , even though they are Colombians? Why do you think Afro-Brazilians live in more squandor than Brazilians who are not of African heritage? Do you think this is by design? Have you been to Nicaragua? Do you know how Dominicans feel about Haitians, although the Dominicans, may be just as poor, and in some cases, just as black? Do you know how the Trinidadians of Indian descent feel about Blacks? Find the darkest Indian, (some of them are blue-black)and ask him if he thinks he has African blood in him . His head will start fucking shaking like a leaf and he will look at you with the strangest look. This is nationalism, based upon preservation .

The more distorted picture ,is, how blacks feel about themselves. Ask an Afro-caribbean person about his views of African Americans. Ask an African-American his/her views on Africans. You will feel the psychological scar carried on from generation to generation. This is the easiest group to lead around by the nose, and the one that has the most excuses for being so far behind. This is unacceptable, yet, it is reality . Who do you really need to blame? One does not need confirmation.

[DjembaDjemba]

(11-10-2011 02:10 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:35 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:24 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Athlone McGinnis Wrote:

As one of those relatively rare (in the USA, at least) black men with a pretty serious touch of the Yellow Fever, this is quite relevant to my interests. Any elaboration on the black-asian scene in Canada or anywhere else you're familiar with (either here or in another thread) would be appreciated.

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

You think nationalism is increasing globally?

I think it's decreasing.

If you think its decreasing, then maybe one should spend a bit of time in particular countries (not a vacation) to understand the increase. If you feel that the "arab spring" is not interconnected with nationalism, then spend some time there. If you think the reason that there has been at least a 300% increase all across Europe since 2000 and it is not a precursor to nationalism, then spend some time there. Germany has more hate groups than they did in 1932, and more (NDP) party members are in council seats today in many towns. The idea of nationalism, today, is different than it was 60 years ago. It's not about extermination of a race, it is about preservation. Therefore, to the naked eye, subtle changes go undetected and protected. When you become engrossed in a culture, and put down the articles, or have mental jousting on a forum, you can analyze the stench with clarity. Is this a mental exercise or facts based upon what is happened on the ground?

On a related item,This is 2011, so let me pose this to you ...... Why do you think Blacks and Mexicans don't get along as well as Whites and Mexicans ? Why do you think Afro-Colombians are at the bottom of the barrel in Colombia to this day , even though they are Colombians? Why do you think Afro-Brazilians live in more squandor than Brazilians who are not of African heritage? Do you think this is by design? Have you been to Nicaragua? Do you know how Dominicans feel about Haitians, although the Dominicans, may be just as poor, and in some cases, just as black? Do you know how the Trinidadians of Indian descent feel about Blacks? Find the darkest Indian, (some of them are blue-black)and ask him if he thinks he has African blood in him . His head will start fucking shaking like a leaf and he will look at you with the strangest look. This is nationalism, based upon preservation .

The more distorted picture ,is, how blacks feel about themselves. Ask an Afro-caribbean person about his views of African Americans. Ask an African-American his/her views on Africans. You will feel the psychological scar carried on from generation to generation. This is the easiest group to lead around by the nose, and the one that has the most excuses for being so far behind. This is unacceptable, yet, it is reality . Who do you really need to blame? One does not need confirmation.

Interesting. I haven't analysed it on such a deep level.

Blacks in general are just hated overall across the globe. There are more anti black websites online than any other form of hate groups.

However do you think that things will start regressing into lynchings and public beatings again?

Spanish culture in general is very anti black, and so is the Mediterranean culture that it's an extension of. Nothing new there. But as individuals, blacks, and light skin blacks still thrive. People on this board are living proof. It's no surprise that Mexicans hate blacks. But on the individual level, I've had tremendous success with Mexican girls. And specifically the white ones, pale, blond, etc. I've never done a Mexican indian or mestizo. So it can't be all that bad.

I think things for Blacks are improving in Latin America. Brazil seems to be improving things for its large black population. They even have affirmative action in some of their top universities now. Blacks in Brazil also vote in droves, and in the last election there was a self identifying black woman who ran for the 3rd largest party. Her endorsement for Dilma Russef meant that Dilma virtually sealed the nomination.

