[Buck Wild]

(01-05-2017 10:57 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

Who cares? No one will take this bitch seriously.

[RichardCranium]

What kills me the most with the daffy broads is they don't realize that if there were no men their entire society would collapse in about 45 minutes. Because Lindsey West and TrigglyPuff are going to be pulling third shift at the sewage plant and picking up the garbage at 5 AM every Wednesday and Saturday and keeping all the offshore oil rings functioning right?

Oh wait it's the hard work of MEN that lets you sit in an air conditioned office and have that cushy $72,000 a year paper-pushing HR job.

[EDantes]

(01-05-2017 02:39 PM)RichardCranium Wrote:  

What kills me the most with the daffy broads is they don't realize that if there were no men their entire society would collapse in about 45 minutes. Because Lindsey West and TrigglyPuff are going to be pulling third shift at the sewage plant and picking up the garbage at 5 AM every Wednesday and Saturday and keeping all the offshore oil rings functioning right?

Oh wait it's the hard work of MEN that lets you sit in an air conditioned office and have that cushy $72,000 a year paper-pushing HR job.

The ironic thing is that from a sociological definition, a housewife is more 'empowered' than a single feminist working for a corporation.

Sociologically "heirarchy" as defined as having people "below" you who do things for you, which is why a military general is at the "top" despite the grunts on the front-line doing the most physical labor, since he commands the grunts who fight for him.

So of course, a classy married housewife with a husband who actually wants to protect and provide for her, and children who she gets to manage, is much more empowered than a single woman slaving for a corporation owned and operated by rich white malee who has to be told what to do each day by white male superiors.

Probably the reason that so many feminists are miserable and hate their lives compared to wives and mothers; much of the 'empowerment' PR put out by corporations is just propaganda created by rich white fat cats to trick idiotic women into thinking they're "empowering" themselves by voluntarily becoming corporate drones controlled by white male executives for 50 or more hours a week, or flashing their tits on camera for basement dwelling nerds with porn subscription to beat off to, so the joke's on them, lol

Hell, even a woman in an Islamic country who has enough 'influence' over her husband that he'll kill a guy for seeing her naked is more empowered than drunk Western slut who can't even get a guy to call her back after a night of drunken sex

[debeguiled]

Surprised no one has posted this yet. She reads the forum and the manosphere. And makes videos to get attention from men:

[Buck Wild]

(01-05-2017 02:53 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Surprised no one has posted this yet. She reads the forum and the manosphere. And makes videos to get attention from men:

Yes, and why are we giving it to her?

[debeguiled]

That is a very good question.

[Tim in real life]

Hurry, ask her directly if she had fantasies of Cthulhu.

Yes, I'm purposely being sardonic, just to make a point here.

Whoever did that video really took VALAR MORGHULIS too personally.

[IvanDrago]

Male pattern baldness is a bitch.

[Matsufubu]

(01-05-2017 02:48 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(01-05-2017 02:39 PM)RichardCranium Wrote:  

What kills me the most with the daffy broads is they don't realize that if there were no men their entire society would collapse in about 45 minutes. Because Lindsey West and TrigglyPuff are going to be pulling third shift at the sewage plant and picking up the garbage at 5 AM every Wednesday and Saturday and keeping all the offshore oil rings functioning right?

Oh wait it's the hard work of MEN that lets you sit in an air conditioned office and have that cushy $72,000 a year paper-pushing HR job.

The ironic thing is that from a sociological definition, a housewife is more 'empowered' than a single feminist working for a corporation.

Sociologically "heirarchy" as defined as having people "below" you who do things for you, which is why a military general is at the "top" despite the grunts on the front-line doing the most physical labor, since he commands the grunts who fight for him.

So of course, a classy married housewife with a husband who actually wants to protect and provide for her, and children who she gets to manage, is much more empowered than a single woman slaving for a corporation owned and operated by rich white malee who has to be told what to do each day by white male superiors.

Probably the reason that so many feminists are miserable and hate their lives compared to wives and mothers; much of the 'empowerment' PR put out by corporations is just propaganda created by rich white fat cats to trick idiotic women into thinking they're "empowering" themselves by voluntarily becoming corporate drones controlled by white male executives for 50 or more hours a week, or flashing their tits on camera for basement dwelling nerds with porn subscription to beat off to, so the joke's on them, lol

Hell, even a woman in an Islamic country who has enough 'influence' over her husband that he'll kill a guy for seeing her naked is more empowered than drunk Western slut who can't even get a guy to call her back after a night of drunken sex

[RatInTheWoods]

WB slump buster.

[Abelard Lindsey]

I think it was Camilla Paglia who said that if women ran the world, industrial civilization would last until the next oil change was required.