[godfather dust]

(10-05-2018 10:08 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  

Read JBP's other social media posts surrounding the issues. Bonus point if you've seen his debates with the Weinstein brothers (giving context to the first tweet). This is just sarcasm (to make fun of Eric Weinstein's long-winded and convoluted point/tweet).

I went through Peterson's tweets back to October 1st to see if you were correct about it being out of context. I'm going to have to say you are wrong, there is no other stuff about Kavanaugh. Unless you have some context (in which case you should share it.)

[Leonard D Neubache]

(10-05-2018 07:48 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

...He isn't by any means my enemy...

He's shilling for the idea that a gyno-supremacist lynch mob can decide who can and who can't be on SCOTUS.

Imagine you went for a job and three women you'd fucked and chucked protested the office, calling you a rapist. Then Peterson arrived to suggest "you should be given the job and then refuse it, back to the unemployment line, bucko."

How is this man not your enemy?

[rotekz]

Up to now Owen Benjamin has been a massive fan of Jordan Peterson but following the Kavanaugh betrayal is absolutely furious. Benjamin calls him evil and hypocrticital for putting the left-wing lynch mob before due process and accuses JP of being a leftist and sucking the devil's cock. This is a very impressive rant and exposes the machinations of the people behind the 'Intellectual Dark Web' of which they tried to make Benjamin a figure.

[NoMoreTO]

(10-05-2018 11:47 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 07:48 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

...He isn't by any means my enemy...

He's shilling for the idea that a gyno-supremacist lynch mob can decide who can and who can't be on SCOTUS.

Imagine you went for a job and three women you'd fucked and chucked protested the office, calling you a rapist. Then Peterson arrived to suggest "you should be given the job and then refuse it, back to the unemployment line, bucko."

How is this man not your enemy?

That's some sort of slice of my quote there, MSM style.

On balance, not the enemy.

Not my Enemy:
- Ripped apart Cathy Newman on Gender Equity on BBC Hard Talk
- Pushed back on Gender bender Laws in Canadian Senate
- Promotes Traditional Family
- Believes in the patriarchy
- Raises mens issues and pushes back on 'some' ideas.
- Has a great video 12 ideas for 21st century conservatism
- Works Hard & Fucks his old wife

Things I don't like
- Very gay that he cries in public (or on video)
- Posted a white knight tweet about Kavenaugh stepping (which he is backing off in another tweet)
- Took tradthot out of his free speech weekend
- Won't address race and IQ or give tough answers on immigration
- Shill on JQ
- Daughter has slutty Instagram photos

On the tweet: He isn't pushing this garbage, but he is being weak on a problem that needs a strong stance. And you're right, I don't want that garbage. Blasey Ford can go back to her hole after this and Kavanaugh will be on the supreme court.

Im an independent contractor, so we can fuck whoever we want in the office. We don't fall under HR rules and guidelines, so I can bang interns as far as I know. If I bang its usually towards the end of the contract and someone I don't work directly with, then I move on!

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(10-06-2018 01:33 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

On balance, not the enemy.

Not my Enemy:
- Ripped apart Cathy Newman on Gender Equity on BBC Hard Talk
- Pushed back on Gender bender Laws in Canadian Senate
- Promotes Traditional Family
- Believes in the patriarchy
- Raises mens issues and pushes back on 'some' ideas.
- Has a great video 12 ideas for 21st century conservatism
- Works Hard & Fucks his old wife

Things I don't like
- Very gay that he cries in public (or on video)
- Posted a white knight tweet about Kavenaugh stepping (which he is backing off in another tweet)
- Took tradthot out of his free speech weekend
- Won't address race and IQ or give tough answers on immigration
- Shill on JQ
- Daughter has slutty Instagram photos

You left out a few:
Things I don't like
- shill for Agend21 UN
- boasted to SJW that he veered thousands of men from joining pro-White pro-Western movements - aka those being even slightly to the right of him
- attacks all kind of ethnic interests of European and Euro-descended tribes, but similarly to SJWs promotes those of American Indians and all other non-Whites as fantastic
- some of his dreams as told by himself in his books are on the verge of psychotic - wanting to fuck and cannibalize his cousin, rubbing the hairy vagina of his grandmother in his face etc. - does not sound healthy to me
- pre-selected by Jewish lobby groups to be our goy hero in the vein of Ben Shapiro or Rubin - here have some conservatives goy

[Transsimian]

Most important thing...
The bucko needs to clean his room

[Leonard D Neubache]

(10-06-2018 01:33 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 11:47 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 07:48 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

...He isn't by any means my enemy...