Black Colombians are unique, because they are so incredibly cut off from white society, and in many ways, they are true African transplants, without any of the skills and knowledge that the Europeans have.

This is an interesting topic.

PS: What I'm trying to get at is that Blacks today still have it much better than 100 years ago. I mean, 100 years ago blacks weren't openly competing with white males for any female across the world. Sure the white male may be more naturally 'accepted' in most cultures, but the fact that as a black or mulatto person I can compete with a white male for a white or asian girl, and even get in her pants, all without being beated publicly or lynched with government approval (or indifference), shows huge progress.

100 years ago there were only 3 black nations on Earth that were 'free'. Abyssinia, Liberia (semi free), and Haiti. Haiti was basically bullied by the US, Liberia was used as dumping ground for British undesirables, and Abyssinia was just invaded by Italy (Italy lost the first time around) and was expecting to be invaded again.

On the other hand today, there are over 40 black nations across the globe, many of them democracies, some of them even cocky enough to thumb their noses at Europe, America and China.


Phrases like 'black middle class', black billionaire (not dictator), black industrialist (Dangote for example), black president (of a predominantly white country), black MPs (of white countries), etc etc...these were unheard of 100, shit...even 30 years ago.

I think, for blacks, things are much better, and getting better.

^^ Damn, long postscript

[speakeasy]

I agree Djemba. I think all this "the world hates blacks" crap needs to quit. I've been to 14 countries and not once did I ever feel "hated" by the population. I've gotten odd stares in countries where blacks are rarely seen but that's not hate to me, just naive curiosity.

I'm not saying that these countries don't have stereotypes against blacks or put them at the bottom of some unspoken social hierarchy, but I think most people have the common sense to judge people by their individual qualities first and foremost. If all you know is that I'm a black male, you know absolutely nothing about me or my worth. And same for any race.

[Pusscrook]

(11-10-2011 02:38 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 02:10 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:35 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:24 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 10:19 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Asians are pretty racist against blacks a group, and if you're an $100,000 black, it's the equivalent of $50,000 white in the eyes of the 'community' (Asian community).

Now, does that mean you can't get Asian pussy? Far from it. In fact, Asian girls, like all women, feel the tingle when a dark man with tight game and smooth words caresses her.

There will always be Asian girls who'll bang black thug dudes here, lots of them (usually Philipino, Laosians, Cambodians etc).

But if you want the good stuff, that Asian businesswoman, lawyer, artist, upper middle class and above girl from mainland China or Hong Kong, then you have to make sure you look good and have your shirt sorted out.

And most importantly, try and hit it before her friends find out about you, Asian males are possibly the most beta, and most vitriolic when it comes to men fucking their women (yes, they REALLY hate white males, deep inside, and being black, multiply that hate by 100).

If you're looking to impress her pussy, do what you do best.

If you're looking to impress her family or friends, you better be hauling heavy dough.

That's my 2 cents on the Toronto Asian 'market'.

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

You think nationalism is increasing globally?

I think it's decreasing.

If you think its decreasing, then maybe one should spend a bit of time in particular countries (not a vacation) to understand the increase. If you feel that the "arab spring" is not interconnected with nationalism, then spend some time there. If you think the reason that there has been at least a 300% increase all across Europe since 2000 and it is not a precursor to nationalism, then spend some time there. Germany has more hate groups than they did in 1932, and more (NDP) party members are in council seats today in many towns. The idea of nationalism, today, is different than it was 60 years ago. It's not about extermination of a race, it is about preservation. Therefore, to the naked eye, subtle changes go undetected and protected. When you become engrossed in a culture, and put down the articles, or have mental jousting on a forum, you can analyze the stench with clarity. Is this a mental exercise or facts based upon what is happened on the ground?

On a related item,This is 2011, so let me pose this to you ...... Why do you think Blacks and Mexicans don't get along as well as Whites and Mexicans ? Why do you think Afro-Colombians are at the bottom of the barrel in Colombia to this day , even though they are Colombians? Why do you think Afro-Brazilians live in more squandor than Brazilians who are not of African heritage? Do you think this is by design? Have you been to Nicaragua? Do you know how Dominicans feel about Haitians, although the Dominicans, may be just as poor, and in some cases, just as black? Do you know how the Trinidadians of Indian descent feel about Blacks? Find the darkest Indian, (some of them are blue-black)and ask him if he thinks he has African blood in him . His head will start fucking shaking like a leaf and he will look at you with the strangest look. This is nationalism, based upon preservation .

