[scorpio]

(08-16-2011 09:50 AM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

If you had a choice between the hottest chick in the world who was a wretched lay, just couldn't fuck/suck the way you like it, and a real ugly chick that fucked you like no other and gave you head like she had bad table manners, which would you choose? And yes, you have to be seen in public with the ugly bitch, and introduce her to your friends too, no exceptions.

This question is utterly and ridiculously easy to answer.

The hot chick should be your gf, and the ugly chick should be your fwb. The hot chick gives you status, which you could parlay to find another attractive girl who can fuck better. Ugly chicks provide no status, and should be locked away for night-time use only.

If you know how to fuck, the skillz of the girl in bed becomes practically irrelevant b/c it's all about you pleasing you using her body as the prop/receptacle/stimulant.

The best head I ever got was from a fat chick.

[Dash Global]

(08-16-2011 11:21 AM)scorpio Wrote:  

(08-16-2011 09:50 AM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

If you had a choice between the hottest chick in the world who was a wretched lay, just couldn't fuck/suck the way you like it, and a real ugly chick that fucked you like no other and gave you head like she had bad table manners, which would you choose? And yes, you have to be seen in public with the ugly bitch, and introduce her to your friends too, no exceptions.

This question is utterly and ridiculously easy to answer.

The hot chick should be your gf, and the ugly chick should be your fwb. The hot chick gives you status, which you could parlay to find another attractive girl who can fuck better. Ugly chicks provide no status, and should be locked away for night-time use only.

If you know how to fuck, the skillz of the girl in bed becomes practically irrelevant b/c it's all about you pleasing you using her body as the prop/receptacle/stimulant.

The best head I ever got was from a fat chick.

This

I like the using the girl as a propt reference. Seriously if you cant propt a girls body for a great ass pounding doggy session or it you cant throw a girls legs over your shoulders and pound the pussy than I dont know what to say.... lol

[Ugg]

Whom would you rather . . .

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 11:25 AM)Dash Global Wrote:  

(08-16-2011 11:21 AM)scorpio Wrote:  

(08-16-2011 09:50 AM)Pusscrook Wrote:  

If you had a choice between the hottest chick in the world who was a wretched lay, just couldn't fuck/suck the way you like it, and a real ugly chick that fucked you like no other and gave you head like she had bad table manners, which would you choose? And yes, you have to be seen in public with the ugly bitch, and introduce her to your friends too, no exceptions.

This question is utterly and ridiculously easy to answer.

The hot chick should be your gf, and the ugly chick should be your fwb. The hot chick gives you status, which you could parlay to find another attractive girl who can fuck better. Ugly chicks provide no status, and should be locked away for night-time use only.

If you know how to fuck, the skillz of the girl in bed becomes practically irrelevant b/c it's all about you pleasing you using her body as the prop/receptacle/stimulant.

The best head I ever got was from a fat chick.

This

I like the using the girl as a propt reference. Seriously if you cant propt a girls body for a great ass pounding doggy session or it you cant throw a girls legs over your shoulders and pound the pussy than I dont know what to say.... lol

Well your claim is that you can make a bitch fuck you just the way you want in one day, regardless of how fine, stuck up, arrogant she is. So my follow up to you is this: let's say one day turns into a week, or a month (which is quite possible) would you fuck the ugly bitch who you know would be able to service you accordingly without any training or is she just out period? Would you continue to train the real hot bitch who isn't really cooperating as fast as you thought, regardless of how long it would take?

[Dash Global]

@Pussycrook

Like the other poster pointed out if if for some reason the female is mentally handicap and just plain dumb as rocks. I can still get my nut with simply positioning her body for her. She doesnt or wouldnt even have to move or anything, and I would have no problem busting my nut with doggy or missionary.

So im taking the hot chick everytime.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 12:51 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

@Pussycrook

Like the other poster pointed out if if for some reason the female is mentally handicap and just plain dumb as rocks. I can still get my nut with simply positioning her body for her. She doesnt or wouldnt even have to move or anything, and I would have no problem busted my nut with doggy or missionary.

So im taking the hot chick everytime.

So you say this>>>"she doesn't or wouldn't have to move or anything and you would have no problem busting your "nut" .> This would classify as a good fuck? a dead roach that you positioned in order to get off seems are bit meaningless , unless of course as long as you "nut" ,it's a good fuck. Am i getting this right Dash? I ask you this because my original post was distinct about one who could fuck you really well ,just the way you like it, and one who cant. I guess I have a different definition of a good fuck, as opposed to "nutting" in a bitch.

[Moma]

I would go with the busted lizard to a degree. I have had this experience before. I've banged hot lizards with crap punanies and I have banged a particular buttaface lizards with the bom ass puzzy (I always hit her under the cover of nightfall).
I couldn't believe that I kept returning but it's like she had some magic in her puddy..I used to hit that relentlessly.

[Dash Global]

I understand what your saying.

It wouldnt be the BEST FUCK, but for me a good fuck is a combinations of things. How tight the pussy is, how plump the ass and tits are, her ability to work the dick.