He's shilling for the idea that a gyno-supremacist lynch mob can decide who can and who can't be on SCOTUS.

Imagine you went for a job and three women you'd fucked and chucked protested the office, calling you a rapist. Then Peterson arrived to suggest "you should be given the job and then refuse it, back to the unemployment line, bucko."

How is this man not your enemy?

That's some sort of slice of my quote there, MSM style.
...

I try to only quote the part I'm referring to avoid growing walls of quotation text in threads. I'm careful to add ellipsis where parts are cut to denote it, and people who want the whole quote can find your post easily enough. This is common forum etiquette.

[StrikeBack]

(10-05-2018 11:28 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 10:08 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  

Read JBP's other social media posts surrounding the issues. Bonus point if you've seen his debates with the Weinstein brothers (giving context to the first tweet). This is just sarcasm (to make fun of Eric Weinstein's long-winded and convoluted point/tweet).

I went through Peterson's tweets back to October 1st to see if you were correct about it being out of context. I'm going to have to say you are wrong, there is no other stuff about Kavanaugh. Unless you have some context (in which case you should share it.)

I don't follow him on Twitter, just Facebook and Youtube. Just the last couple of days, he shared two of these articles related to the Kavanaugh drama and commented:

1. "A warning (and the situation in Canada is just as dangerous): don't underestimate the degree to which political correctness has corrupted the law schools, or how dangerous that corruption will be. It's already been devastating in Canada:"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/tomorrows-e...1538695941

2. "And today on the New York Times"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/04/opini...tions.html

Both are pro-Kavanaugh articles.

I'm fairly used to his use of sarcasm and facetiousness when posting on his Facebook. Knowing his debate history of the Weinstein brothers, I believe he was just driving Eric's logic to its conclusion to show how silly it is.

Anyway, I'm sure someone will ask him about it at one of his next public appearances, then the man can answer for himself. I wouldn't trust the usual frothing at the mouth mob around here or elsewhere on the Internet, who would jump at the first chance to denounce him as some kind of charlatan. Seen enough of that treatment dissed out at President Trump too since he ran for presidency.

[loremipsum]

It's all in the eyes bucko.
Look at that room and look at that face. If that is not a man hiding depression then I dont know what is.
Practice what you preach Petercuck.

[Leonard D Neubache]

One would have to concede that it would be pretty fucking stupid to play sarcasm wars on Twitter when you don't have an established public record for being overly sarcastic on Twitter (ie James Woods).

The only reason I think Strikeback may have a point in retrospect is that if Peterson were controlled then this would have the be the dumbest and most pointless gesture for his theoretical masters to burn the man's credibility for. It would be like spending tens of millions of dollars on a Rembrandt and then using it to start a camp fire. The only reason I initially lent it credibility is that Soros and his minions are visibly so desperate to keep Kavanaugh out of the SCOTUS that they're burning every ounce of political capital they can muster. IF Peterson was a globalist stooge then it's possible they were attempting to leverage his sway in some kind of last ditch attempt to swing the public mood, but that's probably a bit far fetched.

Maybe he was drunk and forgot smug sarcasm is hard to read in text. He'll walk it back, regardless, and maybe he'll learn to stay off the bottle or off Twitter.

p.s. Gab is in savage mode and the comments on Twitter are not much better. Regardless of whether Peterson was serious about those tweets he has handed his enemies the dagger they will use to shank him.