The more distorted picture ,is, how blacks feel about themselves. Ask an Afro-caribbean person about his views of African Americans. Ask an African-American his/her views on Africans. You will feel the psychological scar carried on from generation to generation. This is the easiest group to lead around by the nose, and the one that has the most excuses for being so far behind. This is unacceptable, yet, it is reality . Who do you really need to blame? One does not need confirmation.

Interesting. I haven't analysed it on such a deep level.

Blacks in general are just hated overall across the globe. There are more anti black websites online than any other form of hate groups.

However do you think that things will start regressing into lynchings and public beatings again?

Spanish culture in general is very anti black, and so is the Mediterranean culture that it's an extension of. Nothing new there. But as individuals, blacks, and light skin blacks still thrive. People on this board are living proof. It's no surprise that Mexicans hate blacks. But on the individual level, I've had tremendous success with Mexican girls. And specifically the white ones, pale, blond, etc. I've never done a Mexican indian or mestizo. So it can't be all that bad.

I think things for Blacks are improving in Latin America. Brazil seems to be improving things for its large black population. They even have affirmative action in some of their top universities now. Blacks in Brazil also vote in droves, and in the last election there was a self identifying black woman who ran for the 3rd largest party. Her endorsement for Dilma Russef meant that Dilma virtually sealed the nomination.

Black Colombians are unique, because they are so incredibly cut off from white society, and in many ways, they are true African transplants, without any of the skills and knowledge that the Europeans have.

This is an interesting topic.

PS: What I'm trying to get at is that Blacks today still have it much better than 100 years ago. I mean, 100 years ago blacks weren't openly competing with white males for any female across the world. Sure the white male may be more naturally 'accepted' in most cultures, but the fact that as a black or mulatto person I can compete with a white male for a white or asian girl, and even get in her pants, all without being beated publicly or lynched with government approval (or indifference), shows huge progress.

100 years ago there were only 3 black nations on Earth that were 'free'. Abyssinia, Liberia (semi free), and Haiti. Haiti was basically bullied by the US, Liberia was used as dumping ground for British undesirables, and Abyssinia was just invaded by Italy (Italy lost the first time around) and was expecting to be invaded again.

On the other hand today, there are over 40 black nations across the globe, many of them democracies, some of them even cocky enough to thumb their noses at Europe, America and China.


Phrases like 'black middle class', black billionaire (not dictator), black industrialist (Dangote for example), black president (of a predominantly white country), black MPs (of white countries), etc etc...these were unheard of 100, shit...even 30 years ago.

I think, for blacks, things are much better, and getting better.

^^ Damn, long postscript

You are right. Blacks, in general, have it much better than they did 100 years ago. I am not sure what you mean by the countries you mention being "free". Free from what exactly?The three countries you mentioned that were "free", where are they now?

It is good that you can compete with a white male for an asian or white whore, but you also compete with yourself, for a black whore .We should look at things on a whole, rather than as a part.

There is a "part" of the problem that is never explored in great depth, and it deals with self- inflicted wounds. This is the identity crisis , which no other group seems to suffer from ,today . If you compare the plight of Blacks to Jews , there is really only one big difference. Identity. For instance, if we went to Nigeria, and see warring factions of Christians and Muslims, the first question should be....., what the fuck is an African doing warring over a religion that imposed their will on the people, for the sake of raping the country? You cant just be Nigerian? You have to be a Nigerian with a twist, for the hate to work its magic.

