rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.
#1

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

It is my assumption that every individual in this forum is well read, mature and is generally a discerning individual. That being said, I think I should post quite a few points I disagree with Roosh. This isn't meant to deride his intellect, but to point out where I think he's wrong.

1. Donald Trump: I admire Trump's no-nonsense persona, pragmatism and showmanship. He's a great TV personality, businesses savvy and an alpha. However, I don't think he's a great fit for presidency. He's too petty— engaging in unnecessary Twitter tirades with people who don't really matter, often distracted by small things. A great leader should forgo these small things and focus on the big picture —Making America Great Again.

2. White Genocide: I partially agree here. Fertility rates are quickly declining while death rates are accelerating. However, I don't think its as a result of migrants "diluting the white gene pool". I think it's self-inflicted. Feminism has made women less family-oriented and more career-oriented. I'm a Nigerian. Nigerians women believe having lots of kids would increase her rep in the society. An average Nigerian woman gives birth to 5 kids. White women are less inclined to do so and more inclined to accumulating cats. As for abortion? Well, I think it's a not so serious factor. In fact, abortion helps check humans burgeoning population. Our technology hasn't yet been sufficient to conquer the sea, so do the math. Land mass isn't increasing, but humans are. Result? Thinning resources, destruction of green life and acceleration of human annihilation.

3. Alt-Right: I believe extremities are unhealthy. I believe we should develop an objective mindset towards everything. I would categorize my political views as centrism. I read conservative and liberal books, then objectively pick the opinions that are factual and rational. For instance, I think saying " abortion should be banned" is not really good. "Abortion should be regulated" is more like it. Victims of rape shouldn't have to be forced into childrearing. The alt-right is a reactionary movement at best. It emphasizes the need to preserve the Aryan race, but aren't we all humans before black, white or brown? I recently read of a Zimbabwean woman giving birth to a white girl, despite having to her black husband. Verdict? it's all gene playing. Africans and Asians and Europeans all possess the OCA2 gene. However when partial deletions of the gene occurs, we have blue-eyed Caucasians. What does it mean? We're all the same.

I don't mean to race bait or ridicule anyone's belief, I just think we should base our opinions as closely to the facts as we can.

Pitch In yours too.
Reply
#2

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

Quote: (10-04-2017 03:42 AM)Les Luka Wrote:  

I'm a Nigerian.


You have just joined this forum and only have 3 posts to your name.

Start contributing something useful, before picking controversial positions on topics this forum has already discussed on various other threads for many years before you arrved on the scene.

Is this how you welcome yourself as a guest when visiting a new home ?
Reply
#3

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

Les, we were all waiting on your take, it's important that we know where you stand. Thank you for sharing.

Hello nice to meet you. Let's talk White Genocide. -This is exactly how I introduce myself to new groups.

Americans are dreamers too
Reply
#4

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

I disagree with your choice to start this thread.

Respectfully?

Not so much.

The public will judge a man by what he lifts, but those close to him will judge him by what he carries.
Reply
#5

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

Quote: (10-04-2017 03:42 AM)Les Luka Wrote:  

I recently read of a Zimbabwean woman giving birth to a white girl, despite having to her black husband.

Africans and Asians and Europeans all possess the OCA2 gene. However when partial deletions of the gene occurs, we have blue-eyed Caucasians. What does it mean? We're all the same.

"I recently read of a number of Sub-Saharan women giving birth to white babies", and they were, and are, hunted by their neighbors, persecuted by society, as "witches" and devils. [Image: dodgy.gif]

Tanzanians believing that "White" bodily parts will bring them wealth (I tremble at the thought of a Jewish person falling into their hands... I mean, if body parts of a White -perceived as Christian- bring wealth, then body parts of a "White Jew" must bring extreme wealth? sad to see witchery still strong in this century!):
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-31849531

"More than 200 witchdoctors and traditional healers have been arrested in Tanzania in a crackdown on the murder of albino people.

The killings have been driven by the belief - advanced by some witchdoctors - that the body parts have properties that confer wealth and good luck.

Nearly 80 albino Tanzanians have been killed since 2000, the UN says"


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecutio...h_albinism

" when partial deletions of the gene occurs, we have blue-eyed Caucasians", so we are just a genetic accident, some washed-down, weak-blooded version of Sub-Saharans? [Image: dodgy.gif]

Actually funny to read a Sub-Saharan hamsterizing hard, at how "we're all the same and therefore borders are useless" [Image: hamster3.gif]
Reply
#6

I disagree with Roosh —Respectfully of course.

You forgot to leave us your Western Union details Les...

Irish
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)