[scorpion]

This is actually a good thing. I've always maintained that Peterson is basically just a self-help guru who appeals uniquely and inexplicably to a certain sort of alienated young man. And I think his work has helped a lot of those young men break free from self-destructive behavioral patterns and set themselves on course to live a better life. But now that Peterson has put his foot in his mouth with this Kavanaugh tweet, we'll see if his legion of followers move on from Peterson and continue getting red-pilled, or if they maintain allegiance to their messianic leader. Judging by responses so far, I think it's mostly the former. Which is what I've said all along: Peterson has always just been a gateway to red-pill thought. Once you see the Matrix, you don't go back. You can't climb up the rabbit hole once you get past a certain point. You've got to make it to the bottom. Peterson always denied being alr-right or even of the right, but the fact is he acted as a bridge to the right and soured many thousands of young men on leftism, men who otherwise would likely have fallen into SJWism. This has always been his greatest contribution, even if it was accidental and unconscious on his part.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Or maybe Peterson thought: "Uh - oh - I offended my Patreon-buddies by showing them the extent of my leftist beliefs. Better backtrack fast before my believers drop my ass."

[Teedub]

(10-05-2018 06:30 PM)MidJack Wrote:  

This is the strongest evidence yet that Peterson is controlled opposition.

I prefer the phrase 'allowed opposition', and I think this is exactly what he is — but he's making a lot of money for his family so I can't say 100% I wouldn't be the same as him. I agree with Scorpion and others. I was probably wrong about him, and I apologise for defending him so aggressively. I was also wrong about Milo when guys were saying he was a degenerate who would burn himself out - they were right. If Tommy Robinson turns out to be what some say then I might as well pack my bags and leave this place!

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(10-06-2018 01:35 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 06:30 PM)MidJack Wrote:  

This is the strongest evidence yet that Peterson is controlled opposition.

I prefer the phrase 'allowed opposition', and I think this is exactly what he is — but he's making a lot of money for his family so I can't say 100% I wouldn't be the same as him. I agree with Scorpion and others. I was probably wrong about him, and I apologise for defending him so aggressively. I was also wrong about Milo when guys were saying he was a degenerate who would burn himself out - they were right. If Tommy Robinson turns out to be what some say then I might as well pack my bags and leave this place!

There is always a place for you on the side to the right of Tommy Robinson. The funny part was that the normies utterly could not understand why non-European-heritage British guys could actually work for the BNP and even be buddies with the old Mark Collett (who seemed to have been more far-right than the current Mark Collett). Most views adjacent on the Alt Right - somewhat pro-White are also pro-Western and simply are more honest and make sense. They are more observable with the policies of China, South Korea, Japan, Israel, heck even Uganda whose politicians were concerned about a few hundred women marrying Chinese men - it was a big deal over there as if they would become black riceballs in no time over those few marriages.

Though I doubt that you are wrong on Tommy - he is not approved opposition - seems to be more a bloke who stumbles through stuff any way he can. I would not hitch my wagon to that horse either, because it's a platform that only warns about Islam and nothing else.

Gays and the right don't mix for too long. They often don't have any skin in the game long-term because they are not going to think forward to the future of their children and grandchildren. Recently the gay Youtuber Alternative Hypothesis who strongly advocated for a White ethno-state left and went full civic nationalism, because by his reasoning - "fuck Europeans if they cannot help themselves". Sure - he and his boyfriend go and blow some cock - what's it to him.

Peterson is just approved opposition - a classical leftie boomer with the right kind of views about the world. They don't even have to warn him what not to say - he self-censors like all the left of old - and he censors anyone to the right who might save Western civilization.

Even with him as a prime minister you would get a 30% European Canada, but no more gender pronouns. Great - because Soros agrees with Peterson on that as well.

[Gmac]

JP is confused. I think he should probably stay the hell away from American politics and with what he knows best until he gets a better grasp.

[MidJack]

This is an insider perspective worth its weight in gold.

(10-06-2018 01:31 AM)rotekz Wrote:  

Up to now Owen Benjamin has been a massive fan of Jordan Peterson but following the Kavanaugh betrayal is absolutely furious. Benjamin calls him evil and hypocrticital for putting the left-wing lynch mob before due process and accuses JP of being a leftist and sucking the devil's cock. This is a very impressive rant and exposes the machinations of the people behind the 'Intellectual Dark Web' of which they tried to make Benjamin a figure.