African leaders cant blame "the white man" for everything when the truth of the matter is , that African leader, may just be inept and corrupt! I can just as easily make the argument that African leaders were stupid enough to aid foreign invaders for a fucking glance at himself in the mirror , and therefore, not all Africans were forced into slavery . You can't just round up millions of people unless their government leaders/leaders in the community, were willing to assist in some form or fashion. Just because it is not spoken of , doesn't mean it was not written my friend. Jews were rounded up by Babylonians, Assyrians, Chaldeans, because other Jews, sold out Jews. When Nero, burned Rome, and persecuted Jews and Christians, it was easy to do, because Jewish and Christian leaders, sold out other Jews and Christians. Hitler had enough Nazi collaborators, who were leaders in the Jewish community, and this made it a lot easier to round the poor bastards up. How did they come out of it, time ,after time ,after time? Are they any better than an African? Why do we think that it is impossible for African leaders to do the same? I submit to you that Africans are psychologically enslaved to this very day. Check it..."your hair is a better grade than mine", "your light skinned, why am I so dark", Why do you speak like you're white", "what do you mean you don't like rap"? "You can't dance"? I could go on and on.... This is an identity crisis. If you step outside the "black box" well..., you're a sell out. But who made the "black box"?Who do you think perpetuates this vicious cycle? The white man? "Maybe I should be ...., whomever offers me something I perceive to be, better than what I am". Who does that sound like to you? The white man?
This is what Lyndon Johnson, did for African Americans .By creating the "great society", he gave African Americans..., you guessed it, another identity. Now ,the government is like my father to my kids, so why can't I have 10 fucking rats running around here? "Reconstruction" was a much better time, because for the first time in history ,slaves understood you were free (to a large extent), to finally be you, and not a label.

If someone argues that Africa is a poor continent, simply because it has no technology, they are quite myopic, ignorant, maybe just fucking dumb, to put it bluntly. Does that same person think Brazil is a poor country, or run very poorly? Why is it that all of sudden Brazil is a leading emerging markets in 2011? Did the resources change? No, the right leaders, with understanding, are moving the country in the right direction. Sometimes you have to discard ignorance. Some people should spend more time in international trade to understand certain things.

Africa ,is one of the richest continents in the world, if not the richest, in terms of natural resources , but it is ran very poorly, and they have no one else to blame but themselves. There is nothing in your way,(I'm speaking of the inhabitants, so don't take this as if it is directed at you ) ,so, if you still insist on blaming the Dutch, English, Spanish ,and the Portuguese, by all means, do so. Do you think they give a rats ass? Do you think the Chinese who are easing their way into Africa, give a rats ass ? You can't change the hands of time, so what is the point of killing 20 million Europeans or taking their land? You can't heal the pain you have in your own soul right now. Killing someone else, just to settle a score, won't solve it. Maybe you should dig up your ancestors and kill them again for letting this shit get so out of hand in the first place....Or maybe ......, you can educate yourself on how to run a fucking country and put the right people in place to do it. There is really no secret as to why the continent is so far behind, and it is more to do with internal power struggle, a string of inept leadership, and a failure to connect with itself. Now, the question is, how does your identity crisis, and self inflicted wounds, correlate to what people perceive you to be. Pride goes before destruction, and African leaders are puffed up with way too much pride.

* If you thought your post was long, you're in good company.

[Moma]

I luv you, Pusscrook. *Bursts into alpha tears*

Real talk.

[DjembaDjemba]

(11-10-2011 04:40 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 02:38 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 02:10 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:35 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(11-10-2011 01:24 PM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

it's not as if Korean males sit down with Japanese males for a cup of tea, knowing that the Japanese is fucking quality Korean whores, either.

In terms of interracial dating,Black males, worldwide, will initially be seen as the lowest person on the totem pole that other races would want to partner with. As more and more countries become more nationalistic, you should expect this trend to increase. Part of this "stigma" can be blamed partially on the backs of those who placed historical stereotypes in the minds of the masses. Guess who is responsible for the other portion....

You think nationalism is increasing globally?

I think it's decreasing.

If you think its decreasing, then maybe one should spend a bit of time in particular countries (not a vacation) to understand the increase. If you feel that the "arab spring" is not interconnected with nationalism, then spend some time there. If you think the reason that there has been at least a 300% increase all across Europe since 2000 and it is not a precursor to nationalism, then spend some time there. Germany has more hate groups than they did in 1932, and more (NDP) party members are in council seats today in many towns. The idea of nationalism, today, is different than it was 60 years ago. It's not about extermination of a race, it is about preservation. Therefore, to the naked eye, subtle changes go undetected and protected. When you become engrossed in a culture, and put down the articles, or have mental jousting on a forum, you can analyze the stench with clarity. Is this a mental exercise or facts based upon what is happened on the ground?