For me I can have a good fuck with only doggy style on a chick with a tight pussy and phat ass.

So I have no reason to pick the ugly girl. At the end of the day getting my nut is the most important and I can get that from both chicks. Therefore Im gonna pick the fine ass girl everytime. Without even thinking twice.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 01:05 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

I understand what your saying.

It wouldnt be the BEST FUCK, but for me a good fuck is a combinations of things. How tight the pussy is, how plump the ass and tits are, her ability to work the dick.

For me I can have a good fuck with only doggy style on a chick with a tight pussy and phat ass.

So I have no reason to pick the ugly girl. At the end of the day getting my nut is the most important and I can get that from both chicks. Therefore Im gonna pick the fine ass girl everytime. Without even thinking twice.

Ok, now I'm understanding your logic. As long as you get a "nut",(she could be dead as a doorknob) and no matter how long you have to "trainnnnnnn" this hot whore, (be it a century, or a day) you're sticking with the hot bitch, because she's hot and you will nut regardless. THen you say one of the things she would have to have in the "combination" was the ability to work the dick? Well...... let's just remember the hot bitch cant fuck at all I as stated in my original post. But i get it, you would will yourself to nut and the thing that matters most is that she's hot,time is of no consequence, is that right?

[Dash Global]

@Pusscrook

Generally speaking that is the jist of my reasoning.

But your missing a big point, atleast for me.

I can have a great/good fuck with only doggy as long as the female has a phat ass and tight pussy with the girl doing pretty much nothing but holding still in the right position. Doggy is my favorite position. So I dont have to "give up" or "have one or the other". See what im saying?

[Gmac]

Boner test. Ugly chick wouldn't pass. At least I enjoy the scenery with a bad lay. Luckily, this is theoretical, and I'd never actually have to face this decision in real life.

Then again, if the ugly chick has a great body I'd just put a bag over her head. Been there done that, just remember to poke eye and mouth holes.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 01:04 PM)Moma Wrote:  

I would go with the busted lizard to a degree. I have had this experience before. I've banged hot lizards with crap punanies and I have banged a particular buttaface lizards with the bom ass puzzy (I always hit her under the cover of nightfall).
I couldn't believe that I kept returning but it's like she had some magic in her puddy..I used to hit that relentlessly.

hahahahahaha, Yea man, under the cover of nightfall for sure, but I would hit it if she swallowed kids with reckless abandon.

[Clyde]

You can put lipstick on a pig. I'll take the dog. Because LTR with bad sex is not worth the Bro Nods.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 01:19 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

@Pusscrook

Generally speaking that is the jist of my reasoning.

But your missing a big point, atleast for me.

I can have a great/good fuck with only doggy as long as the female has a phat ass and tight pussy with the girl doing pretty much nothing but holding still in the right position. Doggy is my favorite position. So I dont have to "give up" or "have one or the other". See what im saying?

But wait a minute now, one of your requirements is that she knows how to "work the dick". If she's doing pretty much nothing , how can this whore "work the dick"? So , i guess you're saying once you figure out she can't "work the dick"then you have option "b" which is doggy style and that works for you because she has a phat ass and a tight pussy. So, damn, riding the dick would be out, fucking from the side would be out, legs spread eagled behind her ears would be out, scissor fucking is out, oh and head is like a supplement, (you only need it if she knows it). That's the first time I have heard anyone say that that would be defined as a good fuck , but I totally get it. We just disagree but it's neither wrong or right.

[Moma]

I agree with pusscrook. What if she looks great but just has a weirdly shaped puss and you just can't get that nutt from her@Dash? Or her gooch is extremely dry and no matter what you do, astrolube and spit..that shyt stays sahara?

Would you still insist on these look requirements? It seems you are just scared at what your boys would say rather than what your balls are saying..

[scorpio]

Is this some hypothetical question?

My best sex is with the hot girls b/c they turn me on. I think to myself: man, you are such a pimp, fucking this bomb-ass girl.

I look at her nice body and beautiful face, and it makes me harder. When she tells me she's only slept with 5 guys or fewer (maybe it's a lie, maybe it's true), I'm proud of my tight game. Yeah, you got to teach these girls a thing or two, but you know what? It's tight, young, hot pussy.

And that is the holy grail of game.

If she's frigid, you just fuck the shit out of her. Objectify her if you have to. But just break her down emotionally until there's nothing left but submission. Do you need her to validate you during sex with her dirty talk and whore moaning? I don't.

[el mechanico]

We've been through all this with Dash before. He will argue it out to the end.
@ Scorpio, describe good sex.
How could it be a hypothetical question? I run into this all the time.

[Dash Global]

Quote:

But wait a minute now, one of your requirements is that she knows how to "work the dick". If she's doing pretty much nothing , how can this whore "work the dick"? So , i guess you're saying once you figure out she can't "work the dick"then you have option "b" which is doggy style and that works for you because she has a phat ass and a tight pussy. So, damn, riding the dick would be out, fucking from the side would be out, legs spread eagled behind her ears would be out, scissor fucking is out, oh and head is like a supplement, (you only need it if she knows it). That's the first time I have heard anyone say that that would be defined as a good fuck , but I totally get it. We just disagree but it's neither wrong or right.