[911]

(10-06-2018 01:35 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 06:30 PM)MidJack Wrote:  

This is the strongest evidence yet that Peterson is controlled opposition.

I prefer the phrase 'allowed opposition', and I think this is exactly what he is — but he's making a lot of money for his family so I can't say 100% I wouldn't be the same as him. I agree with Scorpion and others. I was probably wrong about him, and I apologise for defending him so aggressively. I was also wrong about Milo when guys were saying he was a degenerate who would burn himself out - they were right. If Tommy Robinson turns out to be what some say then I might as well pack my bags and leave this place!

Zel is spot on about Peterson, he's just a purple pill center-left Toronto boomer who has obviously steered away from engaging his flock with the deeper levels of truth. The definition of controlled opposition.

I think I have been the harshest critic of Milo right from the start on this board, because the idea that a pedo-homo degenerate could be upheld as some kind of role model and leader of the woke right is deeply flawed to say the least.

Tommy Robinson is controlled opposition as well, he's a low-level con artist who is posing as an idealistic British nationalist martyr. He's 100% zionist owned and is a major propaganda cog in their project to take over European woke nationalism, turning western right into zio-nationalist movements who worship their main owners/oppressors. Tommy will constantly rail about Pakis and muzzie immigrants but will never mention who has been pushing for this, and what their motives are.

Once you understand this, you can see very clearly that TR is a shill.

[Easy_C]

(10-06-2018 07:38 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

One would have to concede that it would be pretty fucking stupid to play sarcasm wars on Twitter when you don't have an established public record for being overly sarcastic on Twitter (ie James Woods).

The only reason I think Strikeback may have a point in retrospect is that if Peterson were controlled then this would have the be the dumbest and most pointless gesture for his theoretical masters to burn the man's credibility for. It would be like spending tens of millions of dollars on a Rembrandt and then using it to start a camp fire. The only reason I initially lent it credibility is that Soros and his minions are visibly so desperate to keep Kavanaugh out of the SCOTUS that they're burning every ounce of political capital they can muster. IF Peterson was a globalist stooge then it's possible they were attempting to leverage his sway in some kind of last ditch attempt to swing the public mood, but that's probably a bit far fetched.

Maybe he was drunk and forgot smug sarcasm is hard to read in text. He'll walk it back, regardless, and maybe he'll learn to stay off the bottle or off Twitter.

p.s. Gab is in savage mode and the comments on Twitter are not much better. Regardless of whether Peterson was serious about those tweets he has handed his enemies the dagger they will use to shank him.

I think the right way to analyze Peterson is the same way you'd look at any other Ivory Tower Academic. They're much more concerned with the abstract and the theoretical than the practicality for the most part, and most of them I've seen comment on the Trump thing (some in my personal feed on social media) seem to hate Trump more because of the optics (he's crass, he's tempermentally unfit, he's an irate bully, etc) than because of any policy position he has...and quite frequently will even concede that he's implementing polices they don't have any objection to.

Double that up with Peterson because he's born and raised in a country where key aspects of their legal and government framework is very different from ours.


So basically I can see why someone coming from his perspective would be "troubled" or something about Kavanaugh and also attack the rage mobs. In fact that's exactly what I would expect someone like him to do.

Peterson isn't any kind of right wing hero or rally leader. He's just an academic who happens to have some good arguments that effectively deconstruct social marxism.

[Higgs Bosun]

(10-06-2018 01:33 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

On balance, not the enemy.

Not my Enemy:
- Ripped apart Cathy Newman on Gender Equity on BBC Hard Talk
- Pushed back on Gender bender Laws in Canadian Senate
- Promotes Traditional Family
- Believes in the patriarchy
- Raises mens issues and pushes back on 'some' ideas.
- Has a great video 12 ideas for 21st century conservatism
- Works Hard & Fucks his old wife

Yes, that Cathy Newman interview was very awesome. Juicy, juicy shit and I will not deny it. Jordan Peterson has come out with some good stuff, I think we can all agree with that.

The thing is, I would not call myself a fisherman, but I have caught fish before. When you're fishing, you give the fish some tasty, delicious, irresistible morsels at the end of the hook. But it is not the bait that is the point, the point is the hook.

