0 year anniversary of 9/11
09-10-2011, 02:22 PM
Quote: (09-10-2011 11:19 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Quote: (09-10-2011 11:10 AM)Roosh Wrote:
Quote:Quote:
That's just so ridiculous; the USA could just have BOUGHT some more oil from their tinpot dictators in Iraq or Iran or whoever they needed.
Having the ability to buy something is not the same as having your hands on the spigots. It's like being able to buy the television versus owning the factory that produces the television.
Oil is power. No amount of money can be placed on it by its incompetent leaders when you're trying to maintain power.
But what are we doing with this power?
We have our hands on the oil spigots, and our nation is broke as fuck. What the hell was the plan? Take the oil so you can... go bankrupt???
If we were using this oil for strategic warfare purposes, we'd be making boatloads of $$$ from the conquered lands. Instead, we are spending money to rebuild Iraq! What kind of world domination plan is that?
Yeah, if we own Iraq, why the fuck aren't we paying 10 cents a gallon for gas like they do in Venezuela? If we've taken over their oil, we sure aren't getting much out of it.
For those that say the government knew the attack was going to happen and deliberately allowed it, why would they allow a plane to strike the Pentagon? Especially when you think of how critical that building is to our government. I could even somewhat see that scenario if the twin towers were the only target. But you'd also have to believe that they were willing to let the Pentagon get blown up and either the white house or capitol building if the plot wasn't foiled by the passengers fighting back. I have a 9/11 "truther" friend who still isn't convinced a plane hit the Pentagon despite literally hundreds of civilian witnesses. They think the Pentagon planted a bomb in there or hit it with a missile. It's funny when people start piling layer upon layer of conspiracy to patch over holes in logic. To these type of people there's nothing in the world that will ever shake their conspiratorial world view.
To me the most plausible scenario is that the government dropped the ball. They probably get shitloads of false alarms and these things are always easier to piece together in hindsight than in foresight. The overwhelming majority of terror warnings are false positives and our guard was down. It was really just a matter of time before something slipped through the cracks.
In response to some of the statements some are making about the improbability of a WTC7 collapse because it's never happened before, we are looking at unusual circumstances here. Heavy structural damage from the falling debris of the main towers, and intense fires raging around critical support structures for 7 hours. Even if it does seem improbable, it's not impossible. Every time the NTSB investigates a plane crash, it's often traced back to some improbable engineering flaw that started a chain reaction culminating in a catastrophe. Look at that Air France jet that went down over the Atlantic a couple years ago for example. Something as simple as a flawed pitot tube measuring air pressure caused an entire jet to end up at the bottom of the ocean.