You mis-interpreted what I said or I worded it wrong. I will clarify for you.

Those things are components of good sex. Not that ALL of them together equal good sex. In order for good sex to occure there needs to be atleast one or more of those characteristic/components for me.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 01:42 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

Quote:

But wait a minute now, one of your requirements is that she knows how to "work the dick". If she's doing pretty much nothing , how can this whore "work the dick"? So , i guess you're saying once you figure out she can't "work the dick"then you have option "b" which is doggy style and that works for you because she has a phat ass and a tight pussy. So, damn, riding the dick would be out, fucking from the side would be out, legs spread eagled behind her ears would be out, scissor fucking is out, oh and head is like a supplement, (you only need it if she knows it). That's the first time I have heard anyone say that that would be defined as a good fuck , but I totally get it. We just disagree but it's neither wrong or right.

You mis-interpreted what I said. I will clarify for you.

Those things are components of good sex. Not that ALL of them together equal good sex. Good sex needs to have atleast one or more of those characteristic/components for me.

I probably did. So taking my original post ( quite hypothetical) the hottest chick in the world that cant fuck or suck, but has some components that would induce "good sex" once you put her in doggy style, would be sufficient enough as long as you "nut"

[scorpio]

(08-16-2011 01:42 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

@ Scorpio, describe good sex.

Good Sex = Own the bitch.

It's different for each person, but I just impose my animal will on her. I don't care if she starts frigid, she'll be a puddle of nothing when I'm done.

[Dash Global]

Quote:

I probably did. So taking my original post ( quite hypothetical) the hottest chick in the world that cant fuck or suck, but has some components that would induce "good sex" once you put her in doggy style, would be sufficient enough as long as you "nut"

More or less. Here is my components that can make for great sex.

1) Phat Ass
2) Big Perky Tits
3) Tight Pussy
4) Pretty Face
5) Knows how to work the dick

As long as a female has some combination of the above I can have good sex. Or atleast it is good sex for me.

So a HOT chick is certainly gonna have a combination of the above, which would allow for good/great sex.

Giving me no reason to pick the ugly girl that can only do / satisfy #5 above.

[el mechanico]

(08-16-2011 01:50 PM)scorpio Wrote:  

(08-16-2011 01:42 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

@ Scorpio, describe good sex.

Good Sex = Own the bitch.

It's different for each person, but I just impose my animal will on her. I don't care if she starts frigid, she'll be a puddle of nothing when I'm done.

How about if she owns you? Is that good sex? I think thats what pusscrook is trying to get across here.

[scorpio]

(08-16-2011 01:56 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

How about if she owns you? Is that good sex? I think thats what pusscrook is trying to get across here.

No chick has ever owned me sexually, so I wouldn't know. Like I said, they are a prop in my world.

For sexually submissive guys, I really don't know how you can balance this with alpha cool. I mean, yeah, I just don't know how to answer this.

[Pusscrook]

(08-16-2011 01:54 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

Quote:

I probably did. So taking my original post ( quite hypothetical) the hottest chick in the world that cant fuck or suck, but has some components that would induce "good sex" once you put her in doggy style, would be sufficient enough as long as you "nut"

More or less. Here is my components that can make for great sex.

1) Phat Ass
2) Big Perky Tits
3) Tight Pussy
4) Pretty Face
5) Knows how to work the dick

As long as a female has some combination of the above I can have good sex. Or atleast it is good sex for me.

So a HOT chick is certainly gonna have a combination of the above, which would allow for good/great sex.

Giving me no reason to pick the ugly girl that can only do / satisfy #5 above.

Ahh, thats a good breakdown and really ,there's nothing to argue . It works for you and albeit a bit strange to equate great sex with a lazy bitch with big tits, a pretty face, phatt ass, tight pussy, (I'm leaving out working the dick, 'cause I'm assuming the bitch is lazy per my post) I see the point. I have had some 9-10's who absolutely made me want to fling them down a flight of stairs head first because of the resistance to cock up the right way, be fucked right into a box spring, give me head until I start babbling incessantly, or even kiss properly. Sometimes a 5 has made me commit strange acts parallel to blasphemy because of how "good" they fuck me. I guess i need to stop being so concerned as long as they got that ass hiked up just right for doggy and have that pretty face, perky tits, and tight pussy attached to it. (I'm bussing your balls man, i respect your opinion)

[el mechanico]

(08-16-2011 02:00 PM)scorpio Wrote:  

(08-16-2011 01:56 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

How about if she owns you? Is that good sex? I think thats what pusscrook is trying to get across here.

No chick has ever owned me sexually, so I wouldn't know. Like I said, they are a prop in my world.

For sexually submissive guys, I really don't know how you can balance this with alpha cool. I mean, yeah, I just don't know how to answer this.

You can balance by switching it up. She owns you..you get 'pissed' and put a hurting on her for a while...