[spokepoker]

The next stage should be "It's not ok to be white" fliers.

[LeightonBlackstock]

"It's okay to be white"

That is an incredibly clever phrase

Disagreeing with it instantly puts the person in the camp of "It's NOT okay to be white".

It's far cleverer than "Black Lives Matter" as that can be countered well with "Yes, black lives DO matter, hence let's look at crime statistics" or "All lives matter"

It's also gentle enough to be held up on a sign, without the person looking like a white nationalist.

Bravo, 4chan.

[TooFineAPoint]

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

It's okay to want to fuck chicks under 30 with big tits, longer than shoulder length hair, and a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 or less.

[Edit: almost forgot the hair length... for some reason hair length triggers them even more than weight]

[Guile]

My official white man troll dance.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's OK to be manly."

[John Michael Kane]

(11-02-2017 11:58 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's OK to be manly."

Shorter, to the point, and likely to offend all the right people and encourage all the men who need to hear it. I like it. Put "MANLY" in full caps and bold and you have a winner.

[N°6]

(11-02-2017 11:22 AM)Agastya Wrote:  

I will write more about this in the future, but it is a weird phenomenon that has become impossible to ignore. I doubt things were like this in the 90's or early 2000's/.

They were but the rate of the process was slower. The catalyst was 9/11. This was the crossroads just before several Western nations crossed the demographic Rubicon.

Given the widespread acceptance of the orthodox version of 9/11, it was the obvious time to abandon multiculturalism and at least attempt to absorb and integrate recent waves of mass immigration.

What actually happened was the complete opposite. The drive to a multicultural utopia increased in rate and hate laws were put into statute which disproportionately affected White men. Western governments became more and more neutral like imperial governments moderating the turbulent dealings between competing groups with the empire. To achieve this fair balance, governments have had to disproportionally oppress host populations to favour replacement populations. This is why after every terrorist outrage perpetuated by someone from an imported group, the media will find and report some sort of action done by a member of the host group to raise to equal status of infamy. This is done by using the inert pejorative "extremist" against any person or group who isn't in the Centre Ground™ of financial-democratic politics. Example: the (Jihad) extremism returns to NYC but extremists are putting up offensive signs on college campus walls.

Around 2011-12, Merkel, Cameron and Sarkozy declared multiculturalism a failure but once again, the rate to fragment Western nations increased - with Merkel single-handedly altering the demographic balance of Europe forever unless war returns things to balance.

The biggest difference between today and the era from - say - 1970 to 2001 is the role of women. Most men into nationalist or conservative endeavours had a young wife and children and a peer group of men to support them. Today it is a mass of single, friendless or unmarried men with a few glamourous you tube hostesses who have effortlessly climbed up the dense tree of monkey branches of "alt-right" politics with modest female competition.

Demographically, European women need to have 12 children each to reverse the tragic Winter brought about by the boomers.

[homersheineken]

(11-02-2017 08:21 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 11:54 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

This is a brilliant way to red-pill the masses. Anyone who follows politics knows that the Dems hate Whites, but plenty of uninformed Whites have not caught onto this fact.

So, /pol/ decides to create the most harmless statement possible: "It's okay to be White," and right on queue comes the incredible hatred of Whites from the Dem controlled industries: education, entertainment, media, etc.

Regular normie thinks, "Wtf? Why is this racially divisive? It's not okay to be White?" And gets pushed into radicalism. Well done by /pol/, and most importantly congrats to the Dems for creating a nation of White Nationalists with their extreme hatred.

Most of the Dems who "hate whites" are themselves white. The Democratic Party is white self hatred on a massive political scale.

This will do more to discredit the left than create WN's in my opinion. Sure a couple more may pop up, but more importantly, the Dem reaction to this will just make liberals look like asses once again. Non-libtarded minorities will see the liberal reaction and roll their eyes. White people will have a similar reaction, though they will feel more personally insulted than minorities.

Basically leftists humiliating themselves doesn't necessarily correlate with a surge of WN's -- it just makes them look stupid for the 33234th time.

Also homersheineken which subreddit is that from?

I'm not sure, I saw it on /the_donald https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...izes_they/

Edit: Here we go: https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestio...gn_racist/

[CynicalContrarian]

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's okay to be a XY chromosome man."


Otherwise.
I hear the police were notified about this particular act, yet said police do not intend to press charges or investigate, cause it does not -quite- fit the notion of hate speech...

[Vladimir Poontang]

I liked back to the kitchen.

[Chris Brown]

Not as catchy as White Power.

[Samseau]

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"There's only one thing a woman can do a man cannot."

[scrambled]

(11-02-2017 11:45 PM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  

the hair length... for some reason hair length triggers them even more than weight]

Apparently women lose hair length (and pigment, and luster) naturally as they age. Young hot ones having it long exposes the difference badly.

Reminding uglies that they are ugly = trigglypuff-narcissistic rage

[heavy]

Can you imagine an "It's Okay to be Black" campaign. It would be seen as anti-black.

[durangotang]

(11-03-2017 09:04 AM)heavy Wrote:  

Can you imagine an "It's Okay to be Black" campaign. It would be seen as anti-black.

Good point.

[Samseau]

[/url]

[url=https://twitter.com/MemeAlertNews/status/926411206746955776]

[Agastya]

Actually, I think 4chan posting signs saying "it's NOT okay to be white" could be a pretty potent weapon in the hands of the right. It would piss off based minorities and whites, piss off normie minorities and whites, and goad the SJW's into even greater fits of hysteria. 4chan could get away with it too, since they're trolls who have no reputation to uphold. When hijabis fake hate crimes or Jews smear fake poop swastikas on bathroom walls, it makes all liberals look stupid. 4chan dicking around is just behavior as usual.

[Grodin]

What an absurd time to be alive. Both the mainstream media and their arch-nemesis white nationalists seem to believe that whites are on their way to being a minority (which we aren't). They only disagree on whether to celebrate or freak out.

The media knows it's being trolled and still can't help itself....... they find the implications of this statement so repulsive that they react nonetheless

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

Maybe "the future is hetero"

[iop890]

When boomer-posting in real life goes wrong:

EDIT: Meant to post this in the DNC is imploding thread but it works fine here too I guess.

[Roosh]

(11-02-2017 11:58 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's OK to be manly."

That reminds me of Art Of Manliness, which is not manly.

How about "It's okay to be masculine."

It may be super triggering since the left is constantly attacking "toxic masculinity."

[Emancipator]

(11-03-2017 04:28 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 11:58 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's OK to be manly."

That reminds me of Art Of Manliness, which is not manly.

How about "It's okay to be masculine."

It may be super triggering since the left is constantly attacking "toxic masculinity."

Maybe shorten it?

"Masculinity is okay"
"Masculinity is good"

[John Michael Kane]

Masculinity is Magnificent
Masculinity is Masterful
Masculinity is Majestic

Thoughts?

[debeguiled]

Majestic is the most triggering.

[homersheineken]

(11-03-2017 04:28 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 11:58 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 08:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What would our troll phrase be?

"It's okay to be a man"... probably won't trigger.

"It's OK to be manly."

That reminds me of Art Of Manliness, which is not manly.

How about "It's okay to be masculine."

It may be super triggering since the left is constantly attacking "toxic masculinity."

A manliness site, (co)run by a women

[John Michael Kane]

(11-03-2017 04:55 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Majestic is the most triggering.

That's what I'm feeling as well. It suggests that we should up to men as leaders. Subtly enforcing The Patriarchy and triggering all the Soy Boy Cucks.