This whole Jordan Peterson saga has been just a sad, pathetic episode of "Fishing with Shlomo" and boy oh boy uncle Shlomo, did we reel in a haul of Dumb White Goys today! I frankly wish I was a member of the tribe, because the stupidity of the goy team I am stuck on by accident of birth just utterly demotivates me sometimes.

[NoMoreTO]

(10-07-2018 11:24 PM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  

(10-06-2018 01:33 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

On balance, not the enemy.

Not my Enemy:
- Ripped apart Cathy Newman on Gender Equity on BBC Hard Talk

Yes, that Cathy Newman interview was very awesome. Juicy, juicy shit and I will not deny it. Jordan Peterson has come out with some good stuff, I think we can all agree with that.
…
This whole Jordan Peterson saga has been just a sad, pathetic episode of "Fishing with Shlomo" and boy oh boy uncle Shlomo, did we reel in a haul of Dumb White Goys today! I frankly wish I was a member of the tribe, because the stupidity of the goy team I am stuck on by accident of birth just utterly demotivates me sometimes.

To me Peterson did legitimately go viral with his screaming at the students about free speech, and then again with Kathy Newman. But he already had a following from putting his lectures on youtube and some tv panel appearances on public Ontario television. And yes, well aware he did work for the UN globalists, but they were kind of running the world back then so its actually a good checkmark on his resume. He also did business and personality consulting for some extra coin on top of his University Salary of appx 200K(?) . Its publically disclosed if anyone wants to look it up.

His weighing in on politics has been mixed in my mind. Yes, I still understand that he is controlled opposition or not truly conservative. We do not need to be reprogrammed. On the other side, he has given lots of pushback on SJW views and perhaps deprogrammed some screwballs on that side and got some ideas chucked.

Ultimately, where I lose respect for him is his move into the intellectual dark web and some sort of public commentator. His better work is his psychology stuff, the lobster and all the study of ancient relgions, nietchze, and the cold war. He seems to have lost his edge, maybe he should disappear for a while like he has said.

Hopefully when he does he Exodus Bible study he gets away from the politics. If he tries to blue pill the bible I will puke, he needs to stick to the stories themselves.

I'm with Scorpion that he can also be a gateway to Red Pill, but not lately though I would say. The Kavanaugh tweet was ridiculous, he took a lot of flack for it on twitter so he'll step back on that least if hes smart. But we're watching.

[NoMoreTO]

(10-05-2018 11:47 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 07:48 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

...He isn't by any means my enemy...

He's shilling for the idea that a gyno-supremacist lynch mob can decide who can and who can't be on SCOTUS.

...

How is this man not your enemy?

Would you say the typical Peterson follower is probably a Trump Voter or here in Canada a Doug Ford Voter or a Cuckservative Andrew Sheer Voter?

No agreement on the SCOTUS tweet or the idea itself. Like I said, he is not a leader in anyway, but not the enemy because of one retarded viewpoint. Like he always said, he didn't want to say anything totally stupid, turns out he has..

[Teedub]

(10-07-2018 05:30 PM)911 Wrote:  

Tommy Robinson is controlled opposition as well, he's a low-level con artist who is posing as an idealistic British nationalist martyr. He's 100% zionist owned and is a major propaganda cog in their project to take over European woke nationalism, turning western right into zio-nationalist movements who worship their main owners/oppressors. Tommy will constantly rail about Pakis and muzzie immigrants but will never mention who has been pushing for this, and what their motives are.

Once you understand this, you can see very clearly that TR is a shill.

Zel/Simeon and I went into this on another thread so I'm not going to repeat the arguments, as it'll derail this thread. State assets and what not don't get thrown into jail and locked in cells with hostile Muslims at the direct request of the Home Secretary. I'll give you that he works with pro-Israel groups, that's undeniable, but I don't think the JQ is his fight simply because he doesn't see it as a direct thread (Jews aren't taking over Luton, blowing themselves up, and raping his cousin). "It's not his beer" was Zel's phrase I think. And I think I've said in the past (not to you) "take TR from what he is and not what you want him to be". He's been involved in his struggle before even the EDL, as he discusses in the Oxford talk, and his cousin was drugged and raped by Muslim gangs... when you join all the dots up "con artist" certainly doesn't come to my mind.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

< If Tommy was controlled opposition, then he should have demanded a multi-million-dollar contract in the fake alternative media, not an elimination of all his businesses and a prison stint where he had to survive on an apple and a can of tuna a day while Muslims were throwing shit through his window in scorching heat.