On a related item,This is 2011, so let me pose this to you ...... Why do you think Blacks and Mexicans don't get along as well as Whites and Mexicans ? Why do you think Afro-Colombians are at the bottom of the barrel in Colombia to this day , even though they are Colombians? Why do you think Afro-Brazilians live in more squandor than Brazilians who are not of African heritage? Do you think this is by design? Have you been to Nicaragua? Do you know how Dominicans feel about Haitians, although the Dominicans, may be just as poor, and in some cases, just as black? Do you know how the Trinidadians of Indian descent feel about Blacks? Find the darkest Indian, (some of them are blue-black)and ask him if he thinks he has African blood in him . His head will start fucking shaking like a leaf and he will look at you with the strangest look. This is nationalism, based upon preservation .

The more distorted picture ,is, how blacks feel about themselves. Ask an Afro-caribbean person about his views of African Americans. Ask an African-American his/her views on Africans. You will feel the psychological scar carried on from generation to generation. This is the easiest group to lead around by the nose, and the one that has the most excuses for being so far behind. This is unacceptable, yet, it is reality . Who do you really need to blame? One does not need confirmation.

Interesting. I haven't analysed it on such a deep level.

Blacks in general are just hated overall across the globe. There are more anti black websites online than any other form of hate groups.

However do you think that things will start regressing into lynchings and public beatings again?

Spanish culture in general is very anti black, and so is the Mediterranean culture that it's an extension of. Nothing new there. But as individuals, blacks, and light skin blacks still thrive. People on this board are living proof. It's no surprise that Mexicans hate blacks. But on the individual level, I've had tremendous success with Mexican girls. And specifically the white ones, pale, blond, etc. I've never done a Mexican indian or mestizo. So it can't be all that bad.

I think things for Blacks are improving in Latin America. Brazil seems to be improving things for its large black population. They even have affirmative action in some of their top universities now. Blacks in Brazil also vote in droves, and in the last election there was a self identifying black woman who ran for the 3rd largest party. Her endorsement for Dilma Russef meant that Dilma virtually sealed the nomination.

Black Colombians are unique, because they are so incredibly cut off from white society, and in many ways, they are true African transplants, without any of the skills and knowledge that the Europeans have.

This is an interesting topic.

PS: What I'm trying to get at is that Blacks today still have it much better than 100 years ago. I mean, 100 years ago blacks weren't openly competing with white males for any female across the world. Sure the white male may be more naturally 'accepted' in most cultures, but the fact that as a black or mulatto person I can compete with a white male for a white or asian girl, and even get in her pants, all without being beated publicly or lynched with government approval (or indifference), shows huge progress.

100 years ago there were only 3 black nations on Earth that were 'free'. Abyssinia, Liberia (semi free), and Haiti. Haiti was basically bullied by the US, Liberia was used as dumping ground for British undesirables, and Abyssinia was just invaded by Italy (Italy lost the first time around) and was expecting to be invaded again.

On the other hand today, there are over 40 black nations across the globe, many of them democracies, some of them even cocky enough to thumb their noses at Europe, America and China.


Phrases like 'black middle class', black billionaire (not dictator), black industrialist (Dangote for example), black president (of a predominantly white country), black MPs (of white countries), etc etc...these were unheard of 100, shit...even 30 years ago.

I think, for blacks, things are much better, and getting better.

^^ Damn, long postscript

You are right. Blacks, in general, have it much better than they did 100 years ago. I am not sure what you mean by the countries you mention being "free". Free from what exactly?The three countries you mentioned that were "free", where are they now?

It is good that you can compete with a white male for an asian or white whore, but you also compete with yourself, for a black whore .We should look at things on a whole, rather than as a part.

