[RiderKnight]

Is it because of the current cultural climate which shames men for showing even a hint of abusive (including behaviors that aren't legitimately abusive) behavior while never mentioning abusive women, therefore only dealing with half of the problem? Aren't women biologically programmed to care for their offspring? How are women who are abusers escaping biology? What is wrong with these people?

[Leonard D Neubache]

Because the women abusing their children are the same self-centred headcases that divorced their husband at the drop of a hat (or never knew his name in the first place) and have blown a fuse trying to raise kids by themselves.

I suppose if half of these kids even had fathers then the statistics might be a little more even.

[JayR]

(09-17-2017 09:12 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Because the women abusing their children are the same self-centred headcases that divorced their husband at the drop of a hat (or never knew his name in the first place) and have blown a fuse trying to raise kids by themselves.

I suppose if half of these kids even had fathers then the statistics might be a little more even.

Right, it might be as simple as opportunity. With custody going to mothers over 80% of the time after divorce, they have the kids more, and so have more opportunity to abuse or kill their children. I'd like to see a study that adjusted for this variable.

Statistically, the safest place for child is in a home with his biological father. Despite that, we continue to make policy that pushes fathers out of homes.

[debeguiled]

Golden Uterus Complex. (GUC)

Meaning the women has a Golden Uterus (GU)


http://shrink4men.com/2011/05/17/does-yo...en-uterus/

The link is to an article listing 15 characteristics of the GU.

Relevant characteristics quoted below:

Quote:

Golden uteri, despite the sense of superiority and entitlement they derive from the title “mother,” are typically lousy parents if not downright abusive parents. GUs are often the high-conflict, abusive personality-disordered parental alienators. They are the women who expect others, including their own children, to sacrifice everything at the altars they erect to themselves. Golden uteri lay golden eggs (children) and milk their motherhood, the children and you for all you’re worth.

Quote:

3. Disobedience is abuse to the golden uterus. If the children, father/husband/ex-husband doesn’t heed her demands, the GU perceives it as abuse. If you don’t parent the same way the GU parents (or mis-parents); you’re a bad parent. If you challenge the GU’s decisions, she’ll punish you by denying you access to the kids or taking you to court. “A GU believes that because she gave birth, she has exclusive rights to all decision-making related to said child, no matter what anyone else (including the courts or the father) say” (anonymous source).

This applies to the children, too. If they disobey mom or have the temerity to have their own feelings and opinions (you know, what childhood experts call healthy childhood development) that differ from the GU’s feelings and opinions, it’s an act of high treason. There are consequences for this.

Quote:

11. Children are possessions; not their own persons. “The GU views the child as her possession. The GU will take all the kudos for birthing a child, but none of the responsibility. If someone tries to point out the discrepancies, the GU will will heave out emotional garbage to cover up their horrible parenting. The GU only views the child in context to herself. Everything is about her” (anonymous source).

Quote:

14. Motherhood is a title and a power trip. “The golden uterus views mothering as a title rather than a relationship and a set of behaviors. Mothering requires selflessness at times. It requires sacrifice at times. It requires paying attention to the child and putting your time and energy into meeting their needs, which also requires seeing the child as a unique and separate individual from yourself, not a mirror of your own thoughts, feelings, and needs. A golden uterus mother fails at mothering and instead uses her title to extort things from others ‘in the name of the child.’ Essentially, they use their offspring as a way to get their own needs met” (anonymous source).

[rpg]

If women don't have a man to shit on children serve as the next best thing.
Eminem's mother is a perfect example.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

+ because they spend more time with them and statistics are a bitch
+ child-raising was never meant to be a single-gender enterprise, but a joint team effort - the weaknesses and strengths of both genders balancing themselves out

Currently the laws are so incredibly slanted towards women that even psycho-bitches with a legion of criminal abusive boyfriends will get full custody while good simp Beta dad gets zero. I would add the endangerment to violent boyfriends to the list of abuse by women - if you do that, then women don't beat men by a mere 60-40 ratio, they beat men by likely 85-15. And that says it all really considering that we have x-times the testosterone, aggressive potential and sexual drive.

[Tytalus]

Zelcorpion hits the nail correctly, IMO, while psychological predilections are fun speculation, a lot of it simply comes down to more time spent with children, try by a factor or 2 or 3, easily, even in most hetero relationships.

[Aurini]

There's an r/K explanation for why single mothers are such terrible mothers:

Quote:

They don’t know it, but their behavioral drives are the yin to a violent rapist’s yang, designed to produce a model of reproduction which favors the women who make themselves available to rapists most readily, and the rapists who are most aggressive and prolific. With enough time and selective breeding, we would end up breeding like sharks, where males surround females, violently bite their pectoral fins, pin them to the sandy seabed, and force intercourse upon them. After mating the bloody female struggles up and swims off stunned, to eventually give birth to her own violent rapist offspring.

It is ironic, because it is a form of behavioral programming which actually sets the afflicted females up to be violently traumatized by the act of reproduction, rather than reward them for it – unless the leftist woman is secretly desirous of that outcome and is not telling us about it.

As I look on it, it is tough to not see the extraordinary evil of such a violent, rapist reproductive scheme were it to arise, especially when contrasted with the K-selected model where men compete and demonstrate fitness in an effort to win the affections of females who stand by them for love and loyalty.

r vs K is evil vs good, and nightmares vs dreams.