I am also pro Israel, but strongly against Zionist wars and their meddling in the West. And trust me - I haven't got a shekel for my words - in fact they would call me an enemy if they knew what I was writing in some threads. I don't care - I am seeing truth as I see it.

Tommy does what he thinks might work - curbing Islam in the West is the top priority even if top-tier Jews are for flooding the West with them and thus causing it to happen. But seriously you guys sometimes excuse Islam too much - if millions of Buddhists or Jainists came over then we could grumble at best about some slow replacement of Westerners, but no one would get raped, murdered, enriched by Jihad. Tommy would likely be still having his plumbing business and not drinking too much would be his biggest problem in life.

There are Jews out there who are pro-Israel, pro-White, pro-Western, anti-Zionist and even Alt-Right. They are not shills just because they don't want to murder every Jew out there. Seriously....

[Teedub]

(10-08-2018 04:47 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

< If Tommy was controlled opposition, then he should have demanded a multi-million-dollar contract in the fake alternative media, not an elimination of all his businesses and a prison stint where he had to survive on an apple and a can of tuna a day while Muslims were throwing shit through his window in scorching heat.

I'm laughing to myself because it sounds like an exaggeration, but it's actually the truth. He'll probably be back in jail by the end of the month as well, since his hearing was pushed back from September to October (or maybe November).

[Leonard D Neubache]

(10-08-2018 12:26 AM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 11:47 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-05-2018 07:48 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  

...He isn't by any means my enemy...

He's shilling for the idea that a gyno-supremacist lynch mob can decide who can and who can't be on SCOTUS.

...

How is this man not your enemy?

Would you say the typical Peterson follower is probably a Trump Voter or here in Canada a Doug Ford Voter or a Cuckservative Andrew Sheer Voter?

No agreement on the SCOTUS tweet or the idea itself. Like I said, he is not a leader in anyway, but not the enemy because of one retarded viewpoint. Like he always said, he didn't want to say anything totally stupid, turns out he has..

My problem with Peterson which I've made clear over many posts is that he's basically a tar-pit on the road to reaching levels of political awareness that might actually make a difference in the West.

If he was just selling self help then I wouldn't care, but this "non-political not-a-leader" guy openly brags about pulling young white men away from identarian politics while giving every other race and tribe a total pass.

Identarian politics is going to be a necessary survival strategy for whites moving into the next few decades but the so-called "non-political" Peterson is desperate to freeze as many young white men as possible just a teensy bit North of using tranny pronouns.

But this revolves around a regular theme with Dear Professor.

He's an intellectual giant striding through the West, until he fucks up, then he's just a well meaning old pops type who we can all dismiss outside of his chosen field of expertise until everyone forgets his fuckup then he's once again an intellectual giant striding through the West!

He's not political, except he keeps talking about politics to his millions of followers who all regard him as an intellectual giant striding through the West, until he reveals himself as a Left wing blue pill boomer foisting his 1990 world order on a generation living in a (relative) 2018 political dystopia, but soon everyone forgets and they can go back to convincing themselves he's not political.

Here's the reality. If you have as many book sales and twitter followers as Peterson then you are a leader by default. If you cut your public teeth fighting tranny pronouns then you are political, whether you like it or not. Now, if you try extremely hard you can back out of politics, but what you can't do is dip your toe twice a day and then claim "I'm just a self help guy."

That's bullshit, particularly in light of the Kavanaugh tweets.

He is an enemy every bit as much as the guy who tosses his comrade's swords away in the dead of night "because he is a man of peace".

I don't really care who he votes for or what uniform he wears. He preaches mantras to his flock that will inevitably lead to the dispossession of their civic birthright.

As such, he is an enemy.