There is a "part" of the problem that is never explored in great depth, and it deals with self- inflicted wounds. This is the identity crisis , which no other group seems to suffer from ,today . If you compare the plight of Blacks to Jews , there is really only one big difference. Identity. For instance, if we went to Nigeria, and see warring factions of Christians and Muslims, the first question should be....., what the fuck is an African doing warring over a religion that imposed their will on the people, for the sake of raping the country? You cant just be Nigerian? You have to be a Nigerian with a twist, for the hate to work its magic.

African leaders cant blame "the white man" for everything when the truth of the matter is , that African leader, may just be inept and corrupt! I can just as easily make the argument that African leaders were stupid enough to aid foreign invaders for a fucking glance at himself in the mirror , and therefore, not all Africans were forced into slavery . You can't just round up millions of people unless their government leaders/leaders in the community, were willing to assist in some form or fashion. Just because it is not spoken of , doesn't mean it was not written my friend. Jews were rounded up by Babylonians, Assyrians, Chaldeans, because other Jews, sold out Jews. When Nero, burned Rome, and persecuted Jews and Christians, it was easy to do, because Jewish and Christian leaders, sold out other Jews and Christians. Hitler had enough Nazi collaborators, who were leaders in the Jewish community, and this made it a lot easier to round the poor bastards up. How did they come out of it, time ,after time ,after time? Are they any better than an African? Why do we think that it is impossible for African leaders to do the same? I submit to you that Africans are psychologically enslaved to this very day. Check it..."your hair is a better grade than mine", "your light skinned, why am I so dark", Why do you speak like you're white", "what do you mean you don't like rap"? "You can't dance"? I could go on and on.... This is an identity crisis. If you step outside the "black box" well..., you're a sell out. But who made the "black box"?Who do you think perpetuates this vicious cycle? The white man? "Maybe I should be ...., whomever offers me something I perceive to be, better than what I am". Who does that sound like to you? The white man?
This is what Lyndon Johnson, did for African Americans .By creating the "great society", he gave African Americans..., you guessed it, another identity. Now ,the government is like my father to my kids, so why can't I have 10 fucking rats running around here? "Reconstruction" was a much better time, because for the first time in history ,slaves understood you were free (to a large extent), to finally be you, and not a label.

If someone argues that Africa is a poor continent, simply because it has no technology, they are quite myopic, ignorant, maybe just fucking dumb, to put it bluntly. Does that same person think Brazil is a poor country, or run very poorly? Why is it that all of sudden Brazil is a leading emerging markets in 2011? Did the resources change? No, the right leaders, with understanding, are moving the country in the right direction. Sometimes you have to discard ignorance. Some people should spend more time in international trade to understand certain things.

Africa ,is one of the richest continents in the world, if not the richest, in terms of natural resources , but it is ran very poorly, and they have no one else to blame but themselves. There is nothing in your way,(I'm speaking of the inhabitants, so don't take this as if it is directed at you ) ,so, if you still insist on blaming the Dutch, English, Spanish ,and the Portuguese, by all means, do so. Do you think they give a rats ass? Do you think the Chinese who are easing their way into Africa, give a rats ass ? You can't change the hands of time, so what is the point of killing 20 million Europeans or taking their land? You can't heal the pain you have in your own soul right now. Killing someone else, just to settle a score, won't solve it. Maybe you should dig up your ancestors and kill them again for letting this shit get so out of hand in the first place....Or maybe ......, you can educate yourself on how to run a fucking country and put the right people in place to do it. There is really no secret as to why the continent is so far behind, and it is more to do with internal power struggle, a string of inept leadership, and a failure to connect with itself. Now, the question is, how does your identity crisis, and self inflicted wounds, correlate to what people perceive you to be. Pride goes before destruction, and African leaders are puffed up with way too much pride.

* If you thought your post was long, you're in good company.

You're singing to the choir.

I agree with this.

I've always asserted that Africa's problems are self inflicted.

Those of us who choose to have no issues getting what we want. The barriers aren't as high we think they are.

I just don't like whiners. Guys like Lika who think that somehow we're taking something from him. We're not. They're just as pitiful as black men who blame all their problems on whites, or 'others'.

Real talk.

[Pusscrook]

(11-10-2011 04:44 PM)Moma Wrote:  

I luv you, Pusscrook. *Bursts into alpha tears*

Real talk.

Thank you , Sir.